I got into a discussion with someone about the question above and I personally think it is inherently revolutionary. It doesn't seek to return to monarchy or feudalism or any system before capitalistic liberal democracies, it seeks to make a new order, a new man, a new woman, a new identity. Am I right?
Is National Socialism Reactionary or Revolutionary?
Hunter Morgan
Brandon Sullivan
...and when its done it purity spirals to shit. Its reactionary.
Carter Morgan
How is it reactionary though lol
Michael Morgan
Because that level of we wuzzery can only form after a massive, unjustified cucking. Just like Germany had when France made them sign Versailles.
Brandon Sanchez
Listen to Horst Wessel Lied sometime, Nazis certainly didn't consider themselves reactionary
Brandon Fisher
Aren't all revolutions reactionary? I mean Iam not an intellectual but logically it seems like if you have a Revolution its because things are bad and they forced you to react.
Aiden Reyes
Neither. It's pic related.
William Long
National socialism has always been a revolutionary anti-monarchist ideology. They'd be considered far right by today's standards but considering back then the European far right were monarchists, they were considered somewhat left by yesterdays standards.
Blake Garcia
National Socialism is just proto-National Transhumanism
>Humanity accomplishes a step up every 700 years and the ultimate aim is the coming of the sons of God. All created forces will be concentrated in a new species. It will be infinitely superior to modern man
t. Hitler
Eli Moore
Look up weimar.
Lincoln Edwards
>181738241
Hitler never said this you lying jew.
Nathan Wilson
I would say that it is reactionary, in that it seeks an end/limit to many of the rights won by prior bourgeois revolutions, the strengthening of "natural", that is ideological, notions of value and in that it is accompanied by a sense of "taking back what was lost". I would be curious about what/if any structural changes are made under NatSoc. Like you said, it doesn't seek a return to feudalism, but it does seek to stop any progression of things "going out of control" so to speak.
Jose Bennett
It was evil.
Cooper Sullivan
How is it anything but reactionary, the whole volks thing Hitler had going was a reaction against modernism and urbanization,
The Nationalism and racial pride was an attempt to remotivize a lost and shamed German people still rattled from the loss of World War I.
Invading poland was all a part of the German plan to get back the last German Empire
Landon Edwards
Levi Miller
That's only if you use the old "proper" dictionary definition of the word.
Now the hippy communists have redefined the word to mean "right winger/regular person who doesn't like us fucking their shit up".
Jason Evans
Why’d you post Carly?
Joseph Hughes
This question doesn't matter since feudalism and therefore monarchy is dead and will never come back as long as pic related exists.
Andrew Miller
Great read!
Samuel Price
Revolutionary
>overthrew the prussian aristocracy
>told the reactionaries to fuck off when they wanted the kaiser back
>completely reorganized the economic and social systems of the Wiemar republic
They BTFO the true monarchist reactionaries
Mason Bell
yeah why
Gabriel Green
this is now a Carly thread
Zachary Roberts
John Morales
Andrew Cruz
Juan Peterson
Ryder Davis
Jason Morales
I honestly wish George Washington became King George the first.
Julian Taylor
Don't trust revolutions, by definition they come around again and again
Asher Allen
I think its both.
Michael Wilson
Neither, it is marked by being both revolutionary and reactionary. That is what made it so refreshing, what drew people to it was that it presented a solution to revolution which confronted revolution on its nihilistic terms. End result was as bonkers as you'd expect, they sank to the level of leftists and reaped what they sowed.
Juan Harris
Pic like this have been my fetish for like a solid decade now.
Christopher Sanchez
The gun is no surefire way of assuring anything except political instability in the short term. Plenty of aristocratic men have braved far more accurate fire than that piece of shit puts out in acts of noblesse obleigé and earned the right to authority thereby. If your commanding officers aren't more brave than the average soldier it means that you are led my massive cuckolds and your whole society is fucked.