They're right you know. Why can't we have a discussion about wealth inequality?

i hope they kill lebron james and jeff bezos

Got to get the dildos somewhere.

they really dont know what net worth is

i really don't know why they give so much of a shit what another person does. It doesnt affect them at all what bezos does with his "money" of which most all of it is in shares. I never get this mindset of seeing someone with more than you and thinking they must do something for those with less. Bezos had less when he was young and he made more, why cant they do the same if they care so much.

>James wants to create more niggers
>Bezos wants to escape niggers

Sounds like he has his priorities in order desu

Wealth inequality is caused by the left in the first place. Look at San Francisco, Detroit, and Cuba. They do not care about the poor, just about taking political power by using that manipulative talking point.

IF they cared about the poor, then why do they frequently fire right-wingers from their jobs and cut access to their payment processors? These are actions that are designed to make a person poor.

Ultimately the monetary system (in our case the current version of capitalism) is intended to be a way to exchange goods that everyone is satisfied with.

If people stop being satisfied with the system, the system will be replaced.

When people complain that wealth inequality is a problem, and other people mock them by referring to the rules of capitalism "haha those are the rules bud, though luck" they don't realize that the rules themselves could get thrown out the window. Because the rules don't exist for their own sake, they exist for the people, and if people don't want them, they will go. So maybe the concerns of the people should be taken more seriously.

It's not like people actually want rich people to give them free money. They want economic policies somehow changed so that the wealth divide is smaller than it is now. Which is not an extravagant thing to ask for.

He left out the part about Bezos being a huge flaming lefty.

kek

>they don't realize that the rules themselves could get thrown out the window.

Hypothetically Jesus could come back to earth too

Idiots don't have a clue what net worth is. He doesn't just have $120 billion just laying around ffs

>It's not like people actually want rich people to give them free money. They want economic policies somehow changed so that the wealth divide is smaller than it is now. Which is not an extravagant thing to ask for.

Also, are you fucking stupid. The wealth divide is meaningless, either you're poor or you aren't poor it doesn't matter if some guy has billions because that guy has zero to do with you being poor.

Ah, you didn't.

>have a discussion

That is leftist speak for agree with my proposals.

>you can solve wealth inequality by pumping more money into education for poor people

Has this ever been proven to work? Or is it just throw money at something and hope for the best?

>Net worth = money

lol

It is almost as if providing every possible product delivered right to someone's door is worth more than bouncing a ball. Who knew?

Attached: IMG_7185.jpg (480x480, 35K)

>implying that conservatives think Bezos earned his wealth fairly
No conservative has an ounce of respect for Bezos. He gets special deals from the postal service, and disenfranchises thousands of retailers trying to thrive in the same field. Their no-tax monopoly is a spit in the face to Capitalists. Congress is on Cloud 9.

Liberals pretend like Conservatives defend every single rich person. No, we defend the right to be rich. We do not defend the right to have an inorganic upper-hand in the free market. That's fascist, that's authoritarian, and that's enabled by every democrat in congress.

At least he's spending it on something to maybe save humanity unlike Soros who only spends his money to divide us

Sure. Keynes said, in direct response to the social justice question, wealth inequality decreases when the economy is doing well and other than regulating obviously unethical and predatory business practices, regulations should be kept at a minimum.

net worth isn't cash on hand
it's the value of all his assets. he'd have to get rid of everything to actually realize that money and he'd end up with far less. his private wealth is probably fractions of what he 'owns' as a businessman

Why don’t you get a job?

I agree shit like Amazon is cancer.

His private wealth was built on illegal lobbying by WaPo and unconstitutional favoritism from the Post Office. Amazon was allowed to monopolize the retail industry with incredibly low parcel rates, which no other retailers are granted. With that said, who in congress supports the Amazon/WaPo scheme? Who has allowed this to go on for so long? We need to increase parcel rates on Amazon products to the standard fee, and then start scraping the top layers of shit off of congress and get to the bottom of who was bought & paid for by the WaPo Amazon complex.

>they don't realize that the rules themselves could get thrown out the window.
>hey want economic policies somehow changed so that the wealth divide is smaller than it is now.

Do you dogfuckers not recognize when you make a contradiction?

Well, maybe you could, I don't know, not be employed by a guy that makes you piss yourself? Just find another job you fag.

If you really think that you're naive.

Do you agree that the comfortable lifestyle of 1st world citizens is supported by shit countries doing the shit work for them? (the correct answer is yes). Would you then agree that 1st world citizens are "rich" at the expense of certain other countries' citizens? (the correct answer is yes). The same thing is happening within a single country such as the US. You're like a third world shitter defending your right to work for pennies because capitalism can do no wrong.

And by the way I'm not saying that we should threat poor countries fairly. We should keep exploiting them to our advantage. But it's in your interest to fight when you're the one being taken advantage of. Then again shit country citizens are happy in their situation and maybe you are happy in yours. I'm happy in mine. It's when most citizens aren't happy that change happens.

Fighting wealth inequality is anti-Semitic since a majority of billionaires are Jewish.

Deporting all non-whites would be a massive redistribution of wealth.
Brain drain is theft at a greater scale than colonialism.

Most wealthy people are smart enough to realize that “Americans” aren’t worth much of an investment.

It depends, is it distributing the wealth to become equal that you want to discuss. Because that's just going to piss people off. Or is it the neccessity of unequal wealth. Because it's quite a popular belief here that unequal wealth is human nature. We aren't born communists, it's a disease that develops in adolesence.

>comparing those three places

Attached: brainlet 3.jpg (211x239, 5K)

>Qu'ils mangent du gateau

>buy from Amazon and give JEFF money
>complain
>work for Amazon, hold your pee and make JEFF money
>complain
FUCKING JEFF AM I RIGHT?!

>privately explore space

Pretty based.

You can eliminate income inequality by forcing everyone to earn 100$. Now everyone lives lije shit (typical socialist solution).
Income inequality is not the problem. At best you need to worry about poor people having some quality of life. And you do that by strengthening the economy, like Trump is doing right now.

>I don't understand what net worth means

Attached: 1532710596212.gif (250x317, 1.23M)

Plagues, war, revolution and societal collapse. Those are the only way you're going to get closer to those rich men, LeafBro

>wasting money on educating niggers, as if they could magically become intelligent and productive members of society

Attached: 1503396029227.jpg (2544x4000, 906K)

accurate. though i would broaden this statement to include all people, not just americans.

people are terrible even when you don't spend your money on them. they only disappoint you more once you start spending money.

Attached: 1432345492574.jpg (320x366, 53K)

it's ok. you don't need to understand net worth in this instance. what you need to understand here is the difference between liquid and non-liquid assets.