Is life without great wars good for people? I mean you need wars to develop yourself

is life without great wars good for people? I mean you need wars to develop yourself

Attached: 1535751120995.jpg (1024x960, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=S7Jll9_EiyA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Wars develop science

Kraut, were two great wars not enough for you? Do you fancy another one?

>Do you fancy another one?
yes

Attached: 3t5jw8.jpg (540x768, 101K)

>I mean you need wars to develop yourself

That was just edgy 1900s meme, during most of the history majority of men never participated in warfare, exception being slave societies where free men didn't need to work as much. Masses producing food was far too essential.

I mean this would be good for you, for your future

put me down for yes

War only allows for feels free scientific advances.

Try reading some German history you filthy turk

>War only allows for feels free scientific advances.
But that's the best kind?

Even though it's edgy opinion, human society develops faster than humans themselves, there hasn't been any major life threatening turmoil in the civilization centers in past 70+ years and look where it got us. Biggest threat in today's first world is somebody with different opinions.

We were victors in two world wars, but we lost in peace treates. First time because we were dumb as rocks second time because British willed it. So it's really not benefitial for us to fight in another one. We just die in vain.
Wars speed technological progress sure, but wars today are far too destructive. There are too many negatives and few positives.

Also, tfw no one will ever hold you like this

Attached: 1kinni.jpg (600x596, 150K)

strong generations breed weak generations

>great wars

The last two world wars literally broke the backbone of europeans. Who were the ones that went to the frontlines first? People with spine, courage, sense of responsibility, and who avoided all of that misery? And two world wars pretty much ensured that those bloodlines were extinguished from any major western european nation. Look at those countries now. We now have countries ran by cowards, cucks, liars, thieves and women.

That's going with the assumption there are any strong people left to create that next generation.

I hope that humanity goes extinct cause of a huge ass war. Outer Heaven type deal. That'd be a prime life, none-stop violence, blood, gore, and hatred towards the enemy. Sounds like a boner to me.

>Implying you would actually survive that war

>Who were the ones that went to the frontlines first? People with spine, courage, sense of responsibility, and who avoided all of that misery?
Yeah, because every single combat vet died am I rite, and there were no combat veterans in politics after war, and they certainly weren't driven by the fact, that they don't want their children to face the same hardships as them.
>We now have countries ran by cowards, cucks, liars, thieves and women
Yeah I am sure that this particularly retarded feminist is WW2 combat vet... Just because your or mine shit country can't appoint or elect a strongman does not mean that the less fortunate shitholes won't do so. Europe is destined to be conquered by the shitskins simply because they've got what 1st world lacks, balls.

>develop yourself
Western men are no longer able to develop via war. Fighting is for Muslims now, we are the only real men left in the world.

No, it's fatal.

Mars curse is what happens when you dont give him his due sacrifice.

It's been 5 generations since we had a real war. The wars we have had had had so few casualties for the west, they have had no real impact.

Now in those 5 generations, obesity, athsma autism, feminism and all kinds of malaise has become endemic.

Calhoun's mice never lived past 10 generations. We are half way there.

Mars requires his sacrifice.

Hast du niemals 'Mutter Courage und ihre Kinder' gelesen?

>Do you fancy another one?
Don't we all? It would do us all a massive favour

Attached: 1528110417565.png (1920x1080, 1.17M)

Attached: 7628736487234.jpg (497x604, 69K)

You're fucking stupid, look at how damaged Europe is because of WWI and WWII. An autistic German should know this. Go kill yourself.

Wars develop certain individuals while wrecking the overall populations genetic quality. Hardly ever worth it from a eugenic perspective.

War is the most awful thing imaginable for the individuals engaged in it.
If you romanticize it, you're either extremely naive and ignorant, or you're a cold-blooded psychopath.

>I mean you need wars to develop yourself
yeah getting your legs blown off is good personal development

No shit. Or seeing your buddy have his melon exploded.
Or driving through a town and seeing women and children BTFO, bloodied and crying on the side of the road.

fucking kraut retard

Attached: 14516420_1099697073457702_1505192788675021725_n.png (800x801, 1.56M)

Now to put it in a more secular language;

Humans have only one predator, other humans. It's how we "cull the herd" as it were. It culls the weak, and creates male scarcity. With male scarcity, women must compete. And it gives the top males access to more females, thus spreading more able genes further.

As soon as females no longer have to compete for a mate, they become emboldened. They can start making demands, and since males must now compete, they must give in for a chance at reproduction. Que feminism and the collapse of society. And since we dont have that culling, weak, sickly, or sub-intelligent people can reproduce as well, in relative peace, and have weaker, more sickly, and less intelligent offspring.

But you will develop some useful things to prevent this.

You deserve to live in a war ridden muslim country.

youtube.com/watch?v=S7Jll9_EiyA
>I mean you need wars to develop yourself
shut the fuck up Hegel!

Attached: 44B9909300000578-4920628-image-a-16_1506417922070.jpg (306x427, 34K)

this is good. Weak will die and strong will survive, good for evolution and natural selection.

>you need to be a frontline stormtrooper for war to affect you
Go read Metaphysics of War.

Weak dont deserve to breed

This is a reason we have this level of cuckery now. A Big war will save us

"War is sweet to those who have not tasted it."

If you have not experienced war, and still fear it, you are the weak that should have been culled.

So all these detractors fear war because they know, it's them that would perish first.

Do not stray from your devotion to the one true god of all mankind. Give him what ever name you wish, whether it be Mars, Odin, or whatever else, he is War, and He is our only true god.

i unironically want to go to war

come on you bosnian fucks do something

You needto stop playing call of duty you inbreed. War isn't thestrong survive. The strong get bombed the weak getbombed and who has more bombs has survivors left

t. omega virgin that's never been in a fight

this is the opposite in modern warfare the strong die first (high IQ requirements for enlistment ) and everyone else dies in similar numbers (a draft).

Big wars are shit cos they'll be decided by planes and drones and missiles and shit. Give me some of that low-to-mid-intensity shit.

Incorrect.

Read Macnamera's follies. He removed the IQ requirement to get more bodies into vietnam. "Macnamera's morons" had a casualty percentage 3 times higher than any other group of GIs.

A simple plan, imperfectly executed is disasterous in War.

Why don't you pick up fencing/shooting as a hobby?

>Europe is destined to be conquered by the shitskins simply because they've got what 1st world lacks, balls

Disagree with his point, then you validate his point... Why do you think Europeans lack balls? Because the bravest men died in wars you dimwit.

Only americans claim retarded shit like that. Show your flag mutt man

Get a good archery mat and you can have fun in your backyard

Attached: Jaguar-175-lbs-80 euros.jpg (630x630, 34K)

i am fully aware of macnameras morons. the point i am making is distance weapons make intelligence and combat prowess irrelevant when bombs and mustard gas kills everyone in equal measure.

Ukraine/Russia conflict?
>tfw you will never have emotional bond with qt ):

Attached: 1496615715509.jpg (470x540, 82K)

And again you are incorrect.

An intelligent man keeps his Gas mask handy, well maintained, easily accesable, thus sparing him from becoming a casualty.

A moron, leaves it in his locker because it's "too heavy" or what ever other excuse he can come up with, and becomes a casualty number.

An Intelligent soldier uses cover, teamwork, and all means at his disposal, a moron stumbles into ambushes.

I get it, you were educated by hollywood and have no knowledge of reality. Not your fault.

Mar's approved.

wars weed out the fittest of two nations
conflicts weed out the weak of a nation
you want a nation willing to create conflict internally to remove the weak and the dangerous, you don't want wars

wars will be pushed by them to force the remaining top white males to the front to die while the poor immigrants that would be racist to use will be left to fill the void, which they will claim to be industrial and economic but it will actually be purely demographic

but your Norwegian, your nation is populated by qt's.

Attached: 0snOr.jpg (750x1000, 50K)

>If you romanticize it, you're either extremely naive and ignorant, or you're a cold-blooded psychopath.
Yes. It's a selfish attitude borne from bored men who live in comfort. They think the world they're living in is an artificial, inauthentic and fake world compared to the "real" world of an armed conflict or whatever. But that's bogus because it's the same world. There's no higher meaning or special insight about the nature of reality or the cosmos to be found in war.

In any case, most people who experience war are civilians who have no choice in the matter. War is something that is visited upon them by other men. A 10-year-old girl who just saw her family barbecued by a guided bomb falling through their ceiling would have as much insight as any soldier would.

I have never been to war but when I talked to people who had, I was talking like OP is, and those veterans snapped me out of that attitude pretty quickly.

i know, but their level of brainwashed combined with my autism makes it near impossible

Attached: 1496615827763.jpg (1835x1835, 1.25M)

Mainly, war is just politics. It's also bullshit.

War is natural selection... Darwinism.

If one society becomes smarter and more capable, and decides "caves are for suckers, we should pile up sticks and make houses" they then enforce their evolutionary leap onto others or kill them.

Without war. We would still be banging rocks together.

>meme flag
>meme opinions
>meme reading comprehension
Just shows how retarded you self-identified Nazis and Fascists are, and that's a bold statement since I despise the soi left just as much. Just because you go to war does not mean you will automatically end up dead, thus there will be still abundance of people with desirable character qualities returning home, not to mention that men who weren't participating in the war got shamed and those who wanted to go but couldn't for health reasons sometimes got driven to the suicide. Same thing applies to those so called "bravest bloodlines" where every single bloodline will have drops of tainted blood. You live in this romantic imagination land of bloodline superiority and pure form. Western Europeans lack balls because after 1960 quality of life skyrocketed and all the life struggles were practically abolished, that's why eastern europeans are ballsier than westerns and are considered based which is shown in their governance and for the same reason the shitskins could be considered rabid comparing to the eastern euros.

As much as I hate what is happening to the Europe, it cannot be stopped, and it takes a lot of temerity to think that world revolves around you and your way of life. Will it spin in the downward spiral of decay and dystopia? You bet, but this is the laws of nature in the purest form, those talking heads that are openly welcoming the flooding masses will be terminated the second they start interfering with the way of life of newcomers. Will I take the arms if the need arise? Do I have any other choice? I think not.

Downfall of the now tainted western civilization will seem as a tragedy only to one or two generations, 500 years later it could be seen as a greatest push towards better world. I don't have any illusions that it may end up utter disaster but you have to destroy something in order to build and anybody who thinks otherwise is deluded.

Attached: 1529848990379.png (771x807, 1M)

If you can't claim the women in the lands you conquer for your own, why bother? War is pointless now.

No the 'strong' were braver & died in battle, their genes were not passed on.

>No the 'strong' were braver & died in battle, their genes were not passed on.
Yep, because evening the odds or using the gift of intelligence equals cowardice. You are a fucking retard if you think that every single person who went to war died and only draft dodgers were left to reproduce. It's almost as some kind of self-projected cuckoldry fetish mindset.

Sure if your a faggot with no character or intelligence to begin with.

lmao what the fuck does a 120mm shell of high explosive care wether or not there is a weak or strong in the receiving end. All flesh will be torn apart regardless. The only difference is that cowards, lazy, spineless and opportunistic people generally avoid being anywhere near where the lottery of ballistics is being played.

Yeah, and that's why europeans are dying off, and being replaced by invaders.

>Just because you go to war does not mean you will automatically end up dead
Ofcourse you don't end up dead if you get yourself a comfy job as a fobbit, don't volunteer for shit, and avoid going to war as much as possible, which generally means that there is less time for you to get killed before the war is over.

We should kill blacks, latinos, south asians and muslims by nuking them in their country of origin. We should eradicate them so that we whites can finally leave in peace together.

>comparing today's warfare to the world war 2 warfare that we are talking about
>comparing the today's option to not participate at all or bomb shitkins with a drone from comfy chair to the world war 2 necessity where nobody gave a fuck whether you want or don't want to participate (Europe) cause you would get involved or end up on a receiving end one way or another
>comparing the war for survival or right to simply exist to today's distant opt-in wars on foreign soil for resources, wealth and political power
Seems like the future is bright, just like your intellect...

Attached: 1515199193850.jpg (541x960, 48K)

>whites
>together
>peace

Attached: 1519837885438.jpg (664x539, 27K)

Why not?

>wars in homes of ethnic origins
>not resulting in immigration
when will you fucks learn? When has a country ever gotten whiter following war?

It's not romantic, but is is necessary. don't be a bitch and shy away from duty. Your world is falling apart around you and you wont do a thing to stop it because you fear the solution more than the problem

Because we never lived in peace.

You cucks never stop to amaze me. We should do ethnic cleansings worldwide. Till the last one.

Enjoy dying for whatever goal your Jewish elites have while your girlfriend fucks some other guy while you're deployed

Whom do you side? I'm for reuniting white peoples. The only others that I respect are southeast and east asian ones, except muslims and Myanmar.

We were never united, we always went to war with each other. Put your finger on a European country and chances are that country fought more with other Europeans than with non Europeans. You will always have conflict because there will always be several strong countries that will want to exact their influence on others and will then fight other strong nations for said influence. These dreams of pan-whitnes are a pipedream

>reuniting white peoples

This is Ameritmutts my fellow posters and lurkers.

Attached: aaaa1.png (280x291, 88K)

This guy gets it.

Europeans are fighting over who is the whitest or more civilized while on a sinking boat. And you retards still did not swallow the biggest and lumpiest red-pills of them all, that nationalism is in reality cancer and will lead to inevitable downfall of western civilization. Simply because we are divided. On the other hand you have Muslims, that are "fighting" under single banner of faith from Tunis to Indonesia and I don't see them duking it out between each other on a grand scale of things (Sunnis and Shites both hate west meanwhile fighting eachother) or whole African continent that feels disadvantaged and shunned upon simply because they were born in some African shithole and western culture only spins this hatred further by constantly boasting about lavish lifestyle and meltdowns over lack of Starbucks meanwhile somewhere in this shithole people are dying from famine. While they certainly bear great deal of responsibility for it themselves, it already got so far, that it's now easier to move and flood western nations on the pretext of "THEY ENSLAVED US AND STOLE WEALTH FROM OUR LANDS rather than fix it there. And list could go on.

Attached: 1535116935642.jpg (700x699, 55K)

We need great wars every generation of 3 to cull out the bottom 10-20%. This is what is wrong with western civilisation now.

The leaders have no 1st hand knowledge or ability in battle.
The population is passive, grown fat, with no perspective.

Let's speak frankly, you wish there was a war because you are a loser

We shouldn't fight each other but nuke the shitskins at their place of origins.

Why though?

> I mean you need wars to develop yourself

Typical kraut romanticism at work. The only positive thing about war is the sense of brotherhood, and it's there only because being in combat really fucking sucks. You must be a complete baby with no life experience to think war will turn you into a better person.

Then again, you have a metric fuckton of kebab to remove in your country, so you'll probably get what you want.

They will continue to reproduce and invade our countries. Also they are animals.
Check my flag.

What makes your life more valuable than theirs. You've got absolutely no right do decide who will live or die. On the other hand, you absolutely have a right to decide who you let in your country or not, because you participate in it's construction by living there and being another cog in the system unlike them.

I see your point (pic related), but another great war would involve nukes and "not even the carrion eaters will be interested in your irradiated corpse..."

Attached: Strong Men.jpg (678x960, 133K)

The only wars I want are civil wars between white people with vastly different political idelogies for the sole purpose of strengthening the nation by culling the weak, these should be Honorable and involve no innocent lives.

We shouldn't have 'wars' with inferior shitskins, we should destroy them with drone strikes and nukes. They are animals and unworthy of war and don't deserve to take a single white life.

Attached: Jews_and_muslims_vs_whites.png (909x923, 703K)

I agree with you except the civil wars between white people.

Check out julius evola's "metaphysics of war." Pretty much lays out the case for this. One of his shorter and easier books to read.

Attached: IMG_3207.jpg (1200x630, 67K)

Feminism can’t allow great wars to happen any more. Did veterans of Iwo Jima and Normandy take shirt from women when they returned home? No. Will veterans who invade Tehran and Manchuria take shit from women when they return home? No.
Great wars aren’t good for women if they want to be in leadership roles with men below them.

>Cheng, aim for that dumb and weak euro
>Ok Shin
Lulk a mortar doesn't discriminate you fucking moron.

Just don’t assinate anyone to kick the war off and you might be ok.

you need an amount of bitterness in life to be worth more than a ditch digger's wage, you can't just go through life as a cattle head in the eyes of everyone who manages you, from school to college to work. nah, go get your shit fucked up or experience some non-ordinary moments.

you could almost call this idea "just enough third world," because frankly humans are still animals no matter where they live or what they do or how they think

Why do I only hear about this now, this is not good frens.

Attached: concerned.jpg (247x204, 9K)

That's not the only positive Serb, it's that the whole society gets rewritten at times.
It's pretty impossible to advance up the social ladder in peaceful times, but wars are where people rise and fall.
So wars shuffle the deck if you can put it like that.

Also Checked, trips don't lie

Yes plz.

>Eternal peace is a dream --and not even a beautiful one. War is part of God's world-order. Within it unfold the noblest virtues of men, courage and renunciation, loyalty to duty and readiness for sacrifice--at the hazzard of one's life. Without war the world would sink into a swamp of materialism.


--von Moltke in 1880


Europe did fine when it had wars. Since it stopped waging war, aside from dropping bombs on people from afar, it has sunk to the lowest point of any society that has ever existed (a literal will to oblivion)

>Look at those countries now. We now have countries ran by cowards, cucks, liars, thieves and women.

This is so fucking dumb. A disdain for war is part of feminisation and the increasing dominance of women. It was not war that created this, but peace. Europe was already well on the way to decline by 1914, and if anything, the first war contributed mightily to produce the generation who more than any other fought against this trend of deterioration.

>"Y-you can't kill me! You don't have the right!"
>dies
Is there anything more pathetic than rightscucks?

Attached: 1d34ea14904e3ba2ff6c135ea52f696a.jpg (720x677, 80K)

Good post. This man gets it. It's been known for thousands of years that times of ease and luxury produce deterioration and degeneracy faster than anything else. In fact, in such situations human beings will end up making their lives more difficult, but without any reason (purely nihilistic, like the beat generation)

fuck off, you first