The post has nothing to do with Trump. I don't even like other liberals getting triggered by two scoops of ice scream or mean tweets or whatever. I care about policy and that's how I would oppose Trump.
The post was just to show that the notion that liberals care more about feelings than facts is nonsense. Conservatives are more driven by their feelings than any other group.
Tyler Sullivan
Id argue zealotry is the real issue. Pick a side and support blindly.
Tyler Morris
Sage
Liam Morgan
Seems about right.
Every group has their blind spots. Liberals think people of color get shot by the police because they saw a few videos of policy brutality. Conservatives think ANTIFA is a serious threat because they saw a few videos on fox news.
Landon Gutierrez
*disproportionally shot by police I meant that they think they get disproportionally shot by police even though when you look at the evidence and include different crime rates that's not the case.
Leo Clark
Sage
In all fields boys
Eli Cooper
>REEEEEEEEE these facts trigger my fee fees REEEEEEEEEE gotta censor the librul because HE is the ones against free speech REEEEEEE
Adrian Gutierrez
Know what matters more than what you say? What you do.
Ayden Turner
>Saging is censorship being this new
Jaxon Rodriguez
also stop using a memeflag
Isaac Mitchell
>The Investigative Fund >Our investigations have appeared in a wide variety of outlets, from major print magazines such as The New York Times Magazine, Wired, Cosmopolitan and Vice to independent magazines such as Harper’s, The Nation and The New Republic, to digital outlets such as the Highline, Slate and the Intercept, to regional publications including The Texas Observer, Virginia Quarterly Review and The Chicago Reader and broadcasters such as ABC News, NPR and PBS.
lol at your sources
Robert Ortiz
Who cares where the investigations have appeared? That has nothing to do with how reliable the data these outlets decided to publish is. That's like me saying that the PEW poll results of what muslims believe around the world are invalid because they were mentioned on fox news.
Zachary Flores
sage also >most of them being sjw sites
Tyler Price
>cuckistani get out
Levi Thomas
>Wrong. The data shows that the far-right is more violent than the left
False. These stats are gerrymandered. You fake news, OP and so are most of your sources.
It's just surveys and stats, some of them posted on sites that like the results, which is irrelevant on whether the data is reliable.
Post data that shows the opposite and then we'll see.
SJWs will say the same thing if you post data they don't like. >"this data was posted on right-wing sites, clearly it's wrong!"
Gavin Diaz
fake news stats big boy. Most of those assertions have no solid source, ive looked. 99% chance liberals commit more crime just due to racial demographics but those stats arent tracked. Your links are fake news propaganda
Evan Collins
>facts don't care about your feelings >the facts you posted trigger me, so clearly they are gerrymandered, even though I have no evidence whatsoever that they are.
>Wrong. Liberals are more likely to be fired because of their views than conservatives >niskanencenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/FreeSpeech6.png This says liberals are more likely to be fired for their speech but it completely ignores that statistically conservatives are more likely to be discriminated against for their views (in both hiring and promotions). This causes conservatives to be very careful about what they say publicly. Source: yoelinbar.net/papers/political_diversity.pdf
Elijah Roberts
>fascists hate freedom
Wow, what a surprise. Who could've seen that one coming?
>we hire jews here, do you have a problem with that? >FUCK THE JEWS THE HOLOCAUST WAS FAKE LIKE THE MOON LANDING! >doesn't get the job >THIS IS DERSCIMERATION!
Those media websites can't be trusted to be objective. They frame information a certain way, or straight up omit stuff.
These outlets are agenda driven. They publish these things if it advances their narrative. When it comes to left vs right, we know what they want their readers to think.
