Ok, I'm going to talk about the controversy surrounding the Lauren Southern "rape robot".
Yes Straight White Males: It's still R A P E, even if it IS a Lauren Southern look-a-like doll, but yes the definition of rape does change if the attacker is black or Muslim, and the victim is white.
My blog: feminismbyanita.wordpress.com
While logging into Remington's facebook to delete messages from other women seeking child support, this concerning invention came up on his feed, worse still, Remington had given it a like, with a comment "at least dat bitch dun complain". Given that Remington is black, and rape is power+opportunity, black men cannot rape white women so I'm happy to look past his comment. But this is the latest invention of the patriarchy, a facsimile of a woman, but this time, she cannot say no.
Not only does this "rape doll", represent an unrealistic image of what a woman should be, but it also lacks any capability to withdraw consent from the straight white males who purchase her, which also presents another even more sickening dilemma: human trafficking, and rights.
With the recent shutdown of backpage for sex trafficking, it didn't take the patriarchy long to think of this sickening object of oppression to take to the market.
I'm calling on a "No!!", doll, to be produced, which promotes a more realistic interpretation of what a woman is. Why blonde hair? Why not green hair, even a nose ring, a realistic much larger body shape, perhaps Birkenstock sandals with wool socks underneath with cargo shorts and a voice that repeats No! No! No! in the presence of a straight white male.
But really perhaps what's needed, is a doll that has a body camera attached to her to film her rape as evidence even though a woman should always be believed.
So yes, dolls can be raped, Lauren Southern cannot be, so long as her rapist isn't white.
