Larry Silverstein did this. Prove me wrong.
WTC7
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
100777.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
wikispooks.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
He literally admits he said "pull it".
I also think nukes were used in the basements of the twin towers.
eeeehhhhhhhh
Watch this closely.
oh yeah i'm with you my man. im sure you know about the squibs too. molten steel burning for like 9 weeks after the collapse. so much proof right in front of people.
You know what's interesting... conspiracy deniers always say how difficult it would have been to pre-wire the building.
> they don't acknowledge how difficult it is to manually pilot a Boeing 767, at low altitude, into a skyscraper with no experience.
Building 7 explained for all the conpiratrards.
youtube.com
Yeah. Ground Zero was still burning for 100 days after 9/11.
Fucking kikes kids called in “sick” the same day
No one will ever know, but I must say Larry was extremely lucky.
Pull it...
who were the tenants in WTC 7?
what was stored in those Tenants offices?
Oh Wait it was also a hardened command bunker.
He totally did
>t. dad was engineer on the replacement
dude, that fucking collapse in Tehran, that he used as a "2nd example ever", didn't even come down in the same manner. It was a slow, asymmetrical collapse.
First of all the building in Tehran was not the same structure and second of all it didn't have large chunks taken out of it's side, you're an idiot.
There were diesel generators+fuel in the basement and all the fuel got hot enough to combust for SOME REASON and oy vey
Hope you didn't lose any limbs or friends slaughtering Iraqis along the Euphrates or babysitting Norther Alliance boy fuckers. That would be depressing.
lmao I misread as Lauren Southern did this
ok, well if it's not the same structure, therefore it will never collapse the same way, why the fuck is he using it as an example?
also, if it had large chunks taken out of the side, you would expect a collapse that is even less symmetrical.
>you're an idiot
tfw I'm smarter than you, all of your friends, and all of your family combined.
Http://www.ae911truth.org/
TRUMP knew Truth on 911
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
The destruction of WTC was an occult ritual.
>the Twin Towers represented Boaz and Jachin, the columns at the entrance to the Temple of Solomon
>Boaz and Jachin represent the two key energies: ying and yang, male and female, strength and beauty, north and south, up and down (duality - like the Star of David)
>WTC builder, Rockefeller, says the buildings are the perfect combination of "utility and beauty"; he also owns Jerusalem museum housing remains from Temple of Solomon
>Luciferianism predicts/wants a new age of transhumanism; Kaballah and freemasonry believe one attains perfection by mastering and combining male and female energies
>Twin Towers destroyed in consciousness altering event at start of millenium to usher in this new era of transhumanism
>Replaced by Freedom Tower where bot ph towers are combined, one up and one down, like a Star of David
>2001: Space Odyssey is about man's evolution to transhumanism - he touches the black monolith and transcends human form to a space baby
>9/11 happened in 2001, next to the Millenium hotel designed to look like the black monolith
>madrid bombing was 911 days after 9/11
>sept 11 is the first day of the coptic calendar, first month is named after Thoth
>2001 was the start of the new millenium not 2000 (there was no year zero)
>33 years from groundbreaking to destruction pentagon groundbreaking sept 11 1941
Laura Southern: biologically male had me laughing all day
>The destruction of WTC was an occult ritual.
NOPE
NOPE
NOPE
NEW ORDER OF BARBARIANS ( 100777.com
"TERRORISM
There was a discussion of terrorism. Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned. And very benignly on their part. Maybe terrorism would not be required here, but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place ... or can be if we don't relinquish control to the proper authorities."
>why the fuck is he using it as an example
Because it's fucking STEEL building that collapsed by fires alone you absolute mongoloid!
>you would expect a collapse that is even less symmetrical.
The collapse was not symmetrical the conspiratard videos are misleading.
See here
Meant to link to this
Man imagine being this lucky. Hope I win the lotto tonight.
>it's fucking STEEL building that collapsed by fires alone
No one ever claimed a steel AND concrete building couldn't collapse eventually due to fire alone. Our claim has always been it is a slow degradation, not a symmetrical freefall.
Watch the video I posted. Also this one below.
youtube.com
Nobody can. He admitted it on video. Are you fucking retarded OP? Seriously, I swear to god even the people on /pol want to be blackpilled. Everybody is a fucking mental coward.
Here's the dude admitting the fire dept "pulled it" . The fire dept denies it pulled anything. So who did?
youtu.be
GOD
DAMN
SHEEPLE
alright, ill finish watching this shitty video :D
you're like 3 memes behind us buddy
---> ---> --->
Do you have any idea how much redundancy is in that building? That damage is laughable.
>drumpf is from new york
>WTC was direct enemy to trump tower
really oys my veys
>uncontrolled fires for 7 hours
can you explain why 5 and 6 were unscathed?
i will never forget building 7. there is literally nothing people can say to it. Most people don't know about it and they legitimately don't know what to say when they watch it.
Like I said, laughable. We are talking 7x redundancy absolute minimum, that is a fucking hard thing to get down. That's why experts have to do it. Just like experts have to fly airliners past max velocity.
Chance.
lol you're such a troll. reveal your flag.
Also for the idiots that say you can't see the plane in the footage of the attack on the pentagon pic related.
>where's all da plane parts hurhur
Street lights knocked over by the plane.
Just going to ignore my point then?
he's a troll. he's trying to derail the thread into a pentagon thread, and i guarantee he's masking an Israeli flag.
Larry wishes he did it all by himself
You one, just baseless bullshit and conspiratorial opinion.
>which way does a building fall?
>down
NO OMG YOU FUCKING SHEEP OMG RETARD IT WAS CONTRORLED DEMOALRHEA:SODIFJ
Apparently buildings are supposed to fucking fly into the sky or some equivalently retarded shit.
>You don't have one
don't do meth kids.
Haha are you really going to deny that my post was factual?
You crafty little scrounger.
Hazel Johnson, a housewife who lives in queens, did this. Prove me wrong.
See how that works?
>factual
Source?
I don't have links catalogued I'm afraid, what more can I do?
Your 'sources' could hardly be called credible yourself.
Jetfuell can't melt steel beams aaaaaa
i never understood how having some shade ass heeb pull his own building taking advantage of a disaster proves israel did 911
>I also think nukes were used in the basements of the twin towers.
I saw the video of the Russian guy who came up with this theory.
He's proposing that the nuke blast from underground decided to plow up through ~85 steel/ concrete slab decks instead of blowing out through the path of least resistance, the windows of the first few levels.
There's a reason why cointelpro shills push this along with the equally retarded Judy Wood energy weapons theory - to make people who question 9/11 look like idiots.
Check this out if you are interested in theories grounded in actual observations/science.
youtube.com
If you design a building correctly if it must critically fail it will critically fail just like that as to avoid collateral damage to the surrounding buildings. Would you have rather the twin towers play dominoes with the rest of New York?
>cointelpro
Nigger the path of least resistance would be straight up retard.
>25,000 years of architecture and engineering experience says it's bullshit
>hurr durr conspiratards
fuck off jew. you don't know shit.
ae911truth.org
9/11 was an Israeli masterminded False Flag with help from traitors in the WH, the Pentagon, CIA, FBI and NSA. With generous assistance from the Lying MSM.
if you believe this, you don't understand how structures work. There is no mechanism for one column failure to take out the rest of a building, much less at freefall speed. Even if half the building were carved out, like pic related, there is no reason for the rest of the building to fall.
,000 years of architecture and engineering experience says it's bullshit
Source?
>fuck off jew
Ad hominem.
>Source?
literally the link in my comment, dipshit
>you don't understand how structures work
Yes and i'm sure you're an expert right?
lmao, wow this looked exactly like the real thing. Identical, like two peas in a pod.
You're having fun aren't you?
ae911truth.org
3,000 working architects and engineers have staked their professional reputations on this.
what are your credentials?
The fires were put out in the building on the right, in the building on the left they raged for 7 hours.
Do NOT insult Trump's friends ever again you anti-Semitic little goy.
ae911truth.org
3,000 architects and engineers, 25000 years of collective experience.
you.
are.
wrong.
No it was me
John Kerry also agrees with Larry that it was controlled demo.
So Kerry and Larry thought about trying to convince people that they sent engineers into a 47 floor building while it was on fire and being evacuated to plan and orchestrate a controlled demo which takes weeks of planning over a couple hours? I guess they kept that out there as an option until they realized it would prove the controlled demo was set up and ready to go before the planes hit.
ae911truth.org is not a credible source, I need facts.
>3000 expert testimonies are not a reliable source
>democrat flag
why am i even surprised?
To make money out of fooling gullible idiots.
>thinks one column failure can completely collapse a 47 floor building at freefall speed
>calls other people idiots.
source?
Yep.
He's the blm guy, and trolling
As you can see it does not go straight down.
why do you do this?
bet you're into kiddie porn or some other really sick shit...
>source?
Why do I troll on Jow Forums? gee I wonder why?
Too accurate for sandgrugs, Grug think longnose play trick for shiny rocks
>the conspiratard videos are misleading.
>posts this youtube.com
wow
>that's a nice tower you have, goys
>burning uncontrolled for 7 hours
they give the video away for free on youtube
youtube.com
any other desperate attempts to discredit the brave 3000 certified engineers and architects who say it's bullshit?
>If i photoshop some low rez planes next to this amorphous blob, they'll surely "see things my way"
;)