Why does the anti-migration movement focus so much on culture and crime? What about simple stresses to infrastructure and the environment? You'd think Europe would really be open to this argument - much of that continent has among the most densely populated areas on Earth already.
A bigger picture migration narrative
Other urls found in this thread:
thesocialcontract.com
twitter.com
>Why does the anti-migration movement focus so much on culture and crime? What about simple stresses to infrastructure and the environment?
Because in Commiefornia all those problems have the same source: liberals.
Flood the state with millions of thirsty illegals, then refuse to build more reservoirs and canals because of the "environment." Be surprised when there's no more water to drink.
>Flood the state with millions of thirsty illegals, then refuse to build more reservoirs and canals because of the "environment." Be surprised when there's no more water to drink.
Isn't it actually the intensive farming of cash crops in California that stress the water supply?
The whole thing is a mess. Like Trump said in a tweet, they could do a lot more for water recycling. They used to have an extensive program of "purple pipes" in San Diego, using recycled water. Now, much of it just run out to the ocean.
It was a two-step process: the conservation movement was taken over by leftists, and leftists became obsessed with identity politics. The Sierra Club literally stopped mentioning "immigration" in the mid-90's because a donor named David Gelbaum gave them $100 million.
Too bad republicans don't seem to give a fuck about the environment, since the best argument against "carbon taxes" and other CO2 reduction measures is that they're pointless with a growing worldwide population. This would give ammos to criticize the black and brown hordes that breed prolifically.
As it is now, Republicans can't do that because they'd be offending the religious right.
Culture and crime are easier to see which is why people focus on it so much.
Because all major parties agree on the wage destruction aspect and both look the other way while they tacitly call one and all to GET IN HERE.
There's also a long successful history of xenophobia leading to anti-immigration legislation. I just think in this day and age it opens up ad nauseum "no hate" discussions.
Mainstream conservatives wrote off the "environmentalist" movement as a bunch of hippies and leftist freaks. While somewhat true, it was a big strategic error. And oddly enough, the religious right used to be worried about out-of-control third-world population growth. It wasn't until the late-70's/80's that they began seeing Africa as a place to gain new converts rather than as a place to avoid.
Not really a fan of conspiracies, but sometimes it really feels like the "Elders of Zion" or "Illuninati" or whatever have perfectly split policy positions between the two party as to make no side get too popular.
If Dems weren't identity obsessed race hustlers, there's probably be a lot of appeal to their healthcare and infrastructure plans.
If the Republicans weren't programmed to react to autistically to "socialism," they might see the value in national healthcare for the sake of saving costs to businesses.
Sure, that has been part of the game for a long time. A small example many people have forgotten - during the 2012 GOP primaries, the other Republican candidates were struggling to compete with Mitt Romney. Newt Gingrich finally attacked him on populist grounds for being a "corporate raider," and the attacks worked.
But he suddenly stopped that line of attack after being scolded by members of his party. "Newt doesn't speak for us; we believe in free-market capitalism." And Newt more or less apologized to Romney. He had forgotten that his "side" is not allowed to use populist economic arguments. And he was "policed" back into line.
It's true. Holy shit.
thesocialcontract.com
Oh I remember that. But I also remember Ron Paul came to Mitt's defense because part of the criticism was the Newt never worked in the private sector outside of education, and tried to pass his time at a Government Sponsored Enterprise as free-market experience.
But I agree with your overall point. To her credit, Hillary actually called for border enforcement in contrast to Bernie Sanders, who was full open borders. Of course, the leaked emails and speeches shows Hillary privately opposed borders. Now that she's gone, the "abolish ICE faction has of course become the standard.
so fucking close
The left has utterly bankrupted this once great nation.
>It wasn't until the late-70's/80's that they began seeing Africa as a place to gain new converts
That was a bond thrown to their new Moral Majority wing.
The error is in assuming that the parties actually compete with one another for anything but donor dollars. Confluence of interest.
>lot of appeal to their healthcare
Lol no. They're market-jews through and through and, as a Party, are against public goods and services. Obamacare (© Heritage Foundation) is what they wanted. Anything else is a bait and switch.
No, that was the neoliberal right. Also, you need to kill yourself.
>>>/reddit/
Because the latter two are also "solved" with bigger government in the minds of leftists, and wouldn't convince anyone.
Yes. They have a bunch of old water laws from a century ago that basically force farmers to use as much water as they can, otherwise they lose their access to any of it.
Also, the faggots in Beverly Hills use a shit ton for their manicured lawns
What do you think they want the beaners for in the first place?
>thinking Obama was a leftist
>thinking leftists are market idolaters
>thinking US politics isn't just one party with two right wings
Do you understand yet why you are a childish idiot and should kill yourself?
Its not a draught, its called our tryannical politicians that need to be killed are importing more people than resources can support, but they dont care because they live a life of luxury at the cost of future generations. I live in las vegas and this city will become a ghost town in 10-15 years. Mark my words. Unless the politicians are held accountable with violence we are all going to face misery. So make the choice, buy guns now and fight or buy one and shoot yourself. The mexicans and foreigners are never going to stop coming. The only resolution is to kill politicians that support illegal immigration. Our founding fathers would have done the same.
are you a fucking retard? the biggest polluter in the world is china, so shut the fuck up about democrats being the good guys in environmentalism when they suck the cock of the chink. just kill yourself you useless idiot.
we do, so the left calls it "green racism"
everything is racism
LMAO
Theyre dumping the water into the atlantic.
Not even joking. To "rehabilitate the colorado river estuary"
They are dumping 100's of millions of gallons.
No.
They dump the water into the ocean. Im not even joking.
At some point you realize it isn't a conspiracy. The heads of right and left talk to each other at the synagogue and that's the cause of most of this world's problems.
dumping water into the ocean is what rivers are supposed to do. the water jews in california have stolen every drop of water from the colorado river to grow almonds and hay to sell to china.
Seasonaly. In the west rivers dry up during summer and drought
>selling food abroad instead of feeding one's own
Wasn't that the plot of the Holodomor?