2 way street

It's hilarious seeing capitalists suddenly upset with the excess power of capital. Oh I'm sorry did you just realize that undemocratic, hegemonic, control of resources was bad? Maybe you need to reconsider your ideology a bit

Guess I'll just go to other YouTube down the street

I fucking hate this private company argument. We need to break the fuckers up and regulate them. Cunts act like god damn monopolies, they're practically public utilities at this point.

This shit needs to end.

Actually, political affiliation is not a federally protected class. Unless a given state constitution has something to say about it, it's totally legal.

If you want to learn more about which groups of people it's illegal to fuck with, just look up "Constitutionally protected class" on google. It includes stuff like race, religion, national origin, etc. So you could put up a sign that says "no Democrats", but you couldn't put up a sign that says "No Portuguese".

It can't be a monopoly if Alex Jones has his own site to show his videos, which he does.

And what about the DailyStormer?

It's not actually part of the constitution. It's just a law.

You are right OP, the bakery should be able to refuse without getting executed as punishment and google should be able to remove whatever they want from their website.

But I dont know why you bring that up, nobody cares about Alex Jones content. When he talks about reptilian people and shit like that its funny at most. What you fail to recognize is the problem that we have a free speech issue in the western world and people are not able to express their opinions about their problems and we turn into a tyranical, unjust world at bigger risk of civil war.

Now if this is exactly what you want and you are a shill then of course you are doing the right thing. But keep in mind that you have no way of protecting yourself.

Retard-tier logic, fuck off with shitty b8 like this.

Attached: 21B41588-3F75-41CF-A4B8-950263DBBAE8.jpg (700x693, 76K)

>dailystormer
wtf does that have to do with Alex jones?
I go there to laugh my ass off while drunk of high because of how ridiculously stupid it is.

The funniest part is this is why i never went full libertarian.

Maybe a little antitrust will sort this out.

What about it? If I have a product, and not store wants to sell it. I can open up my own store. The Daily Stormer is free to host their own website. If the government shuts it down for something not illegal, then I have an issue.

I've literally only been on there twice. I'm no fan. But godaddy and google both shut down their website frequently. They aren't allowed to have a website. But it's not a monopoly, r-right guys?

And the cake shop hasn't cornered the entire baked goods market. They probably aren't even the only one selling cakes in their small area.
And there are probably plenty of places to get food outside the eatery.

nah that is a normal tos. yt lied and made shit up to oust AJ.

Also multiple major tech companies colluded to shut down AJ in a single fucking day. OP is eier retarded or a shill, like you.

the small bakery is protected by his religious beliefs. there was no bad faith involved, unlike the progressive tech giants conspiring together in concert with dnc plans to soon enact draconian law stifling freedom

>Refusing cake is the exact same as threatening to literally murder someone

here we go again

When they have articles with blatant racism and hate speech and pure biased opinions, I still wonder how they haven't just been shut down completely. The person who runs the site even admitted they target kids. Fucked up.

It's not so much that any one site banned him, it's that they all acted in lockstep with one another and let lefties who violate their terms and conditions go all the time.

>get the fuck off my platform
Okay, disagree, but they're their own platform
>my cabal of social media sites has decided you don't fucking exist anymore
Little more fuckin' concerning.

Attached: lsSkLqt.jpg (1080x1064, 112K)

yes they control the vast majority of the market. what you are saying is like omeone complaining about cable providers, and you tell them to buy a fucking antenna. what happened to lefties? fuck

Cool, so any time a black person tries to enter, say "sorry no, cause you're a democrat"

>blatant hate speech (not illegal) racism (not illegal) and biased opinions (not illegal) but aren't allowed to have a website
>but it's not a monopoly

If a bakery doesn’t want to make a cake for fags then those fags can get a cake from another shop.
There are no other platforms other than YouTube or Apple because fucking kikes monopolised them .

ok but the law only supports one side, its a one way street pretending to be a two way street.
memeflag jew once again with a shit thread

There is a legal distinction between a publisher and a platform. A publisher has editorial rights, a platform does not. Social media can't decide which they are.

Sounds like an awesome way to turn black people into socialists instead of Dems. I love it.

they also never, ever answer how multiple tech companies conspiring to oust a small outfit with "hateful rhetoric" all on the same day is legal or ethical

>>"A bakery should be allowed to refuse customers because it's a private company but a website should not be allowed to control the content on them despite them also being a private company!"
The bakery was allowed to refuse service because the client requested for a costume product which sent a message which the owner didn't want to offer for personal reasons. Pretty valid. Had it been that they didn't want to sell them any cake for being gay, that would have been a no-no.
YouTube and facebook cannot discriminate either, however since they host content, they are perfectly in their right to decide what kind of content they host. In this there is some gray area: are your content prohibitions clearly stated in your terms of service? did you change your terms of service and notified the user with enough time to make the necessary changes if they want to remain on your platform? Of course the allowable content must stem from some sort of code of morals, but who defines those morals? Are they very objective and impartial or opinionated? All in all, they cannot look completely "in the clear", they should always expect some heat for shutting someone down. But again, they're ultimately entitled; if viewers don't agree, they must act accordingly.
>>"Shutting down the InfoWars youtube is censorship but letting Trump shut down media that hurts his feelings would not be censorship"
hasn't happened faggot
>>"waving flags of Americans enemies does not disrespect the flag but exercising your right as an American to protest does"
indeed Trump and everyone game to much attention to those kneeling self righteous faggots
>>"This political group should be allowed to speak freely but any other group I disagree with should not because freedom of speech only applies to me"
the right is the side less guilty of this
>>"what do you mean ancestry isn't a dating site?
oh so the whole post is a joke. ok

Well until the courts actually do something about it, they get to have it both ways. They need to clarify how the law (Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act) applies.

You don't even know what a monopoly is how can you call google one?
If google was a monopoly they would have bought out or made every website they host pay them for their services.
Standard oil was a monopoly, google is not.

If AT&T was a monopoly google and apple certainly are as well

>neet thinks internet is a human right
toplol
Put down your phone and get a job you faggot.

Ita not the censorship that bothers me. It’s more a case of what has youtube become? They have moved away from user created content and are just another MSM platform now. If I wanted to see videos from CNN, BBC, FOX or any of the other corporate news orgs, I would seek out more traditional platforms.

google actually does that
that's why they were fined for over a billion dollars

>>"what do you mean ancestry isn't a dating site?"

some of my distant cousins I never knew existed are hot af

Fuck em right in the pussy.

Let me list the arguments presented in your post:

Americans are absolute hypocrites, they can't even comprehend what is wrong witht them

wow, so why hasn't CNN shut down?

Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued his findings of fact on November 5, 1999, which stated that Microsoft's dominance of the x86-based personal computer operating systems market constituted a monopoly, and that Microsoft had taken actions to crush threats to that monopoly, including Apple, Java, Netscape, Lotus Software, RealNetworks, Linux, and others.

Google's dominance over video sharing over the internet constitutes a monopoly.

Lol a disgusting kraut with an opinion. It's like fucking finding a rainbow unicorn.

Attached: 1532704241619.gif (200x223, 1.63M)

i love when people have no counter argument so they go "you are retard , fuck off".

I love when smug morons cherry pick the posts that don't refute anything and ignore the actual replies

>public forum
>cakes
This is the same

Attached: 1533513628950.png (680x620, 157K)

There are a shitload of bakeries.

>only one Youtube.

>citation needed.

Your analogy would be better if the bakery produced ~95% of all cakes in the country.

Alex Jones is a paragon of libertarianism. He wants to you be free to do what Trump says!

There are a shitload of video sites.

No gives a shit if youtube shut them down, the problem is that ALL the big tech companies shut them down for Hate Speech which are not explaining where they did it, so we are saying its a political propaganda to hurt the american conservative. Also didnt twitter shut down some conservative acc (if im not mistaken that black conservative woman)

Popularity doesn't mean monopoly

Anti-American speech and idealism should not be tolerated, ever.

Your dumb and conflating Libertarianism / Free Speech with retarded Jesus Freaks.

Feel free to continue to conflate the two.

there is no purpose in choosing a plattform which is not the most popular

Faggot.

>your opinion is illegal
very illuminating post.

>being this retarded.

Attached: 1529215137132m.jpg (881x1024, 76K)

Fuck your standards. The time for your principled bullshit has come and gone. The hour is late, and change is coming. We must seize power in any way possible, and hold onto it as if our lives depended on it.

mf give me your argument, not the others argument

You're right, but there's no good reason religious beliefs should be protected but secular beliefs, like politics shouldn't be
Scratch that, there's one (((big))) reason that will never happen

Screen cap this. FOX is trying to iron out contract for a 1 hr weekend only gig with AJ. Contract language is pretty tight about certain rantings.

>you're forced to shop at Wal-Mart because other box stores aren't as popular
Idiot.

Normally, I'd agree with you on that, but our government has funded these platforms to become what they are today. It's more than popularity that make their platforms succeed.

Prove the government funded them.
Do you have proof other than some nonsense Alex Jones rant claiming it to be true?

Attached: 1478214205830.jpg (966x541, 39K)

Straw man.

>Multiple companies conspired to shut down an information source that challenges political veiws that they feel benefit there profits and thar they deem undesirable. These companies engage in making money through hosting public discourse and news coverage.
This is violation of anti trust laws
>These companies tell their customers that they are social media. Social explicitly implies that it is public and open.
Buy deplatforming users because they don't want their users to hear certain types of public discourse is in violation of the advertising and the trade description of these services.
>of course these websites have the right to police content that is in violation of their terms and content which breaks the law
This is not what has happened though. The companies have just violated their own terms by blanket banning a popular user of these services based on their own political whims. This again violates the trade description of these services and violates the principles of fair and regulated business and violates the contract they made with users and advertisers

Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony

The fact that all these sites kicked him off at the same exact time is highly suggestive of collusion. Conspiring to shut aj up is in fact a violation of the Sherman act

other box stores are equally as good as wal-mart

but other platforms next to youtube are just shit

Why not just force american businesses to abide by the american constitution?
Freedom of speech muffugah

Attached: you.jpg (511x461, 34K)

>compares competitive market like baking to winner take all tech companies with enormous control over discourse and perception
Off to a good start.
>hurr durr incest
Nice finish as well. Original and witty.

Anyway, I don’t want to censor anyone, which is why I’m here

I love the white people are inbred meme.
Europeans are THE best breeding stock on Earth, it's the kikes and muslims who are functionally inbred to shit

That’s the main reason why libertarians, especially ANCAPs are full-stop retards.

That's just your opinion.
There are alternatives.

Service wasn’t refused. Baker would’ve made any regular cake and sold it. They wanted to gay it up to make some Christian retard uncomfortable. Literally told them he’d be happy to make any of the wedding cakes he had. The customization was where he refused.

>One bakes bread
>The other doesn't do jack

>2018
>being this dumb

Wew lad. Read a book. Private companies can do what they want on their own platform. Private citizens can express their religious freedom as long as it doesn't infringe upon the freedoms of others. Some classes are federally protected and if you're still dumb enough to have a discriminatory religion against a protected class in 2018 then kick rocks but I won't be bothered explaining why it's necessary that your 'freedom' doesn't leave enough room for the rest of the world.

alex jones is so full of shit it's not even funny

He's threaten to actually kill people live on his show and he expected everyone would be ok with it? Yeah I'm glad this dumbass was taken down because I know this is a special case.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1024x576, 55K)

This.
On top of these big social media "influencers" having complete control of the info market, means we're one more step for lefties to start demanding anything right of centre should be shut down.
It's a slippery slope because these degenerates don't know when to stop.

>Technically a bakery in the USA has no right to refuse people based on their political affiliation.

u tarded m8?

No that is not just my opinion it is a fact
these alternatives became irrelevant when the primus gets to big

we're talking here of a platform for self-expression
not some retailers
and on the internet especially

google.com/amp/s/www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/google-microsoft-facebook-apple-and-amazon-get-2b-in-data-center-tax-breaks-economic-benefit-unclear/

Does this count?

>memeflaggot with low effort b8

Shocking. Sage.

Thank you, user! That's exactly what I was looking for.

I've been listening every week day for two years. When the fuck did he every threaten violence upon anyone?

He's said he wants to kill pedophiles but never anyone in particular.

The IRS adjusting tax rates doesn't equate to the government conspiring to put the competition of those companies out of business.

>a cake shop isn't the public square, social media is

>asking someone to make something isn't the same as distributing something yourself on someone else's infrastructure

>social media can't hide behind safe harbor laws if they're going to police legal content. you can't be a publisher one day and a neutral content distribution mechanism the next.

Cakes and Information are not the same thing, dumbass

this is a false equivilency

this would be like Walmart/Amazon/Publix/Costco/etc all refusing to sell gay wedding cakes within 12 hours of each other

Bakeries and social media providers both provide goods and/or services.
They're the same.