I see no hominini genus blackus

I see no hominini genus blackus.
We are all humans, RACISM is OVER.
We have seen this when racist naziland was BTFO in the great war. It prooves that racist society was inferior.

Attached: 52646456643.jpg (422x276, 21K)

>evolution

Attached: The tipping has begun.jpg (1280x720, 69K)

Are you retarded? Nazis didnt hate niggers. Only jews for being cockroaches and gypsies for being useless

They hated commies for being retarded, as well.

The only thing they got right

Attached: Uncle Fester-The F Is Wrong With You.jpg (480x458, 20K)

t.kike

Oh, shit i was wrong. BONOBOS have the same genus as chimps (pan) but still have a completely different lifestyle.
I was wrong. I'm sorry. Black people are clearly different.

Attached: FUG - ROOT BEER.png (255x207, 82K)

There are differences between humans though and these differences often correlate with Geographic areas. This is undisputed scientific fact. There are reports of all sorts of differences ranging from hormone levels to anatomical differences. This doesn't mean we have to be racist or anything like that, but to hide or not acknowledge differences for ideological reasons is not just stupid but actually dangerous and will lead to racism and division.

*one of the many

Socialism is only unsustainable with dead weight. Niggers/minorities require gibs to survive, whites use them as a safety net. Everybody needs healthcare. You are not some magical creature who can will away unforseen medical expenses. If you have an issue with paying for it in taxes, then you can move.

>oh but everybody will just get fat and put burden on the healthcare system

That is why it must be taught in schools that one's body is the property of the nation, which is the property of the fuhrer. Fitness regimens ought to be maintained in youth clubs and fatness should be taxed.

Bonobos and chimps can also interbreed, despite them being different species. Blacks are probably a different species, but its too politically incorrect, so genealogists refrain from touching it.

WE

Attached: But it do.jpg (508x418, 75K)

Proves nothing of the sort in fact it proves the opposite. Germany was.land.locked with no nearby aiding countries who had a surplus of weapons and supplies. Still took 5 years.
I agree we are the same race. We are however a different breed.
Racism is stupid
Breedism is very much real and expected.
Niggers are shit tier.

>genus homo
just like OP, what a coincidence

There are 2 lineages of "humans" i.e. there should be Homo sapiens and what I like to call Homo proto-sapiens. This is evident in genetic lineages and even visible to the every day person who a basic knowledge of biology through observing the effect of "hybrid" or "chimera" species.
First the 2 species.

>Homo proto-sapiens
These were the first "modern" humans that came out of Africa and were proficient nomadic hunters at the time. The migrated and settles tropical regions from Africa to India and even developed primitive boats and made it to Australia. This group then evolved into the subspecies of Negroid and Australoid. You can even see Negroids native to some SE Pacific islands, but most have been pushed out.

>Homo sapiens
This group evolved out of the caucasus mountains or Iberia, there is some debate. This group mated with Homo neanderthalis and first evolved into Caucasoid which spread out across Europe, Arabia, West Asia, and pushed the Negroids out of India (yes modern Indians and Arabs are Caucasoid). This group pushed east and evolved into Mongoloid which colonized SE Asia and migrated over to America (Native Americas are Mongoloid).

So we have 2 species with 2 subspecies.
Homo proto-sapiens
>Negroid
>Australoid

Homo sapiens
>Caucasoid
>Mongoloid
There is some debate whether native Americans are their own sub-species.

Now back to my main point on observing this in everyday life. The phenomenon of hybrid species occurs often in nature. These offspring will have what is called a dominant- dominant phenotype, where they have a mixture of dominant features of both their parents and often look strange; like small wings with a body to heavy to fly in birds. These hybrid species are sometimes sterile, but almost always have decreased fertility and immune system problems. See pic for an example.

1/2

Attached: sheep goat.jpg (300x168, 9K)

2/2

Now when subspecies mate, you get a mixed phenotype where the offspring have traits that are between the parents. Take for example dogs, if you mate a large black dog with a small white dog, you will, in general, get a medium grey dog.

How does this apply to humans?
Well take Happas, a mix of Mongoloid and Caucasoid. Their offspring are somewhere in between both parents (even the ugly ones). They do not have Mongoloid brows with a Caucasoid jaw bone, they have something in between. This holds true for mating between Native Americas and Europeans, or Indians and Japanese. While their offspring may be ugly, they are an in between of both parents. Additionally, if they have multiple offspring, their offspring will all have very similar phenotype and traits.

However, what happens when you mix a Negroid and a Caucasoid? Well, you have all seen it. You get mixed dominant phenotype. Skin is often much more towards one parent or the other, hair is the same, as well as facial structures. Offspring of these pairings also have higher rates of infertility and auto-immune problems. Additionally, offspring of the same parents can have wildly different phenotype (pic related, these are twins). You can also clearly observed the dominant- dominate phenotype i.e. Negroid facial structure on lighter skin girl and Caucasoid facial structure on darker girl.

Spread the word, there are 2 human species each with 2 subspecies.

Attached: n-TWINS-628x314.jpg (628x314, 54K)

Funnily enough Austaloids are more closely related to Europeans than to niggers.
It's not because they both have dark skin, ugly nose, curly hair etc. that they're more closely related.
Same thing with Europeans/Indians, East asians/South-east asians.

Additional offspring of a Mongoloid and Negroid.

Attached: az8xQOB_460s_v1.jpg (460x690, 46K)

The difference between Abbos and Europeans is still very great however.
They're more closely related to Asians.

Attached: i-a90942cc20ecba4d6c4fa3599b1caa1e-worldstruc[1].png (500x509, 65K)

you're close but not quite.

we all descend from the proto-homosapiens but the difference is everyone else diverged from that primitive group white niggers and abos didnt.

eurpopeans/middler easterners = homo sapien with neanderthal admixture

asian = homo sapien with homo erectus and denisovan admixture

Attached: 2foov3[1].jpg (420x315, 23K)

Abos actually have some denisovan DNA.

The bulk of Australoid are not included in that graph, HGDP Oceania are part of Australoid, but you cannot read that graph as just because they are closer to Asia, that they are an offshoot of Asia. They are also not in the same migration or evolution path as Native Americans.

You can also see that Central south Asia are clustered more towards Europeans than India, but Mongoloids evolved after Caucasoid.

It is a useful tool for helping to identify relations, but should not be used as the sole reason. Also Oceania is highly divergent from even America when interrupting that style of graph.

You are right, I forgot to add the Homo denisovan in there. Which both Australoid and some Mongoloids did mate with.

I seem to have struck a chord with I assume a Negroid-Caucasoid hybrid species?
Did you luck out and get mostly Caucasoid traits? or are you a Frankenstein?

...

And for being jews

Attached: 1533586563665.png (650x994, 600K)

Also taxonomy and species are a very tricky and difficult grey area. It can be very clear i.e. comparing cats and dogs, or rather tricky i.e. forest vs. meadow finch.

This is just a random flow image I pulled, but it is useful for conveying the point. You can clearly see that there are 3 groups, but it is hard to say where one group ends and the other begins; sort of a Loki's wager.

Attached: 364624626246.png (357x401, 88K)