Communism is the truest way for men to still be men

Think about it. Capitalism enslaves every single one of us for a meager wage and makes us pawns for (((them))). Is this what men aspire to be ? Pleasing their boss working overtime while their wife is getting fucked by the neighbour ? Spending their life worrying about bills, mortgage, saving for the children's college degree, having to wait until retirement and a limp dick to enjoy life ?
A communist society could allow men to be free from the burdens of late stage capitalism. Every worker would get his due part, and would be proud of his work, his role in society, because he owns his means of production. His work brings society forward and provides for his own family at the same time.
The state would provide, via taxation healthcare, education for the children and so on. Decent housing and quality of life would be compulsory for everyone.
The Man could then reclaim his role of family leader which he is losing more and more because of liberalism. Modern man is not more a man than a disposable thing that bows down to his bourgeois masters to get the wealth he produces stolen, and he must accept it without saying a word.
Since the State economy maintains a workforce proportionate to it's needs, and employs everyone, that means work time could get divided more among workers. No more extra work to stuff more money in the shareholder's pockets while your boss leaves 2 hours earlier. Therefore children could see their parents more, ensuring they don't end up becoming trash degenerates. Also, more children could have access to education, from primary school to the highest level university, all funded by taxation. Ensuring equal opportunities for all and breeding generations of rocket scientists, engineers and doctors. Jobs society really needs to progress and function. No more gender studies.

Healthier work, healthier mind, healthier family unit. What have we got to lose ?

Attached: soviet_family.jpg (266x190, 13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nxVYKcVUhDk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Communism has been usurped by faggots and idiots who want to be "productive NEETS."

>Every worker would get his due part, and would be proud of his work, his role in society, because he owns his means of production.

What does that even mean?

The importance of capitalism is that you are able to move up in the world by creating your own business. I have known many people in my life who have started businesses from scratch some who have done this right out of prison and thrived by making at least 6 digits a year. It takes self application and determination. In a communist society you are stuck in the same spot as everyone else even if you are more skilled then they are. Also there has not been a single communist society that has thrived where America, an obvious capitalist society, is the strongest and greatest nation in the world.

Under communism, workers own the means of production. They own their factory, they own their machines. And they work only for the State, who's role is to benefit society (and not just to enrich a few individuals like in capitalism).

If a Man owns his means of production, that means he isn't a puppet for shareholders and the kikes. The product of his work goes to him (via salary) and to society as a whole. There is real pride in that. That is how humanity started : we didn't work for a salary, we worked for the community, the tribe. Leading his people forward is what man was made for. And that can only be done via economic emancipation.

But still, 45 million americans live under the poverty line. People sleep in their cars, are homeless, can't feed themselves, can't get medical aid. All those basic things are denied because they are simply too poor. Is this acceptable in a modern society.
Also, those people making "at least 6 digits a year" are indeed in a good spot. But how about the huge majority of people just getting by with the monthly wage ?

Not everyone can be a business owner and you know it. There is no room for everyone. In a capitalist society, people are always going to be left behind.

Communism does not create a workers utopia so much as it creates two classes:

1: slave masses

2: ruling elite

Shilling for communism is shilling for (((them))) because (((they))) created it

But (((they))) are pulling the strings in our current capitalist society as well so go figure. I thought (((their))) utopia was wild capitalism because (((they))) want to make the most money in the most unethical ways.

Kek. Do people honestly believe this is how it would play out? I know it's a meme at this point, but fucking read Animal Farm.

Who is "the state"?

The state is what makes a country a country, with its laws and its boundaries. Don't tell me "but communism always ends up with a ruling class" so what is fucking capitalism then ?

Shut up fag

NaZbol is the only way

>some who have done this right out of prison
Capitalism elevates the dregs of society while noble, civilized people are forced under their apeish foot. Thanks for proving his point.

Actually capitalism made me rich so no.

>Capitalism enslaves every single one of us for a meager wage and makes us pawns for (((them)))
Loser mindset, commiefaggots think there is nothing in between working $7.25/hour and owning Amazon.

Are you not a slave to the kikes under the current liberal NWO? At least nAzbol gives us the chance to be governed by fellow goyim. I’ll take Stalin over Bernie any day.

Only an idiot with no real experience in the public sector thinks more government is good. Governments are corrupt, wasteful, inept, dysfunctional monopolies that have no process to punish failure. If you hate monopolies but love government you are a retard.

So workers who build the factory dont own the factory? Or do they share ownership with the machine operators in the factory?

I could go on but you get my point. Who owns what exactly?

You don’t have the power to stop the browning of the west at $7/hr, $30/hr, or $100/hr. Capitalism, at best, will only ever indulge your selfish individualism while ultimately destroying the means by which you came into being in the first place (i.e your race).

So i take it you would rather trust corporations such as Monsanto, Nestle, McDonald's ... with no "middle man" between them and you ?

Those who build the factory do not work there so it's not theirs, but they own their own State mandated construction company.

Communism was invented by (((them)))

The author of animal farm was an avowed communist and also a retard.

And yes the lot of the worker is always substantailly better after communism than before.

Both capitalism and communism are inherently materialistic. Both deny tradition, family and faith. USSR had some pro family propaganda to try and keep birth rates up but besides that it's about it.

Monarchy, orthodox national socialism (something like what Codreanu wanted), or unironically what the US founding fathers actually wanted are best. However we allowed women and blacks to vote as well as let the central banks pretty much run the country.

And all the biggest advocates of capitalism are jews.
Communist ideology when takem whole hog is no better tham capitalism but a fully socialist economy with a traditionalist social policy is the only way to preserve the future of the white race.

By "the state" i assume you mean the bureaucrats?

Well socialist but as much as I love his books it's so odd to realize how close he was yet so far. He seemed to simply be against authoritarianism on all levels, not realizing the "democratic socialist" stuff is how the road to communism or at least an authoritarian bureaucratic machine of a government generally seems to start. Democracy is big gay.

Third position friendos

Attached: 1513211700046.jpg (1807x933, 902K)

Orwell didn't like Stalinists but he was an avowed socialist and mixed up with the POUM, a Trotskyist militia in Spain. Actually took a bullet in the throat fighting fascists.

Orwell was literally part of the antifa of his time.

>The truest way for men to be men is to be cucked to a superstate
cool story bro

Exactly we need to take Communist economic policy with traditional social policy. Actually because communism creates products only for use instead of being fuelled by mass consumption can reduce modern materialism.

communism enslaves you to slave labor
youtube.com/watch?v=nxVYKcVUhDk

"Democratic Socialism" is not how you get communism at all. They literally just support capitalism with welfare.
He was also a terrible author and you should be embaressed for liking his work.

>or at least an authoritarian bureaucratic machine of a government

Nice attempt at reading there short sighted prick.

Fascism is a superstate.
And yeah we are part of society and id rather be a part of one thats defined by traditionalism and cooperation instead of unending souless consumption in which most people cant even afford to support a family.

Like I said they just support welfare. A lot of the time they also try to limit law enforcement.

>Fascism is a superstate
Fascism is a type of government and does not denote size in any way. Leftists goverments have historically created THE LARGEST states in the history of modern civilization. You are either severely naive or haven't read any books by communists. Lenin himself said in State and Revolution that the purpose of communism was to replace every natural aspect of a person's life with the state. That includes, god, family, "tradition" etc. It is the exact opposite of traditionalism.

Attached: 1531747007876.png (644x598, 120K)

And you clearly havent read the founding documents of Fascism. It is entirely about putting the state above the individual. "Everything for the state nothing outside the state" is the fascist motto. Yes, Communism was obviously about creating a strong state as well. That does not mean creating communist economic structures cant also exist alongside a traditional society.

lol

>IT WASN'T REAL COMMUNISM
KEK

Founding documents? You mean books by people like Sorel? Before WW1? Most certainly not. I think you're going off of hearsay for that one. Otherwise list what you mean. I'm tired and can't guess, especially since you thought Orwell was a communist and somehow don't think leftist socialism leads to communism, whether it be fast or slow. National socialism is literally what it sounds like you want unless you are just trolling or something. Don't think Hitler necessarily, look into Codreanu. I mentioned him before but you obviously didn't look because you responded to me with

>Exactly we need to take Communist economic policy with traditional social policy

Makes no sense.

>more women being married to the state is great for men goys!

state will not provide anything, it's a parasite feeding on the work done by others, wasting the produced wealth, taking money from intelligent and successful and giving it to muslims, single mothers, welfare queens and other trash, while talking half of it in the process, and making it worse for everyone. state institutions perform many times worse than the private ones which is catastrophic on a global scale, just like allocation of resources done by braindead officials instead of the market. it's all been shown in practice numerous times, yet there are still retards believing in some comunist utopia. no one forbids you to find some commie workers, chip in and start a company where you own the means of production, but it will fail, because blue collar brainlets have no idea how to run a company. not that commie trash would ever establish something without stealing it from somebody else. what we have now is not even capitalism, it's socialism feeding on the wealth produced by capitalism, e.g. the state taking over half of the earnings, countless regulations that make it extremely difficult to enter the market, which favors big established corporations, etc. seems like it's not enough for you that mohameds rape your women on the streets, you want commissar Jamal declare your bedroom a common good of the commune.

Attached: 1.jpg (1280x720, 216K)

absolutely, because those corporation don't hold me at a gunpoint