NOOOOOOOOOOO, we wuzn't monkeys at the jungles of Europe for 5000 years while there wuz civilization outside of Europe...

>NOOOOOOOOOOO, we wuzn't monkeys at the jungles of Europe for 5000 years while there wuz civilization outside of Europe, we wuz Atlanta like this movie and shiet!!!

Attached: LaughingMuslims.jpg (424x337, 90K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728368/
eupedia.com/europe/autosomal_maps_dodecad.shtml
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natufian_culture
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

up

ups

>t. pic related

Attached: pdcequrndhi11.jpg (640x1136, 29K)

rude

you can't bump your own thread that soon
shit thread btw
very unclear wtf you're talking about

uped

What does this photo of a Corsican pimp have to do with anything?

What do you mean?

If that's true then why do some of the largest cities that first existed begin Europe?

Attached: neolithic settlement size.png (1218x683, 59K)

And why are the majority of ancient megalithic structure/buildings located in Europe?

Attached: FireShot Screen Capture #494 - 'List of the oldest buildings in the world - Wikipedia, the free (733x1869, 183K)

Attached: FireShot Screen Capture #495 - 'List of the oldest buildings in the world - Wikipedia, the free (599x1188, 116K)

>Greece/Ukraine
>Europe
Chose one, Ancient Greece were Arabs not white
>ancient megalithic structure
>civilization
Chose one, some monkey's use tools too

Attached: tFLrdkgRfr5BMiU23thJBrxA.jpg (770x430, 150K)

>Europe isn't part of Europe

uh, no

>Arabic, a Semitic language being spoken in Europe

Arabic wasn't spoken outside of Arabia until the Muslim conquests after 600 AD. There is a 0% chance anyone in classic antiquity spoke Arabic. Greek is literally an Indo-European language.

Attached: europe-large-map.jpg (2000x1500, 406K)

>Arabs are languages not phenotypes
okay

True Arabs (Bedouins) are a specific geneotype/phenotype that are a mix of Levantine Neolithic (~60%) and Basal Eurasian (~40%).

Ancient Greeks were mostly Earyl European farmer (Anatolian Neolithic) with some Steppe ancestry (Eastern Hunter Gatherer/Ancient North Eurasian). There was little to nothing in common between Ancient Greeks and Bedouins.

Most modern day "Arabs" really are just a linguistic category, they speak the languages of the old Islamic Caliphates but aren't genetically related or are only partially related through mixture.

Modern Levantines for example are partially mixed with the Bedouin Arab invaders, but still have mostly Levant Neolithic ancestry.

tl;dr Neither Ancient Greeks nor any other Euros had anything in common with ancient Arabs linguistically, culturally, genetically, or phenotypically.

u what...

Attached: Neolithic_farmer_admixture (2).png (800x581, 62K)

Early European Farmer DNA is equivalent to the Anatolian Neolithic which is partially distinct from Levantine Neolithic.

Levantine Neolithic DNA, while ultimately descending from the Caucasus is still different from Anatolian Neolithic. In addition Arabs have significant Basal Eurasian admixture and are therefore not close to Early European farmers/the Anatolian Neolithic.

Attached: 1504984905148.jpg (736x953, 139K)

>we wuz arabs nd shiet

you can see the admixture rates in the map i provided tho

>comes from egypt
>was only enlightened after european influence
>is more than likely an arab follower of satanic pedo prophet

get fucked.

lol kys, west is shit

>gets triggered by the truth
>can't even refute what I say

Typical camel-jockey.

>>was only enlightened after european influence

Lies, the Ptolemaic dynasty was Kemet's downfall.

Why would I redbill you?

Modern Egyptians are the result of Arabs (paer Basal Eurasian) mixing with the local Coptic peoples as well as the Negroid brought with the Arab slave trade.

The main difference is percent Basal Eurasian (and to a lesser extent Negroid) among ancient and modern Arabs respectively. Negroid DNA was non-existent prior to the Arab slave trade and Basal Eurasian only in Bedouin and Persian population and to a lesser extent in Levantine Neolithic populations.

Basal Eurasian is minimal to non-existent among Europeans.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728368/

Basal Eurasian among Arabs 30%-40%. By the Copper Age in Europe Basal Eurasian was near the single digits as a percent.

The main difference between whites and non-whites in the middle east is the percent of Basal Eurasian DNA.

Attached: percent Basal Eurasian.png (1054x734, 71K)

plenty of differences
i don't actually support his claim that "greeks are arabs" they're greeks and their dna shows this
and the divide isn't as simple as you put it
you need to compare these admixtures and come up with your own conclusion
eupedia.com/europe/autosomal_maps_dodecad.shtml
and no
west asian difference from europe also includes lack of european hunter gatherer among other things

No, we're pretty diferent, we're low IQ shitskin subhumans tainting ''precious'' Europe right?

The Valentine Neolithic and their descendants has "Unknown European Hunter Gatherer" DNA a bizarre offshoot of regular European Hunter Gatherers.

>Subsequent ancient DNA analysis of Natufian skeletal remains by Lazaridis et al. (2016) found that the specimens instead were a mix of 50% Basal Eurasian ancestral component (see genetics) and 50% Western Eurasian Unknown Hunter Gatherer (UHG) population related to European Western Hunter Gatherers.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natufian_culture

Either way they are distinct

Greeks=Anatolian Neoltihic, Western Hunter Gatherer
Levant=Levantine Neolithic, Unknown Hunter Gatherers+ Basal Eurasian Admixture

The high amount of Basal Eurasian admixture among Middle Easterners, especially "pure" Bedouin Arabs as well as Arabs and to a lesser extent the Levantine Neolithic makes the populations different.