Daily reminder that global warming is a false religion.
Daily reminder that global warming is a false religion
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
nature.com
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
No it isn't, the weather patterns prove it is a science.
Reminder the most rightwing nutjob conspiracies are cia/fbi ideas.Go back to sleep you tool.
pic related
>weather = climate
nice try but we all know that WATER VAPOR is the only greenhouse gas of any relevance.
Fuck off kike
I’m almost old enough to prove all you climate change believing cockheads wrong by telling you about how it was in the old days. Myth = busted.
>global greening
youtube.com
The problem with climate change is that the only answer leftists have to it is to basically use far less efficent technology and slowly deindustrialise. Some leftists even want us to become anarcho-primitivists, slowly damaging our econimies and armies and allowing nations who give 0 fucks about climate change and the environment to take over; China, India and the Middle East. The same argument when hippie leftists want all Western countries to denuclearize, allowing Russia and China to remain as the sole nuclear powers.
This!
how does it feel dropping out from high school?
The climate does change, though.
Climate change is real, but is spot on. The end goals of socialism (depopulation, limiting personal freedom, etc.) are now suddenly presented as means to combat climate change, and there's no sound science behind those claims.
>hurrr dem librul jew communiz durr le marx hurrr
Climate would change if humans were in the picture or not. Yes humans change the environment.
But you have to ask these deluded fucks, what is the ideal environment? If it's getting warmer what is the range of average temperature you want? And finally how in the fuck do you propose to get it there?
Carbon controls are a debasement hoax brought on by kikes
Global Warming, or as it is better known as now, global climate change is 100% real. Climate changes, duh.
The debate is man's affect on it, which at least is somewhat a factor, when it comes to greenhouse gases like C02, is a load of malarkey. Seriously, what a massive act of self-important hubris that we have that massive of an impact...
Look into Svensmark's cosmic radiation cloud theory, it's really compelling but "academia" shits on him. Really goes to show you that the unquestionable god of "C02 IS BAD DUR" is nothing but a wealth redistribution scam and the cowards in academia have to function with upmost groupthink so as to continue sucking dick for grant money.
Even without Svensmark's theory, grand solar minimum is fast approaching and we'll witness noticable cooling, unless they fudge the numbers to mask it.
...and even if it's all wrong, and it is all C02, the Earth flourished with much higher C02, life adapts, ecosystems collapse>>change>>>reform. Fucking pussies think man is so weak they won't survive a hardship, we survived the ice age for shite's sake.
Follow-up, higher C02 and temps in the historical record. Mideval warm period and the Roman warm period come to mind.
Did the glaciers melt and flood everyone out then?
Also, if you want a real guage on shit check the cut-throat world of finance first.
When they stop offering 20+ year mortgages on beachfront property you'll have my attention.
Follow-follow-up
These alarmists are no different than the people who said human brains can't handle music in cars when the car stereo was invented, or that woman can't ride trains because their uterus would blow out at those speeds. Hell, motherfuckers doubted heavier than air flight, it took two dingleberries to show these assholes before they would believe it.
Ugh it's worse if you try to learn a foreign language because they have their own "beliefs" that have become fossilised into speech. It's like they use proverbs as an excuse not to educate themselves.
what's your response to this?
I flew into Miami recently and that shit doesn’t look like it’ll last ten years hoax or no.
Hi. Hippie-leftist here.
The problem with global warning (if you believe in it but reflects my position on the subject) is that science don't offer green, efficient alternatives to replace the technology we have been used to for a couple of decades. To be fair the only way to solve the problem today would cause losses in our way of living (no more individual cars, smartphones, exotic fruits at every corner, meat three times a day, cheap clothes from the other end of the world, the list goes on, and on, and on...).
And there is the real issue.
> companies don't want to loose customers because of weak products
> countries don't want to loose wars because of weak weapons/economy
> individuals don't want to stop shitting in drinking water or anything that can make their life the least harder than it already is
What I find beautiful however is that some prefer to deny the fucking thing than admit they don't want to solve it.
BTW you're kinda wrong about China. They have inherited the ecological bill of most western countries (by manufacturing our products) and have a very, very polluting industry BUT after some travels there I do believe they take the problem a lot more seriously than we are.
It seems like a lot of the science behind climate change is questionable and the what is it, 97% of scientistis who agree, is basically a 100% of them, scientists in a certain circle who agree that climate change is real. But they went with 97% because that's a better number to convince people, a 100% is a bit sketchy for anyone to believe.
However, while the left always complains about climate change being a huge problem that we need to solve, they never talk about something that's an even bigger problem; overpopulation. Not the overpopulation of whites, because we have replacement levels birth rates, yet they want us to have even less kids. But they never seem to talk about the massive population boom in Africa, caused by all the foreign aid that the west gives them. It didn't cause Africans to increae their quality of life, they just started having even more and more kids, continuing the same problems but with even bigger populations. I believe by 2050, the population of Africa is estimated to become around 4 billion. Right now it's only 1.2 billion. In 1950 the whole world had a population of 2.55 billion. Africa's population boom will cause a lot of trouble for the world, it's a huge problem. The majority of Africa is dependent on foreign aid, without it, around 60% of Africa would starve to death.
Yet nobody seems to talk about how foreign aid to Africa is a huge fucking problem.
Friend of mine took way too much LSD one time and thought the sun was dying...he started to shiver...felt the cold in his bones.
What I am getting at. How the fuck can these people be taken seriously when the sun is in fact going through a phase of minimal activity.
>China. They have inherited the ecological bill of most western countries (by manufacturing our products)
That's true. Which is why I think putting tariffs on their products would be a good idea. But the reality is is that millions of people live in poverty in China, and more technology is helping improve living conditions. And the Chinese government isn't going to sacrifice their population's quality of life for the environment. Same deal with India.
My response is that it is paywalled, and an abstract doesn't mean shit. I kind find scientific abstracts on kooky shit like magnetic vector potential equating to zero-point energy, but you have to dig through the actual paper to find the flaws.
Al Gore gets his butt kicked by the GE.
m.youtube.com
..................................................[15,638]
is that "kooky shit" published in the most prestigious scientific journal in the world?
IIRC they really played it fast and loose with the 97% agree meme. I think they just asked "Does da climate change dur" or pulled everyone who said it does change, and decided they meant that it's man's fault.
That does not change a single thing. In fact, that is a hallmark of shit science by saying "They're so prestigious, I'll take them at their word".
If the doomsday prophets of the 80s (to a man) had said in unison, "go ahead and fuck hookers and don't under any circumstances use condoms", would anyone think that they really believed in infectious, normosexually transmitted AIDS? Replace in the above hypothetical, infectious AIDS with AGW and condoms/fucking hookers with mass population movement from low-carbon footprint lands to high-carbon footprint lands.
>Which is why I think putting tariffs on their products would be a good idea.
Couldn't agree more. Global trading is a bitch.
>the Chinese government isn't going to sacrifice their population's quality of life for the environment
Yes, but environment is a big part of Chinese quality of life.
Air and water are polluted as fuck ; they are daily exposed to cheap, uncontrolled products (the kind they won't export in the west but maybe in africa...) ; in major cities traffic has become a major issue that no bigger road will solve ; they had several sanitary scandals due to poor practices of the food industry...
I'm not saying that the average Chinese is more implicated in those changes that we are but at a global level they tend to regulate more than us.
t. high school dropout
That is a fair point. If the powers that be truly believed the C02 meme why would they import hordes of low-footprint tanned Germans to nations where they will create massive footprints?
Global warming is a meme. It's the result of the idea of science based policy -- an absurd notion. A catastrophic, unfallsifiable threat that guarantees funding.
the reason it's prestigious is that they have tight quality controls. I suggest that this adds to the articles credibility rather than diminish it.
Fair enough. But that still leaves the Middle East and India. Also, South America. Basically any place where white people don't live.
Sorry, had to correct my post.
Adds to credibility, yes. To the point of taking an abstract as fact without reading the actual paper, no?
This entire picture is wrong. Oil companies pay big bucks to limit oil production. The Dakota Access pipeline for instance. By artificially lowering production and making it harder for future drilling to occur via anti-drilling/environmental protection laws these companies seek to raise the price of oil to increase their profits. Basically Middle Eastern politics 101
Let's face it the planet is full of deadshit phd students looking to please their review board by confirming to popular consensus.
It's happening but I reckon 90% of the papers on the subject are full of shit.
You say there's no alternative, but even reducing the amount of CO2 we pump into the atmosphere reduces the effect, which effectively buys us time to find better solutions.
It may be that the only solution though is to invest heavily in nuclear power, which has pollution effects we can at least manage, providing they never melt down.
Splitting the atom to generate heat to boil water is going to directly heat the atmosphere.
No one likes to mention that CO2 makes plants grow bigger with less water, because it complete destroys the "le evil CO2" myth
Climate changes, but it's narcissistic as fuck to think humans have any significant influence on it
We are already having problems with crops around the world since the solar minimum is starting. If we repeat the year without a summer maybe we could drop down to bellow 6 billion hopefully. Most would be from the current developing nations like China, Brazil, India, most of Africa.
Noone talks about that because when they talk about CO2 affecting climate change, they're talking about CO2 in the high atmosphere and stratosphere. Not many fucking forests up there, dickhead. And noone says CO2 is "evil".
Fucking aussies, you're as bad as leaves. Please shut the fuck up about things you know nothing about.
classic christcuck argument
>le only god can change climate!
It's usually the other way around. It's environmental groups and universities that pump out papers suggesting global warming is a thing. Many of those writing the papers aren't even scientists in the sane sense, they're instead things like women's studies professors. It's how the 90% figure came to be, the people that are useless and pump out meaningless papers put out a ton of papers and some guy looked at some and decided for himself whether it meant the person was pro or anti global warming theory.
Green energy companies are also incredibly ineffective in terms of their cost versus output, making it a much bigger racket than what oil companies have going.
CO2 is heavier than air dipshit, if there's high quantities in high atmosphere there's even more in the low atmosphere to promote plant growth
Who the fuck said anything about God? I'm talking about the Sun and planet itself, memeflags need to be banned
you don't have to say anything about god. You use the same argument as religious conservatives to deny climate change
Let me redpill you on this one. Global warming is a political tool used to keep developing countries in check.
>You say there's no alternative
Some alternatives exist but I don't believe the are, at the moment, sufficient to fully replace the commodities we are used to.
Nuclear energy efficiently solve the CO2 problem but has major weakness.
>produce radioactive garbage which we don't know what to do since it will be dangerous to human for thousands of years
>need constant maintenance and strong security which have to be enforced long-term by a non-profit organization (mostly the state)
>power plants are extremely costly to disassemble but we don't take this into account when calculating the cost of nuclear energy
>isn't a portable energy source which implies to build batteries for storage on the side
I do believe however that it actualy is one of the best (or... least worst) alternatives we have to oil.
Want Global warming to go away? Stop flooding the world with shitskins. You fucking idiot Liberal Fools.
Everything you are against is created by your policies.
This. Never underestimate the single-mindedness of ideologues.
I hope we get a new ice age, so only people biologically made to live in ice and snow will survive.
Daily reminder that capitalist shills deny global warming so their pollution can be ignored
You live in a country that is below 3rd world
Climate models have consistently failed in their predictions, meaning they are either “unfalsifiable” (not science) or “falsified.”
>scientists say
Is the new
>the temple says
What about
>nature says
Fuck off capitalist kike
As long goverment doesn't need to pay farmers for choosing the wrong crop and don't need to pay people who lose their ground/beachfront to the ocean, I don't care much.
But this is exactly whats happening. Muh, no global warm shit, then "but my beach is disappearing the waters are 2feet higher, please pay me for my villa"
This is so disgusting.
>ctrl+f
>cfc
>0 results found
It's official, none of you have any idea what you're talking about. Human impact on climate change is a thing and the biggest offenders these days are India and China.
>Pirate meme flag faggot
>Trust what you learned in high school, goy
Let it be. If there is a food shortage in the US, the liers will wage wars to feed them and then they will admit it with the first gun fired.
Ever heard of aerosol geo-engineering? All desired climate effects can be summoned using airborne chemicals.
CFCs are going away slowly but surelg and the Ozone hole is shrinking dingus.
I hope they make a minor error and spray too much, so the sun gets almost completely blocked.
So, what will it take to convince me and Jow Forums that global warming is real?
Did you ever take the garbage out of your house? or did you just let it pile up on the kitchen floor your entire life?
Even if the "leftists" are wrong about Carbon build-up, should you not be a good custodian of your environment and gift our children? or should we just trash it and hoard a bunch of money that we can't take with us when we die?
>carbon dioxide is garbage
Why do you hate plants?
This