Political k/omics
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
deviantart.com
twitter.com
bump
this kind of woman is rare nowadays.
I love this guy's comics
its clear he's left leaning but he hates the American left
yea what kind of woman would buy a 1911 for herself
Left leaning libertarians are okay in my book.
well she was raped so she would want a gun that seems powerful and dominating to defend herself
Not Jow Forums but pertainent to Jow Forums.
Literally all of those except the last one are good things though
SHALL
NOT
>pro-choice
NOT
BE
CIRCUMCISED
Yep. Dude is an out and out commie actually.
deviantart.com
I look forward to trading shots with him if the S ever HTF.
I knew I recognized his comics from somewhere
Yeah, he's a commie, but I can respect the consistency of his veiwpoint at least. He'd be a worthy enemy in da boogaloo.
Being offended and throwing insults never worked. It just took time to overcome inertia in sufficient numbers to change the outcomes.
I find this one pretty funny.
That's a good chuckle
I think youre giving women too little credit. Then again maybe ive been lucky with the girls ive dated. But most ive known intimately were alot smarter then they seemed at first...they were just never encouraged to show it since its not "sexy" and even amongst women it ostracized them from the group.
LOL. Should be "Modern day AnComs" though. AnCaps would just be "Oooh, free gun, spasceba Comrade!"
heh
> he doesn't want to get into a firefight with wetbacks and jiggaboos
Your ancestors are disgusted.
INFRINGED
cant you say both carbine and car-bean?
LEL
making both Jow Forums and /lit/ jokes at the same time.
>wew...
OED says Car-bine. Merriam-Webster says Car-been.
I suspect it's a linguo-cultural artifact, like lieutenant/lefteneant or aluminum/aluminium. Either is correct, but your pronunciation says a lot about where you're from.
/klit/ jokes
Taofledermaus made a video about that where he shows various other firearm or gun-related youtube channels and how they pronouce carbine.
Car-bean is used by 90-95% of firearm experts
Car-byne is used by 90-95% of gamers and 60-75% of airsofters.
I've never heard anyone say car-byne
>I've never heard anyone say car-byne
British pronunciation.
Gun Jesus said that "car-been" is the French pronunciation and "car-byne" is the English pronunciation. Not sure why we defaulted to the French way of saying it, but there it is.
OED says Carbyne, M-W says Carbeen.
>The police are racist fascist child murderers, never trust them
>No mere citizen should have firearms, only someone as trustworthy as a police officer or soldier should be armed
Tells you what they think of the common man.
My issue with things like this is that they fail to address the specific issues on the table and just talk about gun rights like its a meter that goes up and down. I don't think the same arguments that apply to making concealed carry permits shall-issue apply to keeping assault weapons legal and they need to be talked about situationally rather than in the abstract, and if you're one of these people who thinks it's a moot point because the goverment shouldn't be able to have any gun laws at all then it's kind of dishonest to act like you're holding a real discussion of values and factors when you're really just deadset in your view because of political theory.
Great explanation but the anime visuals and ending make it seem really cringy.
>if you're one of these people who thinks it's a moot point because the goverment shouldn't be able to have any gun laws at all
See, this highlights the fundamental disagreement that makes it pointless to focus on specific issues. Almost all of the arguments boil down to "who do you trust to have power and responsibility?", with one side saying "the government" and the other saying "everyone, except maybe felons". Even the so-called centrists tend to be in one of these groups, but just a bit closer to the group's interior edge than their friends. You may think assault weapon bans are a reasonable discussion to have, but the pro-freedom side thinks it's more reasonable to debate the legality of guided missiles.
The groups' axioms mean their Overton windows can't overlap enough for any satisfactory agreement. So you either try to convince them to change part of their fundamental worldview, argue about specific policy details you'll never agree on, or just yell SHALL NOT. The only real exceptions are when somewhere like California does something retarded and everyone can point and laugh because, regardless of what you believe, it's clear the plan just won't work.
Personally I'm really big on the idea of a moral right to self defense and I also believe that the natural right of property ownership should cover to ability to assert your control over that property by force, so I'm 100% in favor of concealed carry and owning long arms but I think there are some regulations that can be had without violating these rights. It seems pretty obvious to me that machine guns shouldn't be able to be purchased the same way a 22 lr bolt action is but some guys here won't even entertain that discussion because anything that's a gun is untouchable. I'm generally against assault weapons laws because they don't make any sense but if they actually did that they claimed to do then I don't see a lot of reason to oppose them, mass shootings have become a lot more common and if we're too stupid to talk about fixing these social issues then what else can we do?
>you're really just deadset in your view because of political theory
Not political theory, but objective statistical facts. No gun control implemented anywhere can be shown to statistically lower the homicide rate, so there is no reason to support such measures unless you just like taking away freedom.
I think it's important to remember that a lot of people really are in the middle, the average person probably doesn't care about the idea of overthrowing the goverment or anything along those lines but actually does believe in self-defense and might have a handgun somewhere in their house (which is responsible for over 90 percent of gun murders lol lol).
That's bullshit because of
>Can be shown
If you make the standard of proof high enough then of course they can't prove that one directly caused the other
Unless you're one of those faggots that thinks you need to justify the government NOT restricting something before you can do it then it falls on the person wanting more restrictions to give a reason as to why those restrictions should be in place, and as of right now the only legitimate reason they have is that guns are scary and they don't like them.
>It seems pretty obvious to me that machine guns shouldn't be able to be purchased the same way a 22 lr bolt action
Why exactly does this seem obvious to you? Because it really obvious to everyone and these assumptions are what disrupt meaningful discussion.
*Because it's not obvious
No I'm just saying there are some things worth discussing, and I could find you lots of sources correlating gun control with lowered gun death/suicide/homicide rates in some place, as well as a bunch saying the opposite.
You could start by recognizing that blanket bans don't do shit to fix underlying issues, and just create black markets and alternatives.
>I'm generally against assault weapons laws because they don't make any sense but if they actually did that they claimed to do then I don't see a lot of reason to oppose them, mass shootings have become a lot more common and if we're too stupid to talk about fixing these social issues then what else can we do?
Ugh, I really just want to call you a faggot and move on, but I feel like I should give you a reasonable response. Even if AWBs worked at curbing mass shootings, why would the reduction of a less than 200 deaths a year justify the confiscation of private property? Why not also force people to fill in there swimming pools? Or require that police inspect your kitchen to make sure your bleach and drain cleaner is locked up? What exactly are the parameters you'd use to justify invasive and infringing regulations? Or is this all just because guns are scarier than swimming pools even though drowning deaths outnumber those in mass shootings?
>and might have a handgun somewhere in their house (which is responsible for over 90 percent of gun murders lol lol).
What do you mean, like accidents? Not an Amerifriend.
I think this is more of an assumption than anything, there are lots of countries where guns are next to impossible to get. Sure, there will always be some guns in circulation in a big enough system but it doesnt amount to much if the goverment banned them long ago and has been serious about border controls (or just happened to be in a place where illegal shipping from manufacturers is impractical).
Yeah and I agree with all that, I'm basically a single issue anti-AWB voter this election cycle in Florida. I've done a lot of research and feel like they are objectively stupid and won't solve shit, and I also agree with the spirit of not always banning shit just because a few people might die but I think it's questionable to not even hold the discussion when the bodies start piling up and even more so to not care at all. The difference between me and the rest of these guys is that I would be okay with giving an inch if it actually made a sizeable difference, I understand the opposite view but don't think it makes sense in a society where we make so many compromises to improve lives.
Rifles and shotguns account for like a single digit percentage of murders, handguns are what criminals use
Most of the sources that find a correlation are lying by omission. They'll report that firearm crime went down, but ignore that crime overall didn't change much. Or they'll report a 3% drop in violent crime, but neglect to mention that violent crime in the area has been dropping by 1~4% every year for the past decade+. I've yet to see a study supporting less guns = less crime that wasn't dishonest or inept.
Im aware that they often do that but you can't fairly say there's "no evidence whatsoever"
No, not accidents. He's refering to murders where a handgun was used. The vast majority of murders in the US are committed with handguns.
>I could find you lots of sources correlating gun control with lowered gun death/suicide/homicide rates in some place
You could find a lot of liars saying those things, but you could find no true statistics to back up their lies.
>tfw no cute ukrainian soldier gf
Love it
>I think it's questionable to not even hold the discussion when the bodies start piling up and even more so to not care at all.
But why should I care over a statistically insignificant number of deaths? Again, do you think we should have a discussion over swimming pool bans when the bodies start piling up? Do you care about accidental drownings? Don't you an inordinate amount of attention is veing given to gun deaths simply because of fear mongering?
So far "often" has been every single study I've found or been presented with. And evidence stops being evidence once it's invalidated.
>letting slaves have rights
Wew lad
>If enough people repeat the same lie that's basically proof
>mods on Jow Forums
no fun allowed
Next you'll say that Jow Forums can talk about guns, get out of here with that shit
Somebody really needs to point out that Wounded Knee happened because the soldiers were there to disarm the Natives.
Leftists are literal children in adult bodies.
>tries to make gun-control argument
>it's based on the assumption that shooting people is fun
>Malcom X said live together peacefully
Wut?
And that getting shot is fun
Seriously what the fuck
Nedroid Picture Diary, nedroid.com
It's good but doesn't update for months sometimes. Here's a Jow Forums one.
Jesus was not assassinated.
What they want is political commissars to be installed in the police and military (in the guise of "diversity" or "sensitivity" training and enforcement). They also want you disarmed so you can't fight back. Basically, a recreation of the USSR.
>jesus
>assassinated
i believe he was sentenced to death by a court
>Implying the police are fascist monsters
Ease on the pills mate, who do you think the cops are? They usually live in the same places they work, most cops want you to be armed so they don’t have to bail your ass out when you get jumped by a dindu.
AMERICANS BE LIKE
AM I WHITE YET
No. Pilate declared Christ innocent and washed his hands of the matter.
Jow Forums and Jow Forums jannies are all redditors.
What the fuck is that abortion of a rifle. What the fuck is it someone please explain to me what I am looking at.
Pontius Pilatus did washed his hands. But the sins of the world it's what killed him. Stop sinning now.
His name was John Chapman
when I was young and just learning about the dichotomy of right/left in the usa. i was like "well I guess I'm on the left", but as I slowly learned more, I kept getting increasingly confused by lefties who hated guns.
In my mind, even as a wee lad, I assumed most people understood why the 2nd was so fucking important.
decades later and I still cannot believe how common it is for lefties to be against the 2nd amendment. It baffles me in a way censorship just can't. It's the most basic fucking concept in nature and they just completely ignore it. I realized eventually that these people just had a LOT of faith in the govt and very little understanding of how it worked. I have yet to meet someone who is decently educated about politics while being anti-2nd. And gun control is literally the key issue that made me question the left ever since I realized they were actually pro-gun-control. Even while supporting them whole-heartedly, I just couldn't let go of that glaring problem.
i'm glad to see these comics. it makes me feel less insane. If the left would just back the fuck off of the 1st and 2nd, they wouldn't piss me off so much. But oh no, gotta control the narrative.
my one consolation is that the average normie lefty just doesn't care about guns. I assume 90%+ of the people pushing for gun control are brainwashed retards being chaperoned by political powers with very malevolent intent, or psychopaths who actually want a large authoritarian state.
it's confused me since I was a child. i will never understand it. what worries me most is how we let so much build up to begin with.
I remember this raid
>The defense for rape is a condom
I honestly can’t tell if I’m rustled or laughing
>breaks open like a double
>breech loading
>bolt action
lmfao it looks like a right wing parody of how liberals think guns function
liberals unironically believe non-whites are more likely than whites to be peaceful and civilized
actually i should rephrase, liberals believe being non white makes you very likely to be peaceful and civilized
