Do socialists really think socialism has never been attempted?

Or do they just deny history as if it never happened.

Attached: f5d.jpg (1179x395, 57K)

Most "socialists" in the US don't support those places. Americans think social democracy is "socialism."

>Henri de Saint-Simon (1760–1825), argued that a brotherhood of man must accompany the scientific organization of industry and society. >He proposed:
>That the state carry out production and distribution
>That allowing everyone to have equal opportunity to develop their talents would lead to social harmony
>That the traditional state could be virtually eliminated, or transformed
>"Rule over men would be replaced by the administration of things"

Oh it's been tried a lot of times, but right-wing asshats have always done their (((masters)))' bidding.

By the way Cambodia wasn't even Marxist-Leninist.

They rob taxes.
They steal cars.
They shoot up schools.
They shoot up our capital.
They rob the liquor store.

They need to be dead.

Attached: cringe compilation.jpg (680x499, 46K)

Americans confuse socialism and social democracy, those that dont are mostly anarcho-communists so they dont care about different ideological systems.
You guys wont have a socialist revolution, you'll just pay more for nigs healthcare. The "left wing" fags you have are hardly left wing at all.

t. the alt-left

Attached: polpasresult1.png (742x680, 41K)

>The "left wing" fags you have are hardly left wing at all.
This. The Democratic Party is basically center-right.

Karl Marx said an actual socialist revolution would happen in the leading world power. Nowadays that would be in the US, or perhaps a few years in the PRC (although they would need another cultural revolution or something).

Cuba is much weaker than the USA and its revolution has been majorly affected by that.

The fact that there is so much of a conservative reaction in the US is a sign of its vulnerability to socialist revolution, not a strength. Sweden is probably the country safest from a socialist revolution.

>The fact that there is so much of a conservative reaction in the US is a sign of its vulnerability to socialist revolution, not a strength.

The revulsion that Americans have toward socialism is due to the pozzed faggots who support it.

People especially people trying to get you to do things you don't want lie.

Where does that put the GOP?

>You guys wont have a socialist revolution, you'll just pay more for nigs healthcare
While the USA is further right politically in both parties compared to the rest of the world, you have to understand almost anything left of center will always be viewed as socialism/communism creeping in and taking hold.

denmark says hi. socialism among a white nation can work

Eritrea succeeded

Attached: ethiopian-prime-minister-abiy-ahmed-left-and-eritrean-president-isaias-afwerki-celebrate-the-reopeni (991x557, 41K)

>What is the nordic model?

Denmark isnt socialist dude

We don't have socialism you dumb retard, and it was all fine until (((they))) opened the gates to 3rd world migrants.

most people support universal healthcare.

they also voted for Roosevelt 4 times and he taxed the rich 90 % at one point so....

Attached: capture.png (533x375, 120K)

Extreme-right, probably the farthest-right party in the Western World that isn't a fringe group.

Nobody wants universal healthcare except college students and nogs.

even if america was socialist it would be better for you than this state of "lmao pay for my healthcare but also be a slave to your rich (((boss))) for the rest of your life while you get nothing but hatred from society since you dont like feminism and trannies"

The fact that the fucking USSR was more ethnonationalist and did more for the white race than liberal west has really shows how bad the USA is doing.
Liberalist individualism has become nihilism, the young people are degenerates with no roots, no aspirations, just idiotic consumers and slaves to the (((system))). But atleast you can be an individual! (that is as long as youre not actually socialist, nationalist, racist, fascist or anything else that conflicts with the idea of (((us))) making money off you and making you miserable so you crave our products which further fuel your doom in materialistic degeneracy)

Attached: tooclosehome.png (556x628, 69K)

No, they think capitalist countries with very high tax rates that provide a lot of services to their citizens (without having to spend a dime on their military, which they have none to speak of) are "socialist countries".

Who owns Volvo? Sweden's government? Or its shareholders?

>B-b-but next time it'll work!!

Attached: not real socialism.png (783x948, 489K)

We don't need any help from Czechs, thanks anyway.

And yet when someone brings up China Jow Forums always says "Muh not real socialism"

Denmark, fag. The Nordic countries you get so wet about.

Friendly reminder 10 years ago socialists were championing Venezuela as a socialist paradise.

Then they ran out of other people's money. Race has no factor in why socialism fails.

Well, Venezuela, sure. But Argentina is strong like bull

Funny how this right-wing bastion of capitalism is overrun with people from other countries who want to live in such a terrible place. Maybe you should educate them.

>Dengism
>Socialist
China is closer to being NatSoc than actually socialist at this point.

lol what
they're neocons. They're hard right ok but saying
>Extreme-right, probably the farthest-right party in the Western World that isn't a fringe group.
is utter ridiculous and shows how little knowledge of geopolitics you have.

Except for the obvious problems

The biggest problem is giving shitskin braindead country folks just as many if not more rights than a man who actually did something with his life or that actually had some education

Yeah

nice pic, but Ukraine was part of the USSR, so it looks kind of stupid

During the civil war Ukraine was an anarcho-communist territory lead by Nestor Machno, so you could say it was a different country.
There were also White and Red factions in Ukraine, but a large part of it was anarchist.

Attached: makhno.jpg (359x541, 36K)

> After slogging through 276 of the book’s 282 pages of bad history and, I hate to tell you, “tepid” jokes, the authors finally get around to their grand plan. Spoiler alert! This is literally it, in its entirety:

>“After setting everyone on equal footing (by seizing the billionaires’ money, socializing their wealth, and handing the keys of production over to workers), you’re looking at an economy that requires something like a three-hour workday, with machines taking care of most of the drudgery; and—as our public fund pays for things like health care, education, scientific research, and infrastructure—all this technology actually makes work quicker, easier, and more enjoyable.”

From the new book by the DSA darlings at Ch*po Tr*p House

You have socialists like Zizek who admit that 20th century socialism was utter shit and should never be practised again. He, for example, advocates that capitalism is crap but that 20th century socialism was bigger crap and that it should be revised, changed, rewritten, retheorised ... etc.

Also we had Yugoslavia which economically functioned like most western European countries until it collapsed due to nationalistic paradoxes inside

Yes