BBC want to stop making telly for white people

>BBC want to stop making telly for white people

LADS...WHAT THE FUCK?

spectator.co.uk/2018/09/why-is-a-bbc-executive-calling-for-the-removal-of-middle-aged-white-men-from-television/

Attached: DB006353-E87F-4C77-BF4D-117D7E34DA08.jpg (750x400, 138K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/telling-us-you-dont-need-a-tv-licence?WT.mc_id=r001
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

You better still pay your loisence though m8

Maybe they should exonerate all white males from paying for the license fee.

britain is a progessive nightmare run amok
get the fuck out while you still can

OI MUFFIN, YOU, TV, LOICENSE, NAHW

I don't get Britain. On one hand they have Brexit, on the other hand they want to remove white males from tv.

Attached: 1530283221889.png (634x513, 11K)

I’m starting to suspect Rupert Murdoch is behind it all.
Fair play to the lad if he can manage to wipe out the BBC like this.

tell the licence inspector to fuck off,
they are not legally able to get inside

I wonder what happens to the BBC when the muslims will have the numbers to dictate policy.

The BBC is an absolute nightmare of croneyism and nepotism.
The rot truly started about a decade or so ago when the director general’s position was tumultuous, so lower levels started to get more power and promptly abused it.
Look up Danny Cohen if you want exhibit A

>written by Toby Young

Total faggot cunt. Opinion piece ignored. Go fuck yourself OP

>bbc
was it ever about white people?

This might help you understand better:

The BBC screeched with autistic fury "NO BREXIT, BREXIT IS RACISM AND MURDER, IF YOU VOTE FOR BREXIT JO COX'S BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS"

Good Ole cuck Island, I feel bad for you.

Usually in a capitalist system you'd just shift your business away from the offending station until it hurt their bottom line, figuring anyone who thought as you did was doing the same.
But how do you kill it if it's state-funded?

Attached: British Space Program.webm (640x480, 2.81M)

Attached: 1488408679949.gif (480x360, 2.92M)

>BBC4
>actually being important an enough Channel to warrant an opinion

Nothing to see here lads, BBC4 is basically youtube teir television

London is not British anymore.

Not a single person in the UK is obligated to pay the fee anymore. It only applies to live TV and iPlayer.

Since not a single person even watches live TV anymore when they have on demand services, no one needs to pay any fee and there is no legal requirement to do so and they cannot do anything about it without changing the license

Here's your kids show bro.

Attached: doctor-nu.webm (854x480, 1.71M)

>BBC4
Christ how many of them are there? You limeys are paying for them, right? Can you get a receipt?

Attached: British Paratroopers with Glider, 2nd drop D-Day.jpg (960x684, 72K)

never got a tv when I moved out, that was in 2012

Attached: 1515699903462.png (657x527, 24K)

I know most media types live in a bubble, but the BBC's is especially boggling in how divorced from reality they are.

A little while back they had a row with John Cleese because some Beeb exec said that "Famalam" is more popular and relevant now than Monty Python's Flying Circus ever was. Be honest: Have you ever heard of the show Famalam before this post? Because it's apparently the #1 British sketch show that changed comedy forever

Attached: p063j3sy.jpg (640x360, 63K)

>article says britain is 87% white
>the muslim hoard has taken over

pick one

comeuppance for all your opium dealing and kikery, you inbred limey cunts

>from commonwealth to caliphate in

Attached: advisory_from_your_sultans.jpg (1332x666, 130K)

I like how Britain is 87% white but British television has more black people than anything. I mean, aren't there even twice as many Pakis in the UK as there are blacks? So how come everybody is just black on TV?

no, never heard of it before and seeing that image already wants to make me forget about it.

I'm black and I've never heard of this.

Your system is confusing so forgive me for not getting this right the first time, are you saying that you would have to pay a license for TV but nobody watches TV so they just buy netflix/hulu/whatever instead?
Here there's still free digitally broadcasted TV channels you can watch as long as you have antenna, am I mistaken in assuming this would require a loicance in Bongland?

BBC is London, not Britain.

The TV license is unenforced.

For reference, last calendar year they collected £3.8 billion. If everyone was actually paying it, they would be getting just about £10 billion.

>unenforced
>collected 3.8billion bongbux
I am confused as to how this comes about, I have no burger equivalent to compare it to offhand.

It is expected that you pay to receive live broadcasts. The TV itself and antenna have nothing to do with it.

Anything not live is exempt. You can live in a SETI installation and not pay the fee as long as you dont watch live TV.

Attached: 1533281907204.png (640x1136, 144K)

Old fucks who think streaming is just a memory of pissing with ease

BBC stations are government funded. They assume you watch/listen to them if you have a TV. That used to be the case back when the internet was not a thing.

I actually can think of an equivalent.

The guys who buy up bad debt and then send letters to people saying "You owe Sears $10,000 since 1986 but if you pay us $1,000 now we'll forgive the debt" and then in fine print it says "btw the debt is so old it doesn't count towards your credit history anyway and also we have no legal way to compel you to pay pls send money"

I mean obviously the industry makes money because it still exists, the TV license works the same way, just scare tactics with no teeth

Attached: TV_License.jpg (600x450, 32K)

You only need a licence to view live / on demand BBC programming as they’re the only channels “publically” funded (plus whatever loot they can get from selling dr who abroad). If, hypothetically, you could get sky to turn off access to all BBC channels live and on demand, you are not legally obligated to have a licence.

The kicker is there is freely broadcast digital tv which includes the bbc, so if our house has got an aerial and it’s plugged in, you should pay for one. But as that other user said, the inspectors have got pretty much zero legal power.

I only bought my first tv licence ever this year because my housemate threw a shitfit that we’d get caught and fined

Read the article OP posted and you might get a better understanding of the political situation right now

It's like when people walk into clinics in america and get treatment they can't pay for, except instead of 50 lawyers coming around your house 2 months later and suing you for 50million dollars, nobody actually asks you to pay the licence.

Eventually the BBC will go soft private, owned by the millionaire actors that they employ getting funding from their billionaire friends.

You should really tell your house mate to stop watching homes under the hammer and you'd be gucci

Attached: 1489445532655.gif (240x180, 845K)

This, but remember to remove all mirrors and large shadows as they can easily enter through them

>I only bought my first tv licence ever this year because my housemate threw a shitfit
what a clown, you should've told him to fuck off

I cannot believe the overpaid male beacon on hope that is Gary Linekers liberal starsi doesn't want to make content for the only people that pay their licence.

Also, besides Peaky Blinders, the BBC has next to nothing of quality.

it's the elite in london

Mate I couldn’t handle her constant paranoia and complaining and decided being 75 quid out of pocket was better than that. In hindsight i should’ve just taken the money and bought a gram. I won’t be letting her extend the lease when it runs out

We have free clinics for the poor, I had to use one a few years back for a tooth extraction when I had no ability to pay. They're volunteer services though, I think they get a tax break for it but it's not a permanently reliable service.

>‘There’s a mode of programming that involves a presenter, usually white, middle-aged and male, standing on a hill and “telling you like it is”,’ he said. ‘We all recognise the era of that has passed.’

Wow, this guy wrote an entire article based on this statement.

>nothing of quality
U wot m8

Attached: D8FDEB20-5293-42C4-9DCB-B00492F645FD.jpg (1200x1200, 358K)

Sounds like a scam, bongfriends. Is there a way to force your representatives to remedy this clearly inadequate system? Could BBC get by on the same model our PBS does, that is, begging for cash constantly from anyone who'll listen?

kys

bbc doesn't represent britain, it represents 60% white london.
blacks are 13% of london, pakis and indians 10%.
for britain, blacks are 3%, pakis and indians 4%

You should never bow down to a woman lad. They will stop respecting you as a man if you do.

They already beg for cash, that’s who the inspectors are.

the older generations are attached to the license setup, (It is nice to get channels without adverts). We'll have to get to the point where the younger generations take over until the idea getting rid of it become remotely popular.

You assume that I give a royal flying fuck what she thinks about me. She’s there to pay my mortgage then she can do one. She’s got fit mates though

>a TV station called BBC
>still didn't see it coming
These guys were once a world superpower.

No

Its become the propaganda arm of the sitting government and above all criticism as a national treasure, much like the NHS

Attached: 1337197524079.gif (500x281, 619K)

Did you have some text to post in order to counter the statement, or is "S-SHUT UP!" the best I'm getting out of you

...

It's all London. The M25 might as well be a border wall.

>no one wants to watch white mansplaining anymore
>BBC's biggest show is Blue Planet with David Attenborough

Why would someone say something that is patently untrue? It's almost like they have some perverse Marxist agenda.

Fuck you mod

Huh, /tv/ really does have mods, wouldn't have guessed.

I can’t move these days for kids making hip Famalam references which old fogeys like me don’t understand.

Except that’s never happened. Ever.

WITHOUT REPRESENTATION NO TV TAXATION
tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/telling-us-you-dont-need-a-tv-licence?WT.mc_id=r001

Attached: DlI7Ik5VAAAd5kY.jpg (895x630, 81K)

How is anyone still surprised by this? They want you murdered, gone, DEAD. Especially if you're a gamer.

Attached: 1529046905258.jpg (750x723, 66K)

Imagine if contributing to PBS was compulsory...

PBS gets funded by donations from rich fucks and various grants and such, I don't think they'd do well sending muppets around to collect loicense fees. I get that the current model relies on the fees, but could that be changed sooner than "eventually when the old people die"?

Minority protection isn't applied to whites.

I imagine collectors would be shot on sight for daring to ask. Good comparison though, gets the idea across succinctly.
Unless you're a little girl selling overpriced but delicious cookies, no solicitors permitted in my neighborhood. We had a random couple "college students" selling literature and begging for cash recently and I think one or two old people gave them a $5 out of pity but most told them to fuck off. I'll let you guess what color those "students" were.

Attached: freedom is nervous.jpg (770x642, 315K)

>David Attenborough
>middle aged
Choose one.

Attached: David_Attenborough_at_Great_Barrier_Reef.jpg (480x319, 117K)

>1984

which destination would you recommend?

fucking jews

Honestly this can only benefit the white man. The electric Jew has been our greatest enemy for decades.

Attached: Jews Control The Media.jpg (4500x4602, 3.88M)

great written article

no, not Greg Gut!
he's so funny though

>Don't know a single person who has watched TV in the past 6+ months
>Still need to fund state funded propaganda channel because we have an internet connection, and the state funded propaganda channel puts out free content on their website

We might access their website, so naturally we're obligated to pay.

Attached: 1534600638728.jpg (465x403, 24K)

No(r) way, that's even shittier than the roving loicense vans.

B-b-but user, they produced 3 episodes of that one good show in 2009. And it doesn't have any commercials!

t. every socialist boomer

Why wouldn't they just put their shit behind a simple paywall rather than expect everyone in the entire nation to access/pay for it? Hell you could make it an elective tax, you check the box during tax-season and your IP can access the channel you decided to fund, seems like it'd be simple enough yeah?
I mean, the answer is because propaganda obviously, but still what's THEIR excuse?

Propaganda channel.

If any political parties moves to cut their funding or get rid of them all together, you better bet they'll use all of their influence as a "neutral" propaganda channel to shut that political party down.

So nobody dares touch it.

BBC is controlled by MAY and the Pedo-Crown

lol jesus christ brits, what the fuck happened to you?

Oh, and every journo from the same propaganda channel went on a strike earlier this year, because they wanted more gibs. And when you strike, it's usually because you want to force your employer to do your bidding, through pressure from the consumer.

Except
>Tax payers saved $1M~ every day in salary costs for useless journos
>Tax payers saved $1M~ every day in useless production costs
>Only a handful of people spoke out about wanting them back on the air. The rest didn't give a shit

lmao did they actually get their demands met then, or did they just quietly shuffle back to work one day?

They were met half-way on their demands.

Manufactured outrage similar to that of the CNN/Trump dynamic in the US. The propaganda journos were reaching out to former colleagues and friends in other media outlets to help them.

>The propaganda journos were reaching out to former colleagues and friends in other media outlets to help them
You got it bad too, then? What a pack of assholes. Sorry you guys also have a swamp, hope it changes sooner than later for you.

Attached: k then.gif (200x200, 484K)

And to give you some perspective; every year there are polls done among journalists to measure political standings.

>3,6% voted for fiscally conservative/socially conservative
>13,5% voted for fiscally conservative/socially liberal
>Rest voted for social democrats or pure communist

Completely fucking unproportional to the population. Since the two first parties I mentioned are currently in government.

but it is, through taxes

Bucket was peak Britkino

I thought they were only state-funded through a few grants for 'public education' like Sesame Street and the like?
>Rest voted for social democrats or pure communist
>pure communist
Jesus Christ, can you drop an entire television network out of a helicopter?

Attached: file.png (600x400, 271K)

William Hartnell turned in his grave when this aired.

The negro finds itself fundemetally unable to function in the European countryside, befit of its gibs, and away from its natural homeland, it swiftly withers away.

Attached: images.jpg (284x177, 7K)