redpill me on snopes /pol why should or shouldn't i trust them.
Redpill me on snopes /pol why should or shouldn't i trust them
Other urls found in this thread:
snopes.com
twitter.com
/lit/
LOL
because their (((fact checking))) is really just partisan propaganda.
can you give me sources and examples to show my friend, because he is hardcore shilling snopes.
They have 5 categories for something that should only have 3. There should only be:
>true
>false
>not enough information
"Mostly true" and "mostly false" is where they inject ludicrous amounts of bias.
CLAIM: the sky is blue
TRUTH: it isnt because clouds
/snopes
They cite their sources. Look at their evidence, look at what the original claim is, and think for yourself. They never make a judgement without citations to back it up.
It's ran by jews dude
>CLAIM: the sky is blue
>TRUTH: it isnt because clouds
>/snopes
CLAIM: Men have a penis
TRTUH: Women can have a penis, too!
/snopes
>redpill me on snopes /pol why should or shouldn't i trust them.
I know OP, why not ask the notoriously sane, rational and clear thinking individuals here?
You shouldn't trust them because they say things we disagree with.
its a mindfield much like wikipedia is but as a rule of thumb you should not trust their politically oriented entries, they will stretch towards infinity to dismiss anything that might benefit the right
The more important question for this thread is who is she? And why did the meme die? It wasn't forced
>as a rule of thumb you should not trust their politically oriented entries
>A 'fact checking' website, with entries authored by both the founder's former wife, and their cat
>started by a (((man))) who hired the prostitute he was fucking behind his wife's back as a fact checker
>who also later wrote off the costs of his wedding to and honeymoon with the same former prostitute as (((business expenses)))
Move along, nothing to see here.
I'm not certain that Mikkelson is a kike, but the fact remains that marrying the prostitute he formerly paid $500/hr to rub his tummy cut his expenses considerably. You be the judge!
any place peddling 'truth' cannot be wholly trusted. the herd animal trusts in the truth of the herdsman all the way to the slaughterhouse door.
>any place peddling 'truth' cannot be wholly trusted.
While it is honest to say that 'truth' is subjective,
you still can't negotiate with gravity.
SAUCE NOW
That's a grill bonganon.
The entire reason your ancestors left your pathetic, rain-soaked island and colonized the world.
emily rudd
>Mostly false
>Mostly true
These two answers alone that Snopes use, disqualify them from being actual fact checkers. Nobody says that the Earth being round is mostly true or mostly false because some faggot begs to differ.
>emily rudd
I'd give'er a right go up the tallywhacker.
IF you know what I mean, chum.
Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, saynomore.
They blatantly misrepresent claims being made by an article so that they can label it as "false" or "mostly false", because they know that most people won't even bother to read the article in its entirety.
>They blatantly misrepresent claims being made by an article so that they can label it as "false" or "mostly false"
If you remember, (((Snopes))) was started by one man, his ex-wife (who goes by the moniker 'big-booty call' in his phone), and their FUCKING cat
Their main problem ISN'T objectivity,
It's sobriety.
and, objectivity.
thanks mate
>thatsamanbaby.jpeg
Pretty sure I said exactly the opposite.
But since you were the faggots who invaded the entire world while searching for fuckable pussy, I defer to your good judgement.
Snopes says things Jow Forums disagrees with, therefore it must be fake
>Snopes says things Jow Forums disagrees with, therefore it must be true!
It''s silly, unless you deeply need to fact-check 'The X-Files'
'That kike and his cat know more about 'The X-Files than Mulder himself.
>Fact checking a meme that contains several independant claims
>one of the claims is true but the rest is false so the meme isn't outright false, just most of it.
>some autist on a Portuguese quilting forum can't wrap his mind around this enigma and paradox of a scenario
Its run by a divorced couple and the stripper the dude is dating. Not exactly a high tech operation. Not to mention he is quite heavily connected to the DNC.
I have only ever used snopes to refute urban legends with parents/coworkers. Other than that I have no use for their fact checking on anything political
they call right wing claims 'lies' and say things like 'it's complicated' etc when left wing claims are false.
>I prefer my news be spoonfed to me by Walter Cronkite
t. 30 year old boomer.
how many days left until you own that fugly (((recreational vehicle)))?
what the fuck are you talking about you stupid nigger
>manual transmissions make me irrationally raciss!!
That's one of the twelve sure signs of a Millennial.
Snopes isn't 'fake' but it treats left wing falsehoods differently. It seems to mitigate them, whereas with right wing falsehoods, they are harsh and direct like a journalistic company should be.
There's definitely some bias.
Get a load of this shit. I typed out a long post but I think I'd better let it stand on its own instead...
>drag-queen-library
That about covers it.
>onthe upon a thyme, there was a bootiful wittle boy who's raciss parents wouldn't let zir go fuck a 45 year old man in a dress, who think's he's a woman.
>You should know that Zir spent 60 hours making zir's bootiful silver tinfoil horns, and now zir is an official minion of the underworld. Just so you know, It's not illegal to fuck little boys in the underworld.
Only in the real world.