If we can create miniature horses why cant we create intelligent black people?

Because we're not allowed to do eugenics anymore. Currently we're probably lowering their genetic stock by allowing the worst of them to breed as much as they wish though welfare.

>spend 300 years breeding blacks to be stupid and strong so they're better farm tools
Nice meme. We purchased blacks that were already slaves in Africa for several hundred years, a mix of Arab rape babies and criminals being punished.

miniature horses are like 400 years old

you cant create a brand new dog breed in 10 years

if society wanted to we could create super mutts in a single generation

micro horses can't procreate

eugenics is "unethical" or whatever that means.

And they all live in Wakanda?

Attached: h89m6t12kv801.jpg (2048x1143, 261K)

Maybe, just maybe, we should provide health care for the millions of sick miniaturized horses before spending our resources to intellectualize blacks.

>I admit freely enough that, by careful breeding, supervision of environment and education, extending over many generations, it might be possible to make an appreciable improvement in the stock of the American negro, for example, but I must maintain that this enterprise would be a ridiculous waste of energy, for there is a high-caste white stock ready at hand, and it is inconceivable that the negro stock, however carefully it might be nurtured, could ever even remotely approach it. The educated negro of today is a failure, not because he meets insuperable difficulties in life, but because he is a negro. He is, in brief, a low-caste man, to the manner born, and he will remain inert and inefficient until fifty generations of him have lived in civilization. And even then, the superior white race will be fifty generations ahead of him.

Why ask questions that have been answered 100 years ago?

Taking the nigger out of black people requires nothing more than a whip. Just give a black person a good flogging and watch him come to his senses.

underrated

And theres over a billion of them substancially dumber. What's your point?

Horses reproduce at the age of three years, niggers usually do it at the age of 14. There were far more generations of horses than niggers in these 4 hundred years.

>we could create super mutts in a single generation
yeah, but why?

Attached: 1516527313442.jpg (1536x2030, 555K)

/thread

deja que mi raza sea pura

fuera por uno...

Aren't black IQs raising though?

I'm seriously worried "Idiocracy" is our future.
Give me one reason why this won't happen.

Attached: SetWidth940-idiocracy-connor-post.jpg (940x517, 240K)

I think they stopped comparing apples to apples.
Now they only score specific groups, with an assigned average of 100.

Wanna bet?

>wanting to be an anglo

It's already happening. The dumbest people breed the most, while the most intelligent people are prevented from breeding. We have created a movement that will lead to human extinction.

they are , most are 150+ IQ
they hide it around white people because their know whites will feel threatened if they learn the truth

Attached: 1514264940803.jpg (637x565, 49K)

I own two minis
One is white with blue eyes

>a mix of Arab rape babies and criminals being punished.

We didn't buy them from Arabs, be bought them from the more dominant black tribes like the Ashanti's in Ghana.

Criminals yes, but also prisoners of (tribal) war.

>eugenics

It is totally possible, but there is something called morality.

Because they'd be better at stealing.

You are not welcome here.

Go away.

Attached: 411.png (998x1134, 197K)

That's exactly what "Idiocracy" is about.

And I see absolutely no reason why it would stop, unless we lift the taboo on eugenics.

Attached: idiocracy-movie_300.jpg (300x400, 35K)

Humans have longer birth and life cycles and also the added inconvenience of their own free will and a network of influencing family, friends, etc. in which they are enmeshed.

Rather than having controlled breeding like with animals, it's more practical to influence decisions through propaganda.
And rather than opting for people who are intelligent per se, it's more practical to aim for a people that is more pliable and submissive.

Oh, wait...

Yes, but if we use our intelligence we can divert the future by stop funding africa and low iq places and close up the borders

That won't prevent it.
Dumb white people still reproduce far much more than smart white people.
High-IQ whites will go extinct, only trailer trash whites are surviving.

Human generation cycles are too long. That's why.

>it is immoral to make people smarter

That is indeed what (((they))) made us believe after WW2 and I now think it will be our (and by "our" I mean high IQ whites) undoing.

Depends on who you are asking.

I think high IQ people understand more and more the value of their intelligence, it will be in their interest to reproduce and have successful children

Becasuse blackness is a dominant gene

Because they did the exact opposite. Don't think for a fucking minute that the Founding Fathers of our country weren't breeding people. They were. They knew all about breeding from horses and cattle, and if watch a professional NBA or NFF game you will see a majority of black players who only make up about 12% of the population. The result of breeding.

But they also made super smart hybrid by breeding with the slaves. SO you have a massive population of retards, with a smaller population of exceptional humans.

They weren't selectively bred for intelligence.

this

Attached: the-top-20-of-blacks-are-smarter-than-1-in-3455391.png (500x522, 96K)

Even science has a limit

Our average IQ has already dropped several points in the last 2 generations.

If we couldn't figure it out 50 years ago I don't see why we would figure it out 50 years from now, and by that time it's probably already too late.

The iq tests averages for whites are literally false in the US

Attached: IMG_0672.jpg (1125x2436, 317K)

Ting

>spend 300 years breeding blacks to be stupid and strong so they're better farm tools

So you also did that in Europe and Africa ? They’re not very bright there either...

who wrote that

In evolutionary terms it wasn't very long at all since they were fucking monkeys

We need to perfect miniature black people first.

Attached: 1529242213532.jpg (220x188, 8K)

how much smaller can we get them?

Beetlejuice is perfect, you shut your dirty whore mouth.

Attached: 1532659208651.png (480x602, 397K)

Depends on how small you need them.
Most miniature blacks aren't as great sadly. Beetlejuice is an example for us all.

Attached: 1505646472428.jpg (480x720, 46K)

That monkey is so cute, I want to brush it's hair and put it in tiny clothes

it's a marmoset not a monkey you dumbass amerilard

Attached: 1465929875849.jpg (645x773, 87K)

It's still a monkey friend.

When slavs were?

roll

Attached: 1523401035118.jpg (600x842, 51K)

Literally in the first sentence faggot
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmoset

10/10 pepe

>wikipedia
>reliable source

Attached: XfxmHE8.png (1480x2900, 184K)

If this were true, American blacks would have a significantly lower mean IQ than other black populations, rather than 1 SD higher.

Damn you
britannica.com/animal/marmoset

u rite

Attached: 1533931444585.png (327x318, 127K)

Unless you're implying that the guy is particularly dumb, then perhaps not. If we take an IQ of 130 as our comparison, that is about 2 SDs above the white mean (meaning about 2.3% of the population has an IQ of 130 or higher).
130 is 3 SDs above the American black mean, meaning about 0.13% of the population will have this IQ. 40M blacks in the US * 0.135% = 54,000
Africa has measured at about a SD below the US black mean, which means 130 would be 4 SDs above that (ie 0.003% would have that IQ). 500M Africans * 0.003% = 15,000.

It's quite possible the global population of black 130+ IQs is below a million.

The smartest blacks don't care about planning, inventing or discovering.
They use their less retarded brain to get more gibs than other niggers and become corrupt politicians.

Because the method to do that isn't really "making people smarter," it's "only allowing smart people to reproduce", and the institution of mass democracy flat-out will not permit us to undertake policies that cause anguish to 97% of the population, even if it's to ensure the species' survival.