Racial Nationalists of all sides are stupid. Hitler Inadvertently by marginalizing Jews and other ethnicities and races helped create Israel, and Black nationalists seem to be completely blind to history, otherwise, they would see that almost every culture has had the same amount, if not more of violent incidents, I think most racial nationalists are so because they want to fit into a collective, because they have no greater purpose in their individual lives so they resort to being proud of something they had no control over. It's all a bit silly to me and I could easily see this tying into consumerism as a social behavior. Politically speaking they both rely on tremendous slave morality, they all want to keep themselves in victimhood because they lack any power outside of their own victimhood.
Racial Nationalists of all sides are stupid...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
attackonamerica.net
twitter.com
>Hitler
>Advocating for Conquest
>Nationalist
>Hitler Inadvertently by marginalizing Jews and other ethnicities and races helped create Israel
just like how gamergate made Anita and SJWs like her more powerful by trying to resist them.
Nice kike arguments. Except it was Poland that was killing German minorities. Hitler warned them to stop. It was france and UK that encouraged Poland to continue by giving guarantees. Then France and the UK declared war after Germany protected german minorities. Fuck off kike.
nice selfie, mutt
>10 gorillion germans killed and Gdanzig
Sauce?
((( )))
>killing whites and chauvinist conquest
>policies I agree with
who are you trying to fool, brainlet?
see there you go.
>Hitler's responsible for Bongs creating Israel
Get a load of this mutt
>no u
yeah best to just lay down and let them use your face as a welcome mat for communism.
The powers which made Anita famous will cease with enough resistence.
To resist is still the most logical action. To do otherwise is to let they hold the narrative and ultimately change what they were trying to change.
Gamergate was no small event and it helped the raise of conservative awareness around the western world, even in shitholes like my country.
>turn your country into a non-white shithole or else you are stupid, goy.
hmm, who could be behind this post?
Her powers continue to grow.
Not at all what I suggest, I think you should stand for your own individuality.
Notice how the people that whine about Hitler never seem to be able to mention the USSR, you know the giant communist empire bent on world domination on Europe's doorstep.
>I think most racial nationalists are so because they want to fit into a collective, because they have no greater purpose in their individual lives
Hello Juden Peterstein.
>stand for your own individuality
how
>If you kill communists they win
Thank you, Trudeau.
reject identity politics, basically just reject what others think you should be.
>you're with the nazi or you're with the communists!!!!
Or maybe they're both retarded, defunct ideologies that resulted in million of white deaths.
>Dismember Germany and Austria-Hungary
>Expect the losers of WWI to accept these new treaties
lol, not everyone is a cuck like you, leaf.
>Muh murdurud whytes
>What do you mean by "terror bombings"? That was justified!
Also:
>Event the Entente called the Paris treaties a 20 year old truce
I love when fuckstick Americans and leafs act like they know shit about Euro politics.
Shouldn't you actually agree with me?
>Poles, French, Anglos, Slavs, Benelux
>Commies
and then what? be easily crushed by a collective that's against me?
Just going off your flag, an-caps are for freedom of association and self-ownership m, the exact opposite of ethnonationalism.
>Killing poles, slavs for Lebenstraum settlers
>Invading sovereign countries for no reason but conquest
>Destroying already occupied cities like Warsaw
>Denying Lebenstraum
WE WUZ
By letting non-whites move to your city so they can turn it into a 3rd world shithole.
That is the epitome of individualism.
Yes like I said, reject identity politics and let non-whites flood your country and turn it into a shithole.
Nazis believed in private property and weren't hell bent on spreading communism around the world, so yes they were objectively better than the communists who wanted to abolish property and relegate all people to slavery to the Soviet commissars.
The Germans would ally with anyone willing to help them fight communism see: Italy, Spain, Hungary, Ukrainians, Finns, etc. Contrary to the typical lies they weren't particularly picky on who their allies were.
>I'm a liberalistist
ahahahaha
No, you can still be an individual and work with a group- all you have to have is a group of people who all agree on one thing, but do nit nesecerilly agree on everything, a Union of Egoists.
I'm sure that'll work really well and won't fall apart instantly.
So does neutrality count as as being an enemy? Kys brainlet Lebenstraum denier.
>GOMMUNISM OR HORTLER CHOOSE NOW
Or maybe neither, retard.
All history is the struggle between competing ethnic groups. Hitler helped to delay the kike extermination of Europe by three generations.
>French, Anglos, Benelux
Ah yes, the forgotten Anglocaust, when Germans ate 6 gorillion Anglos and Frenchfags alive and nuked the Benelux countries.
>Slavs
Oy Rabbi, whatcha' doing?
>Hitler Inadvertently by marginalizing Jews and other ethnicities and races helped create Israel
...check the date on this document, israel was in the works way before hitler.
en.wikipedia.org
except your daily lives revolves around different affinity groups, its just individuals acting together in their own self-interest autonomusly.
>t. Cucked individualist who thinks money can defy material reality and magically put together the destroyed earth and mongrelized population of the new world.
The only one ass hurt here is you, you continually shirk responsibility and duty as if it’s below you. That’s why we will win again and again and again. Cry more shill. Also sage
>Denying that Hitler invaded the Benelux for no reason other than to beat France and gibsmedat Alsace-Lorraine
Do you think i give a fuck. Rat?
>Killing Poles
because they were at war/rebelling. You'll notice Germans didn't kill the Slavs (or anyone else) that allied with them.
The only real reason Germany went to war with Poland was because Poland refused to sign their Anti Communist International Act which led to the previous Germany-Poland alliance falling apart.
It was a very important choice that had to be made by the west.
America, France, and the UK chose communism and we are feeling the effects even today with all our countries being invaded by non-whites and turning into total shitholes.
>oy vey goyim Hitler was a jew don’t fight for your own race just marry a have little shitskin mutt babies and accept the NWO
and look where that got us
>Killing Poles
Poles killed Germans too before the war. Even so, German-Pole relations were good until the Frenchfaggots tricked the Poles against Germany
>Invading sovereign countries for no reason but conquest
Literally every German invasion in WWII can be justified you colossal shilling faggot
>brmftf Lebenstraum
Someone watched too much Man in the High Castle
This is a kike shill thread.
>Because they were rebelling
Do rebels include the children in Warsaw who had their infrastructure indiscriminately destroyed?
>They didn't invaded anyone neutral
Hey, Benelux. Fuck you, I need to break the maginot.
Hey, Czechoslovakia, gibs me those factories.
>no u
I have no responsibility for society, besides my own will. This can include people I care for but just because I have some abstract thing in common with someone that doesn't mean I have any responsibility to take care of them, aside from those I care about.directly.
That mostly because of unconscious, egoism, people due to society's many abstractions, you become less than yourself, these many abstractions and social obligations pushed this, this makes generations of 'last men" they are those who just "get by" through life and eventually die, rather than doing anything great due to their placement in the post-modern world.
>INVASION IS GENOCIDE!!!44!
>Germuney should've waited for the french and Anglo troops to invade, like a fucking whiteknight!
Go back sucking dogdicks, leaf
>Gdanzig massacre where 1000 gorillion germans were slaughtered
Sauce?
>Every invasion can be justifed
Please do.
>Denying Lebenstraum
Pic related.
No, I actually don't want race mixing, that would just create more collectivism and conformity, if everyone was the same, considering at that point everyone would be a shitskin.
>Implying countries shouldn't fight back after being invaded
I would love to be an individualist, it's just that 3rd world peasants keep turning all the cities to shit and demanding gibs
>destroying infrastructure
You are crying to the wrong country about that pic related was famous for destroying infrastructure specifically to punish civilian populations. Yet he's still a hero because he saved the Union.
>Benelux
I said they didn't attack their allies. Belgium was not a German ally.
Ignore and do not reply
also, doesn't the new world order very on perspective, and who exactly is bringing about the nwo, example, if Hitler succeeded in killing all the kikes wouldn't that just create another new world order? Don't get we wrong, I'm not ignorant that society is controlled by a handful of people, and they may be largely Jewish, however, those two facts have nothing to do with one another.
>Benelux had to be invaded to take out France
>France declared war on Germany first
>Denmark and Norway was crucial to protect the iron imports from Sweden, Bongs were planning to keep the Germans in check from Norway
>Yugoslavia pretty much betrayed Germany after a coup against the king
>Germany had to help out Italy against Greece, hitler couldn't allow Anglos to fuck Operation Barbarossa up from the Balkans
>War with the SU was inevitable, soviets were getting their troops ready to invade Germany, sooner or later they would've joined the war against the Axis.
You know Hitler worked with Jewish bankers right, acting through the Bush family at the time.
The stormfag is immunized against all dangers, one may call him a revisionist, a brainlet, or a retard. It all goes over him like plane over land. But make a point he can't refute, and you will be astonished at how much he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "JIDF!!!!!"
>These countries neutrality were stamped on for war
>Morally righteous
This is why ethnonationalism is a joke, they're no better than the left.
>If you seize Rothschild's fortune and chase him out of the country you lose
>War with the SU was inevitable
This is what I'll never understand
Did people actual think that the Soviet Union was just going to sit around and never make a move or attempt their own stated goal of establishing world communism? They were literal Marxist-Leninists, they were going to invade eventually.
>he actually believes this bullshit
It did nothing to help,p them if you think these bankers care if they lost some money, they'll just print more. In the long run, it did very little as well.
stalin wasn't, Stalin basically did whatever he wanted regardless of Lenin.
> implying this wasn't a ploy.
Hitler, in my opinion, was a strawman for them to villify, they built him up just to snuff him out as a false flag, By adopting Ethnonationalism, you are doing exactly what they want, they want you to play their game, use their money, and pay your taxes, and fit in. when it comes down to this you are nothing more than a machine for consumption and production.
You don't have any argument beyond "The USSR was great Germany should have never gone to war with them"
>apologizing for Stalin
So Stalin was a great guy according to you despite all the mass murder and defienitely didn't want to spread communism around the world despite being a devout Marxist-Leninist, but Hitler who loudly proclaimed his opposition to international bankers after seizing the estates of international banksters was "just a pranking" them?
please
>strawman
How was he a strawman when he was a literally nationalist who would do whatever it took to defeat communism? What other position did you want him to take? Did you want him to bend over and take it from the USSR without a fight? That seems to be what you are advocating. Not even the US did that.
After WW2 the US almost immediately switched sides and began the Cold War against Russia and allied itself with many ex-National Socialists
>if you accept the hordes of 3rd world savages they force upon you, you win
peanut butter, yay or nay?
>Reee you're with the USSR if not Nazi Germany
Those were the two major sides in the war and the US, UK, France, etc sided with the USSR and communism and totally whitewashed communism's decades of slaughter in the name of abolishing all private property and enslaving everyone on earth to the Bolshevik state.
Keep in mind your idol Juden Peterstein supposedly admires Solzhenitsyn. But what does Solshenytsyin have to say about the USSR?
Forgot memeflag was on.
you understanding of history is nigger teir.
thus OP is a nigger.
They saw both as a threat, but chose to fight fascism first because they were far more aggressive than the Stalin's soviet union, initially. The SU would have invaded Poland again, and the allies would have fought the Soviets in an anti-Comintern war that would be much quicker than WW2. Of course, Nazi Germany fucked up everything by laying claims to literally more than half of Europe and made themselve the bigger threat.
>The allies whitewashed communism
What is the cold war?
>If you don't like Nazism you are for Jordung Peterstone neo-apathy
Strawman much?
No, not at all I hate communism, it again is based on victimization and a perpetual victimization.
You missed the part where I said I wanted borders.
Nope, it really isn't, to me, history is about perspective, none of which is objectively correct.
Its funny how his only argument is reeeee if you're not a fascist you're a commie, just like commie arguments are reeeee you're a nazi if not a commie.
jews cast the first stone. There is a reason the saying "the jew cries out in pain as he strikes you" was created.
You want borders, but don't give a shit about the browning of the nation as long as they come here legally? What's the difference? In the end the United States is still going to be taken over by foreign nationals, culture is informed by ethnicity. Go to any black majority neighborhood and try actually talking to them and see what they believe. You'll find whites and non-whites both live in far different cultures.
Q predicted this
Ok?? Revenge isn't the answer, instead of holding some grudge, you should just outdo them like the Jews did with the Nazis.
When people come here legally through a process, its only people actually want to make themselves great, also I don't disagree that there is a browsing of the nation, my belief is people can co-exist in a society without nesecerilly interbreeding, most people nowadays prefer their own race as a partner and the white women who are with nigs are basically virtue signalling, they're just showing how progressive they are , its psuedo-uniqueness.
How so?
Stop replying to obvious troll threads.
Report them.
It's because their ideas are being challenged, he has no argument but fails to see how pitiful the Nazis were.
Most of this is due to Plantation politics and the breaking up of the family unit by the state, this has little to do with race, and there is no reason positions cannot be switched, and in fact, you have as there are many intelligent niggers, who are capable of being responsible.
* breaking up of they family unit by the state, and feminism.
These are two very collectivist things, feminism and the state, both rely heavily on their own sense of identity.
Why is it always a mutt
Cause its always the same poster ;)
> nothing but insults.