>muh free speech is violated

I'll just wait for this beast that has been unleashed turns back on it's creators. Censorship sucks, and people supporting it are worst than shit. They're the reason why totalitarianism is possible. At least I get to observe first hand how such regimes get into power, instead of being clueless long ago in class wondering how anyone could follow Stalin or Mao.

According to the other moron's point they would have.

OP is a fag who can lick his own butthole. Must make cake for fags but not let the real light out.

JewTube and Kikebook were leading the push for NN and common carrier status for the internet.
This directly contradicts their arguments in favor of NN and shows that they are a bunch of filthy, lying jews, like you OP
Unironically gas your faggot ass.
It doesn't matter what's legal or not
THe law is written by the jew to protect the interests of the Jew
But the jokes on you because my parents loved me enough to not sacrifice my foreskin to some Jewish blood ritual.

Attached: 1482282076045.gif (250x250, 993K)

>do not hold a monopoly*
>*citation needed

Social media platforms are all funded and controlled by the CIA. The government is using them as cover to violate our rights and they will be held to account. Senators like Chris Murphy from CT are committing open treason by calling for censorship.

>the anger in the replies

holy shit AHAHHAHA

drumpfkins are so angry is hilarious

So angry we are ready to kill

yourself hopefully.

CAN YOU TELL YET?

Attached: 797D9BC3-A0FE-465B-8179-9C05174AD46B.png (225x224, 11K)

Nope. Kikes

Fine by me. I'm not one.

AJ can host his vids from his own site. He’s not “starving” in this analogy either you fucking dunce.

The sad part is unless you wait for the next Stalin or Mao to show up before you act the faggot pathetic retard useless public will help put you down like a dog.

But whatever. I know how to disappear into the woods and survive. I'll be jacking off thinking about all these cultural marxist faggots getting raped and publicly dismembered by their own nigger invasion.

Attached: 1496259008343.gif (320x240, 1.47M)

Not much I can do as a cripple they'd be doing me a favor killing me anyway.

but, but, reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Last time a company denied service to gays you pedophile libtards lost your mind...
And when compamy will deny service to your beloved pedophiles, you genocide enabler libtards will go ape shit...

Daily reminder: Nanny nanny booboo won't stop them from getting regulated.

Vague or not, they still have to treat their customers with equity. Im just saying you can definitely win If you sue them. In Brasil they banned more than a hundred right wing media profiles in facebook for "exposing a divisive Idea". By nature the other side must be doing the same, since according to them simply holding that opinion creates division.

Wheelchair of peace

Probably been posted already but en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

A private company can deny service to whoever the fuck they want. It may not be nice. It may be a shitty thing to do. But they can.

As long as the reasons are just and the rules are applied to all, im fine with banning people.

This may not be the case for kones and could result in these companies being sued for discriminaton.

I dont give a fuck either way.
Its nice to watch the fire burn.

>Social media platforms do NOT grant free speech.
But now they have an obligation to police the "truth"

That man who drives his wheelchair into a violent Muslim is my personal hero.

Attached: 1513674171038.jpg (500x370, 60K)

as an Alex Jones supporter, i am deeply offended by OP's pic.

If this was the free choice of those companies, sure.. But at least when it comes to Facebook in Europe, there's been a huge purge of content going on not necessarily because Facebook doesn't want to host certain content, but because the German and British authorities (among others, but they're the most prominent) threaten with draconic fines if the 'wrong' opinions are up too long.. These kind of effects are fairly worrying, and the fact that 3 major outlet within hours of each other slammed down on Infowars seems to suggest it's not just about private companies making private decisions.

Nope.

No, but the store is 100% free to kick you out if you use it as a platform for holding some retarded speeches.

underrated

Attached: 980x.jpg (980x653, 174K)

I agree but they're still dirty kikes

They asked for a cake featuring a cock. Dude went “can’t we go for something more traditional?” And they said “No we want a covk” so the baker refused to bake.

>Hurr Durr I haven't read Marsh v. Alabama

You're wrong

And the baker has the right to refuse service if he chooses.

Why now?

Why don't you tell the truth about why he was banned?

>*for free expression on the internet

Can I cite your own post where you express your opinion on the internet as evidence? Just because Facebook and Youtube are the most popular outlets, doesn't mean they hold monopolies..

That said, I find the effects of European policy on what those outlets allow to be troubling.

Why don't you?

You're a fucking retard. No one claims they broke any laws, we all know they have right to do what they did.
However if all the most popular platform purge someone, they will lose much of followers. Yes, he still has his website for now but there is no guarantee it will also not end up like Stormfront.

Leftist brainlets are are completely braindead at this point.

>Roseanne gets fired - corporation are free to do what they want, freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of consequences etc. Fuck her because she supported Trump

Gunn gets fired
>reeee reee how could Disney do this, boycott them, I hate outrage culture, better man, benefit of doubt he is one us critic of Trump, Disney must rehire him, attack of alt right, people shouldnt be judged by their tweets etc. etc.

Now they cheer like idiots again when Jones is censored. The funny thing is this can go any way. There might come a day when for example some Trump critic will go overboard and gets Jones treatment. Im curious to see how will they react when one of "them" will experience what happened to Jones. I bet there will be no talk about how corporation can do whatever they want. They will scream about boycott, censorship, orange cheeto, fascism etc.

+2 shekels deposited into your account SHLOMO! you're fucking glowing, cocksucker

Attached: cjfjoifuuaeca8i2.jpg (501x504, 63K)

Google is now the #1 lobbyist to the US government.

If the government is controlled by corporations then the corporations are the government. Thus corporate censorship is government censorship. Alex Jones broke no laws, he should not be censored.

Well outfit you with wheels like this.

Attached: ben-hur-chariot-race-1959-7.jpg (1350x486, 77K)

COMPELLED SPEECH. Look it up

Lol, you guys are trying to turn me into Ivar The Boneless.

Attached: 1493311926562.gif (500x350, 973K)

Proof?

>A private company can deny you service.

Bake the cake.

Are you retarded or just plain stupid?

And it went to the supreme court who said, "Yeah, I guess you can just tell em to fuck off"

And now we're here.

BUT, they are discriminating against a man based on his beliefs.
Checkmate.

Attached: E4EE7F7B-DB51-4C92-9DAD-7BC153AE6799.jpg (499x496, 71K)

Neither.

>I'm a retard and my name is moshe
no one cares, faggot

Look up the RESULTS OF THE LAWSUIT. The bakers WON you fucking mong.

Doesn't matter.

Hey. Still here then? Been a while. Arms and legs just get in the way when you're shitposting.

I'm all six.

Why Alex Jones doesn't post here if he wants free speech and the best audience?

I think you've mistaken me for another cripple. I'm a uber newfag who deserves to be drowned in a river.

Doesn't matter.

If you fucks didn't want this: shoulda baked a fucking cake.

I don't blindly call bread bakers kikes, but (((OP))) is definitely trying to cast sheeny magic.

Attached: 1533026909247.png (426x484, 100K)

Put down your Torah for five minutes and kill yourself.

14th amendement.

Because he can't shill SUPER MALE VITALITY on Jow Forums without being called a snakeoil shill which is the whole purpose of his rants.

Alright very well.

A few weeks ago there was a LGBTQ event in Austin Texas where he lives and at this weirdo event these sick motherfuckers had children out there putting money in these nasty fucks G-Strings and shaking they asses at these chikdren. INFOWARS recorded it and was talking about it on his show. And these little pedophiles and the brown shirts that support him got butthurt and started crying like a bitch about it.

And that's one of the reasons he got banned. So now every LGBTQ are now a target and as far as me and millions of other people are concerned gay people or anybody like them are all child molesters and that includes you you disgusting fuck.

It does matter. Now they have to ban Muslims for hate speech as well.
They might as well ban anyone who hates Donald Trump...
It’s called a slippery slope.

>YouTube, FaceBook, etc. do NOT hold a monopoly
Lol we’re moving towards fascist corporatism run by liberals

Yea its COMPELLED SPEECH which is not the same as speech restriction

Not a single thing you posted addresses the moral or philosophical problem with a bunch of "private" information-broadcasting monopolies colluding to pull his platform all at the same time
But don't listen to me, I honestly hope the left keeps digging

You should look at the recent supreme court hearings about baking cakes. Turns out the 14th is super duper narrow in scope.

Roseanne and Jones were fired/banned for things they did withing the preceeding month. Gunn was fired for things he said 10 years ago.

"the State shall not deprive"

Google it you fucking retard
Holy shit
you fucking retard
unironically KYS

When social media companies decide they will promote one party's views and silence anothers they are no longer just social media companies they are a PAC and should have to register as one.

Cell phone comapies, landline companies the mail can not deny you service based on your constitutionally protected free speech why should faceberg twatter or jewtube be any different?

This. Boomers are up

YouTube is a platform for government funded videos. As it takes revenue from government funded videos it is now bound to free speech laws as far as I can tell

>Social media platforms aren't the government.
They ARE in fact the defacto government and receive subsidies from the actual government, so they are subject to 1a.

>Social media platforms do NOT grant free speech.
They absolutely do. If a social media platform is able to stop information from spreading while promoting other information into popularity, they are the arbiters of free speech and acceptable opinion.

>YouTube, FaceBook, etc. do NOT hold a monopoly on the expression of opinions on the internet.
Yes they do for all practical purposes. They set what is or isn't culturally allowed. They squelch their competition.

>A private company can deny service if they wish.
Let's have all grocery stores deny service to democrats then and starve them to death. How would that work out?

>Get it through your heads.
"I hate free speech, and so can you!"

This is a watershed moment...just not sure for which side...

The USPS is a government entity.

Ironic and Based.

>A private company can deny service if they wish.

There is already legal precedent in many occasions that this isn't true. The faggots and their cake is a prime recent example.

You can open a grocery store that is a private business, however you can not bar black(or any race/religion) people from going into your public business.

So you as a private company have limits to what you can impose on people. It's only a matter of time before the supreme court rules on this and conservatives win.

Get it through your head.

all bullshit.

If your whole argument for this thread is comapring apples to oranges then you dun fucked up

>And when compamy will deny service to your beloved pedophiles, you genocide enabler libtards will go ape shit...
gunn and the guardians of the galaxy just the other week. hollyfags and capelovers lost their minds over that and they're still going on about it

Social networks are the new public space (even if they are privately owned). And there is already established legal precedent in the US that the owners of such spaces are required to uphold people's constitutional rights.
So yes, what these kikes are doing is censorship.

You're a faggot retard corporate boot licking piece of shit and you should kill yourself right now.

he'll be on gab with milo or compound media

>be David Duke
>be a fucking loser

Not on the basis of free speech!

YouTube didn't ban AJ because he was white or any other regulations they're held to by the government to be allowed to operate as a business.

Until Cloudflare and his ISP decides he can't. Then what?

Did you ever learn to think things through?

What did Jones did recently?

Also the more than decade ago is false propaganda spread by left. Some of his worst tweets were from 2012. He wasn't some dumb kid he was the same person he is now, he just learned to keep his mouth shut now that he is famous.