Jimmy Dore Praises Tucker Carlson's Amazon Segment

This guy spit on Alex Jones' face at the Republican national convention in 2016

>both republican and democratic parties are working together to fuck americans and get rich.
you can say this all you want but until you vote outside your party in a general election it doesn't mean shit

>you can say this all you want but until you vote outside your party in a general election it doesn't mean shit
For the record, Dore voted green in 2016

>globalism is a common enemy
nothing wrong with globalism. we are already completely dependent on global trade, btw.
The problem lies with human stupidity. Sperm donation eugenics can fix this.

>Amazon pays employees poorly.

"far right" response: Let's expose amazon through the media and ensure negotiations between workers and their bosses are fairly conducted.

far left response: Let's regulate and tax the living shit out of all businesses, potentially nationalizing them, and support a gigantic fusion between government, corporations and unions.

>both republican and democratic parties are working together to fuck americans and get rich.

Fuck off retard this is a Republican board. We support Trump and all Republican candidates. Shills go back to plebbit

Spitting on tranny loving faggots is a bad thing now?

>shilling for (r)'s
vote for em but the goal should be to slowly elect based and redpilled candidates

my vote means nothing. it's a rigged game. the only solution is to hang all of these fuckers publicly, and perhaps thier first sons as well. how much blood on our county's hands must we endure before we cut the head off the snake?

Why did he leave TYT? I guess he stopped being insane?

Attached: 1535304043896.png (960x540, 921K)

As the American elite grows more and more corrupt, American politics will converge to being pro-elite "liberals" and anti-elite "populists".

>Canacuck
>Worried about American political parties.

I couldn't name you a single Canadian political party. Get out of our board.

You're right to a degree
You're going to see more and more people on the right attacking mega corporations because these mega corporations have made a "pact" of sorts to attack the right.
The right has no choice but to turn on them

repubs and dems work together to grow themselves rich while creating the illusion that they have our interest in mind. it's a fucked game, only their death can save our soul

Jimmie is on the precipice of becoming the next Dave Rubin, with the huge difference of the fact that he is not a cock sucking kike. He is a passionate mutherfucker, and once he takes his final red pills, and he will, he will be one of our best allies because of that passion and unwillingness to bend to the kike and it's lies.

As our Glorious God Emperor said repeatedly during the 2016 campaign, Crazy Bernie and his commie followers see the problems, they are just unable to solve them with their tactics. We must rid our country of the globalist influence and then we can, ourselves, decide how we want to run things.

We Late Roman Republic soon boys.

>globalism is global trade

No, the far left response is to abuse and step over literally anyone in the way of your power. Jeff Bezos is a very far left man. Actual progressives and people who want better services (like Jimmy) aren't our enemy user. It's people like Bezos, champagne socialists in pedowood, neoliberals and cucks in the democratic party, Trotskyist neocons in the GOP, certain deeply corrupt alphabet agencies that are a fucking problem. People arguing for coalition efforts every two months are part of that same problem.

Attached: 1527545831072.png (645x729, 77K)

>Actual progressives
I've noticed this is how they often describe themselves. They aren't redpilled on critical issues but, not at all bad people.

>jimmy dore
>far left

i was 100% expecting an american flag but apparently canadians don't understand basic political terminology either

>They are beginning to realize that globalism is a common enemy
jimmy dore has always been repilled, in fact i would bet he is more redpilled then tucker

the issue comes in defining globalism. some people just mean the juice, others mean all mega-corporations, others mean just some leftist tech companies

it's very easy to come to consensus when you just say the word "globalization" or "globalism" and then nod in agreement that it's a serious issue. the nuts and bolts is what matters

Amazon pays it's Tier 1/3 employees poorly.

Level 4/5 (lower management) get meh pay
Level 6 (middle management) operations get good pay
Level 7 + (upper middle to senior) get great pay with general managers (L9) of an FC getting approx $350,000/yr (after stocks are considered). year end bonuses can bump that up as high as $750,000

area managers however have been increasingly complaining over their pay recently. Most L4 managers make approx $45,000-60,000/yr (depending on location and tenure), and are salaried. it is not uncommon for most area manager to work 60-65/hr per week which averages out to approx $16/hr (before stock options)
The stock awards just a few years ago were nice as many managers were receiving upwards of 80 shares. with the stock trading as high as it is now, the yearly award is a quarter of that.
Tier 1/3, 4 years ago were awarded 8 shares. Today, they are given 1 share.

Amazon likes to hide behind its "total compensation package" spiel when defending its low cash compensation.

>>the problem lies with human stupidity

lel kek

Sing a song of sixpence
A pocket full of rye
Four and twenty black birds
Baked in a pie

>>pol/ is Republican
No, pol/ is nobody's bitch and is largely anti establishment first an foremost.
Right now board seems to support Trump, because he is doing a good job and because he did not as of yet showed himself to be part of the establishment.
This board will turn on anyone as soon as they fuck shit up.
A lot of anons will vote Republican because of Trump and because Republicans seem to be a better option right now. Bit don't delude yourself in thinking that pol/ will support any particular party.

cuck

>Let's expose amazon through the media and ensure negotiations between workers and their bosses are fairly conducted
what kind of retarded shit is this? How would you even ensure this happens? I'm sorry but that kind of bullshit isn't going to work, if it did then we wouldn't be in this situation in the first place. The government stepping in and breaking them up and regulating them is the only reasonable solution.
>potentially nationalizing them
guess what? we've nationalized corporations and industries before. Guess what else? For the vast majority of these cases they have been temporary, the supreme court is generally not going to allow permanent nationalization to happen.
>support a gigantic fusion between government, corporations and unions.
if you let them off the hook this happens anyway. Google already spies for the u.s. government by feeding them information about its users and their digital footprint and it's such a giant fucking company with such vast amounts of resources that pays an army of researchers and lawyers thousands of dollars each to put out research papers in defense of everything from their overstep on their data usage and copyright materials.

You're worried about shit that happens organically when these big companies are left to their own devices. We do need regulation.

You got it. There is something in the air, like a charge before a thunderstorm. Those who pay attention to the shifting winds are quick to pick it up.

The deep diggers and fringe thinkers are reaching the same conclusions; the oligarchic marriage between corporations and the government.

Free market advocates like to pitch their "muh human nature" as a reason to support laissez-faire economic policies. What they don't appreciate is the fact that farmers kill wolves. The wolves are just competition for the farmer's herd, so shouldn't the farmer just work harder to make more livestock? The major corporations view small business and enterprise as the wolves going after the herd (consumers), it's human nature to destroy the competition, we are the only species that does this btw.

He's still on the network on aggressive progressive, but has been shit canned from the main show obviously because he triggers Ana too much but he has way too many lefty bleeding heart positions to ever 'convert', hes a progressive who's left of Bernie Sanders and doesn't mind shitting on the corporate left and democratic party because they deserve it as much as the republicans, he doesnt feel like he needs to be loyal to a party with no loyalty to its members, hes a useful tool but wont ever "convert".

Im pretty much in the same position as him, the problem is the money and bribery i politics and nothing will change within the 2 party system, he constantly says trump isnt the problem, hes the result of a broken system, hes naive about some things, but right as rain about most.

oh he voted green that changes everything

so who'd you vote for most recently?

Well said, and I want to add if the democratic party brought back someone like jfk I'd probably switch. But the party as it stands now is nuts and it's sad because I'd like to have reasonable options.

Also, homelessness is a problem that can never be solved, due to the fact that a small percentage of the population will always refuse to participate in society and choose vagrancy instead.

carlson says anyone who believes 9/11 was an inside job is low life scum
weird

Just like TRILLIONS for wars in Allah snackbar land.

>>we need regulations, even though the regulations were the cause of all of the monopolies that we have
user, seriously, do you think that these big corporations got to where they are because of LACK of regulations?
Regulations are the way to ensure monopolies. Government fucks get their biggest dough for fucking issuing regulations.
Why do you think is raw milk illegal for human consumption in most of the US?
What is the real reason? And what did it create?

that's totally besides the point when, as Jimmy mentioned, 43% of homeless people in the u.s. are actually employed. These aren't people not participating for whatever reason, they are actively participating and they're still getting fucked over.

Here is the real fucking dope on Amazon and shit like it. Amazon is an incredible negative to everyone in the economy except Jeff Bazo and amazon shareholders.

Think of capital like the rain cycle. There is finite amount of capital- it's a closed system more or less. Your banks are typical like lakes hording it let a small portion lend back into the system.

Shit like amazon sucks away that capital on a worse scale then even wal-mart has done. We'll being living a feudal system at this rate in a generation. Hoping to god Bezos that our brown box with spam in it arrives via drone.

>Regulations are the way to ensure monopolies
this is so basic it's amazing more people don't understand. oh wait i forgot 90 percent of the world is mixed race.

True. I say let them. It's how they want to live.

hiding his power level or he has an accident?

amazons investors are mostly retail plebs. smart money is elsewhere. the market has been topheavy for years now.

I despise both parties usually, maybe Democrats a little more for a few reasons, but I always voted 3rd party, and I did not vote Trump. Now I will vote Republican because what's going on on the Democratic side is just freaking crazy, and I don't trust crazy to lead the country....as a matter of fact that was the reason why I didn't vote for Trump. I was wrong, so I may be wrong now, but Reps just look like a better option.
Pol/ was always weirdly Libertarian-ish I guess. And you and me are a prime example- what matters is our own opinion on what's best for the country, not the party.

The convergence of identitarian socialists with identitarian national socialists. Dam thats so crazy that can work. Next we could try the convergence of crhistianism and those followers of jesus religion

>richest country in the world

Attached: 1534944562504.png (403x448, 53K)

I can't forgive Jimmy for his cowardly act of spitting on Alex Jones and running away.

Way too Jewish

>do you think that these big corporations got to where they are because of LACK of regulations?
I didn't say that and that's not really what I'm talking about anyway. I'm talking about once they reach a point where they can literally just fucking pay people off to do their bidding for them in order to sidestep regulations and laws. We're way past that point with Amazon, Google and even Apple at this point. They need to be broken up. I don't know why this is such an issue for right leaning people. One of the most beloved Repub president of all times was a huge trust buster.
>regulations are the way to ensure monopolies
So you think every single regulation on the books is the result of a company paying off a lawmaker to eliminate competition for them? pretty outrageous claim you're making.

r/K selection variance and the "no free lunch" rule(2thermo) combined mean that as long as life exists in some form, poverty will exist. Not every bacterium gets to grow on the richest food source, some of them are stuck on a dry rock waiting to either die or get a new opportunity

>>there is a finite amount of capital
Why some people think that economy is a zero sum game, never ceases to amaze me.
What is labor?
What is added capital?
C'mon user, economy is and never was a zero sum game or we would not have progress at all.

>Amazon is an incredible negative to everyone in the economy except Jeff Bazo and amazon shareholders.

The #1 "leadership tenant" that amazon preaches is
>Be Frugal
to the point that all of the other leadership qualities take a back seat

Managers are expected to devote 10+ hours per week working on projects that save their fulfilment center money.
Ever receive an item in one of those yellow jiffy envelopes and instantly wonder why the fuck would they send your item, which is clearly too fucking big for the packaging in that manner?
because its cheaper than using a proper cardboard box.
it is cheaper to fit 10 lbs of shit into a 5lb bag at amazon.

get a box that sounded like a maraca, open it up to find zero padding inside? padding costs money.

order a $600 item only to find it in NO box and with the mailing sticker slapped on it?
because the metrics amazon uses states that it is cheaper to risk theft of certain items than it is to just use a $0.47 box.

amazon is looking daily for ways to generate revenue and hold onto that revenue without paying any of it back out.

Watch Jimmy Dore's appearances on Joe Rogan, he's surprising refilled compared to the rest of TYT. I'm curious if he will ever show up on Dave Rubin's show.

They reach that point because of regulations user. Not because of lack of the regulations.
So we are going fight fire with fire?
Stupidity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Look what happened with telecommunications companies and how they got into power.
How about we ease regulations to allow for small business to compete?
If a child has to have a fucking license for a meme lemonade stand, how can a small business compete in an overregulated economy?
I'm not sure what kind of regulations you would like to see to get rid of monopolies that the regulations caused.
user, Trump, by getting rid of regulations literally waged a war on the boys in government, he is cutting their paychecks. The biggest money they make is on regulations. The big business is the ones paying for said regulations.
What you see is people with power of government behind them " regulating" businesses so they are not standing in the way of their buddies, monopolies.

We really need to execute people

I think both the American left and the American right agree that these tech giants needs some trust busting.

Attached: 5944862_orig.gif (400x448, 189K)

Here's the problem:

Tucker and right want to end welfare to force companies to pay better wages. Like a true free market. Jimmy and the left want destroy profits and increase welfare so everyone is living on the benevolent governments dime. Both see the stupidity of the cronycaptilism but they have complete opposite ideas on how to fix it. Great we team up to fight the swamp and the globalist. Once we win we have war #2. If the right doesnt win that one. We start the whole fucking cycle over again.

no we need to end the FCC and pit tech companies and ISPs against each other.

No and fuck off faggot

Marxist user here.

What matters is whether you got stuff, or whether you don't. The two-party system in the U.S. has people spooked on tribal affiliations. A trad dude who works on an oil rig off the Texas Gulf Coast is just as much of a worker as a purple-haired SJW who works at a coffee shop or in the urban service sector making $30,000 per year -- but they resent and fear each other (for bad reasons) and identify more with wealthy people in their respective tribes.

Ultimately, Jeff Bezos' interests are much more in line with Rex Tillerson than either do with the people at the bottom.

I've been watching jimmy for awhile. He has done good content even if he is into some leftist faggotry.

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH

IMAGINE BEING THIS BLUEPILLED

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH

Jimmy's not that dumb, to the point of getting rid of capitalism entirely. His guests are idiotic though.

youtu.be/Riinow64_jY?t=887

Most regulation yes, but there's no money to be made in breaking up monopolies.

this is clumsy, but I agree with it.

Bernie can be bullied by any random BLM member, what do you think intelligence services will get out of him?

Most republicans will only fight poz if their reelection depends on it, and even then they'll do it half assedly. Better than dems but still far from good.

Attached: republicans.jpg (601x846, 269K)

The problem is that no one has fixed the main problem, which is what caused the 2008 recession -- and that's keeping the economy "going" by inflating speculative bubbles with cheap credit. Obama just inflated another bubble and Trump has continued this trend.

Trump was quite right during the campaign when he said the markets were overvalued and we're sitting on a big fat nasty bubble. But after he got elected he pulled out the stops to pump it up more. Eventually the time will come to dump.

He is acting far more centrist than left, and contrary to what absolute fucking retards say.. no.. the Democratic party is not centrist in the fucking least.

1 is furthest left, 0 is center, -1 is furthest right, Dems are at minimum 0.45, behaving like 0.55.

Jimmy Dore got red-pilled via red-pill microdosing, and is realizing the optimal is somewhere in the 0 -> -0.75 range, with a hint of 0.05.

He even acknowledges the value of Shapiro

I wouldn't give up capitalism completely. Markets are good for distribution. But I'd nationalize most of the major industries and the major banks. If prefer non-profit credit unions in any case.

Yeah, he can be pretty real about stuff, but he seems to hold some cuck ass opinions at times. I still like listening to some of his rants tho.

Attached: 1534182375618.jpg (552x423, 40K)

The problem with the left is you can't make communism without globalism.

And they're not quitting communism.

Is that RamZ Paul's brother?

>supporting anything the slimey reptillian jimmy fucking dore does

>it would cost $20b to end homelessness.
Nah, just eugenicize the irredeemably mentally deranged and addicts that make up the majority of the homeless, also expel the foreign invader hordes who are driving up housing prices. I bet we could find a contractor who could get both done for no more than $10 billion.

Marxists use the term cosmopolitanism instead of globalism. But either way, Marx wrote in 1848 that globalism was the logical conclusion of capital's search for new markets and that there would come to be a "cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country." That was at a time when industrial capitalism was beginning, and really only existed in England, France, and the East Coast of the United States.

>"[Established national industries] are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production."

Not a bad prediction for it being 170 years old.

But it's just the capitalist imperative. Capitalist enterprises must seek a return on their investments otherwise they go out of business, so when they encounter obstacles to further growth and further profits (which the closed, nationalistic, heavily-unionized U.S. economy experienced in the 1970s), they will circumvent those barriers. As a result, jobs ---> China.

Communists don't even need to do anything. They can just sit back and watch capitalism do its thing.

Isn't he the guy that says all cops are evil monsters?

You don't know what globalism entails, it's far more than global trade. Global trade has been going on since prehistory. Globalism has to do with the creation of a transnational extra-legal authority structure which controls every aspect of culture, economics, social policy, etc. so as to create a completely controlled and predictable population.

>Fuck off retard this is a Republican board. We support Trump and all Republican candidates
lol no, fuck faggot Paul Ryan, Bitch McCuckold, Lindsey "Boy Toucher" Grahamnesty and the rest of the perfidious GOP cuckservative establishment.

Boomer is too far gone. Also he spit on the waterfilter merchant

I agree with you in a sense, but I see globalism as a way to secure private property rights now that capital transcends national boundaries. What ancaps don't get is that you need the state if you also want capitalism, because capitalism uses laws to define, delineate and protect your property rights. Before capitalism and the state, property was held in common. The modern nation-state and capitalism arose in tandem.

If you get global capitalism you'll get a global regulatory / legal regime. A global state if you will.

More commie lies. Keep going into lifelong debt to read that tl;dr drivel.

The universal inter-dependence is created by central banking and the fiat currency system. It' why they blow up countries that do not have a private central bank.

It's funny because I don't disagree with you.

I support this.

Who cares. Jewnes is a Zionist gatekeeper and tranny fucker. I'll trust an anti-Zionist leftie more than a Zionist shill rightie any day of the week. When Dore becomes a Zionist shill I'll stop trusting him too. Until then I can respect the man at the very least.

Rubin only invite Jews.

>economy is and never was a zero sum game
Retarded abstract idealism. At any point in time we have access to finite amount of resources and there are X number of competitors for those resources, all your pretending won't change that.
>economy is and never was a zero sum game or we would not have progress at al
We can expand the range of resources we have access to, but at any point in time there are only a finite amount of resources we can effectively access. Potentiality of expansion and growth does not mean inevitability of expansion and growth.

You must be Jewish.