Why does Jow Forums hate him again? He literally did nothing wrong

Why does Jow Forums hate him again? He literally did nothing wrong.

Attached: clinton-bill.jpg (800x450, 23K)

Other urls found in this thread:

geekpic.net/pm-9ASU42.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>loses conflict in somalia

he's a tool who is used to do his evil wife's bidding.

>NAFTA
>nothing wrong

Attached: Marc_rich.jpg (408x244, 12K)

he didn't kill his wife

No hate here, but if the important parts of Glass-Steagall had stayed in place and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had been structured to prevent Orwellian media consolidation, both America and the world would have been better today.

Perjured to congress. Lost license to practice law.

He showed the USA that Democrats are better than Republicans.

So they have to hate him, for making them look bad.

Attached: 1519526969396.jpg (680x436, 235K)

Happened to notice this selection presented for streaming the other night...

Original pic for your meme-making pleasure:

geekpic.net/pm-9ASU42.html

Attached: 1535642219975.jpg (2560x1920, 1.26M)

Big corrupt pussy Dixie retard.

His wife was a disgusting lesbian. He was a common and vile man.

fuck off dinesh

china

Waco?

Tanked the economy and got away with it because the crash didn't hit for a few years.

caused the 2008 subprime mortage crisis with his "affordable housing" initiative in the 90s. he made regulations that forced banks to give loans to people who could not possibly pay it back or be fined for being racist. banks dont want to go bankrupt from all these toxic assets so sold off the debts to investment firms and when all the loans inevitably got defaulted on the 2008 collapse happened.

He's a weed smoking degenerate and also the first nigger president

He rapes and kills kids you fucking idiot

This desu.
only president who actually gave a shit about government fiscal reponsibility

>sell nuclear secrets to chinks
>nothing wrong

lol

>source: my ass

Rapist

Wrong side of Bosnia War.

Attached: D61B5D4A-1A8B-4DD9-9907-ACD53055B0B5.gif (160x240, 676K)

I voted for him twice

>1 post by this ID
>1 post by this ID
>1 post by this ID
>1 post by this ID
>1 post by this ID
>1 post by this ID
Extremely low effort bait, stop falling for it. If this wasn't a slide thread then OP would have responded to someone already.

Attached: 1532739367435.png (600x635, 207K)

the banks and investment firms both knew what's up. They both profited

He expanded the community reinvestment act of Jimmy Carter in '77 (from a housing loan ration of 4:1 to 9:1) to a point where banks were mandated to supply loans to nogs and other trash at a ratio of 19:1. This meant that if a house lost its value, the borrower would be wiped out, and the bank would have very little cushion before they started to lose money. Once the housing market collapsed in the mid 2000's, housing loans were being wiped out left and right with banks loosing an extraordinary amount of money. The government offered to take these bad loans and put them into the stock market with an A+ rating so that people all over the world would buy them. Obviously, these stocks all went 0 and people all over the world lost a ton of money, and so the government got the federal reserve to print 4 trillion dollars to 'save' the economy in an event called 'quantitative easing'. Up until that point, the US only ever had 800 billion in circulation. This event caused extraordinary inflation, and now that the banks had all of their terrible loans COMPED, they took all this free money and gave it out to themselves and buddies in the stock market in order to buy back their stock. This is why the stock market is showing unprecedented growth, while country wide growth has been floundering. It is an artificial wealth effect that serves only to make the rich richer. I may have missed some details here and there but this is the gist of it.

Central banking is evil.

Attached: moomin.png (640x902, 906K)

what were they supposed to do? sit on the those toxic assets that were forced on them and lose money? they were happily not losing money by denying loans to people who couldn't pay them until clinton forced them to.

Don't forget, the democrats had the audacity to blame the republicans for deregulating the banks and tried to push for more regulation when it was the democrats forcing regulations on the banks that caused the disaster in the first place.

Who cares if its a slide thread, let the shills post them and I'll redpill every single time.

Except I had 2 posts at the time of this post, stupid cunt.

you can thank him for the subprime mortgage crisis.

then go ahead and thank obama for subprime health insurance.

this.

banking is too complicated for democrats to figure out. basically there is this thing called underwriting where they calculate all the odds of a mortgage being repaid using data like loan-to-value, debt-to-income, credit score, payments history, open credit lines, the size of those credit lines. insurance works the same way.

the banks (at the top) knew what loans would be repaid and which were toxic. just like they know which health insurance programs are profitable and which are not. the difference this time is that the banks are bailed out regularly instead of years later.

isnt it great that the democrats want to force you to buy a banking product, and then subsidize the banks providing the products that they know are pure fail?