Is doing porn a bad thing?

>we should live for pleasure

Edonist vermin

>Is doing porn a bad thing?

On balance, yes. Being a professional adult film actor is a poorly remunerated, physically and mentally damaging job.

Yes women who lick toilet seats make wonderful wives. Also there is 0% chance a pornstar wife will cheat on you with the mailman

Disgusting faggot kys now.

Attached: 5A3A269F-E2DE-4F70-B29F-EA51BBB7A2BF.jpg (583x349, 59K)

Would you date her though? Or do you think porn actors/actresses are the same as normal people?

it's just a little mistake, don't be so bothered

Your conscience, OP.

*Note the international mental illness flag

It’s not a bad thing at all. Neither are prostitution or stripping. Of course doing porn shouldn’t ruin your life but it’s naive to think it won’t.

It's only bad when it's not white on white.

Pornography is prostitution on camera. Would you date a prostitute?

>Is doing porn a bad thing?
Use your instinct, of course it isn't a good thing. The only question is if it should be legal, and, if you think it should be legal, how it should be regulated.

>> We should live for pleasure
Absolutely degenerate
>> Many porn stars have great personality, look, and intelligence.
Marketing. I have yet to see proof
>> Just because he/she is having sex with other people doesn't mean he/she doesn't love you.
I bet they also say things like "My wife's son..."

"Many porn stars have great personality, look, and intelligence."

Ehm no. Many pornstars are low life scum who had very bad or no parents. they are stupid as fuck and are exhibitionists, or have other sexual and psychological disorders.

I myself wouldn't. There are people that seem to not mind though. The question, I think, is should we prevent people from doing porn/prostitution at all?

>instinct
instinct doesn't seem to be a very satisfied answer. Porn is already legal in many places but in terms of regulation, I think it should at least be discouraged. I think people have the right to know whether a person they are interested in dating do/did porn or not. So maybe they should be registered in a list? For health reason at least. STDs is a legit concern and I still don't buy the assurance of porn industry with all their supposedly rigorous testing.

>> We should live for pleasure
gas

degenerate people do degenerate things. i wouldn't want to know one of them irl, that's for sure.

>Would you date her though?
I'd fuck her missionary for the sole purpose of recreation.
>Or do you think porn actors/actresses are the same as normal people?
There are actors who are entertainers. They should continue porn. There are actors who did bad life choices. They should reevaluate their choices for their greater good.

I'd have a beer with a porn star but wouldn't date

I bet even Sasha Grey will find her man sooner or later. Men of today have absolutely no standards whatsoever.

Attached: truer words have never been spoken.png (500x300, 59K)

Oh fuck no. Some porn sluts though are simply porn sluts. Degenerates who do degenerate shit. Then there are girls sucked into it who are stupid, but don't know better. Its Nikki Benz vs a Hannah Hays

Would you drink from their glass?

Attached: 1533594355612.png (250x235, 60K)

Depends how much beer

> It's just a job. Doing porn does not taint a person like committing a crime does.

Coitus is a very intimate act, and ultimately, should not be reduce to "a job" for the purpose of "entertainment". It cheapens all involved and does more to detatch the act of sex from its main purpose, ie. having children and bonding with a spouse.

> We should live for pleasure.
No we should not. We are not creatures that are made for abundance and instanteous gratification on a purely scientific level. But on a more transcendental level of argument, in matters of the spirit and the flesh, acts of the flesh will oft damage the spirit. Living for pleasure is an example of such.

>> Many porn stars have great personality, look, and intelligence. We don't judge people for their jobs but how they behave.

Their job is a behaviour, the argument is self-defeating from the very off. Furthermore, looks are fleeting in their natural state and porn, like any other form of film seeks to make people appear better than they do off-camera. Lighting and make-up come into play a lot, here.

As for personality and intelligence, many of the girls in porn drop out of high school or college to start doing porn, this is not a sign of intelligence. There may be individual exceptions, however as other anons have said, this could be just marketing. (eg. Sasha Grey posing with a Nietzsche book is not necessarily here actually *being* intelligent).

As for personality, the biographies of most women in porn are the same. Broken families, drug addictions, daddy issues. Their continuation in the business will only damage them further.

>> People are having sex a lot nowadays anyways. Doing porn is just having sex and getting paid too.

This is not a moral good.

>> Dating a porn star is cool. Sex and love are separate things.

Sex and love are two different things, but they're often linked. Love is chemical and those chemicals are related to sex.

Attached: 19.jpg (888x1120, 164K)

Well, I was talking about those that made a choice to do porn, not those that are forced into it. Being forced to do porn is obviously bad, any kind of forced labor is.

Pornstars are still sluts, but I hold them in higher regard than the sluts banging multiple dudes per week since they are getting paid to do it. I dont necessarily have issues with sluts, I just will avoid dating them.

Porn is just degenerate, I WOULD NEVER AND I MEAN EVER fuck a porn star nor a whore, same thing really. Other is just getting paid with a decent income.

>I've met people that claimed otherwise.
having your photo taken at all is an abomination

thou shalt not worship graven images

>We should live for pleasure

Surefire way to tell if someone's been enslaved by the cryptokikes

Attached: Facebook Comments.jpg (480x509, 43K)

I appreciate you answering specifically to each arguments. What do you think about a person's freedom to choose doing porn, degenerate as it may be? Should they be blocked from making such a choice?

Also, proponents of porn industry refer to the shame and disgrace that associate with starring in a porn video as a "social construct". To them, it's more society failure to be tolerant and understanding than the porn actor/actress choice that causes those consequences. As I stated, I was called closed-minded and sexist for not finding porn as a completely normal job. Accusing me of being insecure is something I never understand though. What do you think about this?

to open up the fridge to see if the cat is closed inside of it.

Not news, meme fag posting then answering his own post to bump.
sage goes in all fields.

This is now a gore thread!

Attached: 1533029846507.png (750x1334, 220K)

Why would you associate this little angel's pic with pornography?

>I appreciate you answering specifically to each arguments.
Thank you for acknowledging it.

>What do you think about a person's freedom to choose doing porn, degenerate as it may be?

The idea that hedonism is freedom is a misguided one. A man is more free when he has fewer vices; for each vice is another master to serve.
I'm going to presume you watch pornography. How long could you honestly go without watching it? When I used to watch it, it was a struggle to go over a week. Is that really freedom?

>Should they be blocked from making such a choice?

Yes. When Larry Flynt argued porn was free speech, that was a point of downfall for us as a society.

>Also, proponents of porn industry refer to the shame and disgrace that associate with starring in a porn video as a "social construct". To them, it's more society failure to be tolerant and understanding than the porn actor/actress choice that causes those consequences.

People who argue in the case of a "social construct" merely wish to argue a position of nihilism but give it a more respectable veneer. Think about it for a second; what they are trying to get you to concede is that "it doesn't matter, nothing matters". Morality as a whole is usually quite steadfast in long-standing civilizations; it is the ethics surrounding morals that are subjective, not the morals themselves.

Tolerance is not a virtue.

>As I stated, I was called closed-minded and sexist for not finding porn as a completely normal job. Accusing me of being insecure is something I never understand though. What do you think about this?

"One day there will come a time when men will go mad, and they shall see a man who is not mad and say 'you are mad, for you are not like us' " - St. Anthony the Great.

Attached: Augustine.jpg (503x640, 129K)

I mean, it's having sex on camera - for money.

The difference between a porn star and an average hooker/whore/prostitute/slut? The camera.

But now everyone knows who you are or will recognize you. Would you trust a pornstar to be your Medical Doctor? Your lawyer? Your senator?

If they would fuck someone for money before, they'll fuck someone else for money likely again in the future. It's seedy, a little gross, and a pretty big blow (no pun intended) to someone's integrity.

>I hold them in higher regard than the sluts banging multiple dudes per week since they are getting paid to do it.
this is basically how i feel about it too. shit, there are college women taking a new dick every weekend and doing 1/2 as much degenerate stuff just for kicks.

Very insightful post. Thank you.

> using a woman's only unique physiological purpose as a fucking toilet
> eating your own shit off some strangers cock to cover a car payment
> getting addicted to drugs to numb the stretching of your fuckholes because you have nothing else going for you
Yeah, maybe you're right, I'm just a prude

You don't need an argument.

I mean broccoli is really healthy, it's literally full of nutrients, but when you cook it it makes yours pots/kitchen smell like pee.
You can argue that I should like the smell of broccoli because it's healthy but it will still smell like pee to me.

The point is that the way you feel about a type of woman isn't decided by your intellect. Even if someone could convince you that it's logical to desire a porn girlfriend you still wouldn't.

You can make a good argument based in evolutionary psychology for why men prefer chaste women. But it doesn't really matter. The feeling you have about whores isn't based on your logical conclusion of them, it's based on your inborn aesthetic sense, of which feminists can't do anything about.

Do I need a logical reason for why a sunrise is beautiful? No. So why do I need a reason for why I find whores offputting and chaste women graceful?

Is there a reason that a flower is beautiful? You can make an argument that there is based in symmetrical carl jung oprah winfrey mandala shit. Or you can make an argument that it's a completely random fluke of human evolution.

But either way the fact that the flower is beautiful is a fact.

You don't need logic to justify your aesthetic sense. Just tell them to explain why a sunrise is beautiful or why a piece of music is beautiful and they'll be stumped.

degeneracy at its finest

Firstly those aren't arguments
Secondly
>it's just a job
being a terrorist is "just a job"
>we should live for pleasure
who defines pleasure and who decides WHOM gets the most pleasure?
Is it equally distributed? Is it institutionalized? Is any means to obtain it appropriate?
no of course not.
>just having sex
that itself is not a good thing.
It's harmful to society at large because it breaks down what men and women are and makes them animals.
>hurr people are animals bro
Animals don't build fucking empires, if we are animals then we must do our best be UNLIKE the other animals
Might as well justify murder at that point.
>sex and love are separate
firstly not an argument in favor it, also getting paid is not argument in favor of it in a moral sense, you can get paid to do a lot of things, it's also not just sex, it's commercialized.
but back to the previous point about sex and love, they are entwined, hence why the first time is seen as special universally because the bond is always strongest the first time because they are so entwined.
This is experience subjectively by everyone, i.e. it's arguably empirical since all sensory data is subjective

>they called me names
so?