Aleksandr Dugin

I just read this faggot's book on the "fourth political theory." It was published sometime during 09', and it sets out to prove what every Jow Forumsfag knows in their heart -- that fascism, communism, and liberalism have all essentially failed. I considered the reading to be of some interest, because Dugin sees that the farcical narcissism and retard-tier individualism of the West is on the brink of eroding the entire world's culture and morality. Russia, India, China, Iran, N. Korea, etc. are all at risk of being perverted like our countries have been.

Like Evola and Nietzche, Dugin suggests that we oppose Post-Modernism with all of the earnestness at our command --- but the faggot fails to offer ANY solution to the problem. He only celebrates the fact that he identifies the failure of all modern politics. What does Jow Forums think of this asshat? Is there room for a "fourth political theory," or, is are we doomed to fade away into the nihilist hole?

Attached: DugInFag.jpg (243x341, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

spencergate.wordpress.com/2017/08/27/aleksandr-dugin/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Anyone who follows a political ideology is a retard. Be a conservative

He mentions something about this. What conservatives do you follow?

Ludovici maybe?

Fascism didn't fail though. It was ganged up upon and destroyed by the largest conglomeration of military power ever because it threatened the current power structure.

Dugin is an anti-white Communist Jew. Here's proof:

spencergate.wordpress.com/2017/08/27/aleksandr-dugin/

Attached: dugin redpill.jpg (3411x2588, 2.31M)

His solution is utterly retarded Eurasionism.

His criticisms are often solid because they're largely the observations of better men prior to him.

Spencer's fondness for Dugin is a crippling weakness.

This. Where did Fascism ever fail?

Chronicles magazine offers genuine conservative/traditionalist evaluation of culture and politics, they have legitimate conservative (not True Conservative(tm)) academics, generally professors emeriti. Chilton Williamson Jr and Aaron D. Wolf are my favorite writers in the magazine, Taki also has a column, and Pat Buchanan has a blog on their website but not in the magazine (I don't read it).

Dugin agrees. OP has poor reading comprehension.

I'm not going to concern myself with some pukey 'Fourth Political theory' This is for fags and retards. I'm going full blast, straight to the FIFTH Political theory, and if everyone else is to slow to keep up, I'm just leaving you all behind... Bye!

Now read Leolv Gumilyov and you'll understand that Dugin is only a shitty interpreter of his and slavianophiles ideas.

Attached: 220px-Гумилёв_подследственный.jpg (220x142, 10K)

Dugin is anti white. Fuck that commie faggot.

Attached: Aleksandr_Dugin_on_White_race_zpswzyrnoze (1).jpg (800x822, 223K)

Dugin is anti-white, advocates for racial mongrelization and blames kike degeneracy on European people. This is all you need to know about him.

>not reconciling and synthesizing all five theories

Fascism is the PUA who tries to AMOG everyone and gets beat down for being an asshole

Didn't he debate with Olavo?

Olavo said he (Olavo) won it and that Dugin is an ass, but I have never read a thing of his. I know a guy who was friends with him on FB, though.

Is it even translated in any European language?

Fascism failed in all its manifestations but not because they lost their respective wars which is a matter circumstance, but because of the many ways it fell in to the traps of materialism common to the modern era. Its socialist and proletariat tendencies, its bourgeoisie moralism and the adoption of one dimensional national socialist racial theory were all to its detriment.

Men Among the Ruins ought to be compulsory Jow Forums reading.

Attached: Evola guide.jpg (993x3657, 1.22M)

>because of the many ways it fell in to the traps of materialism common to the modern era
>bourgeoise moralism
You've obvioulsy never read anything by Mussolini. Or Hitler. Or Codreanu. Or...

>I debate politics by making parallels to degenerate low-IQ subcultures
I didn't really understand what you were trying to say, and I'm pretty sure nothing of value was lost.

I'm quite fond of Codreanu.

>Cuckservatism
>preserving anything
>achieving anything

He has changed his oppinions since then.
Fuck off burgerscum

He changes his opinions more frequently than he changes his clothes. He's a Zizek-tier fraud.

>What does Jow Forums think
he's a commie retard in the shell who is larping as if he's not a commie retard but can't larp coz he's a retard

also there is no such thing as modernism or post-modernism.

it's like there is no art such as abtractionism or cubism or whatever else faggot kike bullshit is there to larp as art.. it's like drawing with piss is not art and making random patterns is not art either etc etc

modern and post-modern are not philosophies - they are basicallly a cringe reaction to rational behavior. so there are no thesis in these cringe reaction. it's like liberalism is not a philosophy either, since it's completely contradictory to itself. it's suppose to free something but in order to "free" one thing it has to contain 10 things.. so it's not a philosophy but a doctrine. meaning that it's a religion just like modern and post modern

in any case everything on the left is radical religious doctrine
everything on the right is moderate religious doctrine

the solution to every problem is quite simple
1.destroy all religions
2.kill all non whites
3.kill all kikes
4.punish all unnatural behavior by death

it's all very simple. there is no need for books when the solution is obvious. just destroy that which obviously doesn't belong among the good things.

everything is obvious. the kike is obvious. the religions are obvious. the niggers are obvious.
they are obviously horrible bad things which must be destroyed or the civilization is gonna turn into total stinking pile of shit.. which is already showing

I didn't finish the book years ago, because the German tranlation was amateurish and stiff. For the most part Dugin offers some old collectivist ideas that show he's still a communist at heart. He's critizing the Western European Christian nations for some part, only than to go back to praising how great this idea is in concept: Gathering people in one nation, who all believe the same.
Gee, Aleksandr. How about liberty? Yes, individual liberty so that people actually have the freedom to sort themselves out according to their preferences in their neighbors.

With a bit more perspective nowadays, I am wondering why Dugin thought it so easy to use Bolshevik writings to critize the National Socialists in Germany for example.
Also I believe he has some tranny fetish in his book.

This is what Dugin says. He doesn't say that fascism failed, but that it was simply beaten.
He doesn't like the fascism tho, because it puts race/the state above everything else and says that it's not plausible to revive such a state today since it would again get hammered down from all sides or as he puts it: Since liberals won 20th century, you have a liberty to be whatever you want, except a non liberal.

soz about the name, didn't actually mean it, here have a free bump