Snopes says white genocide in South Africa is false

Managing Editor at Snopes asks Twitter "how can we keep the white genocide going?"

Attached: Untitled.png (581x399, 329K)

Other urls found in this thread:

snopes.com/fact-check/white-farmers-south-africa/
genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html
youtu.be/LbnvMVhOHjc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: 13.png (724x567, 292K)

how many have died in this genocide so far?

I dunno if any news outlet willing to report on it has said.

17,678 people since 78.

so not much of a genocide then

except they're ramping it up? their government is literally putting an army together for land grabs.

snopes.com/fact-check/white-farmers-south-africa/

Tbfh whites deserve nothing other than genocide for giving their women freedom and voting rights. Ain't nothing good ever come of giving women rights.

t. Ahkbed

dude, go back to your paki neighborhood, lots of parts and parcels to take care of there

There's not a number that it has to pass to make it qualify. People talk of a genocide in Palestine or even a white genocide. A few days ago the UN said there was a genocide in Burma and only about 1000 have died.
It's not just about numbers, but who is in power, language used, treatment of the ethnic groups

There's a problem with this question though. When people are talking of genocide they are talking of an attack on an ethnic group, not a selected group of farmers. If you try to find figures on this MSM straight away try to present these figures for attacks on farmers which are disputed anyway.
There's a official definition for 'farm attacks'

>A property needs to be involved in agriculture for an attack or murder to be flagged as an act “of violence against persons on farms and smallholdings”, the police’s Rural Safety Strategy states.

police have said
>violence related to “domestic violence or liquor abuse, or resulting from commonplace social interaction between people” are not included under farm attacks.

This leads to a position where a murder is not recorded as a
>farm murder because the crime took place on a housing estate and there were no agriculture activities on the property.

The question should really be how many white people have been murdered and assaulted. This should then be considered in the context of everything else that is happening

For everyone wondering how to make the left eat itself on this issue pull the no race no color maneuver. We simply repaint this as "South African Immigrant Farmers under attack told to leave" and every lefty will be throwing dollars and tears at the subject. Just don't mention white. You could probably even say Boer Immigrant Farmers because no one would bother to check what that is.

That because their (((Bosses))) get the land in South Africa if the whites are killed off and all the dumb fuck ape creatures, often called niggers, can't feed themselves. This creates calls for (((humanitarian aid))) which provides the desperately needed excuse to conquer a territory without calling it conquest.

Therefore, White Genocide has to be swept under the rug or called Justice. They have to get the White Gentiles out of the way before they can claim the territory.

Call them Afrikaans speakers.

>Binkowski
Fucking Pollacks. They're as bad as the Germans with the self-hate.

warnings occur before an event transpires. not much point in warning of a genocide after it happens.

Snopes is owned by a divorced kike.

>when you believe the holocaust is a hoax but want it to happen again

78 000 died in a year is a genocide
78 000 dead over the course of 40 years is just death due to natural causes.

Non-Anglos/Brits don't even belong in this country. The Dutch, Penndutch, and Huguenots can stay, though.

why did you you me when your post has nothing to do with mine

i looked into this and whites are 4x less likely to be murdered than blacks in SA

i see how this is good optics for us but factually it doesnt really hold up

Genocide Watch based in Washington DC (a non-profit) says they are in step 6 of 8, the preparation stage.

To compare with Croatia that has a population of 4 million, around the same with the population of whites in south africa's 5 million.

356 000 cases of murder are recorded in Croatia since the 80's. To say that Croatia have a white genocide is more believable than saying South Africa has a white genocide by using your logic.

it's 10 people a day murdered over the course of 40 years, and it's most likely ramped up now

>looked into this and whites are 4x less likely to be murdered than blacks in SA
>i see how this is good optics for us but factually it doesnt really hold up

yes, because you are taking the white population as a whole, and not specifically looking at farmers.

>i looked into this and whites are 4x less likely to be murdered than blacks in SA
>what is black on black crime
Shows what a violent people they are in general huh.

>because Niggers kill eachover like savages, that means Whites are not being targeted gringo-uh, guys
Hi Spic.

>To compare with Croatia that has a population of 4 million, around the same with the population of whites in south africa's 5 million.
>356 000 cases of murder are recorded in Croatia since the 80's. To say that Croatia have a white genocide is more believable than saying South Africa has a white genocide by using your logic.
Again, you are looking at the white population as a whole and not focusing on the farmers - whos numbers have dropped from over 100,000 in the late 1980's to less than 40,000 today.

What we have is an ethnic-cleansing (not genocide) in rural areas. This has been done by a number of means, farm attacks (both murders and normal attack) land redistribution and now the planned land expropriation.

every fucking time the (((establishment))) debunk this they compare the black murder rate and white murder rate. and to no one's surprise, more blacks are murdered. they use that as proof, rather than looking at murders by percentage of population, where white farmers are the most likely to be murdered.

journalists get the rope first.

So expanding on what I said here and using your Croatia example. What we saw in the war in Croatia is ethnic cleansing. There were the high-profile massacres, but there was also the forced removal of people from land.

Equally, in South Africa what we are seeing is a "slow-burn" when it comes to the killings - hence the controversy as to its existence- and then identifiable and verifiable removal of an ethnic group off the land through the use of government and violent social pressure

>Stop saying genocide
>Start saying "Ethnic cleansing"
Its easier to prove and the term is equally emotive

breaking people's homes and killing them =/= genocide

It's not genocide because you rephrase it? You do realize the definition of genocide is ethnic cleansing?

>whos numbers have dropped from over 100,000 in the late 1980's to less than 40,000 today.
maybe because they have moved on to doing other things due to modernization? the amount of farmers in the US have dropped also because they're investing their money on other industries like tech, engineering etc.
The "farmer" that almost got his land taken a couple of days ago dont even grow any produce on his land, he just uses it to breed exotic animals so he can charge hunters money to hunt them.

That SNOUT!

Every...single...time!

Attached: Jew Saturn 1511236380348.gif (690x690, 1.78M)

genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html

Attached: 1526404443635.jpg (536x481, 37K)

>You do realize the definition of genocide is ethnic cleansing?
No, there is a difference between genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Genocide would be the large scale killing of a population group. Ethnic cleansing would be the removal of an ethnic group from an area of land.
Thus, genocide may include ethnic cleansing but ethnic cleansing does not necessarily include genocide.

I am saying this not because I do not think a genocide is occurring, but rather because its easier to prove ethnic cleansing with the facts at hand. I am concerned with shaping normie opinions.

typical civnat cuckoldry

every white killed by a nigger is one too many. it was of course a bad idea to give up apartheid and live with niggers in the first place.

but even if whites were not targeted for being sucessful, thus effectively targetted for being white (and they are), whites simply cannot survive in a nigger-tier society with nigger-tier murder rates. they just dont breed fast enough for it.

>maybe because they have moved on to doing other things due to modernization? the amount of farmers in the US have dropped also because they're investing their money on other industries like tech, engineering etc.
The overwhelming majority stopped farming because of the high risk and low reward

>The "farmer" that almost got his land taken a couple of days ago dont even grow any produce on his land, he just uses it to breed exotic animals so he can charge hunters money to hunt them.
THATS LITERALLY FARMING.
>using land to grow organic matter that is exchanged for goods and services

(((Binkowski)))

>what was created as a fun site interested in the origins and reality of urban myths is now a jewish propaganda outfit

Attached: ap.jpg (495x362, 17K)

>THATS LITERALLY FARMING.
>using land to grow organic matter that is exchanged for goods and services
Thats a dumb excuse for logic. I would totally symphatize with the guy if he showed his vast wheat and maize produce, i mean why would blacks want to get rid of this guy, hes literally feeding the nation, but a hunting farm?
All those acres of land he got from his ancestors, neglected so he can put a bunch of deers there so he and his friends can hunt them.
That makes him no better than the lazy niggers you hate so much.

Where are you getting these figures for Croatia?

Attached: sVCYggvFVCJwdRz-800x450-noPad.jpg (800x450, 88K)

(((Binkowski)))

>Being this fucking ignorant
I understand that not everyone can know everything... but fuck dude, come on.

Its a commercial game farm which means that either:
>Its a place where wild animals are grown and then sold for hunting purposes, no different from ranching cattle
>Its a place where commercial hunting is done. Foreigners come in and pay big $$$ to shoot animals

Usually, it will be a combination of both and will have facilities where tourists come in to stay and just look at the animals.

Its a commercial agri/eco business and is extremely profitable, not only for the farmer but for the local community - its a food source (most foreign hunters dont use the meat, so its often sold to locals at reduced cost), a source of income (because tourists love to buy local trinkets and shit) and is usually more labor intensive than mechanized commercial farming finally, its great for the general economy because it brings in foreign capital.

Its farming my dude.

Remember goyim, only if 6 million, then is genocide.

And niggers cant even manage to be half as useful with the same land

Snopes can't even find his way out of a cardboard box, and now suddenly the discriminate death of innocents for no real reason is not happening in South Africa

> tell the normies Snope is bullshit already so we can put another in the wastebin

Just to clarify, hunting in South Africa is not the same as the US.

You cant just go shoot shit on public land like in the states. All hunting is done on private land and you have to pay the land-owner for each animal you shoot. Its big buisness and now that Americans and Europeans have found out, its basically a licence to print money.

Bonus is that eco-nuts cant complain because it results in a huge area of land being conserved in its natural state or returned to its natural state.

Commercial hunting is a win-win for literally everyone.

>confederate flag
>doesn't believe in private property
I dont think you should have that memeflag on

Attached: mandelaKillBoer.jpg (407x332, 39K)

“Kekistani migrants under attack in historically racist South Africa”

>Kill farmers
>Squat on farm waiting for crops
>Dont have the mental capacity to realize this shit doesn't work by itself
>Starve to death
I say we pull out the farmers and let their agressors shoot themselves in the foot

(((binkowski)))

into le oven you go.

Attached: bunk beds.jpg (480x513, 27K)

>I say we pull out the farmers and let their agressors shoot themselves in the foot
Yep... if only we could pull out. Its basically impossible for even middle-class south africans. I will be ok because I have an ancestral passport, equally doctors and engineers and other such high-skill workers will be fine.

But the majority of whites are beyond fucked and are stuck here.

we need to stop giving foreign aid to africa and let them all fucking starve until their population stabilize, we are only making the problem worse, but that is probably part of the (((plan)))

>Pit the Oppressed against the Oppressors
>Rich vs Poor, Black vs White
>Attack Farmers, steal the Land
>Everyone starves
>Seize power
>Rinse and repeat


Straight out of the Communist handbook. It's the same tactic they've been using for 100 years.

Attached: MandelaCommunistTRIM621x603.jpg (621x603, 39K)

This too.

I had a super-liberal hippie-type friend in University. After Uni he went to the Sudan to help with aid work... and he came back red-pilled beyond all belief. His opinion and your own align completely.

A great example is land use. The reason that blacks in Africa are so shit at farming is because every time a drought comes through Uncle Sam and bleeding-heart europeans come into save everyone. If they didnt, then the shitty farmers would be pushed off the land and more effective farmers would survive and have the space to expand their operations and increase their output, build up capital and move on (after many generations) to something like commercial farming.

But because you keep bailing them out they all stick to this stupid system where everyone sits around trying to scratch a living off half an acre of land.

Nigger tier shit like twater

White genocide is false, it is however an attempt to drive the wealth into control of the government though.

>it is however an attempt to drive the wealth into control of the government though.
First part of your assesment is wrong, second half is correct. More accurate:
>Its an attempt to drive *white* wealth into the control of government.

Wanna know why? When Gov takes a white farmers land, government keeps the land and then rents it out to the black farmers
>Smell that? Its feudalism

They already stripped and sold the black land. If there were rich blacks they would do it to them as well. They just want to take anything that is of value and sell it out for votes or Chinese money.

its all so incompetent.

these people are mentally ill. why dont they genocide themselves?

>They just want to take anything that is of value
Rest is wrong, above is correct.

Our government is super corrupt, to the point that they have sucked all the wealth out of the public domain - government departments, earners are now taxed to the point of exhaustion, government funds (pensions etc) are completely depleted and so on and so forth. So now they want to start consuming private wealth.

The are not only talking about taking the farms, but also our (world class, and very lucrative) private healthcare system, the mines and the banks.

>Jow Forums doesn't understand sarcasm
And you guys wonder why people call you autists.

So go off that instead of the white genocide. Exposing government corruption and want of private wealth does as an as good as if not better job than talking about the white farmers. Liberals will cry for the poor mistreated people under a corrupt government and chinese imperialism. Making it a race issue will scare them away.

The writers at Snopes are leftist scum - this isn't surprising.

In a genocide, no-one need die. Think it through.

The problem is that the fat-cats in government are doing it to get at the money. But they sell it to the peasants through language that is, literally, advocating ethnic cleansing.

I dont like the use of "genocide". Its ethnic cleansing at the moment, but genocide is on the horizon

And remeber that the land seizures in Zimbabwe started the same way.

Government talked shit and the peasants went crazy. When it actually started happening Mugabe & Co tried to stop it - they actually did - but they soon realized that they had started a revolution and that unless they went along with it they would be toast.

Its exactly the same pattern. The corrupt try to manipulate the peasants so as to get at the wealth, then the peasants go crazy and the politicians lose control.

Africans man, they dont learn.

It goes a lot deeper than a simple desire for Shekels.
These Merchants print money after all.

Attached: MannelsonMandelaMEME1.jpg (710x479, 403K)

o yeah man, I know all about the Jews. Have done since before I came to Jow Forums so many moons ago.

you know that thing about how you can look at the leaders of the 1919 revolution in germany and like 9 out of the 12 Socialist/Communist leaders are Jews? Well look at all the (((white))) anti-apartheid activists/politicians.
>same thing

Sure let's see how you feel about feral negroids killing 10 people per day in Norway.

These people need their fucking faces smashed in.

Attached: 1529473040647.png (495x454, 366K)

Have you a sauce so I can spread it around

Same group are in power in America.
Trump was viciously attacked by the Media for merely mentioning South African Farm attacks.
Any White mentioning South Africa, is immediately labeled a Racist.
That's how twisted the narrative is.

And I'm not a Trump supporter, but I respect him for bringing up South Africa.

Attached: mandela Jew connection1.png (1101x667, 560K)

this is right y’know

OP is too much of a nigger to link his source

You are an idiot. People that breed and raise exotic animals for hunting are actually growing the population of those endangered animals.

No, bundle koi and coloured murders by Bantu in with whites.

Whites didn't do the job correctly when they had a chance. Should have exterminated everybody. You failed.
Your only defect as a race is a whopper...you have empathy.

> not a Trump supporter

fuck off nigger

>I’m not a Trump supporter
You fucking serious? Gas yourself

it's a free speech board

That's a surprise.

Attached: snopes-soros.jpg (1080x1082, 155K)

>stop saying white genocide
>start saying ethnic cleansing
I am sharing this on my various social media

Anyone who doesn’t support Trump is a mental midget

youtu.be/LbnvMVhOHjc

I don't even care if the holocaust did happen the kikes would have deserved it desu. It only adds insult to injury that the holocaust could be mathematically disproven

Attached: 1535603597739.png (795x768, 523K)

Nah fuck you ya simple minded Trumptard.
It's time to grow up, and stop acting like a Boomer watching Fox News.

Attached: 13_14_Trump_AIPAC.jpg (470x362, 125K)

>you really shouldn’t step in until millions of people have died
thanks for the brilliant strategy

liberal now are like "white genocide isn't real BUT IT SHOULD BE"

'Large scale kliling' is a strawman argument. It would be more like "is SA really in stage [X] of genocide?:

128 000 late 80s, 30 000 today

It is an issue of syntax and colloquialism. The genocide isn't happening YET.
It is being heavily gas-lit though.

Less than 40k left now, if you destroy 30% of a ethnic group, is it a genocide? I mean, Hitler killed a smaller %. And yeah, there are 4,5 million whites but farmers are only a small portion in SA and they are disappearing.