Industrialization was a mistake

Industrialization was a mistake.

Attached: ted-cabin.jpg (634x702, 144K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tIZi9c0ugJM
youtube.com/watch?v=6kpS_pQaMOE
youtube.com/watch?v=RkMBQaHt_sI
youtube.com/watch?v=BqiFcij9Ne0
youtube.com/watch?v=19CTJ3phlpk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Get over it m8. Whining isn't gonna change anything.

it's inevitable, because of it's usefulness in warfare.

I'm preparing to go innawoods.

Its*

Get a modern soldier armed with an assault rifle, and then get a medieval soldier armed with a spear. See who wins.

Get a prehistoric Neanderthal and an average human in a post-apocalyptic scenario, and see who wins...

In civ 3, the pikeman.

Useful yes, but it's a double-edged sword. Westerners have always been vastly superior fighters. Thanks to military technology, some illiterate child can now take out the most skilled soldier by pulling a trigger.

>Its*

it is

It was, Ted

we will make it right, all data centers will burn

youtube.com/watch?v=tIZi9c0ugJM

Attached: ff7.jpg (500x275, 17K)

No risk, no reward. Humanity advancing and surviving in the cosmos means industrialization and splitting the atom and confronting our own nature and overcoming it in spite of the temptations of comfort and pleasure.

Guns were a mistake

Incorrect.

Not raising you children as devout christians anymore was a mistake.

Why not both?

>“This business shows that we are not dealing with young people making social demands, but with individuals who are declaring war on the Republic,” noted a lucid cop about recent clashes. The push to liberate territory from police occupation is already underway, and can count on the endless reserves of resentment that the forces of order have marshaled against it. Even the “social movements” are gradually being seduced by the riots, just like the festive crowds in Rennes who fought the cops every Thursday night in 2005, or those in Barcelona who destroyed a shopping district during a botellion. The movement against the CPE witnessed the recurrent return of the Molotov cocktail. But on this front certain banlieues remain unsurpassed. Specifically, when it comes to the technique they’ve been perfecting for some time now: the surprise attack. Like the one on October 13, 2006 in Epinay. A private-security team headed out after getting a report of something stolen from a car. When they arrived, one of the security guards “found himself blocked by two vehicles parked diagonally across the street and by more than thirty people carrying metal bars and pistols who threw stones at the vehicle and used tear gas against the police officers.” On a smaller scale, think of all the local police stations attacked in the night: broken windows, burnt-out cop cars.

youtube.com/watch?v=6kpS_pQaMOE

Attached: 1535639841649.jpg (960x720, 42K)

>In a demonstration, a union member tears the mask off of an anonymous person who has just broken a window. “Take responsibility for what you’re doing instead of hiding yourself.” To be visible is to be exposed, that is to say above all, vulnerable. When leftists everywhere continually make their cause more “visible” — whether that of the homeless, of women, or of undocumented immigrants — in hopes that it will get dealt with, they’re doing exactly the contrary of what must be done. Not making ourselves visible, but instead turning the anonymity to which we’ve been relegated to our advantage, and through conspiracy, nocturnal or faceless actions, creating an invulnerable position of attack. The fires of November 2005 offer a model for this. No leader, no demands, no organization, but words, gestures, complicities. To be socially nothing is not a humiliating condition, the source of some tragic lack of recognition — from whom do we seek recognition? — but is on the contrary the condition for maximum freedom of action. Not claiming your illegal actions, only attaching to them some fictional acronym — we still remember the ephemeral BAFT (Brigade Anti-Flic des Tarterêts) — is a way to preserve that freedom. Quite obviously, one of the regime’s first defensive maneuvers was the creation of a “banlieue” subject to treat as the author of the “riots of November 2005.” Just looking at the faces on some of this society’s somebodies illustrates why there’s such joy in being nobody.

youtube.com/watch?v=RkMBQaHt_sI

Attached: DkfVq16UwAUYo6S.jpg (720x816, 59K)

#metoo

you were a mistake

>At the end of June 2006 in the State of Oaxaca, the occupations of city halls multiply, and insurgents occupy public buildings. In certain communes, mayors are kicked out, official vehicles are requisitioned. A month later, access is cut off to certain hotels and tourist compounds. Mexico’s Minister of Tourism speaks of a disaster “comparable to hurricane Wilma.” A few years earlier, blockades had become the main form of action of the revolt in Argentina, with different local groups helping each other by blocking this or that major road, and continually threatening, through their joint action, to paralyze the entire country if their demands were not met. For years such threats have been a powerful lever for railway workers, truck drivers, and electrical and gas supply workers. The movement against the CPE in France did not hesitate to block train stations, ring roads, factories, highways, supermarkets and even airports. In Rennes, only three hundred people were needed to shut down the main access road to the town for hours and cause a 40-kilometer long traffic jam.

>Jam everything — this will be the first reflex of all those who rebel against the present order. In a delocalized economy where companies function according to “just-in-time” production, where value derives from connectedness to the network, where the highways are links in the chain of dematerialized production which moves from subcontractor to subcontractor and from there to another factory for assembly, to block circulation is to block production as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=BqiFcij9Ne0

Attached: X9Aq1PY0IpxgnqU69L_mlfLq_4beaLnb3-9Tkta94h4.jpg (768x768, 155K)

>claims to love Ted and his manifesto,
>still uses a computer.

>Doesn't realise Ted accepts using a computer for means of betterment but to limit it to a must need basis.

oh shut up you melodramatic tit

>In reality, everything involves everything else. The feeling that one is living a lie is still a truth. It is a matter of not letting it go, of starting from there. A truth isn’t a view on the world but what binds us to it in an irreducible way. A truth isn’t something we hold but something that carries us. It makes and unmakes me, constitutes and undoes me as an individual; it distances me from many and brings me closer to those who also experience it. An isolated being who holds fast to a truth will inevitably meet others like her. In fact, every insurrectional process starts from a truth that we refuse to give up. During the 1980s in Hamburg, a few inhabitants of a squatted house decided that from then on they would only be evicted over their dead bodies. A neighborhood was besieged by tanks and helicopters, with days of street battles, huge demonstrations — and a mayor who, finally, capitulated. In 1940, Georges Guingouin, the “first French resistance fighter,” started with nothing other than the certainty of his refusal of the Nazi occupation. At that time, to the Communist Party, he was nothing but a “madman living in the woods,” until there were 20,000 madmen living in the woods, and Limoges was liberated.

youtube.com/watch?v=19CTJ3phlpk

Attached: 5348771529001_5827086828001_5827083260001-vs.jpg (649x365, 21K)

Say that to the chinese retaking the country from mongol invaders

Ride the Tiger anons.
When this diseased beast of a society eats itself, do not be dependent upon its fruits for survival.

Attached: ride_the_tiger.jpg (442x327, 50K)

i wanna build a cabin like teds
but more cozy

Just do it