43% Of Republicans Want To Give Trump The Power To Shut Down Media

Indeed, also checked. Meanwhile, the other wing already started shutting down the media with infowars and shit.

Republicans are retards for the most part. Who knew. Also. I'm sure 80% of dems would go to war with Russia if we could for PaYBaCK

Wonder what "Current year" man has to say about this.

Attached: 1529767371394.png (443x583, 206K)

American news since forever. I mean, it's how the revolutionary ideas got spread to begin with.

honestly nothing of value would be lost

We are sick of (((Their))) BULLSHIT FAKE NEWS!

>Because books without pictures are hard

Attached: Trump-Fans.jpg (960x500, 133K)

>half of Jow Forums actively shills for their MSM kike overlords now
>not just wanting to watch everything burn
call me when reddit leaves, this site is dead

The real numbers must be horrifying. The left needs to pump the brakes before things get hilarious

>believing anyone at a trump rally is more retarded than the inner city youth who vote dem in droves and unironically can't read

I think the problem needs to be addressed in a more specific way, individual journalists need to face consequences for their lies and the outlets themselves will have to follow suit and will hold their writers to higher standards as a result

One faggot journo losing being criminally charged for targeted harassment after doxing someone will result in the news outlet enacting an official "no doxing" policy, for example

Attached: fbi.jpg (499x499, 78K)

Fpbp

Bad. They are horrendously evil parasites that deserve far worse than being shut down.

They need to hang.

hang em high

Attached: 1532130657810.png (396x548, 128K)

No the outlets need purged, period. They should no longer exist as they currently do. They are complicit in selling fake wars and drumming up fear, and selling out America. The top execs who pass down the days talking points need charged, as well as agenda pushing anchors like Acosta, Cooper, etc.

I will not accept censorship from either side.

Uh... have some bad news for ya

Attached: q boomers.jpg (950x538, 86K)

"Doxing" is investigative journalism and protected. That used to be something we put trust in journalists to do because the ethics involved uncovering corruption and advocating on behalf of the country and its people. Now its stalking political enemies and smear campaigns.

Even faggot websites ban it when it doesn't suit them even though its a goddamn constitutional right to do so. But its cool for foreign owned media to do it...

That is self-defense.

Compared to the people who carefully carve naked Trump statues and draw porn of him an Putin or shit on the street and rub it all over signs.

agreed ... faggot

Attached: 5abd7c3073d8a.jpg (1024x1024, 194K)

>stop giving so much money to the cia so they can control the media
>fire all FBI agents taking bribes from the media
There...shut down

Those people can still read. A lot of inner city dem votes can not read. That's fact.

>Literally killing people for saying words

I thought Jow Forums was for Free Speech?

Journalists aren't people :^)

only 43%?

how do we get those numbers higher?

>journalists write inflammatory articles that get brownies riled up against whitey
>just words brah

you hang next

Talk shit get hit

Attached: Based black man.jpg (275x183, 4K)

>do nothing but lie constantly and literally make shit up and call it "news"
>people get sick of it and eventually want you out
>ITS NOT OUR FAULT WE LIED AND MADE UP HITPIECE STORIES, ITS THE PERSON WE WERE AFTERS FAULT FOR CALLING US OUT AND SHINING A LIGHT ON US WAAAAAH
Modern "news" media are nothing but bought and paid for propaganda machines.

There should be independent oversight on all media. Failure to meet standards should require immediate front page/stickied on internet apology and admission of guilt. Sedition for those that provoke racial tension and violence (see image - omit words from speech where they say go fuck up white people's neighbourhoods; media makes her out to be a saint and all blacks just want peace when they are the ones destroying and rioting).

Large fines and suspensions of those that abuse laws and repeat offenders banned from media.

Profit should be limited, too. Similar to pre-Nixon health care act, media should have to reinvest all profits after 10-15% into educating public and addressing mistakes, informing public of mistakes and lies and funding real news stories. Possible break up of 6 main media companies controlling 90+% of news.

Media is enemy of the world. Most should be brought out into the street and hanged.

Attached: fakeNewsSherelleSmithRiotsWeave.jpg (1200x800, 264K)

this seems pretty low and mild, to be frank. it's pretty clear we're going to have to do better than that.

So then its ok for Blacks to kill whites if they call them nigger?

So then its ok for Feminists/SJWs to get men fired for sexist comments?

So then its ok for Muslims to kill Christians for not agreeing with their beliefs?

>A final statistic is somewhat reassuring, only 13% of Americans agree that “President Trump should close down mainstream news outlets, like CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times.” Here less than a quarter of Republicans (23%) agree along with fewer than one in ten Democrats (8%).

ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/americans-views-media-2018-08-07

Attached: Refuting-Bullshit.jpg (1023x613, 47K)

I'd rather it be the other side that does this kind of thing. Because the answer to this kind of thing is hell.

I thought Judges actually have that power?
So, immune, probably ideological appointees with no reprocussions for anything they do are fine to have that power but elected officials are not?

Attached: 1508363696873.jpg (348x342, 37K)

I’m pretty conservative guy and have given Trump lattitude.

But I can’t support this. I have to put freedom before politics. A centralized government that is capable of controlling the press leads to oppression.

I am ok with regulating companies like Apple, Google, Twitter to ban them from censorship

I think the problem could solve itself if we broke up media conglomerates. So now nbc, cnbc, msnbc, and their digital outlets would all be separate and can't all take talking orders from the same person.

HUH? What a bullshit article.

wouldn't work- they've set up mailing lists and cliques

all those shitty no name rumormill clickbait garbage sites are being run by the same people running CNN et al despite no actual financial ties

they're all effectively being used as a weapon

No, none of those groups should have rights.

I WANT THAT SHIRT!

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 14K)

You're saying they're moonlighting as anonymous "journalists", so they can turn around and say, anonymous sources familiar with the matter say trump is a poopoo doodoo face?

>shut down the media

He doesn't have to do shit, just give us blanket amnesty, we'll do the rest

Attached: Jewish solution.gif (400x225, 438K)

I don't think Trump should have the ability to shut down the media. The first main question to ask, woul be what counts as media. If anything can be media, then that could leave the government censorship of anything that they deem to be corrupt. Secondly, freedom of the press is in the Constitution. You don't have to agree with what the press says, and they can have a clearly defined bias, but they still have the right to put out what they want. Maybe, in stead of shutting down the existing media, which would be censorship, we created new media organisations to spread information from across the political spectrum, so everyone can find something that fits them. The only issue with this that I could see, would be that people might go deeper into their echo chambers, and ignore the opinions of others. This would create a greater divide. What do you guys think would be another viable solution without censorship?

The cliques would be illegal instead of unethical

yes trump please shutdown all media that i dont agree with

Attached: 1507093235978.png (408x450, 34K)

"The press" are also companies. They are businesses that are dependent on revenue to continue delivering their content. As a business, they will do whatever they can to make the most profit, even if that means behaving in such a way that is socially disagreeable or downright morally incorrect. Please stop having doublethink and find solid ground to stand on.

that image is retarded

someone needs to speak for the dead

What if is something is shit?

Statistically? Like a category of something?

That it is more a Con than a Pro?

Why can't Trump fine google the way the EU did?

Pass a law about deplatforming, EO Trump can sign it in today.
Save Alex.

Good

Is there some way we can sensibly write a law that makes clickbait illegal? Or maybe make strict definitions for opinion vs reporting? MSNBC does not report news for instance, it's pure 24/7 opinion spewing, so they would still be allowed to spew opinion, but they can't call themselves journalists or news.

Would anyone mind telling me where this statistic came from? Just curious.

Journalists aren't human.

Stop crying Jim, nothing of value would be lost

Attached: 1530241438928.png (610x343, 378K)

That's kind of hard. What would get classified as a source that would be subject to the rules? On top of that, it's difficult to write a law that separates factual reporting from opinion based reporting. Interesting concept though.

What about some journalist tribunal court, where one outlet can "sue" another for false reporting? The consequence being a public retraction for one, and a chance to crow you have more integrity for the other. It would create an arms race for truth of sorts. The question is who/how do you select for the judges?

your people do all those things all the time, your alinsky shit wont work anymore faggot

You'll get the same poison down your puckered asscheeks you've been dishing

recucklicants do it one more time for the boomer elite, crashing the plane without survivors

Fpbp

Mistrust in the media is not cause by Trump.

Trump is the result of that mistrust.

>when You fight against Voter ID because your legitimately worried your voting base doesnt posses enough self agency to get one.

Attached: 6rTa56A.webm (426x236, 2.96M)

They should simply be rebranded as entertainment.

>Hurrrr muh second amendment, shall not be infringed durrr
>Fuck the first amendment, fuck freedom of the press

Attached: 1520800005089.jpg (866x900, 117K)

The founder of the Republican Party jailed people who had opinions he didn't like. Nothing has changed.

>utterly powerless
V.
>Being Paris
World of difference, we're just waiting for a good enough excuse.

>wear this shirt
>complain when alex jones cant post on facebook

>A centralized government that is capable of controlling the press leads to oppression.
But what if the press are the primary oppressors?

implying those people can read

what was the fairness doctrine that got removed in 1987 and completely removed in 2011 for 500 alex

Oh look another uneducated faggot. With out 2nd amendment there will be no first amendment. Look at people arrested for speaking badly about sand niggers and the other nigger refugees in Europe.

Either get an education or kill your self

I wish he would shut down the internet so we could all be happy again

you still be a depressed fuck and you know it just don't fucking spend all your time on Jow Forums social medi have some fucking hobbies instead of having politics be the only thing you do

I don't like this meme.

That particular incident was a deranged guy with a grudge against a local paper that was never very political.

yeah they probably can, how else would they understand the Q story to begin with.
I wish we would shut down all big companies, would be good fun.
keep the internet, I wan't my happening posting.

that is MORE than enough for an American pogrom

Attached: Sean-Penn-Carlitos-way.png (593x599, 649K)

You're right

Attached: CRASH THE EU.jpg (601x601, 51K)

And the MSM caused this Right-lash themselves.

What are the current poll numbers on concentration camps for the media?

Attached: 1522108581770.jpg (720x960, 116K)

>Meme flag
His point was that republicans now support doing away with the first amendment and freedom of the press while claiming to support other parts of the bill of rights and claiming to support free speech.