Polygyny thread. Spread your seed

Christianity and whiteness go hand-in-hand. This is a sin.

It would be amazing to have a multiracial polygamous family like

>an Asian wife, the Hao-Anons
>a black wife, the Johnson-Anons
>a white wife, the Hessing-Anons
>an Indian wife, the Pandey-Anons
And a couple of children with each of them, my black children are sports stars, my Asian children are pretty, my Indian children are philosophers and writers, my white children are artists and in STEM and I get to fuck whatever ethnicity I feel like for that night, whether it's oil drilling into tar black skin or if it's a curry tasting cunt.

GIB MILKIES SAUCE NAO

Attached: 1529369685905.jpg (1096x735, 266K)

I think the nuclear family is healthier. It's better for a kid to have one mom and one dad to bond with, having a bunch dilutes their importance. However, since things are pretty dire in the west, I'd be willing to consider it as an emergency sort of thing.

Attached: Church Family.jpg (806x1024, 154K)

I'd prefer to marry a white woman, have 6 beautiful white daughters and then force all my white daughters to marry black men. It would help cure the world of racism.

Why not use a white girl?

just have 15 kids with one or two wives thats enough for one lifetime. im not that smart or rich but some of you anons are so get to it white man.

>promoting polgymy in the worst way
yeah nah
the main benefits of one man having multiple wives or consorts is preventing low caste men from breeding, improving the gene pool and culture of the nation.

You fucking jews are going to get it one day I swear to god

Polygamy is a meme. My wife and I have been trying to find another woman to start a family with for over six years now. We've had a few long-term partners, and a few more short-term ones, but when things get serious they always flake. Good luck sorting through women who are interested in real polygamy vs millennial sluts who just want to experience an alternative lifestyle and explore their sexuality.

Why wouldn't I just breed the black women myself? Why are you planning who your daughters fuck? That's fairly disgusting of you, if you want mixed race children just fuck black women or at least Indian women.

Australia is interesting in that some Indians look sub Saharan but have the potential to be fairly intelligent, I work with guys like that, one of them literally looks like Kanye West.

My father in law has more then one wife and keeps his children on the straight and narrow. all of the children help and will take care of him when he gets old and the family unity is amazing. These are the perks of marrying into a persian family and going shia.
But in all honesty even the bible allows multiple wives. the strong must breed and the weak should be enthralled.

Attached: 500_F_190308221_zaUkqoSgNHZcri6gXikoqOtFStFWxlln.jpg (500x500, 21K)

I bet the mom is remembering when hubby used to grab her like that.

My thread about fatima get's deleted, but apparently this is fine and not off topic at all

This only worked when conditions were brutal enough that the weaker men would generally get killed off.

Idle, sexless men start revolutions.
>inb4 vidya and porn make them impotent now

I don't want mixed race children, I want white children. White girls. And I want my white girls to get blacked. So I will make sure that happens. I want to produce beautiful thick white girls that are just built to take black cock.

wow so just kill the violent niggers that try to rape one of your wives then.
>inb4 something about niggers hating dogs so your wives would be fine

>I want my white girls to get blacked
...you're fetishising about your daughters?

Same with my tedposts even though the last one was generating good discussion. The mods are degenerate, low IQ faggots.

Yes. You're not?

You sound like a nigger. Europe was at its peak when monogamy was the norm.

am I going to far to say get the rope so we can string this Troglodyte up.

Attached: 38614579_2064397600290851_4439291082047488_n.jpg (462x416, 20K)

>Massive increases in crimes, especially violent ones like rape.
give me sources for crime statistics.
>Incest and inbreeding, particularly marrying of 1st cousins; which also further increases aggressiveness in people.
doesn't seem to be a problem, could be beneficial in weeding out bad genes. don't marry a retard, retard. idk about the agressiveness part. sources.
>Women eventually become property.
i can't predict the future
>Lower happiness in women.
you need to learn to fuck and how to treat a woman. that's your fault.
>Lower average lifespan for men: more wives leads to more stress for caring for them (not to mention the constant infighting to be #1 wife as seen in many species with more than one female) and that leads to lifespan reducing stress.
sources.

>handicap the conversation
it's because everyone wants to scream BRUMPFUCK ISLAM DOESNF WORKS. There is too much islam being promoted, so it stays out of the fucking thread. Why mormons aren't brought up first is beyond me. Maybe they just implemented it wrong? maybe ISLAM is the problem, not polygyny.........

I am a good OP. I shall deliver my good frenz. please stay on topic.
mega
/#F!4PxnUYCD!QDLXDXmUZhvzWu5YmbQ7cw

cause bait works better mate.

HAHAHHAHHAHAHA

women out number men starting in their 20's, the current cultural climate suggests that 80% of men that would be betas aren't even betas anymore. So it's not like we're taking their women.

Polygamists should be hung. Polygamy is the reason the world has a bunch of faggot incels who shoot up madden tournaments.

Fat chick. Can't do fat. Never the fat. Fat females make unhealthy baby's with a high likely hood of basedboyisum. Don't bread the fats. Use a different pic of a nonfatty.

>monogamy was the norm in rome
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Of course not, I'm not an incestuous creep. Don't have children user, you need to be sterilised.

Name 1 polygamous civilization of any noteworthy accomplishment.
Protip: You can't

>rome
>peak
Cringe.

>Wants to have a harem of different raced women producing a le 35% nation of misery
>Calls me the fucked up one

Nah mate. You are. At least I want to produce white children.

>promoting degeneracy as good
yeah fuck off, this is a Christian board and you are a Godless piece of shit. nice try, antifa. you cant trick people on this board

>slows rate of degeneracy by offsetting degenerates
You can't offset degeneracy by engaging in degeneracy
>increases birthrate of your nation with non degenerate children
The majority of those children would be bastards in the eyes of god. They would degenerates by default. Nevermind the fact that they would most likely end up polygamists themselves.
>increases native population to nation built by its people
Implying polygamist families produce more children then traditional families. Women can only shit out babies so fast. You can't accelerate child birth by impregnating more than one at a time. All you are doing is preventing someone else from planting their seed.
>puts women back in the role of housewife and being a good mom
Implying it would
>increases household wages if wives have secondary job
Contradicts last post.
>increases number of "moms" available for child's needs
I have a regular mom and a step mom. Neither of them were particularly good at it IMO, and I doubt a third would have made anything better. You're lucky if your biological mother gives a shit about you. Just because your dad is fucking her doesn't mean she is going to see you as equivalent to her child.
>strong Chad pateral figure/archetype (set your women and kids straight, stop being a pussy)
"Chads" are usually washed up drunks by the time they start reproducing. This meme needs to die.
>children will see the degeneracy of people outside the family unit, and strive not to be those people
By being a different kind of degenerate? I don't get your point.

Your entire argument is fake and gay.

Polygyny is based and allowed in the Bible.

T. Known Boss

Persia before islam had polygamy.

Are you fucking stupid? The degeneracy of the upper class towards the end of Rome doesn't counter millennia of tradition. Fuckin Augustus himself tried to enforce traditional Roman monogamy, with mixed results. Might as well look at San Francisco and say that it's emblematic of American culture from the beginning.

Attached: KYSMM.jpg (600x600, 67K)

Ha-ha, you fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is “Never get involved in a land war in Asia,” but only slightly less well known is this: “Never post a image more interesting than what you actually want to talk about!”

Attached: 5l6wa.jpg (600x400, 24K)

I literally laughed out loud good
stuff aussy.

>Might as well look at San Francisco and say that it's emblematic of American culture from the beginning.
>it's not

goddamn when did japanese chicks get so THICC

Your points are non existent.

You sound like a little bitch who should be ignored. This thread is for alpha gentlemen.

T. Known Boss

Why the porn?

>proof

>name a monogamous one that's not currently falling apart and getting blacked

>polygyny is degeneracy
>you and what facts?

see previous
>bastards in the eyes of god
this is not a religion thread.
>I have a regular mom and a step mom. Neither of them were particularly good at it IMO
sounds like you had a shit dad user.
>By being a different kind of degenerate
>implying it's degenerate

it's working though.

she's not fat. fat is at walmart.

Kind of have this situation with my wife and her mother, have a kid by both of them now and will probably end up with more. In this situation though since the other woman is older, I don't think it's really "stealing" a girl from another man, at least not in my age group.

Here's a (you) just for you.
>this is not a religion thread.
Disregarding religion is degenerate, user. You're digging your hole deeper.

Nope.
cais-soas.com/CAIS/History/hakhamaneshian/human_rights.htm
It was also a feminist multicultural society with daycare apparently, so no wonder a fucking subversive shill as yourself would so quickly point to it as a model to ascribe too.

Attached: Screenshot_20180902-230629.png (1080x1920, 486K)

>Since being in the top 20% of men isn't hard for most of us,
That's a dumb statement.

this x1000

>Look at this diseased thing that died because it was alive to begin with. Surely we'd be better off sick to start, then ever struggle to be healthy and thrive for a time

Room temperature IQ you got there hick.

Attached: 05 fate - glubb.png (830x1159, 91K)

it's only being disregarded because everyone points to islam as an example as to why polygyny doesn't work, disregarding the fact that the problem lies with islam in general, not polygyny.

No it's not. Stop being a pussy. It's not my fault you don't try at life user.

Attached: 1535761032215.jpg (1080x1080, 112K)

Attached: anri.jpg (900x1200, 148K)

Of course you accelerate the rate of child birth with more than one woman.

That is self evident. You can have simultaneous pregnancies.

Please apply logic.

>I know what killed that sickened nation! it was "this little part here." I don't really have any substantial proof that that is what caused it, but yeah, i'm pretty sure.
You could pull the same shit with homosexuality and Romans, but you're just labeling a side effect of a dying nation, claiming it's the cause. You have no proof that polygyny is what kills a nation.

My memeflag is still better than your shit memeflag

sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120124093142.htm

economist.com/christmas-specials/2017/12/19/the-link-between-polygamy-and-war

courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/11/15/2011BCSC1588.htm#SCJTITLEBookMark1024

Bro, most the of the reasons why it causes problems is because you fuck with the male-to-female ratio in sexual market: you increase the demand for women as well as decrease the supply for them. The most successful men are going to marry as many women as they are allowed to. The 2nd most successful tier of men are going to marry close to that number. The 3rd most successful will marry close to the number of the 2nd tier. Etc. Etc.

This increases the pool of men who can't get a woman because they don't have the wealth to compete with the higher-status men. And this isn't just loser men, this also includes hard-working good men with unfavorable variables. For example, a young man starting out isn't gonna be able to compete in the sexual market as well as an established older man. A young man is at the peak of his testosterone production and he wants a woman NOW. He'll eventually get desperate and pursue any means to get one, including illegal means to make money and rape to get the sex he craves. Also, families don't want to die out. So if a son can't get married than he'll be married off to an easy-accesible cousin to ensure the linage continues.

Going back to the demand/supply theme, women become extremely valuble. Eventually a society gets to a point where men start offering martial wealth for a daughter's hand in marriage. Because of this, women need to be protected so their virginity and quality are entact to increase the potential for marrying her off. The best way to do that is to make sure she's constantly supervised and guarded as under strict control not to do anythinc stupid to ruin her value in the marital market. Hence, women eventually become property because of this.

Attached: Global-prevalence-of-consanguinity-as-cited-by-Bittles-AH-Black-ML-ref-6-reproduced.png (850x607, 359K)

>bros polygamy stops shitty men from breeding like how will we ever get getour dicks laid now haha?

Oh, the happiness in women lowers because women want to be a man's #1 love: no woman wants to be #2 (a.k.a. expendable compared to another woman). So they will be constantly competing against each other for 1st wife and constantly irritated with not having and needing to maintain that position. Even if you try to assure them with that bullshit that you like them all equally, your actions will dictate who you facor the most of your harem.

>NO PROOF, NO PROOF, YOU HAVE NO PROOF! IGNORE THE FACT NO GREAT NATIION BY ANY SANE MEASURE PRACTICED IT IN MASS! IGNORE THE FACT NIGGERS, MUZZIES, AND WHITE METH TRASH INFAMOUSLY ARE SHIT PEOPLE AND LIVE IN SHITHOLES WITH SEVERAL DIFFERENT BABY MOMMAS! NO PROOF, NO PROOF!
Just because you knocked up 2 of your cousins doesn't make you a polygamous alpha user. Go try and get your life in order for the sake of your inbreds.

Attached: Kmv7glL.jpg (771x960, 95K)

I love Aussies

It's not just loser men, dumbass. That's already solved with monogamy. With polygyny, men who work hard and smart but in unvariable conditions also get fucked because there isn't a 1:1 ratio any more but a 1:X ratio that severely deplete the amount of available females. As I mentioned before, the average young man starting out is not gonna be able to compete with the average older man who has years of a headstart to accumulate his wealth and success to get females.

The question is not IF it's a good idea, OP.
The question is HOW do I get my wife to agree to such a thing? Mine doesn't want any more children, and I most certainly do. If I could convince her to let me take a 2nd wife, problem solved.

Attached: 1388050641376.jpg (1438x1080, 429K)

>Every negative source is a shitskin country. Shitskin countries already suck ass anyway.
I appreciate you actually providing sources though, bravo user.
> increases the pool of men who can't get a woman because they don't have the wealth to compete with the higher-status men. And this isn't just loser men, this also includes hard-working good men with unfavorable variables
We already have that problem.
>no woman wants to be #2
she won't be. Women are hypergamous, theyll tolerate each other for a high value man. don't be a shit husband, and be a dominant and respectable man, problem solved. Polygyny is for betas and incels.

Exactly. What they don't realize is they were never going to get a piece. If they do, they hate their lives because the girl they are with won't respect them. Polygyny isn't for those types.

>SEVERAL DIFFERENT BABY MOMMAS!
That's not polygyny, thats a shitty man. Shitty men are also part of the problem, the ones we are going to outbreed. You're nitpicking details user without providing relevant proof of your position.

>REEEEEEE I WOULD LITERALLY NEVER GET LAID AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
yeah ok fuck you

>if someone fucking brings up islam, ignore them
>ignore the best example of why polygamy results in a third world nation: incest and the resultant lowering of IQ
Your efforts to stifle debate are laughable.

Attached: 1535836284320.jpg (517x284, 29K)

This sounds all better than degeneracy of adultery and sodomy.

People hate PUA tactics because they work. If you are a dominant, strong, repectable man, they'll tolerate one another due to your high perceived value. Women are hypergamous. But just because you use PUA doesn't make you a douche. It's kind of like how PUA hijack women's biological repsonse's, and women(and whiteknights or cucks) resent them for it, YOU need to hijack PUA methods and use them for your own goals. A hammer is a hammer. It's a tool, use it.

yay another post about shitskin countries. don't use islam as to why polygyny doesn't work, islam is already fucked, which is why polygyny doesn't work THERE, not the other way around. What if whitey practiced it? or just decent men?

...Because all the shit countries are shit countries because they practice polygny... The shit country is the chicken, the polygny is the egg.

its degenerate because it is inherently immoral and unethical to lie and sin. how is that hard to comprehend?

>inherently
>immoral
>unethical
>lie
>sin
go ahead and walk us through your reasoning.

It's a shit country because it's a shit country filled with shit people user. Polygyny is a scapegoat.
>what about shit governements?
>shit education?
>shit desert?
>shit IQ populations?
>shit race?
>shit fathers?
>shit religion?
nah, its cause he fucked 2 women.

Well it's not lying if im telling you, is it user? Sin how? better get back to studying your jew books.

sex is biologically determined to procreate. the child therefore is supposed to be parented by the mother and father. you cannot have more than one father and one mother simultaneously. you are lying by claiming it is a good thing.

>you cannot have more than one father and one mother simultaneously
no shit retard
just because your father fucks multiple women doesn't mean two women gave birth to you
are you fucking stupid?

God damn.

>sex is biologically determined to procreate. the child therefore is supposed to be parented by the mother and father. you cannot have more than one father and one mother simultaneously. you are lying by claiming it is a good thing.
assuming I am also biologically determined to be able to nut at least 6 times a day, can I impregnate at least 6 women a day?(I already know that I CAN, i'm asking permission)

see mega link here, god bless user.

and like i said, disobeying the family structure is inherently immoral
what does this hypothetical have anything to do with anything? saying you are meant to ejaculate 6 times a day doesnt mean you are meant to impregnate 6 different women, by your determined logic

memeflag threads like promoting racemixing or degeneracy are made by JIDF

Attached: 1535734320840.jpg (1797x2100, 2.19M)

Stop larping user. None of us have girls. If we did, Jow Forums would be a wasteland.

>disobeying the family structure
where?

Attached: dd1.png (819x979, 12K)

Load the pic from the first thread again please.

>saying you are meant to ejaculate 6 times a day doesnt mean you are meant to impregnate 6 different women, by your determined logic
that was determined by your logic, not mine. If you can base your reasoning on biological determinations, so can I.

I solemnly swear, I, the OP, am not JIDF. Keep sharp.

I've got 1, going on 2. That's why I started this thread. Figured Jow Forums would be determined to save the white race using shitskin's tactic of outbreeding them in their own countries, and the realized why not use it to outbreed regular shitty people. Hone the blade so to speak. We all know it is a fucking catastrophe right now. Why not do something about it long term?

original thread is listed in OP.
I don't hate AI, but at least try a little.

the fact that there are multiple links. a man and woman, upon marriage, are combined to one flesh. breaking this rule is when it becomes a sin
but the problem is that my claim actually is substantiated with proof and your claim is a hypothetical with no merit

Load more pics of her. Im stuck in BFE with just a phone.

>are combined to one flesh.
yeah their kids?
that happened 12 times

why haven't people edited these so the wife is asian and the kids are hapas yet

i dont understand what you're saying anymore. children created under the sanctity of marriage become the flesh of the parents. if a child is born out of wedlock, they are illegitimate and were born under sin by their forefather

based and redpilled

>wedlock
is that like a contract the couple ask each other to sign? whats the big deal if the guy just says hey I don't want you to touch other men but I'm going to have other wives
like
she agreed to that.

>one flesh
yea it takes two to tango. you cant put your dick in 2 women at once. (dont prove me wrong Jow Forums)
it also says in that same paragraph not to separate what god has joined, so you're argument is actually better suited to divorce or homos. It doesn't say shit about NOT having another woman that you could also cleave to.

>Matthew 19:3–6

>3 And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, s“Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” 4 He answered, t“Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, u‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”

Who says it was out of wedlock? the law? the law isn't god user, and we're not raising bastards. They have a father.

pic related

Attached: heres to you anon.jpg (2456x3680, 2.29M)

you should look into samurai polygyny, it's interesting, legally only one wife, but as many consorts or whatever and the wife and consorts would literally have to kill themselves if the husband told them to.
pretty good system for keeping the patriarchy(society) strong

you can apply that to a woman allowing her husband to beat her, but it doesnt make it moral
that verse you quoted is taken out of context in respect to the argument im making. the child is accepting of the mother and father's sin and is returning to God as one flesh. one must have committed adultery, which is the point im arguing is immoral, would then, in that same chapter, be deemed as unlawful and sin (leading to divorce). that child would still be one flesh, under God and their parents

you're going to have to define where morality comes from and then prove that god exists, or explain specifically what those morals accomplish in a utilitarian way.

it was this way in any primitive society of europe before christianity.

there is a reason christian culture dominated the world, and just as some people abandoned it they started turning to shit