Is recyling based and redpilled?

It works out just fine in the end. Plus half of what's recycled is made into ammunition and other necessities

All recycling is greenwash jew business practice.
Aluminium is the only domestic rubbish product worth recycling.
Anyone saying otherwise is a shill or brainwashed pseudohippy who would benefit from a fucking bath.

>all that shit from just one dude walking around a lake
Kill people that litter WHEN

hate to break it to you user, but it all ends up in the dump anyway. recycling is far too expensive to actually be useful

Daily reminder recycling is extra most goodest goy shit. You pay the jew to take raw materials that he then sells back to you and you pay him to take again. Meanwhile the first world is a blip in global pollution just by virtue of using trash cans. If recycling were really important and done for the greater good, goldstein wouldn't charge you to do it when he makes bank off your shit. You pay a man to get rich off of you and in some places you'll be homeless if you refuse to play the game.

First thing Hitler did was clean the factory. He never stop cleaning.

Recycling metals and plastic are redpilled, but the rest are not. Metals because digging them up is intensive and causes pollution, and scrappers will buy aluminium for a good price, and steel for an acceptable one if you're just going to throw it away otherwise. Plastic because it doesn't end up in the environment as much that way. Glass and paper are wastes of time and energy. Proper battery disposal or recycling is good too.

Not true for metals. They are reproduced at a profit or even at breakeven is acceptable if you consider externalities of their mining as costs. Mining them costs money too, and people are just throwing good quality aluminium and steel away anyway. Plastic is worthwhile even at a loss because of externalities, in my opinion.

Your heart is in the right place OP. Here is happens to a lot of the actual recycling that you put out with your trash for pickup
> Recycle waste put on huge tanker
> It's sent to China
> They sort it
>It's sent back
>It's made into a recycled good which takes more energy than to make a new one
All in all.... Lmao except now they China's wages are rising most are just dumping it into the landfill.

I think litter is a bigger problem. I would like to see harsher penalties for littering.

> Recycle waste put on huge tanker
> It's sent to China
Source? How much material is recycled this way? I know there are scrappers that will do the reprocessing themselves here to make profit. Local governments have refuse collection and do this as well. Shipping it all the way to China and back costs considerable money.

Niggers need to stop littering. It makes me irrationally angry.

No, it near zero impact on the environment or its causes. The biggest polluters are the factories in China, your foot print is negligible. You are just wasting your time more than anything.

>The biggest polluters are the factories in China
America pollutes at twice the rate per capita as China. Both countries need to reduce this.
>your foot print is negligible
False. The average American is responsible for about 20 tons of CO2 plus CO2-equivalent emissions of other GHGs per year.
>You are just wasting your time more than anything.
Not raping the environment to death is a good thing, unless you are a misanthrope or nihilist.

your scooping water out of the sinking titanic with a teaspoon

Recycling in Canada is common. I go to the us regularly for work and you guys are like third world when in comes to recycling and public cleanliness