What's so wrong with socialism? Free healthcare and college sounds like a nice deal. Every other 1st world country takes care of their citizens. Why don't we?
What's so wrong with socialism? Free healthcare and college sounds like a nice deal...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Be sure to sage.
fuck off shill
Look at us and you will know why
>hurr durr everything is free
Only 30 trillion dollars out of the tax payers pay check.
Under capitalism we are forced to slave away for their imported shitskin labor. Paying their welfare hoping one day they will turn out human
Niggers.
"Free"
Taxation is theft
Only the rope for the statist
Sounds like a nice deal when you have a small, wealthy, homogeneous, WHITE nation
When you have hordes of blacks/arabs/mexicans who don't contribute to the system, pay few taxes, pop out ten kids and are a net drain for resources then it becomes unsustainable and collapses
0 for 12. Hardly a hearty embrace. Once again, media confuses "retarded shitskins in New York" with "America"
TANSTAAFL
>socialism is sustainable
Top kek
The reason we can’t pay for everybody’s health care in college and what not is because we spend more money on the military than that shit. And our military exist to be the military and pretty much every other country because they want us to do all the dirty work for them so they can sit on their asses and enjoy socialism Neetbux.
If America stop defending those nations and announce that they would never ever ever do anything to protect them, meaning those countries would have to have their own military, all of those gibs in Denmark would go away overnight
You got too much niggers for socialism.
Too much of the US economy is dependent on war and the defense industry. Remove what we spend on the military and the US would collapse
Why do you want the government to have that much control over you and your resources?
Did you know that rich people sway policy decisions at twice the rate of the rest of the population? You are wanting to hand a reliance on vital services into the hands of an organization you EXPLICITLY cannot control.
>Free healthcare and college sounds like a nice deal.
Silence while the Great Anonno cogitates. The Great Anonno is forming a mental picture.
The Great Anonno can reveal that...
OP is less than 20 years old!
The Great Anonno has spoken.
>What's so wrong with socialism?
>Free healthcare and college sounds like a nice deal.
This is why you can never convince a communist socialist because these people are arguing in a ground of utopia while we are arguing in a ground of reality, yes it would be great but is it possible without straining the government budget? Is it possible without massive hunger as seen in all countries that implemented socialism? No one is arguing capitalism is perfect but it's better for a few to be hungry and then we find a way to help then than an entire country starving reduced to trash eating and cannibalism where no one can help anyone else.
>Free healthcare and college sounds like a nice deal.
free helicopter rides seem like a nice deal as well.
Why would you ever want to bridge any social divides of your populace, one ponders
thre's no such thing as FREE healthcare, you pay for all that shit with your taxes and extremely low wages, same for any other FREE thing you think socialism gives you. funny how people escapes from socialism by crossing borders and climbing walls to evil countries like the united states but never the other ways around.
Capitalism is the worst economic system there is, except for all the others
Isn't there liked dead cheap city colleges? Why are the numbers conflated like "everyone has to get to Yale for free"?
Isn't there a way to lower healthcare cost tremendously? We know most of the cost are accrued in the last 10% of life. So shouldn't America dime everybody who is overweight and has a bad lifestyle to those who don't?
I can say "housing for everyone" and mean a shipping container made for mid-term living, but for some reason everybody is thinking about at 10 room beachfront.
Somehow the honesty in discussions got lost.
You're right, but we need to kick out the minorities first.
Socialism only works in white countries. Case in point Sweden. They've had years of successful socialism but after accepting rapefugees they can't even afford to put out their own wildfires
Welfare state is not synonymous with socialism. European countries are not socialist. Get this through your thick fucking heads
It's not free if someone else is paying for it, you fucking ignorant commie cocksucker. Fuck off to Faggotville, already. All fields, Anons. Spice this shit.
> Real communism has never been tried #192y7912819-2-2
Roosevelt literally forced it onto them post WW2.
No you fucking idiot, socialism involves taking control of private businesses and sometimes you end up with a shitshow that is Venezuela. Welfare state was basically Bismarck's idea and it does not involve socialism.
promising free stuff is exactly how socialists gain power.
but they cannot deliver on these insane promises.
The free stuff system can only last so long before it collapses. and when it does, the socialists remain in charge, and then the real suffering begins for the people.
sometimes socialists simply ignore their promises and do whatever thy want when they gain power.
Every single argument against socialism is just skirting around saying it doesn't work when a large percent of your population is niggers
Socialism doesn't work in third world countries when you have more takers than contributors.
Too many spics and niggers.
White-only nation first, and then we can afford socialism.
Until then, get bent.
Free healthcare, education and social security work in high-trust, homogeneous societies only. Europe's model will be a thing of the past very soon
Who says Democrats are embracing socialism? Aside from single-payer healthcare and Community College tuition, what's socialism is being espoused? This chick won a primary in a district the size of your thumb by a few thousand votes where turnout was incredibly low. Also take into account how more than 70% of Americans can't even name their congressman and how the district had changed demographically over the last decade. The Hispanic electorate voted for a name they recognized.
This narrative that socialism is coming for the Democratic party is nonsense. Most Democrats aren't socialists. They are mainstream center and center left-liberals...at least once you stay off the internet for a few hours.
Socialism absolutely works. In white homogeneous countries. Any large grouping of non whites always leads to its inevitable failure and the decline of said country. The "Nordic" model literally and irrefutably proves this.
You don't even have to say white, it just requires homogeneous populations, unless the population is a bunch of knuckle-draggers who can't implement ANY government beyond big man dictatorships
Socialism hinges on sympathizing with your fellow citizen so you are not motivated to first, abuse the system if you are a recipient, or second, to continue to pay into it if you are wealthy. Successful socialism is very nationalist in character.
yeah all we need is an 80% income tax
fuck off
I for one believe socialism could be a viable perhaps, better alternative to capitalism. However it would need to be implemented according to strictly conservative principles.
Like fascism but less militarised
Except it has been tried in non white countries, over and over. They do not have the concept of personal honour not to grovel for gibs and be lazy fucks.
Socialism is supposed to be about a brotherhood of man to assist each other - an enlarging of the tribe to encompass all of your genetic similarity who would be your brother and values your people advancing. That ideology is not found outside white people in practice only in speech. Even Jews with their heavy in group preference still rort and steal from each other constantly and cannot survive unless they maintain there parasitic relationship with whites.
>Sounds like a nice deal when you have a small, wealthy, homogeneous, WHITE nation
Even then it's not sustainable, don't kid yourself. The only reason European countries can have so many socialist policies is because the US has taken on the role of protector.
IF YOU THINK SOCALISM IS GOOD YOU NEED TO WATCH THIS VIDEO SKIP TO 2:00 youtube.com
Socialism is great as long as you dont have niggers and jews in the country, then its fucked.
That bitch looks like a reptile kike.
>whats wrong with socialism
hitler
>hitler was about racism and not 1%
who is 1% (oh ya kikes)
>socialism works great for european countries like germany norway and sweden
All three countries live in political systems derived from hitler's national socialism and are populated for the most part by the aryan master race.
>why dont we take care of our citizens?
Cause we spend all our money trying to teach spic kids english and funding foriegn graduate students with families to study here and have health care.
How about we stop wasting money on shit skins and kike wars so that we can foster the aryan race....
I want socialism, National Socialism. Those 1% faggots are just an inch from going full 1488
>we can't go too far left too soon they'll figure us out
Sage
Socialism only works if you have a homogenous white, or even Asian, population. Not a culturally enriched society whose interests revolve around their own races.
Bait post so sage.
That being said I trust an anti-NWO socialist over most Republicans.
>free
>Free
There's that word again.
Former Acasio voter here. its was really fun and the whole healthcare thing was amazing but seriously, we cant give this girl the nuclear codes.
Do I get free housing when I go to college? Can I just go to college forever?
>Free health care.
Fucking retard.
Literally the definition of academia.
Yeah, free market and stuff.
Hey doctor, who about making 20% less but we guarantee a 10h shift max, no overtime, no overbooking, trained nurses and a different model how we treat people. Are you in with this?
And then let doctors decide if they want the deal or not.
All the Jow Forums neets should go into Academia
Communist Control Act 1954. All it would take was a single Congress member to contact the feds to start arresting politicians under this Act which has been active since 1954. They could completely remove the left.