Milterizing space = fucking retarded

from ourselves
building fundamentals

100% this. right now seperate branches launch and operate satellites. this is just to make it more organized

Aliens

They can't get to "space" s m h WAKE THE FUCK UP! DO SOME FUCKING RESEARCH! BRAINLEEEEEEEEEEEEETS!

Because it's cool as fuck.

We can't even get to mars and you faggots already want to start literal star wars. How about we get off this fucking rock using international corporation and move to mars and colonize it so we don't die on earth in 100 years.

>Because it's cool as fuck.

What's really cool is building bases on Mars and the moon, not fighting fairy tale space wars.

The Army and Airforce control space (comms, imagery, GPS) right now. He wants to take those elements out of those branches, and put them together in their own branch. It will also involve logistics, rapid delivery systems via re-entry vehicles, like SpaceX's rockets.

It's not space lazers, and it won't cost a lot. Most of the assets are already there, but there's a lot of bueracracy, and combining them gets rid of a lot of it.

Correct me but isn't it just a rebranding of NASA and some other agencies into one big conglomerate?

It's simple. Why bother with stuffing the wallets of military industrial complex to prepare yet another rifle test that ends nowhere or some warship design that delivers faulty result after 40 years when you can make them invest in space travel.

Like it or not the big brains as long as building flying objects goes aren't in NASA, they're in Lockheed, Boeing etc.

>Correct me but isn't it just a rebranding of NASA and some other agencies into one big conglomerate?

I thought it was creating a new branch of the military.

I don't know how that is possible unless congress passes a bill or something.

Pros: Air superiority granted land superiority in most wars. Space is above those. Do you really think nobody has put weapons in space yet? Who investigates satellites, seals and tags them, and keeps them under 24/7 surveillance until launch to verify none have bombs or nukes? Nobody.

Cons: against The Outer Space Treaty, formally the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies

>t. effeminate male

>corporation
I'm assuming you meant cooperation, and no, the fastest way to advance on new frontiers is through competition. cooperation opens the doors for jewish meddling and we've barely made any advances in space technology since the cold war. the space race was productive for a reason, ya damn hippie

Attached: 1529971615961.png (288x336, 149K)

>, they're in Lockheed, Boeing etc.

bingo

I'm scared this will lead to a new arms race, but this time in space. How will the US respond with North Korea or China build space weapons? Remember when US had a monopoly on drones, but lost that a couple years ago?

Moral. It will give Americans that spirit of hope for the future and wonder that we lost under 8 years of Dubya and Obongo. It will reignite the spirit of exploration and conquest that has been dormant in the heart of the white man for so long. Maybe Trump knows about some hidden alien tech that the globalists have hidden away and he wants to use it for good.

How will the US respond when China (lol North Korea, fuck off you retard) or Russia build space weapons first?
That's what it's about: being first. If your potential enemies are first then you're at a disadvantage. Did the space race of the 50s not teach you that? Sputnik scared the shit out of the US.

But of course, an effeminate male like yourself wouldn't understand.

to defeat Space ISIS