NatSoc and ethnostaties, can you please describe to me your economical model...

NatSoc and ethnostaties, can you please describe to me your economical model? Preferably one not based entirely kn war and expansion like Germany was? I hate unrestrained capitalism, and Hitler himself warned that Demcracies would always end up as Corporatocracies inevitably. But I hate socialism far more. I hate authoritarian fascism too though.

So anyway, give me your economical model please. The has to be a third way. Unless that's anarcho primitivism, which I'm starting to lean towards, but that's unrealistic on any scale.

Attached: 1534293901447.jpg (602x796, 73K)

Anarcho primitivism is he most realistic system on a large scale you pleb.

bumping for wanting to know too

Innovation and agriculture. We'd streamline and revolutionise everything we touch like always. We would remember those who helped save us and build our ethnostate when it comes to sharing this knowledge with the rest of humanity. I would be willing to trade with the first-world oriental asian countries and perhaps the hispanic and low% white mixed. They wouldn't be allowed in, but we'd trade fair.

It's simple logic: whites have money, and know how to make money. If you get rid of all the shitskins, all economical problems will be gone. Probably a superpower the size of China in less than 5 years.

Not without a reset or a Messiah.

These are not answers

How exactly are they not answers?

Oh it's coming don't worry.

Attached: 1520660065057.png (640x1136, 273K)

I think it's probably a good idea to copy the US model of the economy as it used to be. Where the printing of money would be explicitly controlled by the government.

I think welfare programs should take the form of government jobs instead of just giving out foodstamps.
Maybe the exception should be that you can get foodstamps if you don't have children and agree to be sterilized. Something like that.

Well, I like the first two a lot. What about corporations? How did they get so out of control? They are supposed to lose their protection the instant they no longer serve the common good, and the people should have a say in this. Personally, I don't think they should be allowed to exist.

Natsoc is basically the government forcing corporations to produce and, generally, act in the interest of the people. Some crucial elements of society are absorbed by the state.

Why not just abolish the corporation and elect leaders for companies who produce important things, leaders who can be held legally accountable?

>What about corporations?
Very tricky subject. I don't have a good answer right now.

In some sense corporations are good, but if they get big enough they start warping society.

And, if you have a policy of cutting them down, they will be incentivized to go to another country. Very tricky balance to strike.

Audrey Hepburn will never crush u with her giant feet

every man should live on his land and grow his own food. anything outside of that you do on your own risk

Sounds like a society that will be starving and conquered in a couple of years

Fpbp. The industrial revolution was a mistake.

Attached: 5G_disconnect.jpg (1000x750, 100K)

I mean, what happens when those leaders conspire among themselves. Also, what do you do about small business then.

This is the society that a racially homogeneous NatSoc is

Attached: Reich Letter pt 1.jpg (720x940, 184K)

Attached: Reich Letter pt 2.jpg (726x940, 181K)

Attached: Reich Letter pt 3.jpg (788x928, 116K)