So let me get this straight. You willingly elect a president who hates the media and loves big business...

So let me get this straight. You willingly elect a president who hates the media and loves big business. He literally puts GoldmanSachs and Exxon mobile executives in the white house. He also has given the biggest tax cuts in recent history to the wealthy and corporations. But it doesn't matter because, hur dur he triggerz da libs.

But when coporations like Google ban a media company like infowars, suddenly you fags want big government intervention in the free market? Sounds like you're hypocrites.

Attached: AverageTrumptard.png (960x576, 226K)

Illegal racketeering

>he doesn't know anything about politics or economics

Is there supposed to be an argument hidden within this dribble?

Normally when people use "but" the two subects on either side of it are related.

I voted for Trump because fuck brown people they have to go back. Everything else in his platform is a side issue to me

Also Jow Forums is a third positionist board not a capitalist one

imagine being born this embarrassing

> big media isn't big business

*sip*

It's not clear what you want to get straight from your post. Because Trump is good for the economy and dislikes msm, why do we not endorse censorship?

Because we don't endorse censorship. Not sure what the problem is.

>no argument

>dribble

If OP made some salient assertions I'd gladly offer an argument, but it takes 2 to tango.

Define “good for the economy”

Trump campaigned on being more anti-wall street, it wasn't until he was elected president that he started appointing wall street bankers.


Clinton ran on the platform of being a wall street shill.

Obama and trump are similar in that regard

All politicians are the same you spanner

True

limiting the supply of labor would raise wages

However sense there hasn't been a real crackdown on immigration that has yet to happen. Across the board tariffs protecting industry would mean increasing production and employment in the US as well as increasing wages, but Trump has only begun putting a dent in the trade deficit.

I'd put Trump's economic rating at a C then. Hillary would have set to work passing TPP and lowering whatever tariffs we had left thus increasing the trade deficit as much as possible.

Obama was still technically the superior option to McCain since McCain ran on the platform of invading Iran, and probably would have got it.

Although Obama tried his hardest to make up for that fact by bombing Libya, arming Jihadists in Syria, bombing Yemen, etc.

Would you have really preferred a war in Iran? We might still get it thanks to the zionist shlls constantly lobbying congress and the president.

Attached: main-qimg-d8d502e450162340ce533be13449574e.png (580x598, 67K)

trump was elected to block clinton from the white house because she would have been blackmailed by china (see china/clinton scandal from the 90s) and crushed the american manufacturing sectors.

trump created a third party coalition and just ran as a republican in order to hijack the christian vote.

We literally asked for bankers and business people instead of polititions. Why do you think the economy is booming?

I hate everyone. Trump is a reality TV show actor. America is Jewish political theater. I'm ready to kill tyrants in the streets and IDGAF what party they belong to nigger.

>He also has given the biggest tax cuts in recent history to the wealthy and corporations
and the middle class
and poor people

god this line is fucking annoying
>HE CUT TAXES FOR THE RICH
>MUH OLIGARCHY
he cut taxes for EVERYONE except a select few rich people in blue states like california

The travesty that is this post

thanks cia-kun

>billary is a warmunger

Attached: FB334E89-C391-408A-ABBB-50716F662AC6.jpg (866x900, 136K)

Instead of relying on the benevolence of the ruling class, why not just give the majority of the cuts to the consumer class?

Media is owned by the biggest businesses you retard.

>we literally asked for bankers and business people

lmao no. I asked for "not Hillary" which is what I got. Anyone who actually thinks that putting bankers in charge of the government is a good idea is delusional.


The tax cuts for business and the rich are "premanent". The tax cuts for the lower classes are temporary. It was a mediocre bill at best.

argument: nonexistent

>I have never heard of the country of Libya.

Just stay on cuck island and don't bother anyone else with you inane opinions.

So let me get this straight
You're a giant one post by this ID faggot
/thread

Why have a ruling class?

If I were CIA you'd already be dead faggot.

>Yo jamal
*BOUNCE BOUNCE*
>What do you think of the macro economics of socialist intervention in a free market society?
*BOUNCE BOUNCE*

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1920x1080, 135K)

Goldman sachs hand selected obamas cabinet, not surprised theyre still attatched to the hip

Why? Indeed...

>hates the media
I hate the media. It's useless in the current year. It used to have a purpose of giving people a platform so that they can spread their ideas and findings and what not. Now anyone can just post it on the internet without any need for gatekeepers, which is why no one goes to the media if they actually have anything to say.
>given biggest tax cuts to those that don't pay taxes.
I don't know how the US economy will recover.
>Google shouldn't be regulated.
Google wants to be treated as a public platform not a publisher, Trump is not allowed to block people on twatter because twatter is a public platform, therefore it follows that Google shouldn't be allowed to block people if it also continues to want to be a public platform and avoid regulation thanks to that. However I have no issue with Google choosing to become a publisher, but if that's the case then it should be regulated as such.

Why do you want Jews to get more tax money?

How can you make these two comments lmao

Are you retarded?

Critical think for once in your life

How much did the big banks get from Obama? How much did Hillary make for speaking at a 1 hour conference? When big business grows, small businesses grow. ExxonMobil, for example, gets crude oil from the smaller oil production companies, which in turn hires even smaller companies for well servicing, salt water disposal, safety and local microwave telco providers, geologists well tracking and steering... and many others. What jobs have you provided?

Yup, you're retarded

>biggest tax cuts to the wealthy
They weren't paying estate taxes, only 1 in 20 farmers were getting fucked by those. "Estate planning" is a career for a reason.
He gutted SALT deductions.
>Last year
omg Trump cut taxes on wealthy
>This year
omg Trump is bleeding california dry because a million californians just saw their taxes go up

Average paid tax rate for the 1% was about 17%.
Warren Buffet paid 11%.
Let's just see how Trump's "tax cuts for the wealthy" play out. (pro tip: everyone who understands taxes already knows they'll pay more because of SALT eliminations.)

When did you see Jow Forums say that google should be forced to allow infowars?
(pro tip: you didn't)
We're pissed that kikes are censoring media, but it's not like we're surprised or think kikes should be forced to do things in a moral way (as if that's a possibility).

Your "argument" is based on two lies.
1. tax cuts for rich
didn't happen
2. Jow Forums thinks google should be forced to allow infowars by the gubment
didn't happen

You... you're a kike, aren't you?

Absolute travesty of a post

What’s wrong goyim don’t you like money? Let me and my big nose cousins run your country and you’ll have plenty of (((money)))

Sometimes I feel like pol is filled with djt neocon shills

>Sounds like you're hypocrites.

Like that's a bad thing.

As in, everyone, even his enemies know he's making smart economic decisions. More jobs. Stocks reaching record highs. Don't be a simp.