Gay rights or islam pol?

Give me Islam.
The fags are disgusting creatures that need to be stopped. The muslims however... know the proper handling of women and got some seriously nice hashish. Also they hate jews.
Remember kids:
Not all jews are gays, but all gays are jews.

Attached: 1534068615997.webm (768x576, 2.93M)

Fags blow each other
Muslims blow up
Is it even a question?

>all gays are jews
I'm a bi non-jew.
You lose.

if I can have Aryan, far right, non degenerate gays at my side to fight with me against barbarians and heretics, I choose gay rights.

Islam without a doubt. It's everything Jow Forums stands for, while faggots are everything Jow Forums hates. And I'm not even Alt-Right.

Attached: Pic.jpg (957x1024, 210K)

Well behaved fags > Goatfuckers > Fruity flamboyant faggots

>If you have a problem with what two consenting adults do with each other being closed doors

Attached: be tolerant.jpg (800x698, 84K)

Oh look, a retard cherry picking arguments.
How nice.

Attached: 1522559446653.png (563x517, 79K)

Neither. Typical Jewish tactics is to present us with (2) opposing choices as if they are the only options.

>2 consenting adults
>2
>uses pic featuring child

The one on the left seeks to make the one on the right a consent-giver to a great many things.

Gays. The queers have contributed. Classical fags, not the Final days of Rome butt-noshers we see on our 'tolerant' media. Islam is just trouble everywhere it goes.

False dichotomy, but honestly I would choose Islam, since the people following it can be converted, but you can't convert faggots into being straight

Do you really think before meeting that drag queen that kid wasn't bent as your elbow?

bump2

The point is that "two consenting adults behind closed doors" is just the thin end of the wedge. Nobody pushes that argument in good faith. They don't keep it behind closed doors, and they go after children. You tolerate "consenting adults behind closed doors" and soon you get pride parades, anti-discrimination laws, and people telling you it's a hate crime to say there's something wrong with prepubescent boys being dressed up like whores and passed around at sodomite gatherings.

Anyway, there are many things that we don't permit two consenting adults to do behind closed doors. What consenting homosexuals do behind closed doors is spread disease.

Take the AIDS epidemic, for instance. The heterosexual population is like charcoal, the homosexual population is like lighter fluid, and Patient Zero is the match carelessly tossed into the grill. Without the lighter fluid, the match would smoulder and the fire would die, but with it, soon the charcoal is burning away. When there are lots of HIV-positive people around, you don't even have to be promiscuous, you can get pricked with a needle or get into a fight.

That is a prepubescent child.

There's no such thing as gay children. Prepubescent children are non-sexual and need to be protected from any kind of involvement in sexual or fetish activity, while teenagers going through puberty are trapped between raging hormones and immature, still-growing brains, so they're easily confused and need to be protected from exposure to deviant sexuality until they reach full maturity.

Gay rights of course, how is it even comparable.
One is about granting people rights based on compassion, other is about instilling the will of some religious nuts on the others.

seriously considering moving to a new life in Saudi

it'll be nice to fulfill my birth right of owning a women instead of lowering myself to pretend to be her equal and therefore being her cuck.

islam

Can I go back to having Mexicans please?

HIV began among straight people and remained a straight people issue for decades. The reason why it can spread easily between men who have sex with men is that male couples don't have to worry about pregnancy, so they had (and still have) less incentive to use protection.

>HIV began among straight people
That's why they called it GRID when it was first discovered, right? You know, "Gay-Related ImmunoDeficiency"? This is a real thing. This is what it was initially named, because it was mainly a gay disease until it was so widespread among gays that the limited contact through bisexuals, gay rapists, blood donations, and needle-sharers spread it widely into the straight population.

pick us bros. contrary to Jow Forums belief muslims are not a monolithic single-minded group. pakistani and indian muslims are disgusting and way too retarded/religious with a 70IQ. turks are generally more secular but turkey as a nation is a disgrace and erdogan can get fucked. a turk would be a decent muslim to hang around usually. the best muslims are arab. lebanese, palestinians are usually easily assimilate into the west and are good friends of greeks and italians. syrians are ok, iraqis are a mix. despite having a corrupt and violent government, i've found that most saudis are actually pretty decent and chill guys that just want to spend money and enjoy life but are conservative. persians are barely religious and most of them in the west are christian, atheist, or larp as zoroastrian. egyptians are very diverse so some of them are retarded some are great. the northern coastal ones produce a lot of good culture and egypt is basically arab hollywood, or used to be. sudanese women are breathtakingly gorgeous, most beautiful of all africans because they are eastern african not bantu congolese. tunisians are a lot like egyptians.
as you can see islam doesn't describe the entire society/nation. some muslim societies are good, some are a disgrace. european muslims would probably get along well with levant and gulf arabs and turks, but not africans and asian muslims. just like how there's an enormous difference between a greek orthodox christian in athens and a baptist in alabama.

Astronomy
Algebra
The concept of Zero
All of your mathematical notation

Nothing in the last couple centuries though.

Fags.
If you force fags into hiding then they continue to breed and spread faggotry.
If you let fags fuck eachother then their genetic disorder dies out in a few generations.

Muzzies have literally no place in white nations.

This.

Islam is the only choice for thinking people.

The question is stupid, of course. "Do you want to be shot to death or stabbed to death? You have to choose one."

Gay rights.
Most faggots are alright.
Trans-demons and the corruption of children are seperate issues.
Fuck Islam to it's very core though. My contempt for those scarf-wearing shit-houses goes beyond anything else in this world.

Attached: Pic.jpg (957x1024, 210K)

this.
your an idiot OP.

You've been brainwashed with some slops. Take this pill: youtube.com/watch?v=q9ZSII3qADI

lol none of this is true

I don't have to accept either. They both get the rope

There's no question that it first popped up in Central Africa (probably the Congo) around 1920.

All muslim progress was made a few decades after the (((burning))) of Alexandria.
Really makes you think huh?

> we wuz scientists for thousands of years
> contribution to civilization
Nothing in the last couple centuries though.
Dont think about it too much goyim

That is a much-disputed hypothesis. It wasn't discovered and studied until 1981, so its origins are a matter of speculation. When they found it, it was widespread only among gays, and the much smaller populations of needle-sharing drug addicts (many of whom were also gay, or at least had gay sex for money) and hemophiliacs (who had no choice but to receive transfusions to survive).

Funny how this disease that supposedly started in 1920 and "began among straight people" was found sixty years later almost entirely in gays. Do you think there aren't men who have sex with men in Africa? Africans are more promiscuous and indiscriminate in general, as well as being more aggressive and inclined to rape. They've got more than their fair share of MSMs.

First of all, that was almost exclusively Persian who were scientists, secondly, almost all of them were persecuted for their beliefs and thirdly, to be a bit specific, Al-Razi, the biggest "Muslim" scientist, wrote 3 books on how Islam was a terrible religion, so no, crediting anything these great men did is ridiculously dishonest to their own beliefs and giving Islam the credit it does not deserve

The area where it started was undergoing urbanization and probably had a lot of prostitution in the growing town at the time.

Yes, I've read the Wikipedia article too. Not only is it speculation, but it's politically biased because any researcher who blamed gays for its transmission from animals to the human population would have their career destroyed politically.

They're carefully avoiding blaming gays, just like European cops who must profess to be mystified at crime rates rising with the migrant population or be fired for racism, or educators who must never suggest that there's an inherent difference in ability between the sexes when attempting to explain differences in STEM achievement.