Free speech is a threat to (((democracy))

Apparently now the survival of democracy depends on banning opposing speech according to this Democratic Senator.
washingtonexaminer.com/news/survival-of-our-democracy-depends-on-banning-sites-like-infowars-democratic-senator-says

They're literally calling for the banning of his site off the internet so that an American citizen's speech doesn't "meddle" in an election.
These people are straight up traitors to your country at this point.

Attached: Free speech apparently threatens democracy.jpg (896x852, 139K)

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonexaminer.com/mainstream-media-errors-in-the-trump-era-your-catalogue-of-the-medias-bias-fueled-failure-fest-in-2017
youtube.com/watch?v=eW-UdTZssRc
ebitbrah.com/products/the-protege
cnn.com/2018/07/03/us/annapolis-capital-gazette-shooter-letter/index.html
youtube.com/watch?v=hWLjYJ4BzvI
marcuse.org/herbert/booksabout/haters/haters.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 1523137174993.jpg (1590x1182, 764K)

Alex is controlled opposit-

This is why Jones got "fired."

Reminder that the supreme court ruled in favor of the bakery.

Still doing the heavy lifting with this, rabbi?

He needs to have his tongue and throat cut out with a dull knife

Note, he didnt say "survival of democracy", he said "survival of OUR democracy". Leftists want democracy for them, not for you.

Only certain kinds of diversity are protected. Intellectual diversity isnt one of them

Attached: _99744223_2chart-rise_knife_crime-nebjt-nc.png (624x416, 27K)

>mfw pol is next

Attached: laughing whores.jpg (600x536, 77K)

civil war now.

If pol gets taken off YouTube it’s over.

Attached: 1487378498086.jpg (550x512, 40K)

>infowars is hateful and tearing our nation apart!
>CNN and Fox are ok though
When is Trump going to do something?

the democratic party is already dead

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRAKSHUN

>Intellectual diversity isnt one of them
Those inside google docs that were published by the former employees that are suing them say exactly that, that by diversity they down't mean diversity of ideas and that is frowned upon

why dont alex jones just stream somewhere else and post on Jow Forums
we know many faggots, shills, and normies lurks Jow Forums

Free speech is a threat to the rule of the Establishments who can not withstand scrutiny nor are they willing to entertain those who dare step outside of the prescribed dogma. "Either you accept our rule and control or you will be silenced".

The Establishments on both the Left and Right see resistance to their influence unacceptable and after the loss of the 2016 election the Left have openly accepted the political and corporate Establishments plan for censorship as long as it means their political opposition is silenced.

Attached: 8347598734985.png (1700x2200, 241K)

Whenever someone says there isn't an agenda to shape the news to the liberal narrative, whenever someone says that 'fake news' doesn't exist, point them to this article.

There's like 30 pages of documented fake news stories, almost all of which dominated the news cycle when they came out.

washingtonexaminer.com/mainstream-media-errors-in-the-trump-era-your-catalogue-of-the-medias-bias-fueled-failure-fest-in-2017

Democrats are literally following the path of Stalin. This right here is why we can never ever give up our guns. The day our guns are taken is the day America dies. it's getting to the point where Americans will seriously have to consider expelling Jews for the sake of our nation.

>Apparently now the survival of democracy depends on banning opposing speech
Slander, Sedition, Incitement, fear-mongering, crying FIRE in a crowded theater, these aren't protected forms of speech.

None of your Constitutional Rights are a "Do as thou wilt" free pass to behave like a shitbird.

Attached: 1448055838854.png (250x446, 268K)

ooooyy veeey

youtube.com/watch?v=eW-UdTZssRc

Attached: 1532834223564.png (751x518, 860K)

>Free speech is a threat to (((democracy))
this but unironically

>Jewish Senator

debbie looks like a stone cold REPTILE

Because the point isn't to "spread the truth", it's to extract bux from excitable idiots.
To do that, he needs to be where the advertisers splash their money.

Quite fair.
You wanted shareblue gone, you wanted BLM declared terrorists, you wanted leddit deleted
Now you get what you asked for tried on yourself first.

I love how absolutely retarded their lack of foresight is. They think this won't be used against them. I'll be withholding MY services from now on if any potential customer appears to be a whiny emotional anti-white shitlib. Thanks for the OK Jewgle/Jewtube/etc!

Because the baker claimed artistic expression. This is nowhere near the same situation.

How long before "Election is a threat to democracy"?

Should have baked the cake

Wait, is to too late for your Tuesday blowjob special? I'd hate to think my political orientation would keep you off my dick.

Kek, or "The People are a threat to Democracy!"

Remember, Iran is right

Israel IS the problem

Attached: IMG_0291.png (775x7566, 3.13M)

When we are living in Trump’s second term.

>they think it won't be used against them
no, they know they must use it to destroy theri enemies and begin NWO control. The elites are willing to kill the vast majority of the plebs to solidify their power.

Their only incorrect assumption is that they too won't be purged when the inner elite have no more need for them.

Faggot, I'm actually a productive citizen with a manufacturing career. Not like you leeching whiny libtards with your hands held out.

Trump already did that with only accepting the results if he wins
Then the EC spazzing

>i'am a good goy i make tax sheckels

Actually, I work for a Fortune 500 manufacturer in Missouri.
I must have you confused with your Sister, but you both have nice tits.

Has there ever been anyone who was a democratic voter that watched Infowars content and then voted Republican?

Here's your (You) Mustafa

who still gives a fuck about infowars.
i hope they escalate this bullshit untill stupid people take stupid actions and do stupid things.

And who the fuck wants to pardon that asshat assange.

Let's just nuke them both

Interesting but not surprising to see leftist celebrating the censorship of political opposition in a time when leftist are known for being so vocal with their political opposition.

Attached: 398746598374985.png (1700x2200, 316K)

>i hope they escalate this bullshit untill stupid people take stupid actions and do stupid things.
Wouldn't that be the newspaper that got shot up after weeks of Trump calling the press the enemy?

>our

>Hurr durr, I don't know you from Adam but I know all about you
Wew, you make more than minimum wage with that IQ?

InfoWars isn't the problem, and banning it won't solve shit.

The problem is that you have an awful lot of people that are stupid enough to buy into the nonsense that Alex Jones and other memers spew. Ffs you have people who unironically believe in that Q nonsense.

Attached: 1532365022201.png (735x710, 364K)

could you elaborate that?

>in a time when leftist are known for being so vocal with their political opposition.
I'm trying to remember the last leftist Congressman to call the sitting President a liar during the State of the Union, but I'm coming up blank. I think your crowd still has the high water mark for belligerent bullshit.

that was a former disgruntled employee

ebitbrah.com/products/the-protege

Of course it won't be used against the government.

They are acting according to (((Karl Popper's )))(teacher of George Soros) playbook 'The Open Society and ist enemies'.

No, no Ausbro. It was cleverly worded. Not the survival of democracy, survival of "our" democracy.

There's a subtle difference.

>open exchange of ideas is now antithetical to democracy

Attached: bizarro world.jpg (490x358, 83K)

saying people don't have the ability to decern good info from bad is saying democracy doesn't work

Essentially the left thinks this way. For them the people are the problem.

this should be our generations waco, if anything this is more important by a mile too

No it was not a disgruntled former employee, it was a guy who failed a lawsuit for defamation against a paper.
cnn.com/2018/07/03/us/annapolis-capital-gazette-shooter-letter/index.html

fuck man
your journalist really have to be erased
physically

>survival of our democracy
Anyone remember this or has it already been memory holed?
youtube.com/watch?v=hWLjYJ4BzvI

Attached: 1471635923720.png (510x332, 66K)

Of course it was
And Vegas was just a nutjob and not the biggest terrorist attack in the US in the last decade

that was more a personal feud kind of thing while Infowars got people so far to show up with guns at a fucking pizza shop looking for underground sex dungeons.

Was thinking more in the direction that mental persian vegan chick took.

Herbert Marcuse (Frankfurt School) is also a huge influence on them, when it Comes to political correctness.

marcuse.org/herbert/booksabout/haters/haters.htm

>this dumb ass bitch
>interested in democracy

Well yeah THIS site needs to be banned for reals.

The paper reported a story about they guy after he plead guilty to all the stalking charges.
It pissed him off and he shot up the place.
Just because someone writes about your criminal case, doesn't mean he wants to feud with you.

if anything happens this sunday at UtR2 we're done

Achtung: the link is to (((their))) Website, but has nice examples of his influence.

I honestly don't understand liberals thought process at all anymore, it's like they're a completely different species, how do their how can they be so fucking insane that they make AJ seem sane?

>Just because someone writes about your criminal case, doesn't mean he wants to feud with you.
I beg to differ

Privately owned media outlets to not have an obligation to broadcast the paranoid ramblings of a huckster.
Just like the city newspaper doesn't have to print whatever diatribe you pull out of your ass.

>they can't suppress the 1st amendment while the 2nd amendment exists
>they can't neuter the 2nd amendment without control of the courts
>they can't control the courts without owning the presidency
>they can't own the presidency without majority control of congress
>they can't get majority control of congress without winning the midterm elections
>they can't win the midterm elections without controlling the narrative
>they can't control the narrative without silencing the opposition

Attached: 1505703423556.png (600x600, 143K)

So hows that capitalism working out for you? You doing good with the elites getting all that money to bankroll this sort of thing off the workers backs?
Reminder these very people doing this would be the first to gulag :^)

Attached: kat.jpg (850x850, 96K)

But the deep state is stopping maga

Tinfoil Hatters aren't obligated to supply you with rational or even sensical theories man.

Yes, if I'm in a position to hire, can I just discriminate against left-wingers? Or is it only right-wingers and whites that can be discriminated against legally?

They are absolute traitors!

Just remember that as your crowd celebrates the use of corporate censorship to silence your political opposition that the tides can turn very quickly and your cheers of celebration can turn into cries of agony. You and your leftist political Establishment may think they can rely on the media corporations to do their dirty work but that really only feeds into what many have been saying all along. You leftist can not handle the banter and your only path forward is through censorship of political opposition.

Attached: 1531729403393.jpg (501x607, 63K)

baby shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
baby shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
baby shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
baby shark

Mommy shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
Mommy shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
Mommy shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
Mommy shark

DADDY shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
DADDY shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
DADDY shark doo doo doo doo doo doo
DADDY shark

>Just remember that as your crowd celebrates the use of corporate censorship to silence your political opposition
Corporations have never been obligated to act as bullhorns for political ideology.
In fact, the older, smarter ones know to steer clear of this/play both sides. But the younger media sites are run by relatively young, unwise people who are learning to stay out of this shit.
>You and your leftist political Establishment
How long do the Republicans have to control the House, Senate, Oval Office, Supreme Court, vast majority of Governorships and State legislatures before they become "The Establishment"?

Attached: 1398472814010.jpg (825x793, 159K)

GRANDMA SHARK doo doo doo doo doo doo
GRANDMA SHARK doo doo doo doo doo doo
GRANDMA SHARK doo doo doo doo doo doo
GRANDMA SHARK

Fuck you.

Nice trips.
Impressive asshurt as well.

Democrats can't survive if Republicans are giving opinions

Attached: 151515151515.png (279x181, 68K)

You can say what you want but you need to face the consequences.

>fear-mongering, crying FIRE in a crowded theater, these aren't protected forms of speech

By those standards the founding fathers of the United States weren’t entitled to freedom of speech since they incited a revolution and stood up for the rights of the individual in the face of tyranny (by your standards that would count as sedition wouldn’t it?)

Attached: 971F39DE-E69A-4CB1-B9E7-5C3525DF09BE.jpg (887x566, 56K)

This isn't Europe
It's America and the only saying here is
You can say what you want

This applies to the US also so dont say this is an European issue.

>Alex Jones
>Republican
He's a clown sowing conspiracy to rubes. Let's not pretend he has a shred of loyalty to a political ideology.

they would probably support banning Jow Forums too, what is the difference between this and literal Chinese style censorship

Oh please commies pull this shit too. Anyone who isnt a Communist is banned from office and deplatformed in Communist countries.

When is that bald fuck Joe Rogan going to have Alex back on the podcast. If he isnt on without a week then Rogan is a pussy.

>y those standards the founding fathers of the United States weren’t entitled to freedom of speech since they incited a revolution
Holy shit, are you 9?
of COURSE the Founders didn't have the freedom to declare revolution against the crown.
Do you really think they had Constitutional Rights before they even fought the British?

It's only treason if you don't win, moron.

Attached: intredasting.jpg (685x567, 51K)

>of COURSE the Founders didn't have the freedom to declare revolution against the crown.

So surely your definition of freedom is wrong, in that case? Since the first amendment was intended to protect precisely this kind of speech

Attached: 7FF3A5DE-13B5-4FEA-98B9-B29AFBF81EDE.jpg (832x827, 49K)