Is IQ genetic or environmental?

this

It's environmental over the long term, that's how genetics works. But on an individual level genetics set the limits of what a person is capable of doing.

Both.
The race has molded itself to the Enviroment so is genetic.
It can be influenced by parental input, diet and mental stimulation but only to a certain point.
There are several studies but IQ is 85% genetic and 15% envrioment roughly.

No, but their children's children will.

A study should be done where they take twin africans. Leave one in Africa and take the other and raise them in a western Culture. And check their IQs over time.

Because they'll be mixed

Would a black person raised in western society be less athletic than a black person in west africa?

Why do people die? Murder? Suicide? Hey multiple factors can contribute to a particular phenomenon. Just like it can be both genetics and environment affecting IQ.

Yes because they would be obese and have diabetes

No. 2,000 years later, yes

This is always the answer to everything for low-iq mutts; if you are til stupid to understand even the most basics of any subject you think you look smart by deflecting your stupidity on others.

Or you just say muh dick; a retort just as avoid of any trace of intelligence as your other response

No, it's because their environment has changed.
Yes.

All those low i.q regions have been victim to white exploitation and oppression at some point,

Fuck you Sven we tried this in America and look what happened. We gave them EVERYTHING and they burnt it all down. Learn from our mistakes.

Attached: nogwarts.jpg (1303x4720, 2.31M)

Europeans and Asians in all environments are smarter than niggers in all environments. Figure it out. Saged.

Cart before the horse. They were dumb before we showed up, which means we had guns and they didn't.

>Is IQ genetic or environmental?
Both. Though the amount of each varies on who you ask. I've seen studies claiming its mostly genetic and others claiming its mostly enviromental, so who knows.

Both.
Enviroment can stimulate intelectual growth, good food when growing up allows better brain developement, etc
Genetics defines your upper inteligence limit. Every race has their own IQ bell curve.

Purely genetic, Thailand has an IQ of 91 similar to some Balkan countries. Yet we live in a tropical country like the niggers in West Africa.

Between two people or two groups who inhabit exactly the same environment, IQ is 100% genetic. But in practice there is no such thing as "exactly the same environment" and there is no upper limit on how heavily the environment can weigh in.
Differences within the US - probably mostly genetic. Differences between EU and Africa are more environmental than that.

Reminded me of this video. It's a motivational but the black dude said the black kids are the worst

youtu.be/TYFXZOKgbCA

But life was shitty in all parts of the world. Why did all the other races advance except for the darkies?

>took in black slaves
>treated blacks like slaves
>failed to integrate them into society
>wonders why niggers are acting like niggers

Op is a Faggot.
>makes his le 85% more inteligent then they are. lowers the IQ of countries who fuck with him.

Still Niggers fucking your women you Chuck

Attached: MosesSucksDick.jpg (2550x934, 458K)

Both. When you're between the ages 4-10 you should study as hard as you can to get your maximum potential IQ.

>also owned by

Attached: moses.jpg (500x541, 85K)

Attached: be94a05c7d43b7b5eac9799218cd1e76.jpg (1024x576, 96K)

also
>who would win...

Attached: cMpZTyK.jpg (620x400, 26K)

>n-word
that's racist, where do you think you are dude, on r/donald? we are inclusive here.

The average black American in NYC has 20% European DNA. In LA 25%. It's like that all over. There was a thread not too long ago with state by state averages; I think in at least 4 states the average black american was less than 70% African DNA.

Niggers here are still thick as pigshit so it's clearly genetic.

t. persian rape baby

>Fair housing act
>affirmative action
>end of segregation

we not only integrated them, but gave them unfair advantages to offset their under performance.... you're in denial. This won't end well for your country.

I'd hate living under the rule of my former oppressor so I can kinda undrstand, not that excuses niggee tier behaviour. Blacks that refused to integrate to society should have been forcefully sent away to an established American colony in Africa.

t. mongolian rapist

>Is IQ genetic or environmental?
greater than 80% genetic, according to science.

iq can be lowered by living in horrible situations and squalor and abuse.

niggers and other subhumans are generally limited in intelligence regardless of the environment.

Genes develop to accommodate the environment, so yes.

Still mad over your red hair and green eyes?

Mostly genetic.

Environmental.

White bois were too retarded to survive on their own "wealth" up until 1500s. Stealing from other continents made them rich, which improved their quality of life, which in turn made them spend time on science, tech, etc..

>Only Europe was involved in war and conquest historically
>The rest of the world dindu nuffin

The rest of the world didn't commit genocide and basically steal 3 continents worth of resources.

Europe would've gone back to being piss poor if it wasn't for the help they got from the country that was built on genocide and slavery (aka USA)

by help, I mean saving europe from ww2.

They did and they did. How else would we have taken it from them?

Environmental

i know you are meming but the niggers in the US show that doesn't happen.

It's 50-50.

>You pick da half breed
>He half breed
I'M FUCKING DYING HOLY SHIT OOGA BOOGA

it's both

Attached: IQ_wolr0-1_210-v_2an-fig2.png (6460x3455, 1.9M)

its both since you evolve for the enviroment

> The rest of the world didn't commit genocide

Accounts of the Mongols taking Baghdad in 1258
"Citizens attempted to flee, but were intercepted by Mongol soldiers who killed in abundance, sparing neither women nor children. Martin Sicker writes that close to 90,000 people may have died. Other estimates go much higher. Wassaf claims the loss of life was several hundred thousand. Ian Frazier of The New Yorker says estimates of the death toll have ranged from 200,000 to a million."

At Nishapur
"The city was destroyed by Mongols in 1221, after the husband of Genghis Khan's daughter was killed at Nishapur. She requested the death of every resident of the city to avenge her husband's death, and over the course of 10 days Khan's troops killed, and beheaded the entire population. Their skulls were reputedly piled in pyramids by the Mongols"

Kek you fucking retard

Attached: genghis-khans-mongol-empire-in-1227-and-at-its-greatest-extent-in-EH06F2.jpg (1300x855, 100K)

Comparing genghis khan killing 90,000 people to europeans killing 50 million natives.

Alrighty, then.

And the best thing about your dumb logic is, Genghis khan didn't even steal their land.

Both, obviously..

54-77% genetic, at least

recent GWASs suggests up 88% genetic

this environment specific situation really makes me think

Attached: 1530389174767.jpg (378x375, 28K)

>50 million natives

Attached: 1507736346291.gif (182x179, 436K)

/thread
why do you niggers keep bumping it?

white people were the only ones to ever say there is something wrong in genocides you little retarded monkey.

soon enough you'll see no one else gives shit about this concept

You mean your wife's kids will?

>Enviroment determines genetics.

sure, kid
...enviroment. lol.

he's right though. here's my theory
hunger, true hunger, is the the rudder that steers the flow of genetic material
environment with little food = lower disgust sensitivity required for survival = more violations of social normatives, r selected sexual activity, and body envelope violations = more reproductive success among individuals with temperamentally less disgust sensitivity = fewer social normatives and therefore no institutions of religion or eduction are constructed = population with little to no value for human life and genetically prone to seek instant gratification

once man is not hungry the domain of magical thinking (via similarity and contagion) that cuts across the 7 domains of elicitors is maximized. He essentially becomes open to the idea of a god and is free to construct a religion around values that secures his safety into the future and ultimately for his offspring as well.

Attached: 93BE5D1B-7379-4D02-A256-5CB2E99B00BB.png (1082x868, 161K)

example of low temperamental disgust (body envelope violations)

Attached: when you let your kids dress themselves.jpg (1100x619, 235K)

Partly environmental, mostly genetic. A white kid who grew up malnourished will likely have lower IQ than a well-fed white kid but higher intelligence than a well-fed nigger.

Attached: bw99xajeo9q01.png (549x848, 504K)

example of the opposite, the manifestation of the domain of magical thinking (contagion) would be the social norm of saying Gesundheit when somebody sneezes.

Attached: CTUEFKLWoAAgmia.png (600x197, 28K)

here's the mainstream consensus on IQ
[spoiler]It's largely genetic, environmental factors can reliably be attributed to decreasing IQ. An excess of remedies for those factors does not increase IQ above the population's average. When social and environmental differences are eliminated the genetic variations in IQ maximize. [/spoiler]

Attached: Mainstream Science on Intelligence.png (1905x1865, 840K)

>the only ones to ever say there is something wrong in genocides

No, whites were the last ones among human races to realize that genocide is wrong. Other races stopped committing genocide 100s of years ago. The underdeveloped whiteoid brain needed time to learn that genocide is bad.

>Is a property of your brain that was created by genetics environmental?

Attached: download.png (213x237, 8K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

Is there a more nigger word than "whiteoid"? I get that "albinoid" sounds stupid, but we don't call them "blackoids", we call them "negroids". Of course, niggers can barely into English, much less Latin, so I get why, it's just so flat and imaginationless.

Attached: 765.jpg (599x616, 238K)

>steal
Shut the fuck up, your an entire race of kleptomaniacs you have no right to talk badly about thief of any kind african ape.

It's probably largely hereditary, but influenced by environment. It isn't a total view of every aspect of the brain's functioning though. The brain is too complex to be condensed into a number.

I'm talking about one race genociding other race.

There never was a race war

Nigger, that happens in every single event in Africa where more than one race is involved. The Sudanese Civil War had sand niggers mass-killing/enslaving regular niggers.

Wow what a monstrous breed of man, he literally doesnt even care about 500,000 niggers being slaughtered by niggers with just machetes.

weak men, and societies, can’t be virtuous
a person and society without the option to be evil can’t be good
it requires the possibility of genocide to make a choice to not commit genocide

and does the killing of 500,000 to 1,000,000 Rwandans during 100-day period from 7 April to mid-July in 1994 not count as a genocide? Africa, the very moment they had the ability to commit genocide, committed genocide. And they did it for pettier reasons than the motivation for genocides in the west.

Attached: rwanda-in-the-eyes-of-history.jpg (2200x1485, 762K)

Well, to be fair, most people here don't.

Well hes a nigger so you would think he would care about his own people.

Is the cow a result of genetics or environment?

- Alt Hype

are you literally retarded?
the Tutsis were as separate a race from the Bantus as the Ashkenazis were from the Germans

A little bit of both

read the image title

Attached: Zimbabwe Economic Growth - Whites Left first in 1980 and again in 2000.png (1435x799, 25K)

>Rwanda

Funny enough one of the smartest Blacks in the world and certainly the most competent black head of state in the world is COMPLETELY turning that country around right now.

Attached: Based Kagame.jpg (968x681, 99K)

>the Tutsis were as separate a race from the Bantus as the Ashkenazis were from the Germans
this

>other races stopped committing genocide centuries ago

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gukurahundi
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_farm_attacks

Correct. With several thousands years of natural selection niggers might just become human.

environment affects genes.

Attached: race and IQ.png (1151x534, 83K)

IQ scale was adjusted because too many african americans fell in the retard category

Attached: 1514126054549.png (511x171, 55K)

world map of IQ

Attached: 1514126305865.png (1317x1652, 425K)

looks like he's overseeing the reintroduction of the native ethnic population to Rwanda

Attached: Kwita_Izina.jpg (1600x1069, 86K)

Don't tell that to Shaka Zulu, who killed 2 million Niggers OFF the battlefield, the Bantus who genocided to Tutsis in Rwanda, the Niggers who genocided Whites in Haiti (then begged France for help and genocided the help, too, because Niggers aren't actually Human). The Jie Genocide in China, the Anasazi Genocide at the hands of other Natives, and numerous genocides of surrounding tribes by the Jews. The only people in history who ever attempted to stop genocides of others were Whites, and the various subhuman populations are simply to ungrateful to realize this.
Damn, Niggers are fucking stupid.