Is this man full of shit or not?

He never gives a defense of the foundation for rights.
He has a shifting definition of truth.
He misrepresents Heidegger and Derrida.

Jow Forums just hates him because Jim hates him.

Collectivism is bad for the goy.
Collectivism is good for Jews.

Jews are super genius thats why they are over-represented

He gets the star kosher cock of approval.

Giving you the truth here op. uninfluenced by pol rage or lefty kiking

the guy literally went on twitter and said this. The guy is a fucking clown. He is only useful as a pawn to either side. Knowing him, that's probably the way he likes it, getting to pretend to be better than both.

Attached: fkzog5G[1].png (538x232, 42K)

not full, just 50% religious shit

Also remember to never organize, that would be EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. Also remember to share, subscribe, retweet, donate and sign up to my Patreon. Oh, and wash your dick or something.

Attached: budding_merchant.png (1149x1369, 800K)

>muh based cyberdad
if Juden Paxilson has changed your life in any significant way, you were quite honestly doomed from the start. everything he says is extremely verbose common sense and It's not wise to take advice from an old man who never grew out of his teenage existential crisis. the man was literally incapacitated for a month from a glass of apple cider.

Attached: 1529092561912.jpg (1078x1332, 516K)

Shills hate him

A very real thorn in the side of the MSM.
Jow Forums should support him on principal alone.

>A very real thorn in the side of the MSM.
>gets airtime from the MSM constantly
Yeah, no.

He is Ayn Rand for the 21st century

yes

he purposely makes his conclusions "positive" and "hopeful" for the youth, but he knows the dark truth.

WASH YOUR PENIS

Dr. Peterson what do you think Jesus Christ would do?
>Well, that depends on how do you define 'Jesus Christ', and also on what do you mean by 'believe'. There is a white snake with a black dot on it, and there's also a black snake with a little white dot... like... if you take 10 peasants and distill them, you get one nobleman. And then you distill 10 noblemen and you get a king. And there has to be something above kings, because otherwise the kings would rape and kill everyone they want, so it's obvious that Jesus Christ exists, although not in the mythological sense, but rather as an idea. If you distill ten kings, you get a Christ; it's the same as 100 noblemen or 1000 peasants, there's the potential to become a Christ in every peasant.

Needs a "my book" product placement, but otherwise spot on.

I dont think so.
I feel a lot better about myself thanks to him and he's helped connect a lot of pieces together regarding mythology and humanity that had been on my mind for a long time.
I will say though anyone who pisses off trans and feminists is fine by me.

Of course the Mexican is an elitists

Yes. He supports radical individualism for white people so they cannot organize against groups organized against them, then simultaneously lauds Jews for their collective nature and accomplishments brought about by racial collectivism. He's a transparent hypocrite and admits he does it solely to keep white people, especially white youths, from acting in their own interests.

He doesn't seem to want to address the fact that individualism will not hold when minorities have electoral majority as they have nothing to gain from it.

He often gets misrepresented by people who don't actually understand him (here), or people who think he's the only public intellectual (his hardcore fans). His is a pretty solid starter kit for not only living a good life, but determining what makes a life "good" instead of "hedonistic". It's also basic, but hey, it's what makes him six gorillion internet shekels.
The alternative is to have people who would have been his followers do nothing all day because they still don't understand life at all, instead of working and becoming functional members of the community like the smart kermit man explained how to do.

That sounds more sensible than what peterson actually says.

Post the "wash your penis bucko" video clip. I'm trying to convince a crowd of people that he's stupid.

>God
That is a big thing that he has not developed at all and a lot of people will call him out on. His definitions he has given so far are awful. It's too abstract.

>No identity politics ever
While he has done a good job of saying that it is the individual that is the lowest level we should view others, I think there is a bit of room for groups to identify. I don't get how he can discuss Israel ever without identity politics.

The rest is largely that he is developing his ideas. Full of shit? No more than anyone ITT.

He's all for identity politics, only not for whites because that's extreeeeeemely dangeorus.

When he is up against an intellectual equal who asks him to explain himself, it shows how much he does not actually understand.

youtube.com/watch?v=FmH7JUeVQb8

I'm unsure about that. I think there's been times where he has said that it's fine to be white, and be okay with that identity. I'd agree with him that it is pathetic when that is the absolute basis that some people go to. I'm white and okay with that, but I identify as Catholic first. It's weird that identity politics are okay in some realms and not others. I don't think he's developed his ideas out.

Or perhaps there's a reason why he gets to be on TV while many greater minds don't..

of course the mutt can't into reading comprehension

It isn't as though most of them like him. I had him as a prof before, and he was pretty great. I somehow doubt that he would discredit people being proud of being white, or even dating on that basis. He himself has said it's essentially each person's right to discriminate. I no more have to date a person of ethnicity [x] than I do a man. It's when the political formation is based on any identity that it becomes a massive problem that societies that interact with other societies need to solve.

Curious Norwaybro, what great minds are you thinking of?

He may as well have learned everything he knows about marxism and postmodernism from Jow Forums. That is to say, he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.

youtube.com/watch?v=mwYs9TQu16w

Now listen up cunts, ask yourselves, who will be better at fighting multiculturalists?Some guys on net with ideas that they can't realise or sucesfull, rich and confident men?Peterson is helping the cause, he has a point, we need to upgrade ourselves before we can take our movement to next level.

Attached: 57A0F2A8-9DCC-4220-913A-7C6AC87A61D5.jpg (1774x1602, 535K)

Get rekt.

Attached: 1526778615578.png (1920x6848, 2.27M)

A common misinterpretation of JPs ideas is to think they're political. They're not. He's speaking to his audience as if each and every one of them was his student or client that he wants to help to understand the world, history and themselves better so that they can become better and stronger people.

His message is purely psychological, and therefore, free from whatever political ideologies is prevalent in the world at the time. Understanding him is good for you.

>Curious Norwaybro, what great minds are you thinking of?
Many people here would be able to actually spark some debate and bring some real counterpoints to the media shows. But they will never be allowed to utter a word of course, because that's too dangerous. The reason why Peterson is allowed to speak on the TV is just because of that. He's not dangerous to them at all.

>Now listen up cunts, ask yourselves, who will be better at fighting multiculturalists
But he himself is a multiculturalist. Why would you think he's fighting multiculturalists?

50/50

Literally Satan

JPL

Everything is political, whether you want it or not. When he says equal rights "make sense" that's political. When he says identity politics are dangerous, that's political. When he says all sorts of other bullshit, that's political. He's a public figure that many listen to, most of them coming to him through issues of politics.

Correct.
In fact he goes out of his way to be completely a-political. I am pretty sure he's actually a standard Canadian liberal.

Why does the internet keep mentioning him?

k Satan

what the hell is your game

Satan

He's too individualistic.

His answers are to abstract or vague.

He backs up Capitalism by economic/social 'laws' and 'principles' that have been agreed by experts don't work anymore - for example the Paleto Principle doesn't explain the massive wealth inequality the 21st century is experiencing.

Hates UBI and yet can't explain another way humans will be able to live with advanced AI making us all unemployed.

Need i go on?

because he is the leader of the alt right

>His message is purely psychological, and therefore, free from whatever political ideologies is prevalent in the world at the time
He openly boasts about the effectiveness of his political message. You're a fucking retard.

Attached: 1527349938476.png (660x660, 88K)

like all philosophers you must take his opinion with a heavy dose of salt.

screenshot his "heil hitler" post and also Jow Forums shit

See: You're a moron.

Attached: 1528729281323.jpg (457x588, 64K)

Wash your balls! Ignore your demographic replacement! Accept Jews are superior! Acknowledge that white collectivism is evil! Pay me!

well you know are they Satan's chosen?

i thought he was ok and then he started straying from what he knows and eventually started charging mentally ill people money to tell them they should only eat meat.

Satan seems to think so, go figure.

yeah that was stupid as shit user

Kind of embarrassing that the Hebrew for meat eater is the same as "riff raff"

cleaning is an interesting thing eh
because there's an objective measure of being good at it
and because you can be good at it, a hierarchy of cleaning competence naturally forms
but the post modernist types, well they like to claim that hierarchies of competence don't exist and that all hierarchies are predicated on power
and of course postmodernists have hijacked feminism over the past few decades
which goes some way to explaining why feminists are opposed to traditional gender roles like cleaning
because the post modernists have convinced them that such gender roles exist because of male oppression rather than being a negotiated relationship to try to mitigate the intrinsic tragedy of being
as a result when men are told to clean their rooms they're like, YES, and it's no wonder eh, because it allows them to turn a chaotic part of their life and turn it into something useful, maybe, if they're any good at it
if they're REALLY good at it they might even be able to make it into something beautiful

He's just another cucked "Classical Liberal" boomer. He's no friend of ours.

there's a lot of shit to say about him, but his take on IQ, G-factor, and genetics is pretty spot on, if not very subtly, a red pill. he just pussy-foots around it too much.

You mean the left appointed him as the alt-right leader?

He will talk about how free speech is so important but I bet he is silent on Alex Jones being banned. He is an opportunist and does no really believe in what he is doing.

His dad advise is descent enough; yet, his boomerism prevents him from understanding complex techo-kapital critique shitplex.

All he can fathom is penis cleaning from those dirty post-modernists.

Attached: 1533477011294.jpg (1064x1513, 566K)

He's the most mundane of self-help gurus you could imagine. That he is popular with anyone really shows how bad parenting has gotten, that anyone finds him offensive really shows how thin skinned society has gotten.

He's an academic so any real issue he's gonna skate around.

Attached: brainletunderground.jpg (2048x1644, 366K)

He's accurate when talking about population trait differences, IQ etc. His main guilt is being unnecessarily long winded and masturbatory with quotes. Bret weinstein is a much better speaker because he's direct and doesn't sideline everything with quotes and fairy tales.

Might be weak on climate change, and things like dealing with incel killers, no amount of socially encouraged monogamy will stop these people from killing.

Leftists like to think that "Identity politics" simply means advocacy and pointing out something that affects a demographic, and use that an argument against Peterson. When ID politics is about cynically boiling things down to race when there are alot more factors involved in explaining disparities.
You could criticize him though for not being more specific about what the threshold is where advocacy becomes Identity politics.

My gf loves when my dwarf is cheesy, fuck you Juden Peterstein.

Attached: 1526684962644.png (370x547, 355K)

Attached: 1530562637629.jpg (960x960, 374K)

Yes

Attached: 1521825508885.jpg (1383x6447, 3.29M)

>Is this man full of shit or not?
given the amount of character assassination attempts here, I can say shariablue is worried at least, which means that what Peterson is saying is truly important, as if he were hitting exactly on the Achilles heel of the crazy left...
jut saying

Attached: peterson looking at SJWs.jpg (981x819, 203K)

FUCK YOU NIGGERLOVER

>What is controlled opposition?

Dude's a fucking faggot beta incel. Whining and crying about muh sex distrubution while getting knocked out by niggers and shut down by blue haired dykes.

He's a man who can't even settle on what the definition of truth is. Of course he's full of shit.

I used to rationalize that he just had an ideological disparity and he was an important step stone for our ideology. That people would eventually end at the JQ no matter what. But now I realize differently, hes a fucking kike shill, very sophisticated, but a shill none the less. Nigger and his radical individuality will be the death of the west. Radical individualists, Liberalists and Civ Nat Cucks will get murdered in the coming race war. Don't be on their side. RWDS WHEN.

Attached: 1505687978095.png (2048x1280, 2.41M)

he shit talks and calls ayn rand '' barely literature '' and calls her work simply propaganda whenever its brought up to him in his lectures lol

>Everything is political
No. That's a ridiculous statement.

How is telling people to salvage their relationship with their parents political? How is it political to describe the way our brain acts when we stick our hands out into pitch black rooms? He's a university professor and a therapist who's primary goal is to educate and help people, and that is what he's been doing for the past couple of decades. He's not a politician.

I've watched over 30 hours of his lecture material online, and i don't think i've ever heard him say any "bullshit". It says more about you that you can't seem to refute his ideas and need to resort to simple insults at his character.

His message is to not be swayed by a political ideology like a child and instead plant your feet on the ground and work on improving your character and making yourself happy and strong. Again, he's as far from being a politician as any public figure can be today.

his basic tenants are good, it's when you delve into him where you realize his entire non research psych work is based on interpreting everything in his own definitions ( which is how hes able to talk 3 hours about one bible passage )

>take JPs advice on most things
>but also be a white nationalist

Why is this so hard? Just because he isnt a white nationalist facist you should disregard EVERYTHING he says?

Less shit then what the main stream ideological groups are pushing.

He's right about some things and wrong about others. He has a bad habit of speaking with authority outside of his areas of expertise, and not bothering to understand the arguments from the Right before either straw-manning them or lazily dismissing them.

Attached: Tay Majority European.jpg (563x352, 46K)

>tells people how to live an orderly life
>can't keep order in his own life and keep his daughter from being a roastie

ok, so refute it

i hate him because his philosophy is common sense to anybody who didn't grow up a complete retard.

Attached: 1530136178840.png (895x955, 591K)

Kinda. I get where he's coming from but he denies a basic reality.

He's right that collectivism is shit. What he ignores is the prisoner's dilemma of the current situation.

Non-whites and the left are willing to be collectivist and identify whites and the right as an out group. This means that if the latter groups don't collectivize, they become the losers who get put in jail.

He's 100% right in that the ideal society is totally individualist, but he's about 10 years too late to preach it, and preaching to the wrong side.

This is why you have so many lolbertarians such as myself grudgingly supporting fascists or at least being willing to look the other way. Because if we don't non-whites/the left will definitely literally murder us or at best make us second class citizens.

This. The problem with communism is that it rejects capitalism and nationalism, and the problem with capitalism is that is rejects communism (which isn't inherently a bad thing desu) and nationalism. National Socialism is the opposite of both and fully embraces nationalism, however it also incorporates quite heavy parts of both communism and capitalism while being vehemently opposed to both.
My point is even if you disagree with something that doesn't mean you can't learn from it and use it to your advantage. Disregarding everything because it doesn't fit your beliefs exactly from the getgo is what communists do. Don't be a communist, use your brain instead.

No I mean when Jordan Peterson says it.

Ever since he switched to an all meat diet, he's been passing waste daily.

lmao non whites make up a large amount of alt-right and right wing figures whether or not you like it

what? marx explicitly states that communism needs to be preceded by capitalism and that capitalism was a good system but a flawed one and how communism was the inevitable next transition

Great, welcome to the club.

But the majority of their kind vote Left. Which means by having their ethnic group in your country, you are giving the Left more votes and operatives than you give yourselves.