What the hell happened over in Vietnam, man?
How did a bunch of Rice Farmers defeat the USA?
What the hell happened over in Vietnam, man?
How did a bunch of Rice Farmers defeat the USA?
Other urls found in this thread:
usni.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Like the jihad fags, those rice farmers were fairly self sustaining, but a proper military costs shitloads of money. Eventually shit gets too costly and we gotta pull out. Also, communist sympathizers in government wanted it stopped.
PS didn't sage, the name was left over from a shill thread.
jews
self sabotage from drug interests,the war losing traction and support at home,the cycling of pencil pushers masquerading as officers every six months,shakey intel and and MOS's scattered like sticks,idiots and faggots being drafted,subsequent fraggings,no clear means to an end,self conflicting interests and lets not forget that faggot LBJ.then again what would a faggot hippy throwing bags of dog shit at men that were made to fight a war they had no stake in like you know or care about reality?
It was just unwinnable. A civil war that turned communists into the most ardent nationalists and the capitalists as weak puppets. The communists had near infinite support from Russia and China in materiel and funds. And the US could not do anything about it.
Unwinnable from the start. Sorry Americans.
Let's put it this way; if you >honestly< believe that a Nation, capable of bringing down superpowers, would ever succumb to a bunch of primitive rice farmers...., then you just fell into 'our' trap...
Better question. We literally backstabbed Vietnam on numerous occassions, started a war over a false flag, used highly illegal chemical/incendiary weaponry, and ultimately had their people flee their own nation from the threat of reeducation camp. Yet they arent hated as much as Muslims are today with far far less suicide bombs
>implying china did not try to invade and get their shit kicked in by an already weakened vietnam
and they had all the support they needed.
the way i heard it vietnam came to us for help but we through our lot in with the fucking frogs.
I think your photo sums it up.
Rice farmers were fighting for their home
American were wishing they were home.
If you swapped the situation around and the rice farmers were burning American homes and civilians, said rice farmers wouldn't stand a chance.
How is this a good question in any way? You would only be surprised that there is more animosity towards the west from the Islamic world than the Vietnamese one is if you're entirely ignorant of Islam.
This. That piece of shit Degaul is to blame for all that nonsense. Biggest cuck in a French history. French. That’s saying a lot.
China launched what was essentially a punitive expedition, the entire goal of which was to show off against the USSR. They accomplished their goal. Cambodia was just a smokescreen.
It started with the assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem; a Catholic dictator who was leading an embattled Vietnam to prosperity, only to be thwarted by a CIA backed coup in conjunction with Vietnamese Marxists under the battle flag of "democracy". The relationship Diem had with the U.S. was an interesting one and it was revealed that JFK was visibly upset when he heard the news of Diem's death.
Soldiers who didn't shoot to kill, low morale, conscription/didnt want to be there, guerrilla tactics/tunnels, soldiers saw that America were the aggressors. All the above equal a recipe for disaster
After the price of heroin fell to an unprecedented low (((they)))
Stopped caring.
Faggots running the government. Vx nerve gas sprayed over the entire country. Checkmate with 0 American losses.
No worries name fag
"Lost the war"
user we were never supposed to win the war.
The war was a tool to facilitate revolution in the united states. The point wasnt to win. It was to create civil unrest to perform a revolution at home.
And it worked spectacularly. By 1972 the revolution and coup had been completed without the vast majority of people ever even knowing it happened.
They won the vietnam revolution.
Just goes to show that a bunch of civilians with AK-47s can stand their own against the U.S. military. Same thing happened in Afghanistan, and not just to the U.S., but to the Russians.
Should add that the Iraq and afghan """wars""" were undertaken for the same purpose.
These wars are designed to be lost and take the view off the government as they work radical sea changes.
Think about the unites states in 2000 vs now. Think of all the rights you have lost, all the rights they have created. And all the capabilities and auspices they have made.
In 1999 you still had the fourth amendment for example.
The russians were winning the afghan war. They withdrew because their empire collapsed not because they couldnt win.
They used the never before heard of tactic called "hiding". The afghans won using the same tactic.
Then it the americans decided it was frightfully unfair the enemy didnt just stand there and let them pour ordnance on them daily and cried all the way home
it wasnt meant to be won. the south korean army units fought using an effective strategy we should have done the same.
I dunno user, american houses are made out of awful lots of wood, and they cant run very fast
They would beat in VC in a battle. Take the hill. Then leave and The VC would take back the hill. Makes no fucking sense,
Are you suggesting the vc should've just not taken it back again?
Hiding in a hole
He never said that. He's pointing out the war was effectively waged by kill count instead of ground taken and lost. There was no clear objective to victory, and victory was next to impossible when you consider the millions of people who supported the VC. They had villagers carving sticks into the ground. Children digging holes to hide grenades in. The regular army fared only slightly better than the VC, even though they were actually equipped with weapons instead of having 5 AKs to 40 men.
We won 98% of all battles in vietnam but lost the stomach for it, with good reason. The war was literally pointless and impossible to win from the outset. The terrain favored guerilla warfare to a huge degree, much like afghanistan.
Boomers lost their war.
Gen X won both of theirs.
I think he's suggesting that if you're going to fight a war, you should just fight it and not pussyfoot around about what you're doing. America wants to bully the rest of the world, but also wants to be seen as virtuous and heroic. We want to have our cake and eat it, too. We should have fought the war with the intent to take over the country and eliminate the opposing forces, not to set up some shaky puppet government and expect the rebel Vietnamese fighters to be able to hold their ground. But if you go around acting like the Roman empire in the 20th century, people are going to get pissed at you.
Also, daily reminder that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a false flag and the US government lied to its people in order to get fully involved in the war in the first place.
usni.org
No, we should have never let the VC take it back. There's a good 6 or 8 part documentary on it.
Dont knock it, it worked for us when you guys were slamming V1s into us every damn night
Threadly reminder there was NO reason to invade vietnam and it would have been EXPONENTIALLY BETTER for the US to have aided the Portuguese and Rhodesian governments in their wars against the communist terrorists in Angola, Rhodesia, and Mozambique
>friendly regimes
>an actual chance at defeat
>already powerful and skilled militaries as opposed to south vietnam
>vested american interests
>massive economic interests in the region
>enormous mineral deposits
>some of the most arable land in the world
But no, you invaded a jungle full of chinks.
>an actual chance at defeat
of the terrorists*
idk
take a bunch of 16 year old highschool kids and force them thru a shortened basic combat training course, shove them over into a new country, tell them to kill people and see how it turns out
the average age was 16, lifespan was 30seconds.
Actually it was nineteen
N-n-n-n-nineteen
(cue the electro)
Same thing that happened in Iraq, Americans won hard battles and destroyed an enemy, demonic democrats swooped in and handed the victory to degenerate trash.
Ah yes I remember vividly the tails of whole battalions made of school children the 178th Killer Kids. 68' was a kooky time.
The fucking french started a fight and left leaving the mess to others again.
The worse crap of this is that Ho chi minh loved the us and literally declared vietnam independence from france by copying the us constitution.
He only larped as a commie to get anti imperialist support from leftist retards but time and time again he tried to align with the usa without sucess even tough he was a spy for the us military during ww2.
There were many reasons for the unsuccessful push back of communism in Vietnam, but the main reason is for independence. If you know ANYTHING about indo-china in those times, you know the Vietnamese had a desire for complete independence from any foreign power, and the U.S. was viewed as another invader/colonizer, no better than the french or Japanese. It was the resolve of the Vietnamese people that cost us the war, which by the way the U.S. did just fine in the battles. It's not an easy answer, because the problems of indo-china at that time were quite in depth. I can go further if you want me to, with much of the history
Thing is US foreign policy constantly made fuck ups like this. Castro didn't hate the US and he certainly wasn't pro-USSR, he only became that after being forced by the US into exile where he met Che Guevara
Even the brownest Jungle gook isn't a fucking nigger. Niggers are the dumbest group of people around. Viet gooks are smart enough to realize the US can be an important counterweight to China, no fucking sandnigger is smart enough to realize that.
he loved us FREEDOM
Am*ricans keep getting captured and snitching their friends
I really need to document this better. Too many buy the whole "JFK would have kept us out of Vietnam" line, completely unrealizing his plan to win Vietnam got him killed. (((They))) benefitted more from a difficult Vietnam War. South Vietnam could be an important trading partner to South Korea today if JFK hadn't been killed.
indeed , when he lived in new york he was so fucking shocked that the colonial master relation did not exist.
Even blacks as segregated could vote or chinese and was fucking impressed by that.
To win the war, we would have to escalate the war to kill civilians Dresden style. Would have also had to take out their ports along with 3rd party nations ships. Would also had to take the fight to China and decimate their forces.
Or we could have just left.
Mccain gave them the secret to American exceptionalism and we lost it forever and they got to keep it.
they didnt. even conservative estimates puts it at over a 10:1 ratio of NV combat deaths to US combat deaths. it wasnt easy, but we kicked their ass, the country grew weary of war, and we left. then 2 years later the NV beat the SV. i know thats a more complicated situation than you can wrap your tiny memeflag brain around, but thats what happened
Three factors
- political subversion at home
- its far more difficult to occupy land against a local guerrilla force than it is to win big conventional set piece battles. Beating the Vietcong/NVA in the field = easy. Occupying rural villages across thousands of miles of dense jungle, trying to keep weapons, supplies and sabateours out of every single hut = not so easy. Would be probably be closer to trying to battle the cartles in south america and wipe out all drugs there then a traditional military action
-it wasn't just some rice farmers...it was some rice farmers trained and supplied by the Chinese and Soviet Union
It would have been so easy to just bomb every single hut until it was safe to land,those chinks wouldn't had stood a chance against constant air attacks,way to make yourselves look like cucks,burgers