Which one of these is best explanation for Africa's poverty?

Being a faguette like you

The dumber you are the less likely you can actually save any money you make so its low IQ.

Sub-Saharan Africa's abundance of resources is why they're so shit.

Up in North Africa, Egyptians build a great civilization while having to constanly worry about water.
The Vikings build ocean-faring ships before Western Europeans because the farm soil was so awful.

Bad conditions stimulate human ingenuity.
Africa is full of retards because they never actually had to worry about food or anything else for that matter.

>Sahara is 90% of Africa
Found the stupid nigger
>if whites lived in Africa they wouldn't create a single civilization
Meanwhile the north niggers in literal desert spawned civilizations so you are wrong.

originality from an americunt?

aren't you late for your gay pride gathering?

Colonialism did not make Africa Poor (or Europe Rich)

youtu.be/aS7XUGh2meI

>what was Rhodesia
>what was south Africa

Australia has the same poor climate and land and its one of the richest countries on the planet

>poor natural resources
Africa is a Garden of Eden. Thats the main reason why niggers are so stupid. They never had to try as hard as the other races to survive.

It's a mix of both I Think. European colonists had a much harder time in Africa than they did than the new world. I think most of this has to do with drastically different geography, but also consider that large domesticated animals like horses would die of overheating or various diseases and infections. I think they also had a hard time extracting resources from their colonies, and didn't put as much focus on it. That being said, there's no reason why modern Africans, after having been decolonized, shouldn't have been able to form successful countries if they were as intelligent as whites with the technology they had.

Egypt was run by Greeks
> muslim retard without historical knowledge

2 digit IQ comeback

>sea
>drinking water
Are you retarded?

there has been 30 egyptians dynasties and only one of them was greek, the last one that ended the egyptian civilization, you fucking waste of oxygen

kill yourself on the spot, shithead

>low IQ nigs

Absolutely

>geography and poor natural resources

Africa has a ton of arable land and the ground is full of all kinds of rare and heavy metals.

>Imperialism

The idea that imperialism made niggers poor/stupid is one of those leftist memes that sounds reasonable as long as you NEVER thinking about it again.

When Africa was colonized the people who arrived there had a good enough understanding of mathematics and engineering to build boats, and enough knowledge of astronomy to navigate the open sea another continent. When they got there, they found a bunch of dudes who hadn't bothered to stop eating and enslaving one another to create written language. The Africans may have lived like second class citizens in these colonial societies, but the life of a second class citizen who was denied the opportunities of a white colonist was still hundreds of times better than the life of an illiterate tribal trying to cure his infected cut with magic. Which is why, in South Africa for example, Bantus came from all over, risking dangerous treks through the bush to live in shanties on the outskirts of these civilizations, and their birthrate skyrocketed in response.

The Europeans built infrastructure, brought medicine and farming practices that vastly reduced the mortality rate, and taught as many nigs as they could to read. They couldn't take the roads, trains, and buildings with them when they left these countries, so the Africans got a bunch of free perfectly useful stuff.... Which they promptly fucked up because they were too dumb to maintain.

Ptolemey is the dynasty that made aegypt relevant shitskin

>>imperialism

The african nations are not underdeveloped, they're over exploited

Attached: resources-of-africa.jpg (1500x1737, 271K)

There's no doubt about this. It's all the fault of the white man. And Christianity. And patriarchy. And sexism, racism and homophobia. And Islamophobia.

Hardship creates ingenuity, abunance creates complacency.

It's not that hard to get. In fact it's why we're failing currently

I fucking hate it, when foreigners bring work and businesses to steal your natural resources. I'm so glad Finland is not rich in natural resources.

Egypt was relevant under Ramses II you retarded piece of shit, it peaked 1000 years before greeks came

Attached: 800px-Egypt_1450_BC.svg.png (800x923, 192K)

>good good, he doesn't know about the snow trade

This guy gets it.

There are plenty of places in Africa with bountiful natural resources, yet to be exploited
There are plenty of African nations untouched by colonialism/imperialism

There is only one common denominator.

No it didn't. Like mentioned, egypt was irrelevant before hellenization. It had no military projection power. Post-hellenic aegypt is the one that actually had any outward influence. Native egyptians were also white, nigger nubians were imported to do menial labour ((not building pyramids, because you subhumans are too worthless to do that with any degree of competency)

inb4 abloo bloo bloo it became muslim and is now semitic so you're wrong

gee it's almost as if they diversified the fuck out of it and mongrelized the populations under islam.

OMG idiot understand what we are talking about , i said if whites were born from the beggining n Africa , Rhodesia and S.africa were the result of european civilization that came to africa
every intelligent person would understand that without water building ciivlization is impossible , wether you are a racist or not

FDI is a nation killer

That's why the glorious Soviet Union has been able to survive indefinitely without it

>Egypt reached the pinnacle of its power in the New Kingdom, ruling much of Nubia and a sizable portion of the Near East
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egypt

Geography causes low IQ niggers. There are no low IQ niggers in places where winter happens.

you just proved my point you dumb retard , north build civilzation because of water , even small civilization in sub sahara were in countries where there were water

Lol
>land was greater during hellenization
>wow look it wa ssmaller and weaker before, you're wrong!

>unironically proving my point by citing the fact that it was smaller, weaker, and insular before hellenization

:^)

>poor natural resources
This couldn't be further from the truth. Obviously the issue is low iq nogs being unable to think long term

They've had hundreds of thousands of years and still haven't figured out farming, like what the fuck have they been doing all this time?

What the hell are you trying to say? That animals need water to survive? Huh. That's a pretty revolutionary thought.

cringe

kill yourself, pseudo revisionnist

>this mad that he cited evidence to prove the person you're arguing against is correct

Wow, you sure showed me that egypt was irrelevant before hellenization by showing it barely reached the borders of modern egypt.

Who even cares? If you need to go back in history to such an era, where 99 % of humans lived in one area, it's not very surprising that that specific area was the dominant force in the world at the time.

the black didn't civilized independently and never domesticated native animals or developed farming independently.

it's an academic fact that Egypt's golden age was the new kingdom and the apex of ancient egypt. stay butthurt.

But I also feel like sub Saharan Africa has so many vicious animals and plants due to the hot conditions there. Maybe they stuck to mud huts because the people and every lion, croc, hippo, etc. is also fighting for survival and water? Africa just seems like hell imo.

Egypt is part of the Middle East

Come home white man.

Attached: 8iszj0k5e8a11.png (6000x4000, 1.4M)

>where 99 % of humans lived in one area

?
What the fuck are you talking about. 3000 years ago it's pretty much the same humans that lived in every country they live in.

>rich natural resources
Wake up every day and you are surrounded by food, water, everything. No need to plan for winters or even bother with farming are keeping animals. They're still stuck on the tutorial

1) They came out of two major wars that were back to back.
2) Many of the countries are reeling from decade long civil wars and seize fires were finally agreed upon just recently
3) Lack of effective leadership and corruption have fucked Africa beyond repair
Africa's leadership is holding it back. So, it leads to corruption and influences from outside forces.

Attached: rani-viii.jpg (1024x576, 56K)

Are you a bit retarded? 3000 years ago, almost all humans lived in about three specific areas. Since Egypt was one of those areas, it's not a big surprise that Egypt was important back then.

>geography, poor natural resources

The farmland isn't ideal, but with hard work, you can produce a lot of food.

>Imperialism

Africa was nothing before the empires carved it up, and it's nothing now. If anything, Africa is better off on the whole due to infrastructure improvements, education, medicine, etc.

>low IQ nigs

This is the answer.

>3000 years ago, almost all humans lived in about three specific areas

can you elaborate? How exactly all humans lived in 3 specific areas 3000 years ago?

nice meme flag

Attached: 1482264143245s.jpg (89x125, 2K)

Learn to read, retard. Almost all humans lived in the fertile crescent, India and China. Small tribes were everywhere, but the population density was insignificant. Larger populations were only starting to emerge around the Mediterranean. And once they did, they started to dominate the game. When Egypt reached its peak, there were about three players. When Rome reached its peak, there were dozens. When the British Empire reached its peak, there were hundreds.

Occasionally

low iq + geography + imperialism

i only include imperialism because it was essentially like handing ET technology to cavemen.

the actual ET's don't intervene with human affairs to help us avoid a similar outcome

>low IQ Nigs
This

>poor natural resources
Oh I forgot all those blood diamonds and other mining operations across the continent must've been digging for fried chicken

>Imperialism
Notice how other races LEARNED from Imperialism, and Africans still live in mud huts without a pot to piss in?

The are just behind evolutionarily. The harsh European winters made our stock smarter out of necessity. Our ability to think abstractly and foresee the future was gained here.

Meanwhile some native African languages dont even have future tenses.

You black nigger, SUB SAHARAN Africa has no water shortage or resource shortage. You are all ooga booga subhumans and this is the only reason why you have failed.

This, if the CFA franc had to be abolished central africa's political and economical conditions would improve enough to convince many imported niggers to go home.

We say it's #1
The left says it's #3
It's definitely not #2 as Africa demonstrably has more natural resources than Europe.

Attached: elon african american.png (1704x800, 308K)

There are no niggers that developed their DNA in places with winter..

Poor natural resources is not a thing.

>imperialism

No.

By that fucking standard, Europe would be a wasteland and Asia would still be medieval.

>call me a retard
>while saying that egypt was part of the fertile crescent

[x] doubt

also Europe had a bigger population than Egypt 3,000 years ago

Tribalism
Religion
Which are caused by low IQ
The thing is, should you and a group a people try to change this, some group will see your riches, and rape you, thus starting the whole shit-show again.
Once your down, it's hard to get up.

1. Foreign aid. Is one of the confirmed problems.
EU dumps food on the markets and drives prices on farming so much down a local farmer can't make a living.
2.Keeping corrupt regimes in place in exchange for cheap access to resources is also a great addiction of the West.
3. Nigs also just want to kill each other most of the time and don't understand the concept of a state.
4. No rule of law.

Geography should make it one of the best places to live and farm. Good access to a lot of resources like rare earth metals, oil and wood. It is in fact so good that Nigs can support their lifestyle as hunter-gatherers for centuries after Europe could. You also see that countries like Egypt had culture, because they were forced to have so by the environment. The west Africa smaller countries like Ghana do pretty well. It is not as simple as "everything is shitty down there".

>low IQ nigs
The best explanation unless you can prove all IQ studies wrong, prove that an IQ test with shapes only is culturally biased and somehow affects blacks the worst, etc.
>geography, poor natural resources
Why did the mesoamericans have advanced civilization with less resources and about the same or worse amount of domesticable animals and plants? Bad explanation.
>imperialism
Why wasn't Africa advanced before the colonial era? Why did Liberia fail? Bad explanation.

>>while saying that egypt was part of the fertile crescent
Confirmed for a retard. Read a book before trying to talk to your betters.

Also, go read the definition of the word "density". It's not a difficult concept.

You can respond to me once you've learned some basic English and at least some relevant history.

Low IQ

Geography, poor resources and maybe western imperialism.

>environmental pressures faced by non-Africans necessitated developments in their societies and civilizations
Right you are user, they never developed because they never needed too. Meanwhile groups across Europe and Asia had to plan and adapt for harsh winters, hell, even South American tribes had to contend with the rainy season. Equatorial Africans could survive with much less effort due to a relatively stable year round climate, and an abundance of natural resources. Desu one of the reasons that it’s so easy to hate or pity them is because they are a near constant disappointment. Many look at them with disgust and contempt due to their inability to form even the most basic semblance of a country. Other people may pity them, empathy is the white mans blessing and curse. Not to mention that certain (((rootless cosmopolitans))) find it all too easy to manipulate those who pity nigs into somehow blaming themselves for their plight. It really is astounding how leftists can claim to be the champions of science (unlike those hillbilly Drumpf voting republicans) yet at the same time completely ignore the abundant research that completely btfos bullshit like the muh one human race myth, or the “gender spectrum”

Attached: 52CCEA3C-EE57-46E5-919D-C320BD9A8775.jpg (569x599, 40K)

no one with a brain put Egypt as part of the fertline crescent.

>Also, go read the definition of the word "density". It's not a difficult concept.
yeah you got the causality inversed, the density was lower because they had inferior civilization, that's all.

No wonder you were enslaved by swedes/russian for 900 years, you're really stupid.

Attached: FertileCrescent.jpg (770x543, 163K)

fertile*

Violating the prime darective

What good is some ancient civilization if their country is a shithole now? I wouldn't trade places with them because they had good history, we have good present.

There are many reasons. The /Homo-Africaans section of suppositoryrepository will surely enlighten you. Of course, chin mods do not want anyone to see this site, so they scrub all my bavarian cave paintings away.

>yeah you got the causality inversed, the density was lower because they had inferior civilization, that's all.
Yeah, it's a total coincidence that civilization evolved in warm places, and slowly reached north as technology allowed people to survive there. Completely random. Makes perfect sense.
>no one with a brain put Egypt as part of the fertline crescent.
Everyone puts it there. Your picture couldn't be more retarded if it tried. It tries to imply Nile delta is infertile. Which is just about as retarded as you.

Europeans advanced quickly because they had nowhere to go and lots of slaughtering each other to do

In Africa you can just run away all the time

>fastest growing region of the world

It's not 2000 BC you fucking mong, Egypt is a shithole full of worthless sandniggers and Finland is one of the best countries in the world.

>If you was intelligent
>while Europe 70%of it have sea
Can’t make that up brothers

the climat and civilization theory was already stupid when Montesquieu said it few centuries ago.

>Everyone puts it there
"no" not the books I've grew up with.
the nile was specific. The fertile crescent is mostly in the levant.

Attached: ob_5a9809_fertile1.jpg (399x299, 32K)

Dont even try to arguement with these people cause they clearly have no understanding of what they are talkimg about.

imperialism

>True to his electoral promises, Nkrumah went to work putting the economic and social fundamentals in place. This encouraged the people to work even harder. Nkrumah firmly believed that political independence was meaningless without economic independence. [7]

>Thus, by the time he was overthrown in the CIA-inspired coup, Ghana had 68 sprawling state-owned factories producing every need of the population—from shoes, to textiles, to furniture, to lorry tires, to canned fruits, vegetables and beef; to glass, to radio and TV; to books, to steel, to educated manpower, virtually everything![8]
`

Attached: nkrumah.jpg (267x188, 6K)

>if you was
Stopped reading here. We was kangz.

it seems after few research that the first to put Egypt as part of the FC is "Vere Gordon Childe" some australian dude and the anglo historian followed this stupid trend.

This proves americans have low iq,why do u bother talking about this without having any knowledge at all

>1948-1991 Britain and US supporting Apartheid in order to gain access to diamonds and gold of South Africa. Following apartheid, they helped install a neoliberal economic regime that ensured SA could not raise wages and had to accept US agricultural dumping.
>1960- 1993 France helped keep Houphouet-Boigny, who in turn helped with coups against Nkumrah and Sankara, in power for 30 years in Cote d’Ivoire.
>1961: Pan-Africanist Patrice Lumumbu, Congo’s first independence leader, in office two months before being assassinated with help from Belgium and US on direct orders of Eisenhower.
>1965-1997 The US installed Mobutu as President, and Congo/Zaire’s poverty levels rocketed.
>1966: Ghanaian president Nkrumah promoted policies were simple keynesian economics, the same that had allowed Europe and the US to recover and build a strong social safety net after WW2. He was forced out in a US backed coup.
>1967-2009 France supported Bongo’s 40 year dictatorship in Gabon, guaranteeing France access to the country’s resources.
>1971: Britain and Israel took down Obote in Uganda. Obote wanted to nationalise the colonial British banks, The Uk wanted to retain it’s ability to extract wealth even after “independence”.

>1972: Portugal assist in assassination of liberation leader Cabral in Guinea Bissau and Cape Verde
>1975 Angola finally gains independence from Portugal. After independence, US, British, French and Portugal get involved in the civil war which last till 2002.
>1987 Thomas Sankara, President of Burkina Faso who advocated for pan-African unity and called attention to the crippling loans of the IMF, which were forcing the Global South to remain poor, is assassinated with French help.

I think this user covered it well
Nowadays we can advance technology without needing to be at infrequent war and also because our countries are always aware of a worldwide threat to one another so Africa would be a great place to live now that we know we shouldn't sit around doing jack shit

>the climat and civilization theory was already stupid when Montesquieu said it few centuries ago.
So it's a complete coincidence, is it? Siberia could just as well have been the cradle of civilization. Finland might have dominated ancient world just as well as Assyria. Sweden might have been the Persia and Norway the Greece. Because food totally grows just as well here as it grows in the south. Because our drinking water literally doesn't turn solid. Because not having shelter doesn't kill you in an hour. Because forests totally aren't devoid of game. You are rally fucking stupid.

>"no" not the books I've grew up with.
You haven't grown up with a single book. I don't believe you've ever even opened one.

Now go die somewhere. It's incredibly tiresome to talk to science deniers like you. In fact, you're even worse than that. You deny clear logic. The only way your worldview would make any sense would be if earth were flat. Hint: it isn't.

Attached: 800px-Map_of_fertile_crescent.svg.png (800x983, 162K)

>“in the Western imagination, Africa is stereotyped as a continent plagued by corrupt dictators, with the supposition being that Africans are perhaps too ‘primitive’ to appreciate the virtues of Western-style democracy. But the truth is that ever since the end of colonialism, Africans have been actively prevented from establishing democracies. The legacy of strongman rule in Africa is a Western invention, not an indigenous proclivity.”

Attached: photo.jpg (650x364, 23K)