Is this how it begins?

>The Trump era has been something of a boon for the Democratic Socialists of America. The organization has seen its membership surge to around 48,000 people nationwide, with some of its members winning congressional primaries and local elections.

thedailybeast.com/rashida-tlaib-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-dsa-democratic-socialists-of-america

Attached: Capture.jpg (753x668, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QsLFYK59C5Y
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Sweden
twitter.com/PeterSweden7/status/1026930898791481351?s=19
eurotopics.net/en/178879/crisis-situation-at-swedish-hospitals
thelocal.se/20150127/swedens-health-care-is-a-shame-to-the-country
youtube.com/watch?v=W56ZKUVECWs
youtube.com/watch?v=qE_4gTVPpmU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Just the pendulum swinging, nothing to worry about. Each swing brings greater extremes until the collapse, such is life.

Yeah this is the beginning of the end for Whites in the democratic party. The only ones who will still support them are the extremely cucked Whites, SJW shitlib cat ladies, (((fellow whites))) and hordes of third world invaders.

If they cared about defeating Trump, they would unconditionally side with the democrats

This is about democrats becoming too right for the far left

When their stares become Venezuela, how do we keep the federal government from saving their dumb asses? I mean, it's going to happen, they're going to slide into the shitter and pretend all is well, but how do we prevent the facade from spreading while bailouts keep them afloat?

Can letting them sink be a nonpartisan issue?

>The Trump era has been something of a boon for the Democratic Socialists of America
>The organization has seen its membership surge to around 48,000 people nationwide, with some of its members winning congressional primaries and local elections

wow, approx 1/7000 people. what a boon. fug drumpf right guys? xdd

Collapse sounds comfy. Tell me more about it.

Just like how Trump needed to unconditionally side with neocons to win... prior to the election anyway.

Attached: 3434433.jpg (768x432, 85K)

>left goes further left
It’s over.

Attached: C0668C1F-24D7-4DB8-8AA6-5198F91A3BFD.jpg (1200x801, 675K)

>It’s over.
For whom?

Not bad for a group with a candidate that no one heard of until two months ago. No big money there either. (inb4 MUH SOROS)

It comes and goes, as with all things.

>More Spics in Congress
AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
When will the nightmare end?!

>Surge
>48k
Lol

they both look batshit crazy

Yeah but I want details. How will life be for normies after the collapse?

Nop..It's how it ends...Think Venezuela. That will be your economy if nothing is done..And my country will be south africa.

What do you say, could this be applied to socialists?

Attached: Screenshot_2018-07-12-10-44-29.jpg (720x2540, 719K)

No they are using the democratic process to destroy the country instead of force and violence. Apparently its working.

History often rhymes

Attached: Chew.jpg (1251x534, 235K)

Nationalists > Socialists > Neolibs >(((Neocons)))

Fuvk you

Every socialist nation that has people in it, that look just like those bitches in the OP, has failed utterly.
Now they want to put them in charge. WOMEN too. It's pure dumbassery.

Attached: 1533163013245.jpg (420x379, 59K)

Nationalists > Socialists = Neolibs = Neocons

Can you guess what time it is, Drumpfies?

Attached: time for communism.jpg (450x600, 58K)

Who is this semen demon?

jesus fucking christ what is this crazy bitch's problem?

Attached: the face of madness.png (493x467, 162K)

Might have to take away women's voting rights again if we're gonna save the west

Attached: 1533535112231.jpg (348x423, 26K)

Makes me think. Should the Republican Party just turn hard nationalist with socialist policies. National socialism. Basically try to get the rural whites who dislike illegals, are pro-life and pro 2nd amendment. With the white city libtards and get them to unite against the shitskins. We can tell them that the only way to afford all these programs is if we kick out all non-whites.

There aren't going to be normies as you understand them. There will be survivors, and there will be the forgotten dead. The survivors will be the new normies.

So 1/7000th of the population, but somehow they are about to have 2 members out of 535 in Congress. That seems a bit disproportionate, user.

>take away
You don't need to, women can just vote to give up their rights to vote.

>48,000

Wow they are a moderately succesful American comicbook now

Can I get a quick list of dumb shit this woman has said? Asking for a coworker who says he agrees with everything she's said publicly :^)

B...b...but that's not REAL socialism! My sociology and women's studies professor TOLD me this, so OBVIOUSLY it's true!

I didn't watch the whole thing, but maybe it can help you

youtube.com/watch?v=QsLFYK59C5Y

Good luck on your red-pilling adventure bro!

The democrats are busy turning themselves into a 3rd world bannana republic tier party that will basically resemble the south african parliment with fist fights and water jug throwing. I for one welcome these lunatics into the democratic party to replace jewish neocons who know how to play the game.

The more fractured the dems are, the better,

National socialism would unironically trounce all other parties in the US

Same tbqh. The more radical they become and more to the left they move the better. When everyone right of bernie sanders is an evil neo Nazi White supremacist, no one is.

S.E. Cupp

I want to hate-fuck her so bad.

Time for raep?

Attached: 1529514853085.jpg (225x225, 10K)

DSA are going to absolutely fuck up the Democratic party by forcing them to go even farther left and thus alienating moderates and whites in the process.

it's gonna be glorious. Jow Forums should support the DSA

Pat Little 2020

If we still had a government concerned with national security, all 48,000 of them would be rounded up and shot for being dirty commie scum.

Why are you concerned with US politics fucking leaf. Worry about your own weak ass faggot of a leader first.

Yay! Go socialism!

Attached: Meanwhile in Venezuela.jpg (1024x576, 95K)

It's always reassuring to think that no matter how much infighting that goes on in right wing circles the left is just as bad if not worse. They're holding on to the idea that "any day now drumpf will be impeached." When the midterms come & go and he's still in the White House, they're going to loose their shit and the party will fracture even more.

Lose* their shit.

Even lifelong democrats I know are starting to see how ridiculous the far left is

They probably wont win their general elections. Even if they do, their ideology is so fringe they wont get any meaningful legislation passed and will largely pull the more centrist Dems further left as well. I love accelerationism.

Attached: 1519097348719.jpg (639x960, 99K)

Jow Forums hates capitalist exploitation of the ruling class, but loves the capitalism that enables it. All I want is a party that goes full collectivism without a bunch of social justice horseshit tacked on - nationalized industry and production, healthcare like the Nordic states, education like Cuba, transportation like Germany or Japan, actual safe elections with strict voter ID laws. Eugene V. Debs socialism, if anyone on this board even knows who that is.
The US has the wealth and resources to do this, despite your reeing about muh Venezuela when the truth is that state capitalism, authoritarian strongmen, and international pressure from the most powerful countries in the world (tradewise and cia-toppling-wise) are what cause the rampant poverty in socialist states.
20th century russia had a lot of problems, but shooting for communism turned them from an agrarian backwater into the second most powerful force in the world in mere decades. A stable, established country like the US making that transition could last and prosper.

Attached: 6608170_1.jpg (500x500, 37K)

kek isn't this why Obama was calling for moderation a few weeks back?
>when you go so far left that you can't control it anymore

> A stable, established country like the US making that transition could last and prosper.
Yes I agree with some of that and yes the Nordic countries that have more socialists policies are still able to function. The issue with the US though is the demographics are being engineered in order to insure that Whites are no longer the majority of the population. You cannot maintain a first world civilization with a third world population. If you stop this invasion of non Whites, then you could roll out the policies you're advocating for. Until that time those socialists ideas are put in place to raise the quality of life for the criminal economic migrants at the expense of the ever shrinking White middle class and working class. See California for reference and what an open borders left leaning state looks like.

Always double down. No exceptions.

tfw they elect socialists and space fascism is born in America

Attached: 1470191103464.png (374x321, 154K)

>Yes I agree with some of that and yes the Nordic countries that have more socialists policies are still able to function.
because there are extremely high taxes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Sweden

twitter.com/PeterSweden7/status/1026930898791481351?s=19

the soviet union had shit economy right until they were able to plunder half of europe. though economy did become marginally better after Stalin's five year plan mainly at industrialization - but it wasn't a big feat since Tzarist Russia was a sub-agrarian hellhole worse than Africa

Fuck off mongrel

High taxes and still majority White population. As it becomes more diverse and more people are taking a larger slice than is being put in it will degrade. Collectivist policies have been shown to work in certain situations but it depends on the demographics of the population. There are high taxes in states in the US but they're shit holes compared to Sweden, that's including the no go zones.

Get armed and hide your firearms.

polarization is god

lmao, looks like the death of the Democrats as a party to me. I fuckin welcome it, Democratic Socialists will only be elected in the areas where they ship in a bunch of 3rd world trash who love socialism (it reminds them of home)

Attached: emperorfinger.jpg (635x600, 96K)

Except Cortez won't win. She won a primary that had 11% turn out.

Crowley already said he's still running and he will win when real people turn out.

feels good knowing the liberal bastions of new york and california are gonna go socialist and all those liberal millionare and billionare elites in those areas are gonna get taxed and have their power sapped.

>High taxes and still majority White population.
Still, yes. But just wait until the boomers start dying off.
>As it becomes more diverse and more people are taking a larger slice than is being put in it will degrade.
of course.
>Collectivist policies have been shown to work in certain situations but it depends on the demographics of the population.
absolutely, societies always were a collective. I have no clue wher ethis individual vs. collective come from, maybe from some austists, great individuals always also were the product of their respective societies.
>There are high taxes in states in the US but they're shit holes compared to Sweden, that's including the no go zones.
Your taxes are nowhere as high than overhere, yet we get cuts in healthcare, public services etc. I am glad my mom covered my hospital bill after my spine cracked, I as a student would not have been able to pay it and I have a good health insurance.
The first thing you see when you arrive to Sweden by ferrry is the amount of beggars at the port. Swedish beggars and homeless.

>The organization has seen its membership surge to around 48,000 people nationwide

Kek and people thought Libertarians and Greens were irrelevant.

Why is the media giving so much attention to these people? Oh who am I kidding, we already know (((why))).

Attached: 1329232322880.jpg (248x251, 9K)

Why Trump didn't do the socialist thing ? infrastructure, healthcare etc....

He would be so popular, and he talked about that shit.

Well when the boomers die off it's going to be a new sort of terrible in every White country. Yeah radical individualism and liberalism are the main exports of the American Empire, our shitty culture does certainly pollute the entire plugged in world, definitely won't deny that. Agreed that our taxes aren't as high but the services the Nordic socialist countries provide are better. Free university, health care, public transportation etc.

Fuck they looked so unhinged even in those prop photos.

National Socialists > (((Neo-)))

>Well when the boomers die off it's going to be a new sort of terrible in every White country.
it luckily will break the West's neck.
>Yeah radical individualism and liberalism are the main exports of the American Empire,
except being a tame subordinate and taxcattle has noting to do with individualism. What liberalism did was breaking up the organic fabric of society, and make everybody a subject of the state (bourgeois feudalism)
>our shitty culture does certainly pollute the entire plugged in world,
I know both worlds, American culture once was great
>Agreed that our taxes aren't as high but the services the Nordic socialist countries provide are better.
again: the services are all in decline, from Switzerland to Sweden, while costs and fees explode. What you Americans constantly do is comparing today's America with 1970's Europe.
eurotopics.net/en/178879/crisis-situation-at-swedish-hospitals
thelocal.se/20150127/swedens-health-care-is-a-shame-to-the-country

>Free university, health care, public transportation etc
aka shit universities with shit equipment, why do you thing young Europeans flock to private universities costing a lot?
health care is getting worse by the day as well.
public transportation means you arrive late most of the time.

Well like the typical Burger I rarely concern myself with many of the global issues that are going on currently ecept for the major ones: Muslim invasion, south African Boer killings, those fires in Sweden last week. There's not too much digestible content coming out from that part of the world that isn't completely biased and there's plenty of shit going on in the US that occupies my mind instead. I don't expect someone from out side my country to have ideas and solutions for my nation nor do I try to provide ideas that could solve your issues, well besides the obvious removal of the (((hostile elites))). My argument for more Socialist ideas adopted by Whites is purely a way to insure that Whites benefit from these policies while deterring non White invaders from coming here. Also if you are able to stop the left from promoting their economic platforms then they're just a coalition of anti-Whites.

Except* for the major ones.

It'll create more extremists on the right.

We're going to end up fighting each other sooner or later.

based

there are many well educated Burgers, and debates here help to understand each other better. I don't understand why you think more socialism was better for whites, more capitalism and free enterprise is, socialism always means one is a subject of the state authorities and the amount of gibs redistributed can be cut at any time and re-allocated to others licking the state boot even more.
watch this (with subs) and compare to what it has become
youtube.com/watch?v=W56ZKUVECWs

Drumpf is finished

Capitalism and communism are two sides to the same kosher coin. If you're an advocate for capitalism you're an advocate for your own population replacement, for debased and degenerate entertainment, for selling out your own in order to insure you keep your head above the water long enough so you can run away to a gated off non diverse area. The fact of the matter is we already have many socialist policies in place, it's just that instead of the native population getting the benefits, it's given to third worlders. I have nothing against an individuals abilities or desires to benfit their situation or advance humanity, it just shouldn't be at the expense of my own countrymen.

>Democrats aren't soc...

Oh, wait...

The next President is going to be a Commie-lite and destroy the Republic

Why are they both these hideous brown things. Why are they always hideous brown things. Pls help.

Whoopee, everyone is gonna be rich!

Attached: zzzantifa9.png (680x661, 1022K)

>Capitalism and communism are two sides to the same kosher coin.
And what makes you think that? Didn't free enterprise, liberty and all the other founding principles make your country great?
>If you're an advocate for capitalism you're an advocate for your own population replacement,
that's a lie. Personal and economic freedoms are essential for individuals forming a society. The situation withtfully complain about came in effect because we have no sovereignty over our own.
> for debased and degenerate entertainment, for selling out your own in order to insure you keep your head above the water long enough so you can run away to a gated off non diverse area.
you describe materialism, which is a Marxist doctrine.
>The fact of the matter is we already have many socialist policies in place, it's just that instead of the native population getting the benefits, it's given to third worlders. I have nothing against an individuals abilities or desires to benfit their situation or advance humanity, it just shouldn't be at the expense of my own countrymen.
I tried to explain it to you alread, here's my 2nd attempt: socialism means a top down system, where governments not only allocate resources, but also decide to whom they are redistributing them. Reclaiming personal and economic freedoms would be the remedy for reckless governing.

Attached: Hoppe.jpg (605x592, 91K)

the better question is why do whites, which can well observe the fact all socialist 3rd world countries are failed states and shitholes, think this suddenly could work? Venezuela is the 85th attempt to build real socialism - the consequences drawn out of it are 0.

youtube.com/watch?v=qE_4gTVPpmU

Attached: LVT Will Save You(1).jpg (1437x908, 375K)

>Didn't free enterprise, liberty and all the other founding principles make your country great?
No, White men made this country great.
>that's a lie. Personal and economic freedoms are essential for individuals forming a society. The situation withtfully complain about came in effect because we have no sovereignty over our own.
Until your society's economic policy is subverted by a (((hostile elite))) that is intent on replacing your population with low IQ individuals who will make better consumers for cheap Chinese crap. Capitalism has led to the people in charge fighting for their right to make profits at the expense of the founding stock. Capitalism insures that the best criminals have control of your nation and dictate policy.
>you describe materialism, which is a Marxist doctrine.
Can't have materialism without capitalism. Is innovation and the free market more important than your own people? How much would you sell them out for a new bugatti?
>I tried to explain it to you alread, here's my 2nd attempt: socialism means a top down system, where governments not only allocate resources, but also decide to whom they are redistributing them. Reclaiming personal and economic freedoms would be the remedy for reckless governing.
I'm not advocating a full socialist country, socialism leads to a full on communim. I am a Nationalist first. So that means that the people of the country are more important to me than some thots ability to live stream and cam whore or for drug dealers to sell their poison and weaken my people. Certain things should be under government control. Utilities, military, police, access to the internet is the most relevant thing especially with the deplatforming of conservatives and other right wingers.

Sanders or Ocasio won't reform dems.
But they might be Ron Paul like figures that come before the party burns to the ground and then re-creates itself.
GOP ignored Ron Paul, crashed and burned after two election losses, and then Trump reformed it. Dems ignored Sanders, will now have two election losses and then the neoliberals die and the party reforms.

Also forgot to include this picture. Western countries in peak late stage capitalism. Do you honestly think that this girl deserves to be pimped out to make millions while thousands of White veterans go without housing or healthcare? What about grandparents who cannot work? Should we just throw them out on the street because the free market gets tired of paying for their social security?

Attached: cash-me-ousside-girl-tweet-millionaire-danielle-bregoli-fb.png (1200x630, 312K)

Can you give a non-memey source on what this image is referring to? Genuinely curious.

Reform into what? Would it become anything that we would consider good?

>Yes I agree with some of that and yes the Nordic countries that have more socialists policies are still able to function.
Nordic countries have hardly any actually socialist policies. Economy is arguably far more capitalist than in US. What they have is taxpayer funded social programs. Ones that will cease to have support once society goes diverse enough. People accept gibs and paying for those as long as those go people like them and they can see themselves receiving those in case of losing health or job. Immigration by 3rd world illiterate niggers and sandniggers will destroy any support for welfare state.

>No, White men made this country great.
and who built the countries according to teh principles I mentioned? White ppl building socialism in e.g. the Czechoslovak Republic failed too.
>Until your society's economic policy is subverted by a (((hostile elite))) that is intent on replacing your population with low IQ individuals who will make better consumers for cheap Chinese crap.
Government power enabled all this, not capitalism.
>Capitalism has led to the people in charge fighting for their right to make profits at the expense of the founding stock. Capitalism insures that the best criminals have control of your nation and dictate policy.
what you describe is today's Keynesianist policy, which is not capitalism. We are forced to fund all this via taxes because government has power over us rather than the other way round
>Can't have materialism without capitalism.
obviously not, if we look at today's societies.
> Is innovation and the free market more important than your own people?
It goes hand in hand, when Germany had more capitalism, more civic rights, more freedom in enterprise and trade, we had more conservativism and less leftism.
>How much would you sell them out for a new bugatti?
I am no materialist and not into fancy-schmancy cars, I am a fan of old military Jeeps.
>I'm not advocating a full socialist country, socialism leads to a full on communim.
Well, in Eastern Europe it didn't lead to more communism, but it lead to more poverty.
>I am a Nationalist first.
good, a bit romantic, but I can understand that.
>So that means that the people of the country are more important to me than some thots ability to live stream and cam whore or for drug dealers to sell their poison and weaken my people.
I do not think all degeneracy simply could be outlawed. There is no reason to worship an unrealitic and romantic view of the people.
(if you extend yourself for those you love, you will start to hate those you extended yourself for, as the saying goes)

>lel people of color and women

Fuck that shit. That's all they care about.

Why do commie women always have that smug bugeye look?

I don't know man. Most of the modern whites I talk to are so insanely self-loathing that they'd stay on board no matter what.

>surge
>48,000

At least they’re bigger than the Klan now.

>Certain things should be under government control.
and then the list grows longer and longer...
>Utilities, military, police, access to the internet is the most relevant thing especially with the deplatforming of conservatives and other right wingers.

all this could be managed privately without government intervention.

>Also forgot to include this picture.
why would I care about her?
>Western countries in peak late stage capitalism.
you keep claiming it, prove it then.
>Do you honestly think that this girl deserves to be pimped out to make millions while thousands of White veterans go without housing or healthcare?
I am not to decide on what she deserves, the white veterans knew what they were fighting for, and for whom they did it - they certainly didn't fight for a white ethno-state, rather for the prevention of that
>What about grandparents who cannot work?
what's with them?
>Should we just throw them out on the street because the free market gets tired of paying for their social security?
No, but first of all it has been their own duty to build up a capital stock for retirement, and over centuries private and ecclesial institutions cared for those.

What really bakes my noodle is how most of these brown people or their parents came to the US to escape socialist shitholes, and then proceed to vote for socialist policies here.