Nazi lie #42574

A nazitard argument:

>If we wuz so bad, then why did we have some (token) blacks, indians, asians, arabs in our ranks?

Germans were getting in a desperate situation with multiple fronts here and there, so they had to become more pragmatic and flexible in their racial doctrines. They had no intention to give these people any equal rights to "honorary aryans" in a german world order should they had won.

In the east front Germans used disgruntled minority groups' anti-soviet sentiments to their advantange, who had suffered persecution under soviet regime (divide and conquer). In India some freedom fighters (Azad Hind) were sympathetic to Axis cause because they opposed British imperialism and colonialism.

Hitler had demonized slavs as the worst untermensch along with jews. Polish had to give way to german settlers and were forcibly relocated and were used as slave labor. After getting their asses kicked bigly in Stalingrad the Wehrmacht in desperation was trying to conscript more slavic men, even admitting them to the SS. If you think Hitler would have let these people, especially slavs, exist in an equal status with "pure aryans", you're dead wrong. Just looking at the comment section of the nu-n*zis about people of other races proves the point (calling people shitskins, insects, poos, mongoloids, spics etc.).

Nazism is an evil and a great poison to mankind as a whole.

Attached: laughing black nazi.jpg (513x600, 45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=isxvXITTLLY
youtube.com/watch?v=NlqyBIQ-Cac
youtube.com/watch?v=tUfisPluAlc
youtube.com/watch?v=MVV821hQ8y4
youtube.com/watch?v=94yj_9jF2W8
youtube.com/watch?v=5CG3ZHHMAK4
youtube.com/watch?v=WhBnMEPTU80
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

An OP-tard argument:

>If I type four paragraphs in response to a common argument by Nazis, doesn’t that mean that I’m right?

No, you just made yourself look like an idiot on the internet. If you hadn’t had a memeflag you would’ve embarrassed your nation, and I have a pretty good idea which nation you’re in.

Are you training for the JIDF? Is this like some sort of test you need to pass to go up a rank? Argue with some Nazis on the internet. Well, you failed because you’re a tryhard. Have fun, I guess

>If you think Hitler would have let these people, especially slavs, exist in an equal status with "pure aryans", you're dead wrong. Just looking at the comment section of the nu-n*zis about people of other races proves the point (calling people shitskins, insects, poos, mongoloids, spics etc.).
So, neonazi groups speak for a personal views of a man who's been gone 50+ years, said man having documented most of his opinions to autobiography? If there's an explanation that doesn't need a shitty fallacy to explain it, you're welcome to educate us.

Attached: 1532884734865.png (239x300, 110K)

Slide thread. Saged and reported

>Doesn't have any informative arguments about the subject, instead has to resort to ad hominems.

Here's the Jow Forums sticky pic for you since you don't know how to properly argue.

Attached: sticky.jpg (1600x1131, 733K)

then why were there blacks in hitler youth? infact 30000 blacks lived in nazi germany and lived normal lives

>Every post I don't like and that is anti-nazi is a slide thread.

Saged.

Nice slippery slope.

You're pulling blatant lies out of your ass in your hopeless attempt to whitewash Hitler.

Black germans were excluded from public school, were forcibly sterilized and were usually registered as "foreign labor".

>b-but Hitler shook hands Owen, he dindu nothing wrong

Read it.

Attached: Blacks in Nazi Germany.png (416x2649, 1.01M)

>being so much of a fucking skin head you use fallacious arguments and try to rewrite history to justify your racism
Shin diggy.

If race is a social construct and jews are just a religion that anyone can join but is primarily white and white nazis fought against white allies and only killed whites, how were they racist by your own conventions?

Check the Ad-hominem you're posting in your own pic.

How is point out a personal flaw ad hominem?

Ummm... good? Those children were a result of the fucking French degenerate cunts bringing in their niggers and Arabs specifically stated for the purpose of diluting German blood. Rhineland bastards. Fuck them all. Blacks don't belong in Germany or Europe. Fucking kys if you have a problem with excluding them from the white man's continent.

pointing*

>White man's continent
>Lives in Australia.

You're using a personal flaw to ignore an argument, you not replying his argument but attacking him.

I meant Europe you stupid memeflag cunt. Although Australia is a white man's continent, as is most of North America.

For now, but yes, let us think for a moment how did that come to pass... Ah yes, whites forcibly replaced the native populations in both continents...

And yet most of Jow Forums cries about being replaced themselves :). Karma, perhaps?

>Karma
No such thing. Sorry to disappoint. Only a lack of will. But once that will is grasped once more filth like you will be reminded why Earth is metaphorically referred to as a 'White man's world' :)

Well, at least you have no pretenses that nazism is nothing but a white supremacist filth, dispelling the myth that it was all inclusive like some retarded memes suggested.

But eh, keep to that delusion. I guess we all need our "marvel superhero" (in your case Hitler) to look up to, when facing real world issues is too hard.

Cheers, have a foster on me.

>Uhhh you ate a tomato that means you have to let a dog eat you.

You are a son of a conquered people. Don't forget that we could have erased you and still can.

Attached: f40273923356e83c66c57ea02c3832bd9798cbeae44671a194f0e604f5e1660a.jpg (800x600, 67K)

you can't sage a sage you fucking newfag
lurk moar

Attached: 1533162916034.jpg (868x2664, 1.46M)

Sure thing, son of celt, roman, anglo-saxon, viking, norman.

This so hard.

I didn't make any comment on National Socialism or whether or not it was 'white supremacist' or not. It clearly isn't. Especially when the German expression of the ideology was directed against other white subgroups like Slavs. If people are going to say that Hitler liked blacks then they'd be lying. But if people are going to say he wanted to kill them all they'd also be lying. He disliked them as much as literally any other white person on Earth did at the time. Of course that didn't mean they couldn't be used if needed and it's hard to call him a 'white supremacist' when one third of the main Axis Powers was Japan. But since you seem to have a problem with word white supremacist (And I'd assume any other similar sounding phrase that you'd lump together with it) I suggest you go somewhere more your speed. Reddit perhaps?

Imagine talking like this and expecting people to take you seriously.

Attached: f15ce1058a8b64de7012b4c29d4f0aa43ffcc69550b220a941263b9e04b626fa.jpg (1280x720, 76K)

> But since you seem to have a problem with word white supremacist (And I'd assume any other similar sounding phrase that you'd lump together with it) I suggest you go somewhere more your speed. Reddit perhaps?

Places of darkness need to be shown the light.

Cringe pretentiousness

Btw, I would like to personally thank the Commonwealth nations like Australia for their decisive role in defeating the evil of nazism and fascism.

Peace.

Attached: 070b4df876766b8337174657ff7616cf--war-photography-north-africa.jpg (736x645, 84K)

lmaoing @fidG4Qzj

Are you against genocide or not you dumb fucking brainlet? Why do leftist arguments make absolutely no sense?

What a fucking faggot

>I attack my own retarded strawman

Attached: 1530445258566.jpg (442x500, 8K)

>Huffpost has mean articles about white people, so white genocide exists

It is what you think and it only exists in your mind. I was merely referencing the common false belief you folks have and made a quip about it.

Besides, if people want to mix with other races, why care? Are you against love?

Nice argument, faggot.

Think I'm wrong? Then disprove my claims with facts, not with low effort shitposts.

He doesn't think flooding white countries with niggers is genocide. He'll rationalize it in his head somehow. Logic doesn't work on the illogical.

But the National Socialists were right about race though.

Genocide means actually killing and eliminating people, dumb ass. People from other ethnic groups living with whites doesnt mean any of that.

>Genocide means actually killing and eliminating people, dumb ass
False
>People from other ethnic groups living with whites doesnt mean any of that.
Lol is that what u call it
O sweetie

Attached: 1531885896732.jpg (360x270, 29K)

It is on the long term.

HAHAHAHA
Fuck off brainlet, go google genocide, you stupid cunt.

a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily harm, or harm to mental health, to members of the group;
-----
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
-------
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Do you want to stop people from other ethnic groups with force from getting married? It's happened all the time throughtout history. It's, one can say, natural. If that creates in the long run different looking people, so be it. Old perishes, but new comes in its place. Nothing more dramatic than that.

Ethnic replacement is genocide retard, unless you actually want to argue that the Native Americans land's were fairly taken from them and thus might makes right. In which case you should have no opposition to NatSoc ideology.

>Besides, if people want to mix with other races, why care? Are you against love?
Because I would rather not see my culture die out and the United States turn into another failed Brazil? They can love each other in Africa with the other monkeys, how about that?

You literally created a retarded strawman that absolutely nobody here argues in favor for to try to discredit the ideology without arguing against it's main points.

Ok, post solid proofs how, under that definition, a white genocide/replacement is taking place?

>They can love each other in Africa with the other monkeys, how about that?

Do you consider blacks as monkeys from other species? Yeah, I hope Owen washed his hands well after shaking hands with that walking turd Hitler.

>You literally created a retarded strawman that absolutely nobody here argues in favor for

Still ignoring my arguments. Jow Forums "high quality intellectual" debate, ya'll

There are less and less White people and more and more non-Whites everyday, eventually if things keep going this way there will be no White people left. You already know this and you probably want it to happen.

We're all human beings. Life continues.

You literally ignored all of my other points fucking dumb nigger, try genuinely arguing for once in your life. I love how you try to claim the intellectual high ground when you are actually mentally retarded. You did this to most people in this thread, too. Abide by your own standards and use your head for once in your life you absolute fucking retarded leftist trash.

That's not how reality works, Dolph Lundgren and you average Pygmie are not equal.

>Importing Africa, Middle East and China into white countries.
>Media enforcing white guilt
>Blacks stealing White owned land in South Africa as well as killing whites.
All things that are happening.

It happened in history in such big rates because someone got conquered, not because you were an autistic fuck who opened your borders to everyone.

>And yet most of Jow Forums cries about being replaced themselves :). Karma, perhaps?
out of curiosity, this post indicates you find our race's replacement a moral positive, is that correct?

Look at how quick he has changed position. First it was "those ebil nazis were doing bad things to black people!" Now it's, "We're all humans who cares if white people cease to exist."

>When he has nothing else to add, he goes into a full autist ree mode.

I answered already, there is no ethnic replacement of whites, retard.

Brazil has failed not because of its racial structure, but because of enslaving blacks for almsot half a millenia and created a big population of oppressed and despised demographics. Also Brazilian white elite was corrupted, failed at industrializing, etc. There are other reasons than race.

There, I fucking addressed your points. Maybe now you can do the same.

>asks how is it white replacement
>get answer
>B-BUT WE ARE ALL HUMANS

How is it a bad thing, if there are less and less people with little melanin? Besides, white skin doesnt disappear, "mischling" children can be very light skinned, have blonde hair and blue eyes.

They didn’t have nonwhites mixed with whites the nonwhites were in their own units

I think you're trolling.

How is it a bad thing, if there are less and less people with too much melanin? Besides, white settlers are going to get a good tan in Africa.

"Nazism" never existed, and you can't prove a single thing you said.
Also it's idiots like you who run around calling people shitskins. Because you're a vicious evil JIDF loser.

>Edgy white kids wouldn't call black peoples monkeys, low-iq shitskins, it's da JOOS

>has no argument
>assume what someone will say and then call them edgy

Literally retarded and purposefully disingenuous.

Thank you for your literally enlightening argument.

>Das not genocide whit boi
>Oh ok gibs me proofs
>silence
>uh we wuz all humans and shiiit the only difference between races is them melanins shiiit

In a nutshell

1. Programs are in place in every western country whose purpose is the redistribution of white-owned capital into the pockets of non-whites. For plausible deniability, races are not named, excepting the cases of employment discrimination, but in practice and by intention of practice, the effect remains that wealth distribution in western nations is premised on the motion of white-owned capital into the pockets of non-whites. And
2. We couple this with the irrefutable truth that there is an inherent link between resources and reproduction to conclude that these programs, which are the product of explicit policy to open redistribution vectors, are put in place for the measure of reducing the capacity of any white populace to afford to commit to reproductive habits while using the product of their labor to increase the reproductive capacity of other races in the same nations, not only diminishing the numbers of whites, but also diminishing the proportion of whites in a democratic system in which racial power from demographic representation interacts in a zero-sum fashion. And
3. Given that we have been endowed with a qualifier for genocide which reads as follows:
>Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
which is clearly and thoroughly satisfied by the above terms, we MUST conclude that
4. An act of genocide is taking place against the white race in white homelands.

>Thinks immigration from third world countries and edgy huff post articles mean genocide.

People from poorer countries have always moved to richer countries. Just like when europeans moved to USA, in the land of opportunity. Some people actually had no choice, but were taken there in chains.

shieeeeeet

The constitution of the USA specifically mentions only white Europeans have a right to immigrate. That all changed in 1960.

Also the poor bleks are now free and can go back to fafrica. Actually, murica created a nation for them. But the niggers crashed it.

Also this is no argument for Africans coming to Europe.

>Just like when europeans moved to USA
you realize that was literally a genocide right?

When he has nothing else to add, he goes into a full autist ree mode.
You literally didn't address my arguments, and had to do it here after criticizing me for the exact thing you were doing and apparently not addressing yours when I addressed all of your arguments you intellectual hack. I love how you even address my arguments here because you're so stupid you actually realized how much of a sperg you were being.

>I answered already, there is no ethnic replacement of whites, retard.
Yes there is, you are denying reality, autist. Look up any study, not sure how you could deny this fact.

>Brazil has failed not because of its racial structure, but because of enslaving blacks for almsot half a millenia and created a big population of oppressed and despised demographics. Also Brazilian white elite was corrupted, failed at industrializing, etc. There are other reasons than race.
First of all, we know that wealth dissipates over a couple generations, so the slavery argument falls flat in it's head once you realize that over time blacks in places like the United States and Britain should have the same gdp per capita by now. If it's institutional racism, then why do Asians in the United States do better than whites despite being subjected to the same racial treatment other races were faced with at that time? And these were mostly extremely poor Chinese immigrants who were factory workers. How did they escape poverty in your head, retard? Race is a major factor, I would love for you to try to find me a nation in which blacks have succeeded. Infact, we can eve look at semi-failed states like China and guess that because of their high iq yet low living conditions most likely the environment doesn't matter.

>Also Brazilian white elite was corrupted, failed at industrializing, etc.
Because of their race. Strange how all black and Hispanic populations are having this exact problem to this day?

Attached: ST_2016.06.27_race-inequality-ch4-06.png (416x414, 15K)

Wong pic

Attached: 0826_census_race_fig1-2.jpg (599x278, 71K)

If you have a problem with a wealth redistribution policy of your country, perhaps you should take part in politics and change that or vote for a conservative party. We live in democracies after all. Welfare policies don't mean white genocide.

Do you want all White people to die?

>perhaps you should take part in politics and change that or vote for a conservative party. We live in democracies after all.
Welfare policies don't mean white genocide.

Attached: cmonnow.gif (380x214, 1008K)

False equivalence. Also, attributing intent to a factor doesn't deny the factor.
White nations are the only nations being overrun by non-whites. It does not matter if the reason is economic, and you purposefully downplay the amount of anti white rhetoric in the media. Europeans also founded the US, you fucking ape.

I think he wants all White people to die and will say anything to justify it.

When talking of blacks, metaphoircally speaking, it takes time to get up on your feet after being forced to grovel on the ground. Jim crow laws and all.

Of course not. I want a world of peace and harmony in race relations.

Le me rephrase that. I want a world with no races.

You want everyone to be equal. I mean not really, that's not even possible, what you want is to be Dolph Lundgren. I don't think you care about anyone other than yourself.

> it takes time to get up on your feet after being forced to grovel on the ground.

No it doesn't, especially if you fought for your freedom.

>I want a world with no races.

And how are you going to achieve that, when there are irrefutable differences between races.

I mean listen kid, hey, that's great.

It's so sad and pathetic.

Nigger tier slide thread

But poor blacks are enter the higher classes at much slower rates than poor whites, which completly discredits your argument. And this argument discredits your earlier argument since blacks in South Africa haven't been enslaved for 200 years.

and
>1 sentence reply to one point
This is why nobody takes lefties seriously.

Attached: MLKday001.png (1164x776, 46K)

>If you have a problem with the Nazi death camps you should just take part in Politics or vote.
>Having large amounts of non-native people moved into your country and being forced to support them isn't genocide. Even though it means you become a minority in your own country.

This. The people coming here aren't representing white interests, just how whites in Africa don't represent black interests. Democracy doesn't do anything when you bring people who are predisposed to hating you and your culture here.

>Of course not. I want a world of peace and harmony in race relations.
>Le me rephrase that. I want a world with no races.
well shit kid if you're just gonna explicitly concede that YOU ALREADY UNDERSTAND THAT RACIAL HOMOGENEITY IS THE SUPERIOR FORM OF SOCIAL ORDER then why don't you join us Nazis here on Jow Forums and we can show you this cool trick where you don't actually have to literally end the existence of every race like some genocidal maniac because you can just promote the virtue of a bunch of countries that each accomplish that goal for their host peoples

Of course he does. You'll notice he says here that: "He wants a world with no races", now how do you think that is made possible? Obviously he wants the only race in existence to be non-white.

>hur dur, you cant be like Terry Crews., therefore we cant be equal

It doesnt have to be zero sum. When these said people assimilate more, the us vs. them rhetoric will go down.

*sigh* South Africa did have apartheid, didn't it? You know, people because of their skin color divided into different castes of people. Pretty discriminatory to me.

>1 sentence reply to one point
When you have one succinct point to cover the whole issue, why wright down a whole essay?

Alright lads, Ive been here for 2 hours, still unconvinced by your narrow-minded racism. Keep the conversation going on if you will, but Im out. Its hard to hold the lines against hordes of nazis with no "JIDF" reinforcements to back me up.

God bless ya'll.

Attached: spice commercial.png (555x333, 204K)

>*sigh* South Africa did have apartheid, didn't it? You know, people because of their skin color divided into different castes of people. Pretty discriminatory to me.
What what point are you trying to make? And black actually did better UNDER apartheid you idiot. Come back when you get real arguments next time.

Oh, I said South Africa instead of Brazil, my bad. My point still stands, though.

>Hitler had demonized slavs as the worst untermensch along with jews. Polish had to give way to german settlers and were forcibly relocated and were used as slave labor. After getting their asses kicked bigly in Stalingrad the Wehrmacht in desperation was trying to conscript more slavic men, even admitting them to the SS. If you think Hitler would have let these people, especially slavs, exist in an equal status with "pure aryans", you're dead wrong. Just looking at the comment section of the nu-n*zis about people of other races proves the point (calling people shitskins, insects, poos, mongoloids, spics etc.).

Did you know a large minority of Germans are descendants of Sorbs or Slovenians? Saying the Germans would persecute Slavs amounts to saying they would persecute themselves.

Anyways, many Slavic countries, such as the Ukraine, Slovenia, Bulgaria, and Croatia were solid German allies. Others like Serbia and Slovakia were not so solid, but also on the German side.

If the Germans were dehumanizing Slavs, show me something a book or a movie that depicts or explains why Slavs are subhuman.

>It doesnt have to be zero sum
it is a mathematical definite that voting capacity per demographic interacts in a zero-sum fashion with population percentage, population percentages do not go higher than 100, when you increase the number of non-whites, you increase the proportion of non-whites, and white political capacity is diminished.

>When these said people assimilate more, the us vs. them rhetoric will go down.
Historically this ends in genocide. Multiculturalism is and remains the universal constant of genocide. There are no examples of Multiculturalism ending well.

youtube.com/watch?v=isxvXITTLLY
youtube.com/watch?v=NlqyBIQ-Cac
youtube.com/watch?v=tUfisPluAlc
youtube.com/watch?v=MVV821hQ8y4
youtube.com/watch?v=94yj_9jF2W8
youtube.com/watch?v=5CG3ZHHMAK4
youtube.com/watch?v=WhBnMEPTU80

lol why would anyone want to be Black?