Are Jews the mythical Aryans/Proto-Indo-Europeans?

The PIE reconstructions look suspiciously Jewish.

Attached: Yamna_Man.jpg (1181x886, 226K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mEYqO6kJVpc
youtu.be/eXIbjGYY0cc
biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/06/16/059311.full.pdf
sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin
davidduke.com/rethinking-khazar-theory/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Also Khazars lived in the heart of Yamna/Caucasus region where the Aryan originated.

Attached: khazar-hitt-connection.jpg (1394x1133, 959K)

No. Ashkenazi are Khazarians which have Neanderthal DNA. They are Nehphilim subhumans.

Why do they look exactly like PIE people reconstructions? This is from their DNA.
> Ashkenazi are Khazarians
And Khazaria is based in the North Caucasus, EXACTLY (yes, EXACTLY) where PIE originated.

Attached: 1531736407924.jpg (750x450, 50K)

yamna people aren't aryan, schlomo

Jews fall under the generic category of "West Eurasians" they are basically white regardless of the fact that jews have white identity.

Indo-Europeans were specifically Eastern European Hunter-Gathers/Ancient North Eurasian with some Caucasian admixture. They were still Western Eurasians though.

Modern Ashkenazi Jews are a combination mostly of Levantine Neolithic and Anatolian Neolithic due to mixing with European populations.

Again both populations are almost entirely Western Eurasian.

Attached: 1531011739510.jpg (946x941, 137K)

They are the most probable candidate.

The Yamna were mostly R1b unlike Khazarian Jews who are mostly J1, J2 and E1b1b1 , so the Yamna were mostly like the eternal Anglo. The guy in the pic looks like Oswald Mosley.

what is an aryan?

youtube.com/watch?v=mEYqO6kJVpc

Attached: 1531460713739.png (1234x1154, 1.72M)

Attached: 1520870131641.png (868x1300, 1M)

Attached: 1515864359055.png (700x748, 672K)

Attached: 1524346630577.jpg (1467x1653, 1.73M)

Attached: 1510563916016.jpg (986x2308, 1001K)

Q predicted this

>regardless of the fact that jews have white identity

Meant to say "regardless of the fact that jews HATE white identity"

Anyway you can see the different ancient populations here overlaid by the previous image

Jews are a mix of Levantine Neolithic and Anatolian Neolithic (EEF) with some SHG and ANE/EHG

North Europeans are mostly SHG with some mixture

South Europeans have EEF mostly but also some mixture with EHG/ANE and SHG. It's all quite complicated.

They were Indo-European though.

Sintashta were the specific branch of Indo-Europeans that became Aryans.

see above

Attached: 2fdrZf8.png (1192x1174, 200K)

You're an idiot. Anyone who believes in this "Neanderkike" meme needs to be sterilized.

A synonym for Proto-Indo-European people. A ancient people who domesticated the horse and also conquered all of Europe, Persia, and India in the Early Bronze Age. They had facial features that could only be described as Jewish.

poos

Neanderthals had a wide range and all caucasians are descended from them.

Nope. You're a subhuman khazar neanderthal.

Attached: 1525499034461.jpg (1374x5710, 2.68M)

>Jewlius Caesar

Attached: 9780448480831_mres.jpg (800x1168, 128K)

It's a very stupid meme

All West Eurasians have some Neanderthal DNA, it's nothing to be ashamed of.

you're describing fictional PIE people
Aryans aren't PIE people otherwise they would be PIE people
that's like saying Jews are Africans

Forgot to attach this pic.
Nigger I'm a purebred Anglo-Saxon.
We should be proud of it.

Attached: IMG_7869.png (728x280, 13K)

Technically Aryans were only ever the Eastern Branch of Indo-Europeans that descended from the Sintashta culture

There was a time though when some linguists propsed calling Indo-Euoprean langues "Aryan" languages which is why this is so confusing.

In modern terminology "Aryans" are only Indo-Europeans that comprised the Indo-Iranian langues (which descended from the SIntashta culture) because those are the people that used the term "Aryan".

Attached: sintashta-culture-7b16e64b-1760-4c20-985e-cb188a42c77-resize-750.png (750x436, 119K)

>They had facial features that could only be described as Jewish.
You absolute retard.

The blue eye/blonde hair thing came from theorists in the 19th century because OBVIOUSLY the whitest white people would be the ancient Aryans. With DNA testing, it turned out recently that Yamna/PIE had brown eyes, dark hair and big noses. Fit in like the Greeks, Romans, Jews, whatever - Meds.

>because those are the people that used the term "Aryan"
where is the evidence for that?
you're using 19th century definitions, my brown friend

That’s not a jew nose.

jews are a pre-Aryan race related to Neanderthals and Denisovans as were the Khazars and as are the present day Magyars, and Basques. To a small extent so are some Arabs from genes they inherited from Bactrian and Sumerian ancestors. None of these groups are directly related to each other and jews are the most corrupt, dengerste, psychopathic, and dangerous.

Jews aren't a pre-Aryan race. Jews as a race are about 1900 years old. That's when they diverged from other Mediterranean populations.

Schlomo bagelstein BTFO.
Really just look into Jew origins they're yamna

Ashkenazi jews are virtually a mixture of old Levantine Jews, Italians and Eastern Europeans.

plausible

Look at this map of Khazaria friend It's smack in the middle of PIE land. You are telling me that people who came from PIE land aren't PIE despite looking exactly like PIE?

Attached: Yamna-PIE-nation.png (800x624, 191K)

Do you have more resources on this stuff, particularly Eurasian ethnic groups and stuff? I find it super interesting, particularly the near east + europe

this shit exists because neanderthals nasal cavity is large, but as elephants prove - plaster casing is speculation bullshit. They could of had a tiny upturned nostrils for all we know

Yeah Ashkenazim are even younger as a race.

>5000 yr old phenotypes having anything to do with modern races

Attached: AlexanderTheKek.png (1200x720, 2.45M)

Khazars were Turkic, though, not Indo-European.

Either way Khazars, Turks, Indo-Europeans, Aryans, etc. they're all fucking steppeniggers

>t turned out recently that Yamna/PIE had brown eyes, dark hair

Not quite, light hair originated from the ANE populations (Amcient North Eurasian) which in turn became the Eastern Europeah Hunter Gatherer (EHG). And since Yamna had about half of their genes from EHG they would naturally have had some light hair.

In addition light eyes came from most likely the Caucasus/Black Sea region in Caucasian Hunter Gatherer populations (CHG) and the other half of the Yamna genome came from those CHG populations. In other words *some* of the Yamna had light hair and light eyes, just not an overwhelming majority.

It was Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers, which were a mix of Western European Hunter Gathers and (WHG) and Eastern European Hunter Gatherers (EHG) that had very high rates of light hair and light eyes, over 90% and this was before the Indo-European migrations.

In the writings left behind in Sanskrit and Old Persian.

NO.
PLEASE FUCKING KILL YOURSELF.

youtu.be/eXIbjGYY0cc

Attached: 1508031851327.jpg (1024x993, 177K)

>In the writings left behind in Sanskrit and Old Persian.
neither of those languages or yamna

Turk originate from China so they were probably AZN at some point, but they fucked so many other races along the way of conquest nobody is sure what a Turk is. Khazar self-identified as Turk, but if Khazar was Turk, it was nothing like Turks of today - obviously.

*are

man with the biggest nose in the world is Laz(Georgian from Turkey)

khazars migrated thousands of years later, you utter moron.

>man with the biggest nose in the world is Laz(Georgian from Turkey)
laž means lie in croatian, I guess pinochio is sourced from turkroaches

I'm sure the entire PIE region was depopulated when the Khazars took over

everyone from Yamna had brown eyes and brown hair with light skin, Corded ware were the light ones

The Yamna were nomads and spread mostly towards Western Europe, the region that the Yamna inhabited (thousands of years before the Khazarians were a thing) was then inhabited by many other peoples, like the later Aryans, Finno-ugrians, Altaic and Turkic peoples like the Cumans, Pechenegs, Khazars (finally) or the Mongols, the Vikings/Varangians, different type of Slavs, Bulgars, etc. Even the gypsies crossed into Europe through there. Those are plains, it's a massive steppe, like a natural road in a time when people travelled with horses.

You see a man with a big nose and you think he is a jew? You are nigger tier retarded.

Attached: 1529000673043.jpg (320x180, 10K)

"Jews" are Canaanites. Cursed by Noah for being fuckin gross. Cursed by God for being fuckin useless demon worshippers. Ironically call anyone who agrees with the Most High "antisemites" when they aren't even descended from Shem (Shemites). Shem, whose line had blue eyes and blonde hair and Made Egypt Great Again (why the blue eyes and blonde hair on all the artwork?).

it was no longer Yamna-dominated, it wass altered. also it's irrelevant, Khazars had no connections ethnically with actual Jews.

this. huge stretch based on thin evidence. not to mention the whole jew fairytale bullshit
because we all know the stereotype of jews being very aggressive

Attached: 47739ABD-266B-4A34-A628-F10DEB60CE39.png (138x345, 28K)

Khazar theory was censored as fuck in Imperial Russia, Germany and USSR. Obviously anti-Zionists love Khazar theory, since it makes the claim that Ashkenazim aren't Israelites and have no historical connection to Israel. But Russians hate it, but it means Jews had a nation before they did. It's also very inconvenient for Aryan mystics and white anti-Semitics to have a big Jewish population originate from the Caucasus and have built an empire there. Kind of embarrassing really.

Attached: 1523126109369.jpg (1000x750, 151K)

Looks Pakistani which makes sense, they have a very high yamna and BMAC mixture.

I'd recommend reading this before anything else

biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/06/16/059311.full.pdf

They descended from Proto-Indo-Iranian, which descended from the proto-Indo-European that the Yamna spoke though.

I seem to remember statistics showing Yamna had low levels of light eyes and light hair, but they were still present. Corded War certainly had higher rates of light eyes and light hair, and the highest rates were the Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers.

sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

SHG had overwhelming rates of light hair, blue eyes, etc BEFORE the Indo-European expansion. These traits had already developed in Europe prior. However at the same time Indo-Europeans still had some of these traits and spread them where they invaded.

Attached: Indo-european_-_languages_-_evolution_-_500_BC_-_map.jpg (750x410, 97K)

this is the single most stupid post i've ever seen here. after 5+ years.

Was it? How do you know? Why do Yamna have big noses and brown eyes like 99% of Ashkenazi?

I'm a half Western European and a mixture of Hemshin/Laz and Pontic Greek from Turkey (No Turkic DNA present in my tests). From Trabzon and Rize. Basically Turkeys snowy forests area very close to Georgia. What does that make me?

And yeah, my dads nose is huge.

Khazars were never ethnically Jewish, they were turko-Scythian mongrels and their descendants are no longer Jewish, because only some top people converted.
khazars theory is pushed by jews themselves
davidduke.com/rethinking-khazar-theory/

>They descended from Proto-Indo-Iranian, which descended from the proto-Indo-European that the Yamna spoke though.
you're using the circular logic of applying imaginary genetic links with imagined linguistic reconstructions

Askhenazi have a very distinct look. White skin. Big nose. Brown eyes. They look exactly like Yamna, and they originate in the same exact region. They look nothing like modern Turks. They share no DNA with modern Turks. If Khazar were Turks, they are a different kind of Turk compared to the Ottoman Turks.

Attached: JohnvonNeumann.jpg (423x499, 130K)

It's just a dumb theory not supported by facts

Modern Ashkenazi Jews are mostly half Southern European and half Levantine Neolithic

Caucasian Hunter Gatherers, who partly contributed to Yamna DNA, are closer to modern Iranians and modern Caucasus peoples and not very close to modern jews.

So the idea that "Jews are related to ancient CHG" is faulty.

They aren't "imaginary genetic" links they're actual genetic links supported by years of genetic and linguistic analysis. I'd recommend reading David Anthony's "The Horse, the Wheel, and Language" if you want to begin researching this stuff.

I have the personal belief that these threads are made by intoxicators and CIA niggers to simply demoralize the visitors of this board with their sheer stupidity. It's kind of between baffling and exasperating reading some of the dumb shit exposed here.

But they aren't terribly closely related to CHG anyway

see

Ashkenazi are closer to Sicilians than any other group.

I guess, I'm Jewish now, I guess everyone with big nose and brown eyes is Jewish, even if it's a somalian or Indian, because we all know jews are everywhere right?
god damn it, how are you american christfaggots so fucking stupid?
a mongrel, an abomination.
show me an ashkenazi that looks like the yamna man, he doesn't look anything like a jew, also it's very convenient for to post the only one Yamna man and ignore the others. I'm starting to think you are kike yourself.

Attached: Yamna_culture.jpg (796x958, 80K)

Odd that' you'd say that. You know that Laz and Georgians have the same DNA, right? Are you not Georgian?

>They aren't "imaginary genetic" links
then why can't you prove Aryans are Yamana?
>years of genetic and linguistic analysis
That's the precise fallacy I mentioned, Shlomo.
>I'd recommend reading David Anthony's "The Horse, the Wheel, and Language" if you want to begin researching this stuff.
Jewish Science full of fraud and fakery.

Attached: 1518112607996.jpg (399x385, 41K)

99% of the threads in Jow Forums about Jews call them Khazars. When it's inconvenient that Khazar suddenly they are not. Kind of funny really. Both Khazar or Israelite are badass origin stories, so antisemities really need to come up with something else to try to demoralize Jews.

Yeah, Yamna are totally jewish guys, that's why Yamna are genetically close to Udmurts while Ashskenzis are to Sicilians. makes a lot of sense right?
just fuck off kike, your shilling ends here.

Attached: 1517329156025.png (1012x652, 27K)

I love how on the R1a1a wikipedia page some jew has tried to shoehorn filthy khazars into having it. they don't lol and never will lmao. Luckily there's a giant CITATION NEEDED next to it ahahah

you are not laz, you are mutt, don't know about hemshins, I know that they are supposed to be Armenians, but I don't know how much armenians they really are.

they are evil yes, but evil and violent are two different things. niggers are incredibly violent with no provocation much like one would associate with an animal or say a more primitive human. but this is simply their nature, they do not know better. they are unintelligent and possess the violent gene
the jew on the other hand knows exactly what he says and plans, and means it too

Attached: 536D770C-3780-4D6E-8B9B-0BBB7F2C8C07.jpg (563x739, 94K)

pic of all the aryan tribe phenotype

Attached: 1523760179885.png (961x1271, 150K)

Italians are PIE idiot

>Aryans are Yamana

Aryans aren't Yamna, they are partially descendant from Yamna. That's not really the same thing.

>99% of the threads in Jow Forums about Jews call them Khazars


It's just a dumb meme

Attached: 1509461723528.jpg (1736x1558, 1.93M)

the Indo-European theory stems from that Indians and Europeans have a similar language structure
Semitic languages are oddly left out of this category

yamnaya are most closely related to finnish people

Attached: PCA.png (637x594, 82K)

Sicilians aren't italians, kike.

Jews have a lot of R haplogroups as well. Bibi is R1a.

>Aryans aren't Yamna, they are partially descendant from Yamna.
What Aryans where? You're shoehorning linguistic reconstruction (read: Jewish guesswork) onto vague genetic analyses that themselves prove no link.

This is utter shit, even ironically user.

and yamnaya is a mix of eastern european hunter gatherer,most closely related to latvians...

Attached: latvians.jpg (1024x689, 141K)

and caucaucasus hunter gatherer more related to georgians

Attached: georgian-people5.jpg (900x600, 192K)

Sephardi are Askhenazi share a lot of DNA but that could be explained by intermarriages. I think it's obvious they have different origins, if not Khazar, then broadly European. Sephardi are probably Israelites who settled with their Punic brothers in Spain about 2500 years ago.

Attached: CarthageMap.png (770x447, 288K)

If Bibi is R1a that explains why they hate him so much and constantly try to run him out of office hahah

if they’re nephilim aren’t they part Angel lol

How is it odd? Hebrew and Arabic have a completely different structure to European languages.

the mix of those two is yamna more closely related to finnish people

Attached: Alexander Skarsgard biography.jpg (500x661, 90K)

Ikr R1a is based.

dumb frogposter

real men

No. They're inbred as fuck. Angels and demons and gods are just myths. Way back when humanity was very primitive we mistook our creators for Gods. They're just humans with advanced technology.

Attached: 1529552687947.jpg (2397x3381, 3.56M)

>tfw no Latvian gf to make Yamna children with

Attached: 1469761765511.jpg (633x758, 44K)

Look up what ashkenazi means.

Nazis were Jewish :^))