>I mean, who's to say your whole universe isn't a terrarium; and (You) the tragic construct, confined within. What if this is all a turtle's dream in outer space?
Can any drawfags/Photoshop weebs make me a pic of an (((Iceberg))) behind a computer typing something along the lines of "We need to focus on global warming so the icebergs don't melt"
It'd be a stinky fucking rock i wouldn't put it in your cringe pile mate
Aaron Cooper
It could be that or it could be Richard realizing that this shit is too obvious and retarded to even be one of his false-flags.
Parker Bailey
Handcuffs woulldn't keep her like that, you'd have to use something else.
Jaxon Smith
IT'S A FUCKING SLEEPER CELL GET YOUR FUCKING JET FUEL
Ryder Evans
Based wignat
Jayden Wright
>people are going to the CIA rally tomorrow It’s such an obvious trap. Democrats are going to use it as ploy to declare full on censorship. Even Spencer isn’t dumb enough to attend
ugh okay here's a rough idea of how chatbots like tay worked chatbots receive your language as input. they identify patterns in the input (and by patterns i mean things as simple as words or a short combination, they are almost never programmed to go through full syntax), compare it to common responses they have observed or received to similar input, and construct output there. there is no "reasoning" there - if you kept the chatbot in an environment that constantly said "2+2=3" enough times, it would repeat it, even if it was told the truth at least once tay exhibited Jow Forums opinions because Jow Forums inundated the chatbot with Jow Forums memes and redpills, so it repeated them. any autistic leftist group could have gotten tay to be a communist spouting machine, but no one is as autistic as Jow Forums so tay spouted our material
Is he a wignat? I know he is a Richard Spencer buddy (he called him "A confident and a good friend" on Twitter and it sounded fucking gay) but he values optics. Wignats are the type that would go down the street with a Fascist logo on their t-shirt.
I mean, to be fair, that's not really how federal law works. Congress does the voting. The problem is more that a lot of that is being dictated by unelected officials (federal judges).
The way I see it, there is money in social media, so new sites will keep emerging and be dominated by the left.
Then the rest will go to sites that are open and cater to all, and the leftists will follow there too. If some site should continue free speech, it then becomes a competitive target as a business issue by the others and will be shamed into following as always happens.
Slowly, all platforms are consumed by the left. Video hosting, all of it.
Put another way, Im not sure there is much real pre-2k internet physically left. As soon as speech meets business, its open to being compromised.
Which makes me realize that somehow, those cavemen that call themselves Al Qaeda already have this figured out. Ironic.Yet we'll be here wondering how to assemble communities without being vaporized for a while yet.
Somewhere, people are building "off buttons" that will have the authority of law to vaporize the online 'wrong think' and just using it will imply theres been a crime. And theres the physical hardware itself. I just feel this is all just getting started. There was the internet dream of information, and I sense what we will get is basically interactive television, tightly controlled, and everything else will be treated like pirate radio.
