How do you defend this?

It's clear that Jow Forums loves traditional european art and hates degeneracy, but help me understand why paintings of naked women (like pic related) isn't degenerate, in fact you encourage it right? Why is nude feminist art wrong but this is good?

Attached: art.png (963x653, 924K)

I only go to museums for the articles

>she isn't kissing another women
>shes with Nature alone
>no Tattoo's
>decent lighting
>her eyes are closed representing some level of shame and control.

One is inspired and honed by nature and skill, the other conveys only ugliness and resentment towards nature and skill.

It's beauty in high art you fucking puritain/zog warped pleb.

Grace

its a picture meant to share beauty , not inspire lust.

nudity is not inherently degenerate.

it's not like she's spreading herself out or anything.

Art such as this is created to appreciate the female body and her sexuality. Modern art is similar to porn in that it's meant to degrade women rather then appreciate what nature made them.

>Old nude paintings depicting the pure human body naturally are the same as Jewish led bbc porn videos that promote degeneracy and loss of morals
The Amerimutt strikes again.

Attached: 1529315219448.jpg (1640x1076, 249K)

this
theres a difference between cherishing the female body by depicting it like its done here, and thots spreading their ass on instagram. if this makes you hard and not appreciate the skill ,culture and art involved you are a nigger.

>Shame and control

Nnnnnnah, that's called sunbathing.
You might have read about this phenomenon.

Naked women aren't degenerate. The reason they're naked is.

Because it glorifies the ideal of the human body without being degenerate you autistic moron. It is immaterial and spiritual in it's context, the essence of the human form is what matters, here elevated and thus divine. Nudity and sexuality in pornographic sense are non-existant here, this is purely erotic. Beauty that feeds the soul, separated from the material and rooted in virtue and love.

If its purpose is to just get you hard then it is just pornography.

Attached: SlovenlyWolf.jpg (778x1100, 219K)

Nudity isnt degenerate. Only burgers think this

this is glorifying the sacredness of beauty, pornography is glorifying decadence

Differences between nude art (non degenerate) and porn (degenerate) as the late Scalia said, " I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, "

2d > 3d duh
2d porn isn't degenerate
3d is

Attached: smugLoli.jpg (960x960, 82K)

>You are a nigger
FeelsGoodMan

DAS RITE.

Attached: rY3jLv5.jpg (480x236, 13K)