What the fuck is wrong with civic nationalists? Do they just have a nigger fetish and therefore would let a nigger fuck their daughter?
What the fuck is wrong with civic nationalists...
why would civ nats allow people of different cultures into their country tho?
quality thread
This picture explains why
Fuck off cuck
No they don't want their wife and kids to fuck niggers. They simply still believe the propaganda we were feed that race is just skin color and that everyone can be American if you only embrace generic, ill defined ideas of liberty. You were probably the same at some point.
I always hated niggers
Good for you. Nonetheless I should think trying to understand the issue in a serious way is a bit more important than making tired old cuckoldry jokes we've all seen a thousand times before.
Quality of life and human rights are more important to them than the skin colour of their neighbors? And aren't pictures like this kind of a straw man? I don't think I've seen any civic nationalist say "hey, let's let everyone in!". I'm pretty sure they were saying that immigration should be more restricted than it is now. Oh but you know what? You're right, they are just libcucks who want to let everyone in so Tyrone can fuck their wives okay, got it. That's reasonable.
Starting a thread with a loaded question and a straw man!
This shit is Reddit tier and you should an hero.
Don't you have a bull to prep somewhere?
>Sweden
No
>Muttland
Stop lying Captain, we all know you love the flavor of feshly deposited monkey spunk.
t.mutt
>52%LeWhiteEthnoState
Are you just gonna shitpost?
Or will you construct an argument against Civic nationalism that isn't a straw man or a loaded question?
Ok let me kill this right now.
Civic nationalism is an oxymoron.
When a state becomes multi-ethnic it is no longer an nation but an empire.
Not that you have the ability to understand the difference between nation and empire but it it what it is. So there.
>When a state becomes multi-ethnic it is no longer an nation but an empire.
>Not that you have the ability to understand the difference between nation and empire but it it what it is. So there.
So if we accept foreigners we become empires?
This seems more like a shit deflection from the point that USA is a cesspool and not an empire...
Ok so you've got nothing left and admit you're wrong and are changing the terms. Civic nationalism is an oxymoron, full stop.
>MAGA
>civic nationalism
Oh, OP is just a retard. Makes sense
You are arguing a point where you dont understand what an empire is, your whole argument is flawed to begin with.
So let me try this:
What is wrong with letting qualified people in?
Civic nationalism got limits, everyone qualified cant get in.
Can you argue those points? Or are you gonna spout "oxymoron" with your faulted argument?
I'm right and you're an idiot. "Civic Nationalism" is an oxymoron.
So you cant argue then? Are we back to shitposting?
>Civic nationalism got limits, everyone qualified cant get in.
So niggers are qualified to get into your wife's ass?
So we really are back at shitposting...
>More rape and niggers killing whites happen in muttland
>You like the taste of Juan semen dripping from your male lovers anus?
Republican constitutional civic nationalism is shit
Antisemitic fascistic nationalism has some potential
MAGA is civic nationalism.
White nationalists are the only ones I know who obsess so much about BBC and interracial cuckolding.
>TFW you want to avoid a situation where millions die at all costs
>TFW you really know in your heart that millions don't need to die. Billions do.
Because white women? We should enslave them.
Stop equating "civic nationalism" with pro open borders.
Its funny that you think 'civic nationalism' just means niggers and brown people only.
Hitler, an Austrian, would not have been elected in Germany without civic nationalism.
civic nationalism = brown people = open borders
multiracialism has never ever worked in history
The problem is that non-whites reliably vote against the interest of married white families.
I know this is futile, but I will do my best to break this down for everyone, shills included.
>ethnostates need to exist in Europe
>America should move towards a Pan-European ethnostate
>for any of this to happen ALL of the populist needs to be aware of the JQ
>the probability of success if step one is genocide is very low
>the revival of nationalism is a step one with a much higher probability of overall success
>remember the stages of redpilling
leftism->conservatism->libertarianism->race realism->JQ->national socialism
>western societies will need to be redpilled and popular opinion will most likely follow this progression
>civnats are part of the progression, it takes at least a year to absorb race realism and the JQ, ideologies do not change overnight
tl;dr: civnats are dumb but part of the progression to being natsoc. It takes a year of exposure to hard data and repeated observance of cohencidences to get people to finally accept the truth. It's a hard pill to swallow.
Founding fathers white nationalists tho.
If civcucks believe that blacks can be french or german they have NO rights to shit on tranies. If your biology doesn't define your nationality why would it define your sex?
And your proof is what, funny pictures of monkeys wearing red hats?
Are you a bit retarded? Germans and Austrians are both Germanic. Without proper nationalism, Hitler would never have been APPOINTED a chancellor.
Would you marry a tranny?
>that thousand cock stare
well what other kind of nationalist is he? he's not a white nationalist. he's your classic establishment politics "values" nationalist. he's done nothing to curb immigration. one million immigrants permanently settle here per year and his answer is to simply pray that they assimilate.
Civic Nationalism is the only pragmatic solution for the US right now. It will also help to *reverse* the demographic trends, not accelerate them, as CivNats want to build the wall, strong ICE, completely cut third-world immigration, etc. Just because you can't live in your ideal fantasyland of 100% White ethnostate now doesn't mean you need to shit on the only reasonable way towards fixing our problems.
>he's your classic establishment politics "values" nationalist. he's done nothing to curb immigration.
That's not a nationalist at all. If you don't support your own people, your not a nationalist. You might be a patriot, a cuck or something like that, but not a nationalist.
Because you still cannot argue that exception cases to racial averages don't exist. And because ethonationalism is too far away from the mainstream to ever become popular without a forced revolution, which would make you no better than the commies.
Also, because I'm at best case scenario quarter white, and I'd very much like to keep enjoying the near first-world tier of lifestyle which would end if 1st world western countries decided to form a basically closed loop of trade.
>exception cases to racial averages don't exist.
Great argument, mate. Clear water doesn't exist, because mud water exists as well. Go kill yourself, nigger.
All nationalisms are civic nationalisms.
Shared values and shared ethnicity are both historically rooted in geography, so they happen to be correlated.
Global communication will change this slowly. Pol is literally proof of this change; you have no idea what ethnicity anyone else here actually is, but you've formed a community based on shared values. You unironically can't see this happening in front of your own face.
Like all arguments against civic nationalism, your pic is a massive logical fallacy.
Brainlets please go.
No, my argument is more on the point of: "If a random plant grows from an otherwise sterile field, let's bother preserving it."
Also
>Nigger
Please. My people have managed to at least build decent empires.
And what happens when the "qualified" people vote against your restrictive policies based on racial lines? What happens when their children are nothing like them because they're genetic outliers?
Civic nationalism is entirely predicated on some ridiculous tightrope-walking that assumes they can somehow force the immigrants to not breed more than the natives. Give a little and the floodgates will be opened, every time. They're trying to repeat what they did to America across Europe and they're using the same excuses about how it won't significantly change demographics. Never trust anyone who spews that shit.
>If a random plant grows from an otherwise sterile field, let's bother preserving it.
Our best scientists are trying to figure how this is related to your previous retarded statement about "exceptions to racial averages", but they're coming up with nothing.
>My people
Your people don't exist. Remember the exceptions.
>arguing semantics
>look guys i killed the argument hurrrrr
Those based Idaho Asians
He's correct, though. It's retarded to call any country a nation, and it's retarded to call any patriot a nationalist.
Idiots who believe all people are the same.
Can different people exist in a nation? Sure, so long as that nation shares an overwhelming monoculture. America was great, when it was 95%+ white.
>Can different people exist in a nation?
No. By definition, no.
>That pic
God I hate the Jews
My point is something of value being appearing from somewhere you'd expect to find nothing of value at all.
Also, I don't deny that the groups exist, because averages mean that a large majority can be put under a same general concept, but my point is that a few outliers might fit in a different group better.
This^
WNs are larping faggots and glue huffing retards.