Chinese Nuclear Accident

How long until China has a Chernobyl or Fukuyama style nuclear accident? They build everything like crap. Just look at their space program.

Attached: china-nuke-fuel.jpg (620x355, 52K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillator
youtube.com/watch?v=PD9c29zJq3U
youtube.com/watch?v=hGPiKswhgy8
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17019054
youtube.com/watch?v=c2RvNLJz_0A
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: giphy (26).gif (500x210, 1.94M)

yet they've had fewer nuclear accidents than the USA

How can we be sure? They cover everything up.

Attached: yaogan-27-lm-4c-yf21-engine-roof-hongjun-village-ankang-shaanxi-1.png (894x960, 833K)

Because its easy to tell when nuclear waste is released in the atmosphere from accidents.

Now testing equipment is very sensitive. China has been making plutonium since 1966.

we've been able to measure radioactivity in the atmoshpere for a very long time, long before nuclear weapons were invented
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillator

Israel caused Fukushima

I love this game.

Attached: 0470B3FF0000044D-0-image-a-2_1441961187354.jpg (634x427, 87K)

bump

Post more chinese savagery

Attached: Xichang-Main-Gate-Launch-631.jpg (631x300, 43K)

the cheap shit being built around china is for profit by private companies. These nuclear power plants are owned by the government who are likely to spend large amounts of money making sure one of these doesn't blow up and kill millions of people.

Their refinement plants are probably just as disgusting as the US and Russia's are.

As for a power plant going kaboom, it's incredibly unlikely anywhere. A lot of China's reactors are straight up foreign designs from the ground up (thanks Canada).

I'd be more concerned about the poo pajeets and their muslim 2nd cousins in Pakistan to be honest.

Attached: lsc-ts-4656-013.jpg (600x800, 119K)

This is what they are up to in Africa.

Attached: Screenshot 2018-08-06 at 10.28.34 PM.png (934x689, 568K)

sometimes I think these stories are just to make people underestimate china. china is taking over africa, canada, and australia and it's barely ever talked about.

great smile

Attached: nuclear-waste.jpg (460x300, 33K)

Based

Attached: WY57As3fmk-8.png (300x250, 64K)

hilarious if true.

Attached: lsc-ts-5280-010.jpg (600x800, 102K)

It's probably happened already and the State media just swept it under the rug.

The accettable probability of a detation of a nuclear weapon in an accident is 1 in a million. In 2012 the odds of you dying in a commercial airline accident were about 1 in a 40 million. So that's even more remote than the accidental detonation of a nuclear weapon. It's just a matter of time before something becomes a bay.

>accidental detonation of a nuclear weapon.
I bet you think a nuclear power station is just a nuclear bomb with a electrical plug connected to it.

Well of course not, you generate the power by detonating the bombs inside an obsidian room

Q predicted this

Nukes are fake, mate:

youtube.com/watch?v=PD9c29zJq3U

Any nuclear device would ionize the air leaving behind a massive glowing ball of blue light from ionized nitrogen (Oppenheimer claimed to see the 'cosmic colours' of the Trinity explosion) but no one at Hiroshima or Nagasaki or any nuke test ever saw this. And there is not even any radiation at the buildings in Hiroshima that were supposedly atom bombed:

youtube.com/watch?v=hGPiKswhgy8

Then there's the fact that the Japanese who survived Hiroshima had no genetic defects:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17019054

>There is, thus far, no indication of genetic effects in the offspring of survivors.

Simple truth is that atom bombs fizzle out and hydrogen fusion only occurs under extreme gravitational / magnetic fluxes. Nukes are a conspiracy used to control the masses.

Just look at old nuke 'test footage.' Most of it is extremely fake looking (btw, radiation destroys film so they shouldn't have been able to film it in the first place...).

There country has enough big and open spaces like Xingjang and Manchuria that they could have had accidents there and have it unreported sort of like the Santa Suzana.

The only thing they so far have done right is have most of there new reactors follow a standardized patten. Which means if it will be easier to maintain and retrofit.

On the downside if there standardized designs are bad it could be catastrophic. Sort of like the USSR's RBMX reactors.

youtube.com/watch?v=c2RvNLJz_0A

you'll have a fatal one first

Attached: 1533135944552.jpg (811x660, 102K)

Attached: 1000lb-woman.jpg (770x432, 38K)

Attached: 67b.jpg (650x488, 31K)

How many astronauts have they lost?