Can you refute this without succumbing to hyperbole and slurs?

Can you refute this without succumbing to hyperbole and slurs?

Attached: NXG9ydl.jpg (700x537, 145K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School
youtube.com/watch?v=QS0oXXJCbdg
isgp-studies.com/intro
archive.org/details/youtube-jmNmGEf-gSg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

only faggots smoke pipes

I agree entirely that those who argue in bad faith are cunts. The position they take at any given time is not relevant. Were Sartre to know what we know he’d be 1488.

Refute his hyperbole and slurs without using hyperbole and slurs?

nice shoop

Attached: jps120.jpg (700x537, 148K)

He would never stand a chance in a debate with Ben Shapiro.

>renowned Philosopher would never stand a chance in a debate against a whiny manchild whose only claim to fame is having a fanbase of autistic whiny manchildren

Go outside

>commie memeflag
>fake quote
>implying kikes arent subversive shitbag parasites
no
all fields etc etc

Sure but don’t listen to me. Hear it from your own mouths.

Attached: 9DA8B492-3655-4C26-9936-B38AE04FC60E.png (775x7566, 3.13M)