Your favourite form of capitalism?

That's what we said about Britain before Thatcher came along. And now we can't get rid of her nonsense policies.

That has more to do with Anglo greed than anything.

the anglo-saxon model is the least remote from actual capitalism, so the least shitty, obviously
the european model is utter commie tier shit, and deserves cobalt nuking
the asian model is for insectoids, so not even they care

Idk wtf common law is at all.

>wtf common law is at all.
Secret Anglo Law you will never know about

Attached: Map_of_the_Legal_systems_of_the_world_(en).png (3564x1870, 874K)

What do you mean, aren't all capitalist systems designed to some extent to maximise profit? The only exceptions are those that factor in power (e.g. mercantilism), but these are still greedy in one sense or other.

Historically, the quasi-religious purist libertarian attitude has not been the norm for Anglo-saxon economics. Free and lubricated domestically, and rigid and controlled internationally has been the modus operandi of our nations until very recently.

For Australia and the USA, we've also had large bodies of water increasing the cost of goods, so the raw tariff rate doesn't express just how protectionist our economies really were.

This is my favourite form of capitalism.

Attached: 1526120126291.jpg (992x574, 248K)

>Common law judges are lay judges
Common law judges are fucking senior lawyers appointed from the fucking bar.
Who writes this shit.

Based, but the mefo bills were going to eventually come back to haunt Hitler had he not gone to war.

>Historically, the quasi-religious purist libertarian attitude has not been the norm for Anglo-saxon economics.
well it was for the 19th Century

i think he had a plan for that , it is known historically that germany wasnt ready for war economically and military

Maybe if you're thinking in terms of domestic econcomic policies, but this truly wasn't the case regarding interntional trade.

This is largely, to my knowledge, a destructive and false meme spread by economic libertarians to inspire a kind of mysticism for their cult-like devotion to the free market.
parisschoolofeconomics.com/hautcoeur-pierre-cyrille/M1_Histoire/Nye.pdf

"The Myth of Free-Trade Britain and Fortress France: Tariffs and Trade in the Nineteenth
Century"

"Invisible hand" lmao. Obviously whoever made this didn't actually read wealth of nations

>best economy in the world
>jews control everything
>government has to raise debt limit every two years
>get cucked by mc pharma when you get sick/ injured
>also worldleader in wageslaving

I don't know what you are talking about but the UK in the 1890s and early 1900s was getting flooded by German and American goods and was starting to change peoples mind Free Trade which had been a bilateral principle since the repeal of the corn laws

britishempire.me.uk/freetrade.html

>Europe is socialist
kek

You don't really see the Japanese pumping in immigrants so they can speculate on property values to the point of making the country majority-brown.

things may change who knows
asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cover-Story/Famous-for-its-resistance-to-immigration-Japan-opens-its-doors

A few pajeets is nothing compared to what Canada or Australia or California do with Chink speculation on real estate. The Japanese actually have very few regulations on real estate, so there's not insane land prices like you have in the Anglosphere. I mean, Canada's entire economy is basically driven by pumping house values with immigration and Chink money, banks speculating on said housing at 60-90x leverage, driving consumer spending via home equity lines of credit, and then bunding and securitizing the mortgages for companies to use as borrowing collateral. Extreme greed is characteristic of all Anglo countries to the point of being happy to sell the country out.

This model is terrible, and written by someone who knows nothing. Both American, British, and Swedish capitalism have gone through significant changes since the 18th century. Moreover, under “Anglo Saxon” capitalism, the intervention of the state is my no means minimal as massive resources are used to ensure competition

Attached: E4587265-439F-4288-9857-EB801A2E116D.png (645x729, 82K)

This guy gets it. Capitalism societies are designed to maximise profits by any means and if some CEO/executive can't be as ruthless as possible there's someone behind them who can thus we have created a population who hate each other, consumed by material wealth, mental health issues, inequality, globalism.

Okay, there are two things to keep in mind regarding this:

A. This is also when British industry began to lose its edge against French and German

B. America still retained high tariffs going into the 20th century.

Capitalism reminds me of Plato's analogy of leading a chariot with reason. The horses of passion, vice, and desire are not guided by reason, and so may veer off the track. Thus, reason is needed to keep us going in the right direction.

The one problem I have with this in practice is that I don't trust the state to act in the nation's best interests.

Attached: Plato Chariot.gif (377x299, 66K)

Thatcher was pretty much the best thing to happen to the UK. Ironically the only PM with the balls to get stuff done.

Terresa the appeaser would have send a strongly worded complaint to Argentina and then agreed to la Maldivas.

The EU is a corporatist dreamland. Lobby the EU to make outside competition subject to tariffs and ensure your sub par product retains market dominance and subverting free market capitalism.

The Asian model is hardly even described and the U.S is NOT a good example of the Anglo system anymore. We are incredibly inefficient because we are neither socialist nor capitalist. The most efficient would be capitalist (with some necessary tweaks), but even being pure socialist would be more efficient than the shitty mixed system we have.

>Thatcher was pretty much the best thing to happen to the UK.
You take that the fuck back

Attached: Ian Smith Not in a Thousand Years.gif (240x235, 239K)

Yep. Incoherent demographics = incoherent policy.

Anarcho capitalism

Fuck off Corbynite scum. We need someone like Thatcher now more than ever.

Biggest economy, worst living standards in the west

You can't just say that without factoring in the effects of negros and spics.

Although that being said, maybe you could argue that part of the reason why America is becoming brown is because of its economical ideology.

Instead of negotiating competitive trade deals she enabled mass outsourcing and destroyed Britain’s coal, steel and pottery industry when she wasn’t busy covering up child sex rings. What were people thinking electing a woman who are short sighted and selfish by their very nature.

Capitalism along with communism is inherently jewish, They both use nonwhites to infest white nations. We need a third system entirely. I'd recommend looking into what Mussolini's system accomplished before the west killed him off. Unless you want to be goy cattle for a group of hook nosed merchants in Israel. Then I suggest just going against both system and forming and a new system altogether that benefits native citizens. I can't name one country that's capitalistic who isn't being invaded by latinos or africans at the moment.

Attached: 1523520753266.jpg (498x498, 101K)

>standards so bad that they can eat so much they have a thousand times more obesity problems than starvation. They can ram burgers down their throat while living like kings.

Wow hard life.

>A brit
>Not recognizing Ian fucking Smith
shame, but typical
Do they really not teach you about what happened?

Attached: Rhodesia.png (600x523, 160K)

If the industry isn't profitable then it needs to go. Fuck governments propping up businesses.

You dumb fuck three of the wealthiest nations with great quality of life operate on the anglo capitalism

Anglo-Saxon model = Jewish model

That’s why you negotiate deals so they are profitable because that is leadership. You strengthen your own country, not other peoples you fucking globalist skype bastard, when your countrymen need leadership you step up and lead them, not sell their livelihoods from under them. How can your nation be great when your leader wishes others to be greater and more productive?

The Singaporean model, while not exactly perfect, is the best model in practice today.

Attached: Asian Reserves.png (2304x1652, 554K)

Obesity is actually a poverty problem, in developed countries.

Anglo but the problem is nobody uses it anymore unfortunately. Not even the U.S. Bailing out banks, welfare state and government in every aspect of our lives etc.

>Negotiate deals

Do you think you are fucking Trump? I'm about as anti globalist as you get but I understand that nothing can be done to sustain an unprofitable industry without massive socialism and fuck that.

cringe

>anti globalist as you can get
>wants another thatcher

Attached: 7E50E21A-791D-4DA6-B623-23E4045225E7.jpg (720x960, 60K)

>mutt education

The biggest defense line I here for Democratic Socialism is how "great" The Nordic Model is. Is it really that great? Or is it a system that will eventually collapse on itself?

Lmao what? Singapore is straight up state capitalism with nothing alike to USA.