If Jow Forums was actually against pedophilia, you would do something about all of the pedos on Jow Forums.
As you read this thread there are posts on /a/ /c/ and /e/ about fucking little girls. There are active loli porn threads on /b/. /v/ is discussing child rape games and /tv/ talks about their favorite underage actresses. /mlp/ is filled almost entirely with pedophiles.
Get your own house in order first before you start bitching about other websites Jow Forums
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
Get out of here spook.
Glow in the dark spotted
In a free market economy, the widespread availability of privately owned child sex businesses will actually reduce the overall level of child abuse...because we'll get rid of all that red tape about reporting these abuses.
Red tape is a spook.
The only antis are retarded newfags.
>/tv/ talks about their favorite underage actresses
I like a Maya. What lolis you guys like?
youtu.be
Kill yourself spook
Well spooked my friend
Friendship is also a spook.
Jewish-Feminist backed age of consent laws are a spook
>Pedophiles on Jow Forums
Post links to their threads
it's better to have pedos fapping to cartoons then molesting kids.
privately owned child sex businesses are child abuse you sick fuck.
t. spook
Every Jow Forums thread is a pedo thread.
Girlchildren are owned by their fathers. It is a father's right to have sex with his daughters.
>Every Jow Forums thread is a pedo thread.
Got any proof to back that up?
>No, but I FEEL that way!
Gofuckyourself.cactus
We cannot stop monsters from using an anonymous Chilean bread baking forum.
>It is a father's right to have sex with his daughters.
Get your own house in order first before you start bitching about other websites spook.
Drawings aren't children
There is unironically nothing wrong with pedophilia
>It is a father's right to have sex with his daughters
Probably 90% of the anime loli obsessed 4channers wont agree to interact with little girls in real life.
You do realize the girls they are after are not real right?
The logic here is that you delegate most life decisions of a kid to her parents anyway, as well as hold them responsible for her behavior. So if you want to be honest about it you should either allow the kid to decide her gender (or consent to sex) or you should reserve this power for her parents which would allow them to whore her out at will.
Lurk more nigger.
Well, it is. A man owns his daughters, he made them, he can fuck them if he wants.
>I only like pretend little girls, not real little girls
You do realize no one actually believes this, right?
youtu.be
No they r based
that's bullshit pedo logic and you know it.
so its not logical because a "pedo" uses it. Logic either stands on its own or doesn't, it doesn't matter what kind of person uses it.
it only stands in the minds of pedos, everyone who isn't a pedo will see how illogical it really is.
A father has no more right to fuck his daughters then he has to torture and kill his sons.
I'm not saying the particular poster's logic is sound, I'm saying there's arguments that are logical and discounting them just because you think the person using them is bad is illogical.
we are the counter balance op there's enough of us here now to be proactive
>some socialist not knowing about the "sex play" of girls young as 4 in the Weimar Republic
>I'm saying there's arguments that are logical and discounting them just because you think the person using them is bad is illogical
yeah you are right, but that's not was i was doing.
my argument wasn't ad-hominem.
i'm not saying his logic is bad because he is a pedo.
i'm saying bad logic like he's using is only attractive to pedos since it suits their desires.
if you want me to break it down bit by bit without ever referring to him personally or pedos in general, i can.
>I have no argument against it
>I'll just say it's wrong and that'll make me right
That's not how it works.
Yes, try to explain how females aren't property men can use as they please.
>there are posts on /a/ /c/ and /e/
>Coming to Jow Forums to bitch about the rest of Jow Forums
Go ahead, ask me how I know you don't belong.
All you said was that it was "pedo logic" before I responded to your post.
'Sup fellow paedophiles.
Go ahead, break it down.
yeah, pedo logic. as in bad logic pedos like.
>Yes, try to explain how females aren't property men can use as they please.
if you honestly believe that, we will have to discuss very fundamental morality, and to do that i'd need something to work with.
could you explain to me why females should be the property of men?
>could you explain to me why females should be the property of men?
They're not fully people, like something between a child and a man.
>we will have to discuss very fundamental morality
The position of cuts as property has nothing to do with morality.
>They're not fully people, like something between a child and a man.
by what unscientific definition of "people"
>nothing to do with morality.
lol, now you're just being an edgelords
It's very odd the contradictions. They are very against jew Hollywood pedos but think 13 is peak woman and age of consent should be lowered.
Those are just muslims
And this is the second time I have seen this little girl Stirner meme with the ghost hair clips.
>13
Way too old. 5-8 is when girls are best, maybe 10.
> age of consent should be lowered
It should be eliminated.
how many times are you going to defend pedophiles from scrutiny by accusing us of having feet of clay?
All you have to do is literally click an arrow and hit report you cock gurgling autistic niggertard, and that shit gets you b& and probably v&
why would op not take pride in Jow Forums.gov?
nigger you have to be kidding
What if the child consents you fucking idiot.
>Pedophiles
You know they want to have sex with animu little girls. They literally don't exist. Can't really go after someone for wanting to dick something that doesn't exist.
you know just as well as i do how easy it is to manipulate children. you could literally get 100% to consent to that using the correct tactics.
That's why we have laws that say children can not give consent.
>whoa, different opinions?
>must be fake
I couldn't imagine this level of delusion
"Sexual consent" is a fiction. You dont need consent from a piece of property
this
>children
>property
this is why nobody likes dixiefags
All of the old fags that are now on Jow Forums are the ones who got fed up with that shit. I scroll through the first page in /b/ and actually find myself shaking. It is the most degenerate shit I have ever seen.
Didn’t read. Egoism is a fake ideology and Stirner wasn’t a real philosopher. Even quoting him will get you laughed out of any philosophic circle.
sensitive fag
Yeah, before they found out all of the gods they idolized in their youth also turned out to be a bunch of baby fuckers.
Hell, the Catholic church, all of you stupid larping christian weasels got fucking EXPOSED.
Suddenly no more bible threads, hmm.
No, only the females. You can't own people.
homosexuality is a mental disease that's spread by child sexual abuse.
>you would do something about all of the (insert thing OP doesn't like here) on Jow Forums
Year after year the inmates still think they run the asylum.
>females
>property
again
this is why nobody likes dixiefags
Don't blame that retardation on us. Fucking memeflag nigger probably isn't American.
Meant for
wait are you a southerner?