Area 51 - HACKED

Are voting machines connected to the internet? I would assume no. So, can someone explain how to hack them and change votes. Maybe im just too small braines

>hacking paper ballots
wew really makes me think

OP status: hacked
i discovered ur true identity

Attached: tacka tacka i'm in.png (1651x781, 118K)

DELET THIS

Attached: ABSOLUTE_WHAT.gif (220x188, 288K)

Yeah this isn't a new story, check out blackboxvoting.org , whenever voting machines and tabulators are independently audited - as in, literally every time it's been done - they turn out to be insecure. Often the hacks can be done in undetectable ways too due to the absence of proper auditing.

Attached: nedroid hacking.png (800x1049, 118K)

childs play to hack websites which announce the vote total and thereupon winner, not to hack the voting machines and alter vote count.
heard this all over normie radio yesterday.
reports like such are designed to preemptively embed false memories which become false positives at a later date, it is predictive programming which creates narratives before time in the social psyche, and in the mind of the true believer they will likely stay true no matter what evidence is provided contrariwise.
the hundreds upon hundreds of wee lies are the stitchwork in the fabric of the grand lie, for without them it is a mere rag, with them it is a heavy curtain blocking the light.

Attached: bgwinkletruthings.jpg (678x508, 83K)

TOP KEK

Attached: 1452124280458.jpg (374x497, 25K)

Liberals area the only ones that support voting machines anyway, and only because they know that if they are manipulated, it will be in their favor.

No. Voting machines aren't connected to the internet. In order to hack one you have to have access to the machine and a few minutes to open it up and modify it. You change votes by introducing a replacement that effectively siphons votes off from one side into the other. For example: Every 1 vote for Republican A = 0.95 votes for Republican A, while every 1 vote for Democrat A = 1.05 votes for Democrat A. So if you imagine a few thousand people use that particular machine, the end result (total votes for each) will be reported as 0.95 vs 1.05 of the actual results, which might be thousands of people. However, you would have to do this to every single machine at a voting location (in person, and not be detected) to "hack" the votes, or at least for that county/area. After the results are reported however, I believe they do use the internet to tally up all of the result from all of the polling/machine locations depending on the state. That reporting system can definitely be hacked, simply because it exists and is online, but I don't know enough about the way it works to say how.

Actual voting systems are vulnerable too :
blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-video/

That's just one example attack, again whenever these systems are examined at DEFCON or whatever new vulnerabilities are found. 1st generation Diebold machines just put the results in an unprotected Access .MDB, current ones aren't *quite* that bad but still can't be trusted, especially since many are literally owned by fucking (((Soros.)))

Of course this is only one source of potential fraud, the Dems might still be relying on the traditional methods of bussing / illegitimate or dead voters / filling in ballots after the centres "close" for the time being.

Attached: stein recount hillary detroit voter fraud leads to voter ID law.jpg (1800x266, 93K)

> In order to hack one you have to have access to the machine and a few minutes to open it up and modify it

False, for current gen machines the election fixers just need to infiltrate rogue poll workers. Then there are attacks that work via the removable media these machines use to transport the voting records.

DAS RAY CIS

I agree.
Alex Jones had Bev Harris on about that fraction magic backdoor. she's been outing vote rigging for like 30 years or some such.
the report however on the hacking conference had fuck all to do with any of that, as you would expect, rather it served as an organ replant the notion that the up coming vote is vulnerable, thus confidence undermining, and also used to take a shite on Trump as the place was full of lefties having at him and the administration.

>Voting machines that don't even have a network connection are less secure than a website

Attached: 6dc.png (914x1208, 131K)

>hacking an election
Okay queermos you can't HACK an election. It's a non sensual statement. That's like saying you broke into Hanukkah. What you can do is "hack" the website data of an electoral campaign or figure out John Podesta's password and catch him using known FBI pedophile code language to talk about little girls ages 5, 9, and 11 coming over to go swimming.

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 21K)

>guys I deleted Donald drumpfy from showing up on www.election com and put my own name! I'm the president now

T. 11 yo boomer

HMMMM FUNNY I DON'T REMEMBER SEEING THIS WIDELY REPORTED BACK IN DECEMBER 2016 HMMMMMMMMMMM

This shit is why when I was undercover in 2016 I told everyone I was voting for Jill Stein. I actually do like her the Green party platform is just too retarded.

If you're free that day you can volunteer to be an independent election observer to make sure no funny business occurs. You can witness the entire day's events and keep your eye on the machines all the way until the votes are tallied. I drove in the car with the vote safe to the counting site last time I did it. The poll workers didn't seem to mind but it was in a solidly red district in a blue state, so they probably targeted their tricks to more evenly split districts and solidly blue districts.

>a non sensual statement
OK then count me out.