The British Empire

>Daily reminder everyone would be happier if the British empire still existed

True or false?

Attached: the-british-empire-7-638.jpg (638x479, 102K)

Honestly the world would be a better place if the East India Company were allowed full rights to dominate the globe

Attached: 640px-Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_(1707).svg.png (640x378, 5K)

Numbers don't lie tbqhwy.

true but if the empire was smaller as in Britain only having the strategic colonies of hong kong, Singapore, aden and Belize etc.
this means that britian doesnt have to deal with so many uncivilized people, white colonies have greater deal of autonomy and the west has foot holds into shitholes allowing for a greater spread of western ideas and the creation of a pax west with america and britian being able to work together as the world police.

The great tragedy of history is the gradual nationalisation of the EIC

Attached: robert-clive-1st-baron-clive-plassey-meeting-mir-jafar-after.jpg (2400x1870, 754K)

Attached: GDP_per_capita_of_India_(1820_to_present)(3).png (728x402, 1.12M)

Attached: 640px-1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA (640x381, 55K)

t. Paki

Attached: View-Storm.jpg (1024x576, 130K)

Vae victis

Infrastructure though.

Britain wouldn't have been able to hold onto India if the EIC wasn't disbanded because Dalhousie's reforms/ Indian mutiny put the death nail into the quick decline of the company.

then again if it wasn't for the EIC Britain wouldn't have its famous imperial mustaches and architecture. British culture = privatised India and that's not a problem.

They made sure no infrastructure developed, that's why 90 percent of the country was in the 1600 in 1947
Word bong, that's why I support the destruction of anglos

Considering the only working railway in India was built by the British it is true.

Things happened for something, however. UK crashed geopolitically following WW2. And now their government misses so much its previous peoples that they've decided to import them

Attached: 1530913483716.png (1206x574, 14K)

>They made sure no infrastructure developed
????
Look at all the railway lines user.

I shit you not part of the reason for the Indian mutiny (for the local villages not the sepoys) was because Britain built to many railways and the locals hated trading with other villages.

>muh railway
India paid 5x of what is was supposed to cost and the railway wasn't a gift it was a means of exploitation, Britain can take it back when they pay us back our ww1 and ww2 debts

Your whole idea of Indian wouldn't even exist if the British didn't conquer all the petty Muslim Kingdoms ruling you all

Attached: india.jpg (275x183, 12K)

Nationalisation of the company happened long before the mutiny and is arguably what caused it

Attached: 6-EIsaleroomreduced.jpg (1024x777, 182K)

BRITISH GAVE INDEPENDENCE TO PRINCELY STATES NOT TO A UNITED INDIA, INDIA WAS CREATED BY INDIANS

Attached: Maurya_Dynasty_in_265_BCE.jpg (656x543, 118K)

I should say started long before

>replying to baits

True

should've just named them all mohammed desu

as with every thing in history I agree and disagree. before the mutiny nationalisation was bad with the crown representatives on the companies board influencing the Bengal presidency and choosing Dalhousie despite his bad track record (he nearly caused a rebellion in Canada) but the quick nationalisation after the rebellion and the anti-intervention guidelines it set for it self enabled the raj to have what success it did have.

The board is basically just bait, a man needs to pass his time

GDP is a meme, especially going back to those dates. There's plenty of strong arguments you could make GDP is not one of them.

Are you monetizing poo on the streets?

>Honestly the world would be a better place if the East India Company was allowed to spread 19th century degeneracy across the globe

Fuck off Jewish slave

>employment of street cleaners

True, but they should never have got into that situation in the first place

>he called me a jewish slave
Wew

This too, EIC is how the Jews made a bulk of their money

~******~~~~~~~~REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER *****~~~~~~~~~~

THE JEWS WOULD HAVE NEVER BECOME SO POWERFUL IF NOT FOR INDUSTRIAL BR*TAIN

THE JEWS WERE PERSECUTED AND BANNED ALL ACROSS EUROPE EXCEPT INDUSTRIAL BR*TAIN

THE JEWS HELD ALMOST ALL THE POWER IN THE BR*TISH EMPIRE AND MANY ARISTOCRATIC LINES WERE PART JEWISH BY BLOOD

ISRAEL WOULD NOT EXIST IF NOT FOR BRITAIN. THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE DEGENERATE POST MODERNIST WITHOUT BRITAIN.

GENOCIDE THE ANGLOS ON THE DAY OF THE ROPE


~******~~~~~~~~REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER *****~~~~~~~~~~

most of them are really serious tho, according to them the colonized world in 1950 before its independance was a paradise and on par with the rest of the western world, lke colonialism was a sort of humanitarian expedition.

They're really mentally ill.

Cringe

>Muh cost too much money
>Muh exploitation
The amount of wealth that those railways have allowed more than accounts for any talk of slight overcharging initially. The 100+ year old infrastructure is still being used today, such was the quality of engineering.

They're mostly American or ill read anglos, what they don't realize is they stole precious metals out of our temples and tombs leave alone giving us anything

>cringe

Attached: 1533046889628.jpg (1500x1000, 617K)

What about the Raj?
The idea that this was just a bunch of muh evil anglos on a throne surrounded by starving Indians is not historically correct.

The war on the middle east was fought on the back of indian soldiers i can go on and on, Britain never made a postive dent in the Indian economy we had a famine every alternate year, we haven't had a single famine after independence

I guess we're all living in a golden era devoid of degeneracy because of the marvels of engineering

kike drone. Not even a level 1 redpill.

Indians where starving, burning, stealing and killing each other long before the British arrived.

What are you babbling about?
I was replying to a point about 'the brits did nothing for infrastructure' which is clearly not true/

Imperialism is wrong. We Europeans should rule over our homelands in our interests, as should all other peoples on the planet. India for Indians, putting Indian interests first.

>right back atcha
Nice

>we had a famine every alternate year
What were the root causes of that though?

Doubtful

>libertarian
>supports imperialism

>(((East India Company)))
No Thanks

Anglos

Attached: quote-africa-is-still-lying-ready-for-us-it-is-our-duty-to-take-it-it-is-our-duty-to-seize-cecil-rho (850x400, 74K)

what about political unity and democracy, the rule of law, railways, English education, tea, cricket and even India itself

Attached: 2905911-Cecil-Rhodes-Quote-If-there-be-a-God-I-think-he-would-like-me-to.jpg (3840x2160, 420K)

You realize that the dollar has lost almost x30 times its original value the last 100 years right? That graph is retarded. So in essence, even after you left the UK, your GDP has been more or less the same?

I hope this isn't the case.

>Majority of the empire is not white

Attached: rhodes-quote-by-cecil-rhodes-316693.jpg (900x600, 45K)

yes it was the Anglos who burned there own crops, farmed large animals like elephants that require tones of food, worship the most productive farm animal and had entire regions grow only dyes.

You cannot into maths, reverse search that image

Pretty sure it actually was though.

Your bants are kinda lame for a Br*t.

Still you have to come to terms with the fact that Br*tain has always been a non country since it's inception.
Br*tish ethno-nationalism has never existed for this reason. Not even as E*glish ethno-nationalism. Br*tain was always a wasteland for foreign elites to rule over.

Attached: quote-remember-that-you-are-an-englishman-and-have-consequently-won-first-prize-in-the-lottery-of-li (850x400, 56K)

What happened after the anglos left?

the graph shows that for 30 years after independence you basically sat on your hands, wtf. Your GDP PP should be over 10,000 if you knew how to run shit.

stupid third worlder the idea of nationalism and even the knowledge that railroads can even exist are a gift waaahhh the big mean brits didn't build their tracks where we wanted

nah, Mughal lords where retarded

pretty accurate description of Jow Forums tbqh

GDP is a retarded meme and shouldn't' be taken seriously by anyone. Also, why are you posting graphs without any proper context or information around it?

>Still you have to come to terms with the fact that Br*tain has always been a non country
First time I've ever heard England or Britain called a non-country.

And by a Canadian at that. Kek. Remind me again when Canada was founded? 1850? If that...

you had wars with china and genocide every Bangladeshi and Pakistani.

Time moves on, nothing stays the same for ever

Attached: quote-let-us-therefore-brace-ourselves-to-our-duties-and-so-bear-ourselves-that-if-the-british-winst (850x400, 79K)

False it was used as a way to spread globalism and with it the jews made a fortune.

Anglos destroyed the oldest known culture in the world that spawned in the Indus valley and replaced it with Poo-outside-loo in slumvilles.

You invented Atheism. You gave rise to Judaical supremacy.
Br*tish pride and jingoism was just another tool to manipulate your pleb ancestors into doing the Hebrew's bidding.

Godamn I hate Br*ts.

While I'm proud to have been part of the Founding Fathers' great experiment, I think we can clearly admit it's been a failure. Republics are just one of those ideas that sound great on paper, but just will not work in reality.

Attached: 42c56584e530a9c86f9c679404454f6a.jpg (500x375, 36K)

They have been weak and will always be weak. The Indian mindset never changes, heck they weren't even able to conquer more land like China did. What a bunch of pussies and failures.

Wrong

lol still mad

Attached: Battle-of-Quebec.jpg (1200x793, 213K)

You mean the same culture that burned widows alive and engaged in tribal warfare into the 18th century?

This the British Empire was the NWO in its prototype stage, it only when jews went full retard and decided to off whites rather than wait for them to conquer the world then kill them off is why the empire collapsed.

Attached: 4de63dbf4338b3e069d31d859616e65e.jpg (1600x1200, 144K)

Lmao
whatever you say chang

Attached: 1533267300923.png (565x486, 461K)

There's no pre-set notion for what will or will not work. It's completely dependent on circumstance, and it should be pretty obvious looking at the most famous example of a republic that what works in, let's say, 500 BC may not work in 50 BC.

We got into socialism we're still socialist country
>flag
That's anglo propaganda

No it isn't. Widows were burned on pyres until the British made it illegal. You may as well still do it.

poos have always been slaves..
डच Dutch इंडिया 1605-1825
डेनिश Danish भारत 1620-1869
फ्रांसीसी French भारत 1668-1954
पुर्तगाली Portuguese भारत 1505-1961
कासा दा Casa da इंडिया 1434-1833
पुर्तगाली ईस्ट इंडिया Portuguese East कंपनी Company 1628-1633
ब्रिटिश British भारत 1612-1947
अक्साई चिन 1962
रूसी Russian भारत 1948-1991
इज़राइली Israeli इंडिया 1991-2018

This kills the Poo in the Loo shill:

Attached: india 2.jpg (722x900, 200K)

Guess who made that failure? Yep, Br*tain.

A non country cannot spawn a real country. That's how the real world works.

>First time I've ever heard England or Britain called a non-country.
Being surrounded by other deluded Br*ts probably doesn't help.

>Scotts/Irish/Celtic/Anglo/Saxons mutts dominated by Normans/Jewish/German elites.

Woah, what a cohesive country

Attached: 23412536.png (639x360, 268K)

Fuck off leaf

t.

Attached: 1530525662859.png (644x800, 174K)

based and redpilled

you have actually. Also
>India is currently home to a quarter of all undernourished people worldwide,

You also can't explain how the Anglo is responsible for the famines or account for why you were repeatedly having them before we even arrived

>flag
That is kind of Ironic coming from you, Poo, isn't it?

This too ^^^^
If it wasn't for that, India would have been floundering today quite obviously. And it wasn't like the entire culture was steamrolled either, you can't say that for many other empires.

Yeah it was all just a coincidence, keep telling that to yourself while pakis wipe you off history

We're talking about shit barbaric cultures?

I wonder what culture genocided their 'fellow' Aryans because they threatened the (((chosen people))).

Attached: gw_hum_dresden-bombing_770x510.jpg (770x510, 102K)

Bangaldesh talking about a failed country is quite ironic

It was significantly Jewish. Draw your own conclusions from the fact.

You can draw a circle around a small area of North-Western Europe & within that small circle you'd have enclosed the homelands of every immigrant group that arrived to the British Isles in all of history. The Britons, the Angles, Saxons, Frisians, Jutes, Normans and Danes...

That's a hell of a lot more cohesive than Canada, trying to keep a country of British, French, Asian and African together. At the very least, no matter how bad Britain ever got, there would always be a historical precedent for who the natives of the country are and what they looked like.

Canada is up for grabs by which ever nationality or ethnicity can gain the most political sway through numbers.

>da jooz

Attached: 1531414372496.png (625x773, 143K)

India calling other countries a failed country

Attached: hahahaha.jpg (250x250, 7K)